Original scientific paper
‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted
Scott F Aikin
; Nesto negdje
Full text: english pdf 172 Kb
page 5-13
downloads: 1.113
cite
APA 6th Edition
Aikin, S.F. (2010). ‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 6 (2), 5-13. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639
MLA 8th Edition
Aikin, Scott F. "‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted." European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2010, pp. 5-13. https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639. Accessed 23 Nov. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Aikin, Scott F. "‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted." European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6, no. 2 (2010): 5-13. https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639
Harvard
Aikin, S.F. (2010). '‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted', European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 6(2), pp. 5-13. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639 (Accessed 23 November 2024)
Vancouver
Aikin SF. ‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2024 November 23];6(2):5-13. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639
IEEE
S.F. Aikin, "‘Knowledge is true belief’ rebutted", European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, vol.6, no. 2, pp. 5-13, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639. [Accessed: 23 November 2024]
Abstract
Crispin Sartwell has argued that knowledge is merely true belief. The two arguments for this thesis are (1) from counter-examples to third requirements for knowledge and (2) from a dilemma for justification-theorists. I will show that the purported counter-examples are inconclusive because they do not reflect an informal pragmatic element of knowledge-attribution. The dilemma is inconclusive, because one horn is easily graspable. Further, I will refine Lycan’s argument that the thesis that knowledge is true belief is inconsistent with epistemic modesty.
Keywords
knowledge; justification; epistemic minimalism; Crispin Sartwell; William Lycan
Hrčak ID:
62639
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/62639
Publication date:
1.12.2010.
Visits: 1.919
*