Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/5

Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction

Iva Z. Alajbeg orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-5661 ; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb, zagreb, Croatia
Marijana Gikić ; Private dental clinic, Zagreb, Croatia
Melita Valentić-Peruzović ; Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences


Full text: croatian pdf 232 Kb

page 119-127

downloads: 887

cite

Full text: english pdf 232 Kb

page 119-127

downloads: 808

cite


Abstract

Objective: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common source of orofacial pain of a non-dental origin. The study was performed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the conventional
occlusal splint therapy and the physical therapy. The hypothesis tested was that the simultaneous use of occlusal splint and physical therapy is an effective method for treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients (mean age =30.5 y) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (according to RDC/TMD and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging) were randomly allocated into 2 groups: 6 received stabilization splint (SS) and 6 received both physical therapy and stabilization splint (SS&PT). Treatment outcomes included pain-free opening (MCO), maximum assisted opening (MAO), path of mouth opening and pain as reported on visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: At baseline of treatment there were no significant differences among the groups for VAS scores, as well as for the range of mandibular movement. VAS scores improved significantly over time for the SS&PT group (F=28.964, p=0.0001, effect size =0.853) and SS group (F=8.794, p=0.001, effect size =0.638). The range of mouth opening improved significantly only in the SS&PT group (MCO: F=20.971, p=0.006; MAO: F=24.014, p=0.004) (Figure 2). Changes in path of mouth opening differ significantly between the groups (p=0.040). Only 1 patient in SS&PT group still presented deviations
in mouth opening after completed therapy while in the SS group deviations were present in 5 patients after completed therapy. Conclusion: This limited study gave evidence that during the treatment period lasting for 6 months, the simultaneous use of stabilization splint and physical therapy was more efficient in reducing deviations and improving range of mouth opening than the stabilization splint used alone. Both treatment options were efficient in reducing pain in patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction. Despite of objectively diagnosed disruption of temporomandibular joint anatomy, physiological function was regained.

Keywords

Temporomandibular Joint; Dislocations; Pain; Occlusal Splints; Exercise Therapy; Physical Therapy Modalities

Hrčak ID:

139969

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/139969

Publication date:

18.6.2015.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.503 *