Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance
Hüseyin Eroğlu
; Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, 65090 Tuşba-Van, Turkey
Mehmet Cengiz Karaismailoğlu
orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-2742
; Siirt University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, 56100 Kezer-Siirt, Turkey
Süleyman Mesut Pinar
; Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van School of Health, 65090 Tuşba-Van, Turkey
Mehmet Fidan
; Siirt University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, 56100 Kezer-Siirt, Turkey
Eroğlu, H., Karaismailoğlu, M.C., Pinar, S.M. & Fidan, M. (2021). Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance. Acta Botanica Croatica, 80 (2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2021-015
MLA 8th Edition
Eroğlu, Hüseyin, et al. "Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance." Acta Botanica Croatica, vol. 80, no. 2, 2021, pp. 146-157. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2021-015. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Eroğlu, Hüseyin, Mehmet Cengiz Karaismailoğlu, Süleyman Mesut Pinar and Mehmet Fidan. "Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance." Acta Botanica Croatica 80, no. 2 (2021): 146-157. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2021-015
Harvard
Eroğlu, H., et al. (2021). 'Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance', Acta Botanica Croatica, 80(2), pp. 146-157. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2021-015
Vancouver
Eroğlu H, Karaismailoğlu MC, Pinar SM, Fidan M. Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance. Acta Botanica Croatica [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 December 25];80(2):146-157. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2021-015
IEEE
H. Eroğlu, M.C. Karaismailoğlu, S.M. Pinar and M. Fidan, "Seed micromorphology and anatomy of 36 Muscari (Asparagaceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic importance", Acta Botanica Croatica, vol.80, no. 2, pp. 146-157, 2021. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2021-015
This study presents the first in-depth evaluation of the morphological and anatomical characters, as well as their taxonomic importance, of the seeds of 36 taxa in subgenera Muscari, Leopoldia, Pseudomuscari and Botryanthus of the genus Muscari in Turkey, where 24 of the taxa are endemic. The results indicate that the taxa generally differ from each other in terms of seed shape and dimension. Seed dimensions vary between 1.66 mm and 3.21 mm in length, and between 1.12 mm and 2.63 mm in width. The seed surface ornamentation is grouped into nine forms: ruminate, reticulate, reticulate-areolate, reticulate-foveate, alveolate, scalariform, rugose, verrucate and areolate. The most common type is ruminate, while areolate, reticulate-foveate and scalariform ornamentation forms were found to be taxon-specific. Testa structures of the taxa examined consist in general of two different layers: the epidermis and the subepidermis in scleranchymatous or parenchymatous structures. The subepidermis may be absent in some of taxa. The structure and thickness of the epidermis and the subepidermis are very important characteristics that disclose interspecific relations among the examined taxa. We also provide a key for the identification of the studied taxa based on seed features.
This study presents the first in-depth evaluation of the morphological and anatomical characters, as well as their taxonomic importance, of the seeds of 36 taxa in subgenera Muscari, Leopoldia, Pseudomuscari and Botryanthus of the genus Muscari in Turkey, where 24 of the taxa are endemic. The results indicate that the taxa generally differ from each other in terms of seed shape and dimension. Seed dimensions vary between 1.66 mm and 3.21 mm in length, and between 1.12 mm and 2.63 mm in width. The seed surface ornamentation is grouped into nine forms: ruminate, reticulate, reticulate-areolate, reticulate-foveate, alveolate, scalariform, rugose, verrucate and areolate. The most common type is ruminate, while areolate, reticulate-foveate and scalariform ornamentation forms were found to be taxon-specific. Testa structures of the taxa examined consist in general of two different layers: the epidermis and the subepidermis in scleranchymatous or parenchymatous structures. The subepidermis may be absent in some of taxa. The structure and thickness of the epidermis and the subepidermis are very important characteristics that disclose interspecific relations among the examined taxa. We also provide a key for the identification of the studied taxa based on seed features.
Introduction
The genus Muscari Mill. is found across the European continent, Mediterranean region and northwest Asia (Jafari and Maassoumi 2011). According to the latest checklist study, the genus is represented by 51 species worldwide (Govaerts 2019). According to other recent studies, Muscari includes 40 species belonging to four subgenera as Muscari, Leopoldia and Botryanthus and Pseudomuscari with controversial status in Turkey, 26 of which are endemic (Dizkırıcı et al. 2019,Eker 2019a,b,Demirci-Kayıran et al. 2019). The genus is characterized by its bulbs, basal leaves, inflorescences, pedicels, flower form and colour, filament placement relative to the tube, and capsule shape (Davis and Stuart 1984). Major taxonomic problems of the genus include the many synonyms among taxa, the fact that type specimens are often cultivated material of unknown origin, that widespread taxa show a lot of variation and the color difference between fresh and dried flowers (Davis and Stuart 1984). Moreover, reliable classification is impossible in the genus because morphological characteristics and karyological information are not complete or consistent enough to make uncontroversial taxonomic judgements (Dizkırıcı et al. 2019). The genus was placed in Hyacinthaceae until the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) re-evaluated its taxonomic position as a result of subsequent studies, and placed it within the family Asparagaceae (Reveal and Chase 2011,Guner et al. 2012,Demirci and Özhatay 2017).
The purpose of this study is to: (i) examine the morphological and anatomical characteristics of seeds of 36 taxa in subgenera Muscari, Leopoldia, Pseudomuscari and Botryanthus of the genus Muscari in Turkey, and (ii) debate the taxonomic use of these characters. The study will also serve as a guide to further related studies on various genera in the family.
Material and methods
The plant specimens were collected from various phytogeographical regions of Turkey during the fruiting season and were deposited at VANF (Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Herbarium). Details are provided inTab. 1.
Tab. 1 The examined taxa and their locations (*=endemic taxon).
No
Subgenus
Taxa
Location
Voucher
1
Muscari
Muscari macrocarpum Sweet
C1 Muğla; between Marmaris and Emecik, after Balık Pass, rocky valley, 36° 46' 27" N, 27° 59' 36" E, 324 m, 01.03.2016
H. Eroğlu 1215
2
*M. racemosum Mill.
C2 Denizli; Çameli, Denizli-Fethiye road, 5 km to Aliveren Village, Pinus yards, serpentine fields, 37° 13' 39" N, 29° 26' 52" E, 1264 m, 04.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1317
3
Leopoldia
M. caucasicum (Griseb.) Baker
B9 Van; Erek Mountain, south of Sarmaç Village, steppe, 38° 29' 16" N, 43° 29' 26" E, 2200 m, 24.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1281
4
M. weissii Freyn
Antalya: Serik, Kumköy, Pinus pinea forest near the sea, dunes under the woood, 36° 52ʹ 07ʺ N, 30° 56ʹ 36ʺ E, 3 m, 02.04.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1220
5
M. comosum (L.) Mill.
C2 Muğla, Marmaris, between Marmaris and Datça, Hisarönü Bay, roadside, 36° 47' 59" N, 28° 05' 31" E, 70 m, 16.04.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1301
6
M. tenuiflorum Tausch
B6 Adana; Feke, Esendere Canyon, Pinus yards, 37° 45' 44" N, 35° 55' 03" E, 651 m, 15.06.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1288
7
*M. babachii Eker & Koyuncu
C6 Hatay, Antakya, Kisecik Village, Radar road, scrub yards, 36° 18' 15" N, 36° 02' 59" E, 1430 m, 12.06.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1286
8
*M. erdalii N.Özhatay & S.Demirci
C4 İçel; Mut, south of İbrahimli Village, scrub yards, 36° 40' 55" N, 33° 39' 23" E, 900 m, 02.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1255
9
M. longipes Boiss.
B6 Sivas; Hafik, west of Durulmuş Village, marly hills, 39° 50' 08" N, 37° 18' 20" E, 1312 m, 30.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1327
10
*M. massayanum C.Grunert
C5 Adana; Pozantı, upwards of Hamidiye Village, serpentine slopes, 37° 32' 27" N, 35° 00' 51" E, 1357 m, 01.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1253
11
*M. mirum Speta
C2 Denizli; Çameli, Denizli-Fethiye road, 4 km to Aliveren Village, serpentine slopes, 37° 12' 41" N, 29° 26' 17" E, 1475 m, 04.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1259
12
*M. elmasii Yıldırım
C2 Muğla; Dalaman, above Gürleyik Village, Çal Mountain, Pinus yards, 36° 52' 49" N, 29° 07' 10" E, 1271 m, 14.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1270
13
*M. ufukii E.Kaya & Demirci
B9 Van; Çatak, between Çatak-Bilgi Village, steppe, 38° 03' 48" N, 43° 11' 49" E, 1670 m, 17.07.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1341
14
Pseudomuscari
*M. coeleste Fomin
B9 Van; Erek Mountain, side of Keşiş Lake, humid meadows, 38° 27' 43" N, 43° 34' 51" E, 2564 m, 18.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1319
15
*M. azureum Fenzl
C5 Niğde; Ulukışla, Karagöl, humid meadows, 37° 24' 16" N, 34° 33' 38" E, 2599 m, 01.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1251
16
Botryanthus
*M. aucheri (Boiss.) Baker
A9 Kars; Sarıkamış to Handere 5. km, meadows, 40° 18ʹ 33ʺ N, 42° 30ʹ 43ʺ E, 2196 m, 08.06.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1285
17
M. armeniacum Leichtlin ex Baker
C4 Karaman; Sarıveliler, Atmeydanı place, steppe, 36° 41' 44" N, 32° 31' 00" E, 1665 m, 01.05.2017
H. Eroğlu 1306
18
*M. sivrihisardaghlarensis Yıld. & B.Selvi
B3 Eskişehir; Sivrihisar, between Kuzuören and Karacaören villages, stony-rocky streamside, 39° 18' 52" N, 31° 42' 42" E, 1416 m, 02.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1309
19
M. neglectum Guss. ex Ten.
B3 Eskişehir; Sivrihisar, Günyüzü cross, steppe, 39° 29' 42" N, 31° 36' 41" E, 1009 m, 17.04.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1242
20
*M. anatolicum Cowley & Özhatay
C5 İçel; Toroslar, Arslanköy, above Dümbelek Geçidi rocky slopes, 37° 03' 56" N, 34° 17' 53" E, 2212 m, 11.05.2018.
H. Eroğlu 1382
21
*M. tuzgoluensis Yıld.
B4 Aksaray, Eskil, 1 km towars Tuzgölü from Eskil, steppe, 38° 24' 43" N, 33° 27' 20" E, 922 m, 13.04.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1233
22
*M. discolor Boiss. & Hausskn. ex Boiss.
C8 Mardin; Artuklu, Mardin-Diyarbakır road, Akresta pass, stony streamside, 37° 22' 57" N, 40° 39' 09" E, 1138 m, 07.04.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1297
23
M. inconstrictum Rech.f.
C6 Kilis; south of Kocabeyli Village, stony-rocky fields, 36° 48' 07" N, 36° 54' 59" E, 450 m, 28.02.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1212
24
*M. latifolium J.Kirk
B2 Çanakkale; Bayramiç, Ayazma promenade, under the forest, humid areas, 39° 44' 45" N, 26° 50' 47" E, 476 m, 03.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1313
25
*M. adilii M.B.Güner & H.Duman
A3 Ankara, Beypazarı, above Hırkatepe Village, arounds of Koçahmet Fountain, marly valleys, 40° 11' 43" N, 31° 46' 39" E, 1000 m, 02.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1308
26
*M. bourgaei Baker
C4 Karaman; Sarıveliler, Atmeydanı Place, meadows, streamside, 36° 41' 25" N, 32° 32' 41" E, 1603 m, 01.05.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1304
27
*M. sandrasicum Karlén
C2 Muğla; Köyceğiz, Sandras Mountain, Sandras Highland, Değirmenbozuğu Place, stony streamside, 37° 05' 36" N, 28° 53' 23" E, 1356 m, 11.04.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1226
28
M. microstomum P.H.Davis & D.C.Stuart
B5 Kayseri; Bünyan, between Bünyan and Pınarbaşı 4. km, humid meadows, 38° 49' 40" N, 35° 54' 24" E, 1389 m, 19.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1277
29
*M. macbeathianum Kit Tan
B6 Adana; Tufanbeyli, 2 km from Güzelim Village to Tufanbeyli, dune under Pinus, 38° 09' 24" N, 36° 10' 45" E, 1442 m, 09.05.2018.
H. Eroğlu 1374
30
*M. vuralii Bağcı & Doğu
C4 Karaman; Sarıveliler, Atmeydanı place, meadows, 36° 41' 25" N, 32° 32' 01" E, 1603 m, 14.04.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1234
31
M. parviflorum Desf.
C5 İçel; Yenişehir, between Emirler and Turunçlu villages, garden edges, 36° 50' 10" N, 34° 28' 42" E, 288 m, 28.09.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1291
32
*M. serpentinicum Yıldırım, Altıoğlu & Pirhan
C2 Muğla; Köyceğiz, Sandras Mountain, Sandras Highland, Değirmenbozuğu Place, stony streamside, 37° 05' 36" N, 28° 53' 23" E, 1356 m, 11.04.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1224
33
M. botryoides (L.) Mill.
B9 Ağrı; Tutak, between Aşağıköşk and Doğanüstün villages, meadows, 39° 24' 21" N, 42° 45' 36" E, 1669 m, 10.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1262
34
*M. artvinense Demirci & E.Kaya
A9 Artvin; Murgul, above Korucular Village, meadows, 41° 18' 00" N, 41° 38' 58" E, 762 m, 13.05.2016.
H. Eroğlu 1266
35
*M. atillae Yıldırım
B7 Malatya, Akçadağ, Levent Canyon, marly-movement slopes, 38° 26' 03" N, 37° 55' 56" E, 1197 m, 07.04.2017.
H. Eroğlu 1296
36
*M. turcicum Uysal, Ertugrul & Dural
C4 Konya; Bozkır, above Avdan Highland, snowpatches, steppe, 37° 01' 15" N, 32° 10' 41" E, 1978 m, 11.05.2018.
H. Eroğlu 1379
Macromorphological features of the seeds including colour, shape and size were documented for 100 seeds of 10 individuals per species utilizing a Leica EZ4 binocular microscope with a HD camera (On-line Suppl. Fig. 1,Tab. 2). For the micromorphological features of surface ornamentation, anticlinal and periclinal cell walls, and the form of epidermal cells, the samples were studied with a Scanning Electron Microscope (On-line Suppl. Fig. 2,Tab. 3). Seeds were first placed on the stub with silver epoxy and coated with gold, then examined with a Zeiss LEO 440 SEM.
Tab. 2 Macromorphological characters of the seeds of the studied taxa (mean values ± standard deviation, L=length, W=width).
Subgenus
Taxa
Shape
Seed dimensions
L (mm)
W (mm)
L/W
Muscari
Muscari macrocarpum
orbicular
2.98 ± 0.32
2.61 ± 0.29
1.14
M. racemosum
broadly ovate-orbicular
3.16 ± 0.22
2.63 ± 0.30
1.20
Leopoldia
M. caucasicum
broadly ovate
2.34 ± 1.18
1.85 ± 0.11
1.26
M. weissii
orbicular
2.08 ± 0.14
1.76 ± 0.12
1.18
M. comosum
orbicular
2.23 ± 0.13
2.03 ± 0.11
1.10
M. tenuiflorum
broadly ovate-orbicular
2.45 ± 1.15
2.17 ± 0.14
1.13
M. babachii
broadly ovate
2.70 ± 0.19
2.22 ± 0.15
1.22
M. erdalii
broadly ovate
3.21 ± 0.25
2.43 ± 0.15
1.32
M. longipes
oblong-elliptic
2.42 ± 0.24
2.01 ± 0.12
1.20
M. massayanum
broadly ovate
3.13 ± 0.23
2.56 ± 0.18
1.22
M. mirum
oblong-ovate
2.82 ± 0.22
2.34 ± 0.17
1.20
M. elmasii
broadly ovate
2.81 ± 0.25
2.25 ± 0.20
1.24
M. ufukii
broadly ovate
3.06 ± 0.17
2.61 ± 0.13
1.17
Pseudomuscari
M. coeleste
orbicular
2.18 ± 0.16
1.52 ± 0.09
1.43
M. azureum
orbicular
2.06 ± 0.10
1.35 ± 0.09
1.52
Botryanthus
M. aucheri
orbicular
2.11 ± 0.13
1.37 ± 0.08
1.54
M. armeniacum
broadly ovate-orbicular
1.96 ± 0.16
1.71 ± 0.11
1.14
M. sivrihisardaghlarensis
broadly ovate-orbicular
2.18 ± 0.17
1.69 ± 0.12
1.28
M. neglectum
broadly elliptic
2.06 ± 0.15
1.64 ± 0.10
1.25
M. anatolicum
orbicular
2.09 ± 0.15
1.72 ± 0.19
1.21
M. tuzgoluensis
orbicular
1.94 ± 0.13
1.65 ± 0.13
1.17
M. discolor
orbicular
2.23 ± 0.26
1.73 ± 0.11
1.28
M. inconstrictum
orbicular
1.99 ± 0.12
1.80 ± 0.12
1.10
M. latifolium
ovate-orbicular
2.39 ± 0.20
1.98 ± 0.13
1.20
M. adilii
orbicular
2.45 ± 0.16
2.20 ± 0.17
1.11
M. bourgaei
orbicular
1.82 ± 0.09
1.42 ± 0.11
1.28
M. sandrasicum
orbicular
1.94 ± 0.17
1.53 ± 0.16
1.26
M. microstomum
orbicular
1.87 ± 0.13
1.55 ± 0.16
1.20
M. macbeathianum
broadly elliptic-lanceolate
1.66 ± 0.13
1.12 ± 0.09
1.48
M. vuralii
orbicular
2.15 ± 0.14
1.60 ± 0.12
1.34
M. parviflorum
orbicular
1.90 ± 0.16
1.62 ± 0.17
1.17
M. serpentinicum
orbicular
1.72 ± 0.11
1.51 ± 0.10
1.13
M. botryoides
broadly ovate
1.80 ± 0.14
1.36 ± 0.11
1.32
M. artvinense
orbicular
1.70 ± 0.12
1.41 ± 0.10
1.21
M. atillae
orbicular
2.25 ± 0.10
1.87 ± 0.11
1.20
M. turcicum
orbicular
1.76 ± 0.13
1.34 ± 0.09
1.31
Tab. 3 Micromorphological characters of the seeds of the studied taxa.
Subgenus
Taxa
Seed surface
Anticlinal
Periclinal
Epidermal
ornamentation
cell wall
cell wall
cell structure
Muscari
Muscari macrocarpum
reticulate
raised
concave
polygonal cells
M. racemosum
reticulate
raised
concave
polygonal cells
Leopoldia
M. caucasicum
alveolate
sunken
concave
alveolar cells
M. weissii
alveolate
sunken
concave
alveolar cells
M. comosum
verrucate
sunken
convex
unclear
M. tenuiflorum
reticulate-areolate
sunken
convex
polygonal cells
M. babachii
reticulate-areolate
sunken
convex
polygonal cells
M. erdalii
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. longipes
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. massayanum
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. mirum
reticulate-areolate
sunken
convex
polygonal cells
M. elmasii
reticulate-foveate
raised
convex
polygonal and alveolar cells
M. ufukii
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
Pseudomuscari
M. coeleste
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. azureum
scalariform
sunken
convex
rectangular and polygonal cells
Botryanthus
M. aucheri
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. armeniacum
reticulate-areolate
sunken
concave
polygonal cells
M. sivrihisardaghlarensis
rugose
unclear
Unclear
unclear
M. neglectum
areolate
Sunken
concave
polygonal cells
M. anatolicum
rugose
Unclear
unclear
unclear
M. tuzgoluensis
ruminate
Unclear
unclear
unclear
M. discolor
ruminate
Unclear
unclear
unclear
M. inconstrictum
slightly reticulate
raised
concave
polygonal cells
M. latifolium
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. adilii
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. bourgaei
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. sandrasicum
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. microstomum
verrucate
sunken
convex
unclear
M. macbeathianum
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. vuralii
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. parviflorum
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. serpentinicum
verrucate
sunken
convex
unclear
M. botryoides
rugose
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. artvinense
rugose
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. atillae
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
M. turcicum
ruminate
unclear
unclear
unclear
A survey of seed anatomical characters was done with dry herbarium materials. Cross-sections were taken from the middle of the seed with a fully automatic microtome (Thermo Shonda Met Finesse, Thermo). They were brought through a series of alcohol and xylene, dyed with hematoxylin and eosin-Y in a staining device (ASC 720 Medite) and mounted using Entellan (On-line Suppl. Fig. 3,Tab. 4) (Karaismailoğlu 2015,Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018,Karaismailoğlu and Güner 2019). Anatomical characteristics were examined with an Olympus CX31 light microscope and Kameram Imaging Software (KAMERAM12 CCD, Argenit Micro System Ltd., Turkey).
Tab. 4 Testa anatomical features of the studied taxa (mean values ± standard deviation, + =presence, - =absence).
Subgenus
Taxa
Epidermis layers
Presence/ absence
Epidermis structures
Subepidermis structures
Thickness (μm)
of crystals
Muscari
M. macrocarpum
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
6-7 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
59.75 ± 2.48
-
M. racemosum
1 layer, scleranchymatic rectangular cells
3-4 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
54.23 ± 3.09
-
Leopoldia
M. caucasicum
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
3-4 layers, parenchymatic orbicular or flat cells
105.44 ± 2.37
-
M. weissii
1 layer, scleranchymatic rectangular cells
3 layers, scleranchymatic large flat cells
46.71 ± 1.82
-
M. comosum
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
1 layer, parenchymatic rectangular or square cells
38.45 ± 3.63
+
M. tenuiflorum
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
116.59 ± 3.88
+
M. babachii
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
121.10 ± 5.64
+
M. erdalii
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
3-4 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
40.37 ± 4.21
-
M. longipes
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
5-7 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
128.46 ± 4.23
-
M. massayanum
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
2 layers, scleranchymatic flat or crushed cells
68.83 ± 3.47
-
M. mirum
1-2 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
5-6 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
108.54 ± 2.88
-
M. elmasii
1 layer, scleranchymatic rectangular cells
4-5 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
44.16 ± 2.72
-
M. ufukii
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic large flat cells
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
85.35 ± 2.41
-
Pseudomuscari
M. coeleste
1 layer, scleranchymatic rectangular cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
33.62 ± 3.13
-
M. azureum
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
2-3 layers, parenchymatic flat or polygonal cells
39.77 ± 2.54
-
Botryanthus
M. aucheri
2 layers, scleranchymatic large flat cells
1 layer, parenchymatic polygonal cells
38.76 ± 1.85
-
M. armeniacum
1-2 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
2 layers, parenchymatic flat or polygonal cells
71.19 ± 4.06
-
M. sivrihisardaghlarensis
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
3-4 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
37.84 ± 3.71
-
Continues on next page
Subgenus
Taxa
Epidermis layers
Presence/ absence
Epidermis structures
Subepidermis structures
Thickness (μm)
of crystals
Botryanthus
M. neglectum
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat cells
2 layers, parenchymatic flat cells
41.67 ± 3.24
-
M. anatolicum
2 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
23.08 ± 3.92
-
M. tuzgoluensis
2 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
1 layer, scleranchymatic polygonal cells
48.33 ± 2.18
-
M. discolor
2 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
-
18.41 ± 2.38
+
M. inconstrictum
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
-
22.05 ± 1.14
-
M. latifolium
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
2-3 layers, parenchymatic flat cells
66.15 ± 3.52
-
M. adilii
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic crushed cells
31.17 ± 1.84
-
M. bourgaei
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
2 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
64.26 ± 2.29
-
M. sandrasicum
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
2-3 layers, parenchymatic flat cells
71.22 ± 2.31
-
M. microstomum
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat or polygonal cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic polygonal cells
69.98 ± 3.53
-
M. macbeathianum
2 layer, scleranchymatic large flat or rectangular cells
1 layer, scleranchymatic polygonal cells
41.13 ± 2.36
-
M. vuralii
1 layer, scleranchymatic flat or polygonal cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic polygonal cells
44.86 ± 1.71
+
M. parviflorum
1 layer, scleranchymatic large flat cells
-
18.08 ± 0.86
-
M. serpentinicum
1 layer, scleranchymatic large rectangular cells
1 layer, scleranchymatic rectangular cells
39.73 ± 3.15
-
M. botryoides
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
-
25.81 ± 2.03
-
M. artvinense
1 layer, scleranchymatic polygonal cells
8-10 layers, scleranchymatic crushed and orbicular cells
117.46 ± 3.55
-
M. atillae
3 layers, scleranchymatic flat cells
2-3 layers, scleranchymatic polygonal cells
82.19 ± 2.68
-
M. turcicum
1 layer, scleranchymatic crushed cells
-
16.64 ± 3.22
-
The terminology used for seed morphological and anatomical characteristics is compatible withStearn (1985).
Grouping of taxa was performed using the clustering analysis method (UPGMA) in MultiVariate Statistical Package (MVSP) in accordance with the 44 characters inTables 2,3 and4 (Fig. 1). Characters used in statistical analysis were: seed colour (1); shape: orbicular (2), ovate (3), oblong (4), elliptic (5), lanceolate (6); sizes: length (7), width (8), L/W (9); surface ornamentation: reticulate (10), alveolate (11), areolate (12), verrucate (13), ruminate (14), foveate (15), rugose (16), scalariform (17); anticlinal cell walls: sunken (18), raised (19), unclear (20); periclinal cell walls: convex (21), concave (22), unclear (23); epidermal cell structure: polygonal (24), alveolar (25), rectangular (26), flat (27), unclear (28); anatomical structure of the epidermis: flat (29), rectangular (30), crushed (31), polygonal (32), scleranchymatous cells (33), parenchymatous cells (34); anatomical structure of the subepidermis: crushed (35), flat (36), orbicular (37), square (38), polygonal (39), rectangular (40), scleranchymatous cells (41), parenchymatous cells (42); testa thickness (43); presence of crystals (44). The dissimilarity matrix of the studied taxa was created with MVSP (Kovach 2007) (On-line Suppl. Tab. 1). A dendrogram was created. Also, the cophenetic correlation coefficient is designed to explain the relation between the dendrogram and similarity matrix (On-line Suppl. Tab. 1,Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Cluster analysis of the studied taxa.
Results
This work assesses macromorphologically the seed features of the studied taxa, including colour, shape and dimensions. All of the taxa examined have the same seed color (black) but the shape and size of seeds vary considerably. Seeds examined can be divided into 7 shapes; orbicular, ovate-orbicular, ovate, oblong-ovate, oblong-elliptic, elliptic and elliptic-lanceolate. Orbicular is the most common type (found in 20 taxa). However, oblong-ovate, oblong-elliptic and elliptic-lanceolate are characteristic types for Muscari mirum, M. longipes and M. macbeathianum, respectively. Seed dimensions range from 1.66 mm to 3.21 mm in length, and from 1.12 mm to 2.63 mm in width. While M. erdalii and M. racemosum have the largest seeds, M. macbeathianum has the smallest seeds (Tab. 2, On-line Suppl. Fig. 1).
The surface ornamentation, anticlinal and periclinal cell walls, and epidermal cell structures of the seeds have been micromorphologically evaluated in this study. Seed surface ornamentation is grouped into nine types: ruminate, reticulate, reticulate-areolate, reticulate-foveate, alveolate, scalariform, rugose, verrucate and areolate. The most common form is ruminate, while areolate, reticulate-foveate and scalariform ornamentation forms were found to be taxon-specific (Tab. 3, On-line Suppl. Fig. 2). The reticulate-foveate (in M. elmasii), areolate (M. neglectum), and scalariform (M. azureum) ornamentation types are each displayed by only one taxon. The anticlinal cell walls in the studied taxa are raised, sunken or unclear. While sunken cell walls are widely seen in the alveolate, verrucate, areolate, reticulate-areolate and scalariform ornamentation types, the reticulate and reticulate-foveate ornamentation types are found where epidermal cells are enclosed by raised walls. Rugose and ruminate types are associated with unclear form (Tab. 3). No clear relationship exists between convex or concave periclinal cell walls and surface ornamentation types; however, ruminate and rugose types are found only with unclear periclinal cells. The shape of epidermal cells on the seed surface has also showed diversity and may be grouped into polygonal, alveolar, rectangular and unclear categories. The most common cell type is unclear, while rectangular and alveolar are fairly rare (Tab. 3).
The results of the examination of the anatomical structures of the seeds are indicated in On-line Suppl. Fig. 3 andTab. 4. Testa structures of the seeds of the examined taxa generally consisted of 2 main layers, the epidermis and the subepidermis, formed in either the scleranchymatous or parenchymatous tissue. The epidermis layer displays important variations in cell form, consisting of flat, rectangular, crushed, or polygonal cells, in 1-3 layers, and has undulated or straight wall structure. The most frequent form is flat, while the rarest ones are the rectangular and polygonal types (Tab. 4, On-line Suppl. Fig. 3). The subepidermis layer consists of crushed, orbicular, rectangular, square, flat or polygonal cells in 1-10 layers. The most commonly seen types are crushed and polygonal, whereas the rarest ones are the orbicular and square types. The subepidermis layer is not found in some of the examined taxa (M. discolor, M. inconstrictum, M. parviflorum, M. botryoides and M. turcicum) (Tab. 4). The thickness of the epidermis layers varies between 16.64 μm (in M. turcicum) and 128.46 μm (in M. longipes). Raphide crystals are seen in the epidermis or subepidermis layers of seeds in M. comosum, M. tenuiflorum, M. babachii, M. discolor and M. vuralii (Tab. 4, On-line Suppl. Fig. 3).
A dendrogram indicating differences and similarities among the studied taxa was created by numerical analyses of the seed morphological and anatomical characters, based on the variation of 44 characteristics in 36 taxa. The cophenetic correlation between the similarity matrix and dendrogram has been computed as 0.59, representing a good match. Cluster A2 includes the highest number of taxa when compared to other clusters. Muscari sandrasicum forms a clade separate from these clusters in the dendrogram (Fig. 1). M. discolor and M. parviflorum are the most closely related taxa (with a dissimilarity coefficient of 1.01), the most distantly related taxa recorded are M. sandrasicum and M. turcicum (with a dissimilarity coefficient of 136.31) (On-line Suppl. Tab. 1).
Discussion
The morphological features of seeds offer valuable information about evolutionary relationships among flowering plants (Corner 1976,Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018). However, seed morphological and anatomical features have so far not been extensively used to elucidate inter-species relationships within genera of the family Asparagaceae. This is the first study to reveal the morphological and anatomical features of the seeds of a genus in the family, and it will be a model for subsequent studies on various genera.
The macromorphological characters of seeds display variation among the examined Muscari taxa, with the exception of seed colour, which is consistently black. The general appearance among populations, including floristic characters and capsule structures, of M. macrocarpum and M. racemosum in subgenus Muscari, M. caucasicum and M. weissii in subgenus Leopoldia, M. aucheri and M. armeniacum in subgenus Botryanthus are very similar, but they can be easily distinguished using seed shape and size.
Comparison of the surface micromorphological structure of seeds is of taxonomical importance (Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018).Heywood (1971) discusses the significance and efficiency of scanning electron microscopy in elucidating taxonomic problems and distinguishing taxa. However, there are few studies on the importance of seed micromorphology in the family Asparagaceae (Yıldırım 2015,2016). This study on 36 Muscari taxa shows that seed microstructures are useful characteristics in separating the taxa within the family. Almost all of the studied taxa have been examined in this way for the first time, with the exceptions of M. elmasii (smooth) and M. atillae (smooth) (Yıldırım 2015,2016). We recorded nine seed surface ornamentation types in this study. In the genus, the most common seed ornamentation types are ruminate and reticulate. In contrast to this study, reticulate and reticulate-areolate types have been commonly seen among taxa from various angiosperm families (Tantawy et al. 2004,Karaismailoğlu 2015,Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018). Two closely related taxa in the subgenus Muscari, M. macrocarpum and M. racemosum, have the same reticulate surface ornamentation type; however, M. macrocarpum has different secondary cuticular protrusions. Seed surface ornamentation is a useful character in distinguishing the taxa of the subgenus Leopoldia, which exhibits five ornamentation types in 11 taxa. In the subgenus Pseudomuscari, M. coeleste and M. azureum taxa are very similar in terms of population appearance, flowers and fruit capsule characteristics; however, they are distinctly different in terms of seed ornamentation types: ruminate and scalariform, respectively. In the subgenus Botryanthus, ornamentation types are diverse (seven types), and the distinct surface ornamentation in nearly identical taxa, such as M. armeniacum-M. aucheri, M. armeniacum-M. bourgaei, M. armeniacum-M. microstomum is proof of the taxonomical significance of this characteristic in the subgenus.
Earlier seed surface studies have indicated that the views and structures of anticlinal and periclinal cell walls are good diagnostic characters in the establishment of inter-species relationships (Barthlott 1981,Karaismailoğlu 2015,2016). The types of anticlinal and periclinal cell walls, and epidermal cell structures of the examined taxa vary among the taxa, except for those of the subgenus Muscari.
Revisions of the anatomy of the testa of the various angiosperm families are influential in solving systematic problems (Vaughan et al. 1976,Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018).Koul et al. (2000) have shown that testa structures may be utilized as a valuable characteristic in the separation of the taxa and the clarification of their phylogenetic relationships.
The seed anatomical characters are frequently as useful as morphological characters for plant taxonomy, and they are valuable in the discrimination of closely correlated taxa in various families and genera (Karamian et al. 2012,Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018,Karaismailoğlu et al. 2018). A detailed review of the literature has not found a previous study aiming at the exploration of phylogenetic relationships among the taxa with a comparative investigation of anatomical structures of the testa in members of the family Asparagaceae. This work is the first such study for the family and is the precursor to subsequent investigations. In this study, we found that the testae mostly consist of two layers, the epidermis and the subepidermis, in the sclerotic or parenchymatous structure. The epidermis type differs among the taxa. This 1-3 layered epidermis may consist of flat, rectangular, crushed, or polygonal cells. The most frequent form is flat, while the rarest are the rectangular and polygonal types. The structure of the subepidermis layer, which is mostly a compressed tissue under the epidermis layers, also displays significant differences among the taxa. The subepidermis layer consists of crushed, orbicular, rectangular, square, flat or polygonal cells in 1-10 layers, except for M. discolor, M. inconstrictum, M. parviflorum, M. botryoides and M. turcicum, which do not have a subepidermis layer. Testa characters such as the structures of the epidermis and subepidermis, thickness of the testa, and the presence or absence of crystals are fairly effective and beneficial in discriminating almost all of the studied taxa, especially in the pairs of closely correlated taxa M. macrocarpum-M. racemosum, M. caucasicum-M. weissii, M. coeleste-M. azureum, and M. aucheri-M. armeniacum. This can be interpreted as follows: the anatomy of the testa is a useful additional character in the Muscari, and it can aid in the classification of this huge genus. The results obtained are also in agreement with similar previous studies performed on seed structure of some taxa of the genera Crocus L. and Romulea Maratti in the closely related family Iridaceae, in terms of the differences observed at interspecific level in testa anatomical structures such as epidermis cell types and thickness of the testa (Grilli Caiola et al. 2010,Karaismailoğlu 2015,Karaismailoğlu et al. 2018).
The dendrogram showing two main clusters largely agree with the results ofDavis and Stuart (1984). The seed morphological and anatomical variations have been observed at the species level and subgenus level, especially in shapes, ornamentation types, dimensions, and thicknesses and structures of epidermis and subepidermis layers. The proximity between taxa belonging to subgenera Muscari and Pseudomuscari has been preserved; however, there are taxon transitions between Leopoldia and Botryanthus subgenera. While M. atillae, M. latifolium, M. microstomum and M. armeniacum taxa are among the taxa belonging to Botryanthus subgenus, M. mirum and M. caucasicum taxa are located between Leopoldia taxa.
In conclusion, the study of morphological and anatomical seed characteristics of the studied Muscari taxa offers important insights into the systematics of taxa within the genus.
Key to studied Muscari taxa, based on seed characteristics
1.Seed shape is orbicular……………………………………………...……….……………….2
1.Seed shape is ovate, ovate-orbicular, oblong-elliptic, oblong-ovate, elliptic, elliptic-lanceolate.…………………………..…………………..……………………..……………...21
2.Seed ornamentation is reticulate………………………………......………..……………..…3
2.Seed ornamentation is alveolate, verrucate, ruminate, scalariform or rugose………..…..….4
3.Outer epidermis of testa consists of crushed cells, with 2-3 layers…………M. inconstrictum
3.Outer epidermis of testa consists of flat cells, with 1 layers……………..... M. macrocarpum
4.Seed ornamentation is alveolate or scalariform…………..………….……………...………5
4.Seed ornamentation is verrucate, ruminate or rugose……………..………………….…...…6
5.Seed ornamentation is alveolate……...…………………...…….………………….M. weissii
5.Scalariform…………………………………………………….………...…….… M. azureum
6.Seed ornamentation is verrucate or rugose…………………………….….………..…..……7
35.Crystals are present in the epidermis or subepidermis layers …….…………M. tenuiflorum
35.Crystals are absent………………...………..…………….…………………M. armeniacum
Acknowledgments
This article is adapted from the first author's doctoral thesis. The authors thank YYU-BAPB for supporting this study financially (Project number: FDK-2017-5960).
Bentzer B, Bothmer R, Wendelbo P. Cytology and morphology of the genus Hyacinthus L. s. str. (Liliaceae). Bot Not. 1974;127:297–301.
Corner EJ. 1976: The Seeds of Dicotyledons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Davis PH, Stuart DC. 1984: Muscari Miller. In: Davis, P.H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 8, 227–263. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Demirci S, Özhatay N. A karyomorphological study on the genus Muscari Mill. growing in Kahramanmaraş (Turkey). Turk J Bot. 2017;41:289–98. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1605-6
Demirci-Kayıran S, Özhatay N, Kaya E. Muscari tauricum (Asparagaceae, Scilloideae), a new species from Turkey. Phytotaxa. 2019;399:109–18. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.399.2.1
Dizkırıcı A, Yigit O, Pınar SM, Eroğlu H. Molecular phylogeny of Muscari (Asparagaceae) inferred from cpDNA sequences. Biologia. 2019;74:205–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-00164-0
Doğu S, Dinç M, Ünal A. Anatomical characteristics of Bellevalia mathewii Özhatay & Koçak (Liliaceae). Biological Diversity and Conservation. 2011;4:14–8.
Eker I. Muscari pamiryigidii (Asparagaceae, Scilloideae), a new species from northwestern Anatolia. Phytotaxa. 2019b;408:255–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.408.4.2
Govaerts R. 2019: World checklist of Asparagaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Retrieved April 15, 2019 fromhttp://apps.kew.org/wcsp
Grilli Caiola M, Leonardi D, Canini A. Seed structure in Crocus sativus L., C. cartwrightianus Herb., C. thomasii Ten., and C. hadriaticus Herb. at SEM. Plant Syst Evol. 2010;285:111–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0261-x
Guner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT. 2012: A checklist of the flora of Turkey. Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi Yayınları, İstanbul (in Turkish).
Gürsoy M, Şık L. Comparative anatomical studies on Muscari armeniacum Leichtlin ex Baker and Muscari neglectum Guss. in West Anatolia. CBU Journal of Science. 2010;6:61–72.
Heywood VH. 1971: Scanning Electron Microscopy. Systematic and Evolutionary Applications, London.
Jafari A, Maassoumi AA. Synopsis of Leopoldia, Muscari and Pseudomuscari (Hyacinthaceae) in Iran, with Leopoldia ghouschtchiensis sp. nova. Ann Bot Fenn. 2011;48:396–400. https://doi.org/10.5735/085.048.0502
Kahraman A, Celep F, Doğan M, Koyuncu M. Morpho-anatomical studies on Bellevalia paradoxa Boiss. belonging to Liliaceae. Aust J Crop Sci. 2010;4:150–4.
Karaismailoğlu MC. Morphological and anatomical features of seeds of Turkish Romulea taxa (Iridaceae) and their taxonomic significance. Acta Bot Croat. 2015;74:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/botcro-2015-0005
Karaismailoğlu MC. Addition to characters of endemic Aubrieta canescens subsp. canescens Bornm. (Brassicaceae) from Turkey. Bangladesh J Bot. 2016;45:509–15.
Karaismailoğlu MC, Şık L, Almıla Ç, Erol O. Seed structure of some taxa of the genus Crocus L. (Iridaceae) series Crocus. Turk J Bot. 2018;42:722–31. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1712-17
Karaismailoğlu MC, Erol O. Seed structure and its taxonomic implications for genus Thlaspi sensu lato sections Nomisma, Thlaspi and Pterotropis (Brassicaceae). Turk J Bot. 2018;42:591–609. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1709-28
Karaismailoğlu MC, Güner Ö. Nutlet structures of subsection Fragiles of the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae) from Turkey and their systematic applications. Turk J Bot. 2019;43:659–72. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1812-31
Karamian R, Moradi Behjou A, Ranjbar M. Anatomical findings of Onobrychis sect. Heliobrychis (Fabaceae) in Iran and their taxonomic implications. Turk J Bot. 2012;36:27–37.
Koul KK, Ranjna N, Soom NR. Seed coat microsculpturing in Brassica and allied genera (subtribes Brassicinae, Raphaninae, Moricandiinae). Ann Bot (Lond). 2000;86:385–97. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1197
Kovach, W.L., 2007: MVSP - A MultiVariate Statistical Package for Windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth.
Küçüker O. Studies on the Endemic Colchicum Taxa of Turkey: C. baytopiorum C.D. Brickell. Turk J Bot. 1990;14:1–11.
Lynch AH, Rudall PJ, Cutler DF. Leaf anatomy and systematics of Hyacinthaceae. Kew Bull. 2006;61:145–59.
Sezer O, Özgişi K, Yaylacı ÖK, Koyuncu O. Some morpho-anatomical studies on rare endemic Muscari sivrihisardaghlarensis. Biological Diversity and Conservation. 2013;6:26–33.
Shoub J, Halevy AH. Studies on the developmental morphology and the thermoperiodic requirements for flower development in Ornithogalum arabicum L. J Hortic Res. 1971;11:29–39.
Stearn WT. 1985: Botanical Latin: History, grammar, syntax, terminology, and vocabulary. David & Charles, London.
Tantawy ME, Khalifa SF, Hassan SA, Al-Rabiai GT. Seed exomorphic characters of some Brassicaceae (LM and SEM Study). Int J Agric Biol. 2004;6:821–30.
Uysal İ. Morphological, anatomical and ecological studies on the two Turkish endemic species collected from Kaz Dağı (B1 Balıkesir) Allium sibthorpianum Schultes & Schultes fill. and Allium reuterianum Boiss. Turk J Bot. 1999;23:137–48.
Uysal T, Ertuğrul K, Dural H, Küçüködük M. Muscari turcicum (Liliaceae/Hyacinthaceae), a new species from south Anatolia, Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc. 2007;154:233–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00646.x
Vaughan JG, Phelan JR, Denford KE. 1976: Seed studies in the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Cruciferae, 119–144. Academic Press, London.
Yıldırım H. Muscari elmasii sp. nova (Asparagaceae): a new species from western Anatolia, Turkey. Turk J Bot. 2016;40:380–7. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1507-17
Acknowledgements
On-line Suppl. Tab. 1. The dissimilarity matrix of the examined taxa.
On-line Suppl. Fig. 1. Seeds of the studied taxa: 1- M. macrocarpum (orbicular), 2- M. racemosum (ovate-orbicular), 3- M. caucasicum (ovate), 4- M. weissii (orbicular), 5- M. comosum (orbicular), 6- M. tenuiflorum (ovate-orbicular), 7- M. babachii (ovate), 8- M. erdalii (ovate), 9- M. longipes (oblong-elliptic), 10- M. massayanum (ovate), 11- M. mirum (oblong-ovate), 12- M. elmasii (ovate), 13- M. ufukii (ovate), 14- M. coeleste (orbicular), 15- M. azureum (orbicular), 16- M. aucheri (orbicular), 17- M. armeniacum (ovate-orbicular), 18- M. sivrihisardaghlarensis (ovate-orbicular), 19- M. neglectum (elliptic), 20- M. anatolicum (orbicular), 21- M. tuzgoluensis (orbicular), 22- M. discolor (orbicular), 23- M. inconstrictum (orbicular), 24- M. latifolium (ovate-orbicular), 25- M. adilii (orbicular), 26- M. bourgaei (orbicular), 27- M. sandrasicum (orbicular), 28- M. microstomum (orbicular), 29- M. macbeathianum (elliptic-lanceolate), 30- M. vuralii (orbicular), 31- M. parviflorum (orbicular), 32- M. serpentinicum (orbicular), 33- M. botryoides (ovate), 34- M. artvinense (orbicular), 35- M. atillae (orbicular), 36- M. turcicum (orbicular) (scale bars = 1 mm).
On-line Suppl. Fig. 2. The micromorphological structures of the studied taxa.