Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 26 No. 1, 2011.
Preliminary communication
Occasional Identity. Reflections on Philosophy of Shadow
Damir Smiljanić
; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Novi Sad, Serbia
Abstract
Light and shadow create a conceptual pair which gives rise to a number of allusions in philosophy (just recall e.g. Plato’s cave allegory). Historically speaking, light is the paradigm of the Enlightenment (German: Aufklärung, French: Siècle des Lumières). Significantly, in this paradigm certain vacillations appeared at the transition from the Age of Enlightenment to Romanticism: an appreciation of the shadow in the wake of the Romantic idealization of the dark side of human existence rises. Using the example of Adelbert von Chamisso’s work Peter Schlemihl’s Remarkable Story, the point of turn from light to shadow can be fruitfully illustrated. This paper is a philosophical interpretation of the shadow alienation as loss of identity. Following this interpretation an attempt to define the structure of relationship between body and shadow as an identity relationship will be presented. By no means should shadow be degraded to a mere concomitant, it must be considered as an essential element of an identity-forming constellation (light–body–shadow). Although its appearance is characterised by short duration, the shadow belongs to the essential identity of the body, given that the body is defined exactly by the fact that it casts shadows when illuminated. The reciprocity of the light, the body and the shadow is therefore used to exemplify an alternative identity model, according to which a potential feature of an object on a particular occasion (per occasionem) becomes necessary. With the concept of occasional identity it becomes possible to correct an ontologically rigid understanding of identity.
Keywords
light; shadow; Adelbert von Chamisso; Peter Schlemihl; occasional identity; mind–body issue
Hrčak ID:
72479
URI
Publication date:
23.8.2011.
Visits: 2.669 *