Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.25.75.4

A Defense of Lexical Accounts of Slurs: Comments on Stojnić and Lepore’s Inflammatory Language

Louise Antony ; University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA


Full text: english pdf 570 Kb

page 361-370

downloads: 146

cite


Abstract

I defend a lexical account of slurs against criticisms mounted by Stojnić and Lepore, and present positive reasons for preferring a lexical account over the articulation account they put forward. A lexical account, I argue, explains why articulations of a slur give offense: viz., they are recognized as articulations of a particular word. A lexical account also does better than the articulation account in explaining the naive acquisition and use of slurs, facts about mishearing and mispronouncing, the evolution of certain words into or away from status as slurs, and the fact that “reclaimed” slurring words still give offense when used as slurs.

Keywords

Norms; normativity; functions; social roles; social construction; social kinds; convention.

Hrčak ID:

343186

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/343186

Publication date:

13.1.2026.

Visits: 321 *