Skip to the main content

Meeting abstract

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2025.192

Interventional management of isolated aortic regurgitation: therapeutic options in the era of off-label transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Tea-Terezija Cvetko orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-4871 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Jasmina Ćatić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-4201 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivana Jurin orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-9691 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Danijela Grizelj orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-7974 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Irzal Hadžibegović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-3768-9134 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Tomislav Šipić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-4523 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Jelena Kursar orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-4910 ; University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: english pdf 137 Kb

page 192-192

downloads: 133

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

aortic regurgitation; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Hrčak ID:

335528

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/335528

Publication date:

27.8.2025.

Visits: 326 *



Isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) presents distinct challenges in interventional cardiology. Unlike aortic stenosis (AS), AR typically lacks annular calcification, complicating the anchoring of transcatheter valves. While surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remains the gold standard, many patients are deemed high-risk or inoperable due to comorbidities or frailty. In this population, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although off-label for AR, is emerging as a viable alternative. New-generation TAVI devices offer features designed to improve sealing and anchoring in non-calcified anatomy. Among these, only the JenaValve has been specifically developed and tested for use in pure AR. Although currently limited in availability across Europe, it has received CEmark approval for severe, symptomatic AR in highsurgicalrisk patients and has seen early commercial use in select centers. The other valves are used off-label in this setting. These include self-expanding systems like Evolut PRO+, CoreValve Evolut R and ACURATE neo2. Self-expanding valves rely on radial forces for anchoring, but their use in pure AR is limited due to the risk of valve migration. Balloon-expandable valves, such as the SAPIEN 3, typically require some degree of annular calcification for optimal fixation. Careful patient selection through multimodal imaging—echocardiography, CT, and MRI—is critical. Ideal candidates include those with severe symptomatic AR, high surgical risk, and anatomical suitability for TAVI. Clinical data from registries (TOPAS, GARY, FRANCE-TAVI) show encouraging results with newer devices, including symptom relief, left ventricular remodeling, and improved quality of life, albeit with higher rates of complications like device migration and paravalvular leak. (1) Ethical considerations are paramount, necessitating thorough patient counseling and shared decision-making. As dedicated devices and ongoing trials evolve, off-label TAVI may redefine treatment paradigms for high-risk AR patients. However, further randomized data are needed to establish its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes.

LITERATURE

1 

Samimi S, Hatab T, Kharsa C, Khan SU, Bou Chaaya RG, Qamar F, et al. Meta-Analysis of Dedicated vs Off-Label Transcatheter Devices for Native Aortic Regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 January 13;18(1):44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.042 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39570231


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.