Skip to the main content

Review article

Proving predatory pricing in European Union Competition law

Ana Pošćić ; Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci


Full text: croatian pdf 317 Kb

page 553-573

downloads: 1.213

cite


Abstract

Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union prohibits abuse of a dominant position by one or more undertakings within the common market. One of abuse forms being especially difficult to prove is predatory pricing.
This paper attempts to find parameters to be helpful in distinguishing normal competition where undertakings with their better products and products of higher quality squeeze out competitors from predatory behaviour situations. To differentiate acceptable from illicit behaviours the so-called AKZO test is applied under which a predatory price is determined by cost analysis assuming that the prices below average variable costs are predatory prices. Prices above average variable costs but below average total costs will not be predatory prices, unless they are a part of a policy of elimination of competition. Therefore, the relation between price and costs will be taken into consideration, where, under certain circumstances, it will be supplemented with test of intention. Although opinions that the AKZO test should be combined with the recoupment test appear in the doctrine, it seems that the test based on costs is still sufficient by taking into account the strategies and behaviours of undertakings.

Keywords

competition; European law; abuse of dominant position; predatory prices

Hrčak ID:

86833

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/86833

Publication date:

17.9.2012.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.564 *