Skip to the main content

Preliminary communication

Why Would Opt-Out System for Organ Procurement be Fairer?

Murat Civaner orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-3499 ; Uludag University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics, Bursa, Turkey
Zümrüt Alpinar ; Middle East Technical University, Department of Philosophy, Ankara, Turkey
Yaman Örs ; Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics, Antalya, Turkey


Full text: english pdf 372 Kb

page 367-376

downloads: 1.913

cite


Abstract

The possibility of organ transplantation has created new problems for medical ethics as well as clinical medicine. One of them, organ procurement, is tried to be solved mainly by two systems. Many countries have adopted the ‘optin system’, which aims to raise awareness and make the individuals donate their organs by their own will. The other system, ‘optout’ or ‘presumed consent’, which considers all members of society as potential donors, was adopted by some countries. In this system, individuals should state that they do not wish to donate their organs; otherwise they are considered as donors. By trying to ground our argument with various justifications, we claim that optout system for organ procurement is a fairer option regarding the right to access to healthcare needed, and therefore it should be implemented instead of optin.

Keywords

organ transplantation; tissue and organ procurement; presumed consent; medical ethics

Hrčak ID:

68520

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/68520

Publication date:

19.5.2011.

Article data in other languages: croatian french german

Visits: 3.763 *