Preliminary communication
https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study
Rastko Jovanov
orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-5375
; University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Kraljice Natalije 45, RS–11000 Belgrade
Full text: english pdf 363 Kb
page 337-349
downloads: 286
cite
APA 6th Edition
Jovanov, R. (2020). Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica, 35 (2), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
MLA 8th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 35, no. 2, 2020, pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica 35, no. 2 (2020): 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Harvard
Jovanov, R. (2020). 'Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study', Synthesis philosophica, 35(2), pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Vancouver
Jovanov R. Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 December 22];35(2):337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
IEEE
R. Jovanov, "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study", Synthesis philosophica, vol.35, no. 2, pp. 337-349, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Full text: croatian pdf 363 Kb
page 348-348
downloads: 172
cite
APA 6th Edition
Jovanov, R. (2020). Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica, 35 (2), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
MLA 8th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 35, no. 2, 2020, pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica 35, no. 2 (2020): 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Harvard
Jovanov, R. (2020). 'Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study', Synthesis philosophica, 35(2), pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Vancouver
Jovanov R. Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 December 22];35(2):337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
IEEE
R. Jovanov, "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study", Synthesis philosophica, vol.35, no. 2, pp. 337-349, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Full text: german pdf 363 Kb
page 348-348
downloads: 205
cite
APA 6th Edition
Jovanov, R. (2020). Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica, 35 (2), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
MLA 8th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 35, no. 2, 2020, pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica 35, no. 2 (2020): 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Harvard
Jovanov, R. (2020). 'Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study', Synthesis philosophica, 35(2), pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Vancouver
Jovanov R. Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 December 22];35(2):337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
IEEE
R. Jovanov, "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study", Synthesis philosophica, vol.35, no. 2, pp. 337-349, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Full text: french pdf 363 Kb
page 349-349
downloads: 156
cite
APA 6th Edition
Jovanov, R. (2020). Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica, 35 (2), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
MLA 8th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 35, no. 2, 2020, pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jovanov, Rastko. "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study." Synthesis philosophica 35, no. 2 (2020): 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Harvard
Jovanov, R. (2020). 'Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study', Synthesis philosophica, 35(2), pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Vancouver
Jovanov R. Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 December 22];35(2):337-349. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
IEEE
R. Jovanov, "Shared Empathy and Self-Testimony in Psychiatric Therapy and in Philosophical Practice – a Case Study", Synthesis philosophica, vol.35, no. 2, pp. 337-349, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35204
Abstract
I address the problem of how shared empathy and group therapy are a required condition for any successful work with patients in medical and clients in philosophical practice. Moreover, a theory of shared empathy must also account for the arguably more intricate issue of how group members might properly share their own mental domain with its distinctive phenomenology, and their distinctive attitudes toward one another, so that the necessary self-testimonies of clients do not rest on the previous pathological state. Furthermore, I aim to offer some steps towards solving this problem. I will do so by outlining what methodology lies behind the theory of shared empathy, and showing how, based on the results of a case study, it can be understood in such a way that it still accommodates all requirements for what counts as valid coherence of self-testimony and successful client’s healing.
Keywords
shared empathy; self-testimony; counselling; therapy; philosophical practice; collective intentionality; group attitudes; Edith Stein
Hrčak ID:
253998
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/253998
Publication date:
29.12.2020.
Article data in other languages:
croatian
german
french
Visits: 2.836
*
