Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/11083

SUBSTANTIAL VALUE OF A PRODUCT SHAPE AS AN ABSOLUTE GROUND FOR TRADEMARK REFUSAL

Tea Hasić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6079-1156 ; Faculty of Economics and Tourism “Dr. Mijo Mirković”, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Preradovićeva 1/1, 52100 Pula


Full text: croatian pdf 249 Kb

page 167-200

downloads: 579

cite


Abstract

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of “substantial value rule” as an absolute ground for trademark refusal. Originating from the US “aesthetic functionality doctrine”, the rule took a specific form in the EU. There it was incorporated in Directive (EU) 2015/2436 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks – Article 4 (1) (e) (iii), as well as in Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 on the European Union trade mark - Article 7 (1) (e) (iii). Pursuant to “substantial value rule”, signs consisting exclusively of the shape that gives substantial value to the goods are not to be registered as trademarks or, if registered, are liable to be declared invalid. The objective of the paper is therefore threefold: a) to define the rationale of “substantial value rule”; b) to analyze relevant case law; c) to conclude whether a respective rule shall be abolished (providing its purpose may be achieved by other legal instruments without negative side-effects) or kept in the EU trademark law system. Bearing in mind the rationale of “substantial value rule” (on the one hand) and numerous problems that arise whenever “substantial value rule” is applied in practice (on the other hand) the paper provides guidelines for its appropriate interpretation.

Keywords

substantial value rule; aesthetic functionality doctrine; absolute grounds for trademark refusal; shape marks; 3D trademarks

Hrčak ID:

250022

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/250022

Publication date:

31.12.2020.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.192 *