Skip to the main content

Review article

https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2118

Understanding yeast shells: structure, properties and applications

Larissa Silva de Macêdo
Samara Sousa de Pinho
Anna Jéssica Duarte Silva
Ingrid Andrêssa de Moura
Benigno Cristofer Flores Espinoza
Maria da Conceição Viana Invenção
Pedro Vinícius Silva Novis
Marco Antonio Turiah Machado da Gama
Matheus do Nascimento Carvalho
Lígia Rosa Sales Leal
Bruna Isabel Santos Cruz
Beatriz Mendonça Alves Bandeira
Vanessa Emanuelle Pereira Santos
Antonio Carlos de Freitas


Full text: english pdf 1.017 Kb

page 299-317

downloads: 117

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Abstract
Background and purpose
The employment of yeasts for biomedical purposes has become increasingly frequent for the delivery of prophylactic and therapeutic products. Its structural components, such as β-glucans, mannan, and chitin, can be explored as immunostimulators that show safety and low toxicity. Besides, this system minimizes antigen degradation after administration, facilitating the delivery to the target cells.
Review approach
This review sought to present molecules derived from yeast, called yeast shells (YS), and their applications as carrier vehicles for drugs, proteins, and nucleic acids for immunotherapy purposes. Furthermore, due to the diversity of information regarding the production and immunostimulation of these compounds, a survey of the protocols and immune response profiles generated was presented.
Key results
The use of YS has allowed the development of strategies that combine efficiency and effectiveness in antigen delivery. The capsular structure can be recognized and phagocytized by dendritic cells and macrophages. In addition, the combination with different molecules, such as nanoparticles or even additional adjuvants, improves the cargo loading, enhancing the system. Activation by specific immune pathways can also be achieved by different administration routes.
Conclusion
Yeast derivatives combined in different ways can increase immunostimulation, enhancing the delivery of medicines and vaccine antigens. These aspects, combined with the simplicity of the production steps, make these strategies more accessible to be applied in the prevention and treatment of various diseases.

Keywords

Nanocapsules; delivery vehicle; β-glucans; encapsulation; immunostimulator

Hrčak ID:

316603

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/316603

Publication date:

25.12.2024.

Visits: 475 *




Introduction

Initially described for their use in the food industry, yeasts such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae have characteristics, such as fermentation capacity and adaptability, that make them biotechnological platforms with a broad range of applications [1-3]. Thus, it did not take long for its functionality to be explored by the pharmaceutical industry, ranging from the production of vaccines and therapeutic proteins to the delivery of drugs and vaccine antigens [1,4,5]. Its use as an antigen carrier has received special attention due to its ability to protect against physiological degradation, favor antigenic presentation, and present adjuvant properties [6,7].

In addition to the whole yeast cell as a carrier and immunomodulator, some derivatives of its structure have also been extensively studied [8-10]. The yeast shells (YS) are structures obtained from intact cells, taking advantage of the natural predisposition to assimilate different molecules. These YS are generated through treatments with physicochemical agents that can favor their permeability to molecules and the ability to interact with target cells. The yeast nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane structures are removed, resulting in a scaffold composed of β-glucans, mannan, and chitin [1]. The resulting structure can incorporate the material of interest, like performed by the liposomal shells also adopted as a delivery system, and further be administered via parenteral or oral [11].

The surface carbohydrates of the particles are recognized by receptors expressed in macrophages and dendritic cells, leading to internalization by phagocytosis [12]. This specific antigen delivery, even to remote sites, is interesting in treating diseases with inflammatory characteristics [13,14]. The influence of inflammatory processes on the progression of chronic diseases is already well established, and the use of yeasts and their derivatives has been studied to propose more effective and specific treatments targeting diseases such as diabetes, obesity, osteoarthritis, and cancer [14-17].

Despite the advantages presented, some parameters need improvements, such as the lack of standardization in the incorporation process, which influences the reproducibility of the protocols, as well as limited information about adequate quantification of the cargo. Even though the proof of concept about this delivery system has already been demonstrated, greater technical detail is necessary for clinical translation. In this way, understanding targeted studies can be the key to better use of YS.

Throughout this review, we intend to give a general overview of yeast capsules, from their structural characterization and adjuvant properties to their application as a delivery system for drugs and vaccine antigens that occur through various routes of administration. Here, we will also address some of the main protocols adopted to obtain capsules to point out possible ways to work with this delivery system. Part of the current challenge in establishing this platform is precisely the standardization and knowledge about the concentration and quantity of cargo that can be carried, combining it with the best method for each type of molecule to be delivered. The present review, besides compliance protocols and the main results of yeast shell studies, can provide insights to overcome the bottlenecks that still limit the use of this delivery system.

Characterization and properties of yeast shells

Among the different studies involving particles derived from yeast, there is a diversity in the nomenclatures adopted. For example, capsules composed of β-glucan can be referred to as β-glucan particles (GPs), whole glucan particles (WGP), or even yeast cell wall particles (YCWP). Furthermore, some variations in composition can be found, such as glucan-chitin particles (GCPs), glucan-mannan particles (GMPs), and glucan-chitin-mannan particles (GCMPs), as shown inFigure 1. The protocol of preparing these particles influences their composition, size, and, consequently, the most appropriate terminology [18].

Figure 1. Representation of different yeast shells based on composition: glucan-chitin particles (GCPs), glucan-mannan particles (GMPs), and glucan-chitin-mannan particles (GCMPs).
ADMET-12-2118-g001.jpg

In this study, we will adopt the term YS to refer to capsules derived from yeast to address general aspects. Furthermore, as it is a common component of all particles, most studies refer to β-glucan structures and the influence of this component on transport and interaction with target cells. Therefore, we will focus on their characteristics, preparation, and applications.

Cell wall components

The yeast cell wall is composed of polysaccharides such as β-glucans, chitin, and mannoproteins that favor its rigidity and thickness [19]. It also acts on physical protection and cellular osmotic maintenance [20]. The composition and distribution of cell wall components can vary between yeast species. In S. cerevisiae, for example, the cell wall comprises about 30% of the dry-weight cell and is structurally defined by internal and external layers [21].

β-glucans present different structural and physicochemical variations depending on their origin (yeast, bacteria, cereals), influencing their physiological functions [22]. In yeast, they represent the main component of the internal layer, with high molecular weight and degree of branching. It consists of a β-1,3-glucan backbone polymeric structure with an amorphous β-1,6-glucan side chain. Functionally, β-Glucan is an immune activator of the innate immune response that can act nonspecifically and specifically on the immune system with PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) [23,24]. Therefore, GPs can be used for enteral transport of probiotics [25] and delivery of medicines and vaccines [26].

Chitin is a minor constituent in the internal layer, and its crystalline structure provides resistance to cell wall stretching and fiber insolubility [27,28]. Its arrangement can be seen in free form or linked to the β-1-3-glucan or β-1-6-glucan portions, functioning as an essential component for normal cell division [29,30].

In the outermost layer, mannoproteins are present, which consist of mannose residues linked by glycosidic bonds [31]. This fibrillar layer is characterized by the presence of electrons that confer the yeast's surface anionic charge through the phosphorylation of the mannosyl side chains [27,28]. Furthermore, mannoproteins are associated with cell-cell recognition events [20]. Some studies have revealed that β-glucan and mannan of the yeast cell wall can activate macrophages, thus promoting the organism's non-specific immune response [24,32,33]. However, studies with Candida albicans have demonstrated that mannans mask β-1-3-glucan molecules from dectin-1 receptors, contributing to yeast evasion of innate immunity [34-36]. On the other hand, for yeasts such as S. cerevisae, K. lactis and P. pastoris, which have GRAS status, their viability does not have the same characteristics and, in addition, inactivation by heating increases the exposure of β-glucans in these species [6].Figure 1 demonstrates the structure of the yeast cell wall.

YS general features

Yeast shells are biodegradable, porous, and hollow, allowing the carrying of nucleic acids, antigens, adjuvants, drugs and other molecular structures with targeted delivery and protection against degradation [18,37-42]. The size can vary from 2-4 μm, which enables specific phagocytosis by dendritic cells and macrophages [43,44]. Due to the porous characteristic of the capsule, there is the possibility of the product leaking, which can be overcome by coating with cationic chitosan and anionic alginate, forming a matrix that protects the pores [18,45]. Other strategies that can be used to solve this problem are preloading the capsules with anthocyanins and sequential deposition of polysaccharides with opposite charges, such as chitosan and chondroitin sulfate [46], another study used colloids of aluminum hydroxide to form aggregates with the transported molecule of interest within the capsule [38]. Furthermore, stearin blocking can be done and chitosan, tripolyphosphate and alginate can be used to form colloidal particles capable of keeping the molecules transported inside the particle [42,47].

Structures derived from yeast have gained prominence in the vaccine development and delivery of nanomedicines administered orally, maintaining the integrity of the carried molecule. The composition of the capsules makes them resistant to pH and gastric enzymes, allowing them to pass through the gastrointestinal tract where they interact with M cells that will mediate biodistribution to components of mucosal immunity [13,48].

Furthermore, YS can be constructed by conjugating β-glucans with other molecules to improve delivery, as performed by Chowdhury et al. [49]. They synthesized a vehicle composed of taurocholic acid and β-glucan, capable of protecting molecules from the harmful environment of the stomach and accelerating the absorption of particles by the circulatory system, in addition to having target specificity for the liver, the organ of interest in the study. An important aspect of the technology developed from YS is the ability to form encapsulated cores in situ within the hollow cavity. Thus, antigens can be incorporated and combined by the layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly methodology of nanomaterials, which are held together by electrostatic interactions [8]. The formation of stable complexes between negatively charged genetic material and cationic polymers is the most commonly studied approach to developing nonviral delivery agents. Soto and Ostroff [8] developed an approach to create nanoparticle materials in order to protect and deliver DNA to phagocytic cells efficiently. In this way, the main barriers found in the transport of nucleic acids, such as low protection of the material with a consequent reduction in payload, inefficiency in delivery, release and uptake by cells, can be overcome using this system. The delivery system demonstrated efficacy in DNA delivery and transfection of both macrophages and dendritic cells through in vitro and in vivo evaluations [8].

In this sense, new strategies for drug and vaccine delivery vehicles have advanced, and it is worth investigating the use of fungal β-glucans as materials for capsule synthesis, whether or not these are conjugated with other materials [50,51].

Preparation of yeast shells

The methodologies used in studies to obtain the different YS have some similarities [10,52-54]. The extraction and purification process of these yeasts involve some steps to guarantee the purity and effectiveness of the YS without altering their morphology [3,6,54]. YS is obtained through the elimination of nucleic acids and some intracellular proteins present in the yeast cells, resulting in hollow particles capable of carrying drugs, antigens, and proteins. This procedure employs a simple treatment with alkaline and acid pH, associated with a heat treatment, using NaOH (80 °C) and HCl (60 °C) [3,10,52-54]. After carrying out this approach, the only remains of the yeast cells are β-glucans, the predominant component of the cell walls of these yeasts, and chitin, lipids and proteins in smaller proportions [18,43]. Young et al. [55] verified the structural composition of purified YS from S. cerevisiae that contained ~80 % branched 1→6-β, 1→3-β-glucan, 2 to 4 % chitin and <1 % mannan. However, the composition of each component can be changed after extraction of these particles, depending on the strain or growth stage. For example, the composition of chitin in the cell wall can vary from 0 to 36 % depending on the growth stage [55]. Other aspects, such as the number of cells, temperature, concentration and volume of solutions, vary between different studies [52,56].

Subsequently, these yeast shells are dehydrated with alcohol and acetone to remove residual moisture and improve the YS porosity. Then, the particles are dried to obtain a solid and thermostable form of the YS [10,53,54,57] (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Purification and characterization of YS from yeast. Schematic representation of the methodology used in the studies to obtain the YS.
ADMET-12-2118-g002.jpg

Some aspects, such as temperature, concentration, and volume of solutions, vary among the different studies. The induction of variations in the final size of the YS was proposed by Xu et al. [58]. Through differential centrifugation, with a range of rotations from 2,400g to 21,100g, different sizes of nanoparticles derived from YS (NPY) can be obtained, ranging from 50 to 500 nm (Figure 2). For YS nanocapsules obtainment, it is necessary to break these structures through high-speed centrifugation to reduce the size of the original particle. The reduction of these particles demonstrated an improved anticancer effect compared to larger particles.

The standardization of this process enables its reproducibility with greater accuracy. Furthermore, this methodology offers a cost-effective approach to large-scale production of YS, making them more accessible than other delivery systems. After the preparation, it is necessary to check the particle morphology, size, uniformity, and stability. Most studies employ atomic force microscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, Zeta potential determination, and scanning electron microscopy to characterize these YS [38,58,59].

The subsequent steps to allow the entry of these materials into these YS vary according to the objectives proposed in these studies. The drug or antigen to be carried may be contained, uniformly dispersed or chemically linked to the GPs [3]. Pan et al. [40] used ovalbumin (OVA) as a model antigen conjugated to the YS surface. By incubation with YS oxidized with NaIO4. Through chemical treatment, OVA was attached to the surface of YS, forming YS-OVA particles with a drug loading of 20 %. The results showed that YS facilitated antigen absorption by dendritic cells, in addition to stimulating maturation and inducing the release of immune co-stimulatory molecules by DCs. Thus revealing the potential use of YS in the administration of antigens carried on its external surface [40]. Sabu et al. [60] demonstrated the efficiency of an oral delivery system for YS-carrying insulin, using 100 mg of YS added to a volume of 10 mL of insulin with a concentration of 100 μg/mL in HCl 0.01 N. This material was agitated at 400 rpm for 3 hours and then centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 minutes. This approach demonstrated encapsulation efficiency (EE) of 89.84±1.04% [60].

Another study using these particles as carriers addressed YS encapsulating curcumin, employing a stock solution of curcumin (0.2 mg/mL) in ethanol. This preparation was added to the dried YS and mixed with UltraTurrax T10 (IKA) to create a uniform distribution of curcumin within the YS. The EE of the composites prepared with three measures of YS compound with 0.55, 0.11 and 0.055 wt.% curcumin showed that the real value of the mass fraction of curcumin with 0.621±0.064, 0.139±0.007 and 0.071±0.004 % respectively, was slightly higher than planned. This approach allowed the encapsulation of curcumin, potentially increasing its stability and bioavailability in pharmaceutical applications [52]. Both studies demonstrated potential applications of YS in drug delivery systems [52].

Although numerous studies demonstrate efficient transport by YS, when using a porous particle as a delivery systems, transported substances may be lost during their delivery to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) due to external environmental conditions [45]. Given this, recent methodologies propose the application of YS associated with adjuvants or stabilizing agents. Zhu et al. [38] used YS associated with aluminum chloride (AlCl3) to carry a vaccine against human toxoplasmosis. The particles were incubated in a solution containing 0.125 M AlCl3 for 2 hours. Subsequently, the excess aluminum salt outside the YS was removed by centrifugation. To further optimize the formation of aluminum hydroxide colloids in the YS, the solution was resuspended using 2.0 mL of ammonium hydroxide (0.05 M), followed by 10 minutes of stirring to facilitate precipitation of the aluminum salt. Finally, ultrasonography was performed for 30 minutes at a frequency of 25 kHz and power of 100 W to ensure the formation of stable aluminum hydroxide colloids within the YS [38].

A similar methodology was reproduced by Liu et al. [53] to obtain NPY with aluminum for use as a vaccine delivery system against hepatitis B. The study used GP-Al (5.0 mg/mL, 1 mL) mixed with HBsAg proteins (10 mg/mL, 25 μL) stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. After that, the residue was resuspended in PBS and subjected to three centrifugations to form GP-Al-HBsAg particles. The vaccine showed promising results in improving humoral and cellular immune responses, representing a safe and promising system for antigen delivery [53]. More information on payload strategies and encapsulation efficiency through YS is summarized inTable 1.

Table 1 - Payload trapping strategies.
Payload classPayload trapping moleculesEE, %Load levels and YSPayload locationRef.
Peptide - proteinPolyethyleneimine (PEI) / cationic polymer6845 ng/μl fetal calf serum (FCS); 0.2 % PEI; 1 mg of YSWithin the hollow shell[18]
DNA- plasmidAgarose / anionic polymers>80500 mg aliquot of YS; 500 ul of DNA in agarose at 50Within the hollow shell[18]
Peptide - proteinSodium periodate (NaIO4) / anionic polymers-50 mg of YS; 1,5 mL of NaIO4 solution; OVA protein solution and aldehyde YS were mixed at the mass ratio of 2:1Linked to the surface YS[40]
Small molecule - water insoluble- doxorrubicina (DOX)Chitosan / cationic polymer and alginate / anionic polymers52.45 mg of YS; 100 μL of DOX solution (1 mg/mL); chitosan (0.4 % w/v); TPP/alginate solution (1.0 mg/mL of TPP, 0.4 mg/mL of alginate sodium)Within the hollow shell[45]
RNA- tRNA and DNA- sodium salt from Salmon testes (DNA)PEI / cationic polymer>85YS (108 particles/mL); DNA or tRNA (10 mg); PEI (3 mg/mL)Within the hollow shell[8]

Yeast shells as adjuvants and carriers in biomedical therapies: studies and perspectives

Microcapsules and nanocapsules derived from glycoproteins or cell walls are formulated for biomedical applications, taking advantage of the immunostimulatory properties of yeast. Therefore, they play fundamental roles as adjuvants, immunomodulators, and carriers for the delivery of therapeutic agents [4,11,61]. Yeast cell wall components play a crucial role in mechanical resistance, cell adhesion, and modulation of the host immune response [11,62].

β-glucans (β-1,3 and β-1,6) are readily recognized by receptors in the host body, such as dectin-1 and complement receptor 3 (CR3), leading to opsonization, inflammatory cell influx, and immune responses T cells (Th1, Th17, and cytotoxic) [2,63-65]. Mannan and chitin of yeast shells also bind to pattern recognition receptors, inducing characteristic T cell responses, depending on the proportion between these components [66,67].

The ability of yeast shells to activate several T cell response pathways, including those induced by antibodies (Th2 type), makes them promising adjuvants and carriers in disease therapies where treatment efficacy and immunological stimulation act synergistically [6,11,68]. For example, in research into vaccines against viral, bacterial, fungal, and protozoal diseases, yeast shells have been employed as adjuvants and carriers to amplify T-cell and antibody-mediated immune responses. Soares et al. [69] found that the use of YS as an adjuvant in a hepatitis B vaccine triggered the release of antigen-specific Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, Th22, and Treg-related cytokines, promoting antiviral immunity [69]. Otherwise, Liu et al. [53] created hybrid aluminum and β-glucan microspheres to deliver HBV antigens to enhance humoral and cellular immune responses [53]. For fungal infections, glucan-chitin particles were used as adjuvant carriers against lung infection caused by Coccidioides posadasii, being able to stimulate a mixed Th1 and Th17 response and improve the protective response against infection [70]. Furthermore, as new strategies to enhance the activation of protective CD8+ T cells in a coccidioidomycosis vaccine, Cole et al. [71] added Endo-Porter peptides to increase the release of proteins into the cytoplasm of APCs after phagocytosis of GPs [71]. As a hybrid carrier of GP-AS04 in a vaccine against Toxoplasma gondii, it mediated the delivery and facilitated the uptake of antigens by increasing the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [38].

Regarding cancer therapies, studies have investigated YS to stimulate immune responses targeting tumor cells. The potential of YS to activate cytotoxic T lymphocytes and their ability to transport cancer-specific antigens can lead the immune system to identify and destroy cancer cells [72,73]. To prevent the development of tumors, NPY modifies the immunosuppressive microenvironment in tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes [58]. Jing et al. [54], for example, developed a broad-spectrum therapeutic vaccine with neoantigens coupled to YS capable of inhibiting tumor growth in cancer cell models (EG7·OVA, B16F10, 4T1, and CT26) [54]. In addition, studies have also investigated the impact of yeast shells on the modulation of macrophage phenotypes, particularly the transition from M2 to M1 macrophages, as this transition is known to play a key role in influencing cancer progression [74-76]. Yeast-derived whole β-glucan particles (WGPs) have been identified as potent inducers of macrophage polarization. They can drive M0 macrophages towards the M1 phenotype, characterized by pro-inflammatory and antitumor properties [74]. Moreover, WGPs have demonstrated the ability to convert existing M2 macrophages and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) into the M1 phenotype [74,75]. This unique capability positions yeast-derived WGPs as promising agents for cancer immunotherapy, not only by directly affecting tumor cells but also by reshaping the tumor microenvironment through the conversion of immunosuppressive macrophages into pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages [76]. In autoimmune diseases, where immune regulation is compromised, the use of yeast shells as adjuvants has been studied as a way to rebalance immune responses. Furthermore, they can be used as delivery systems for genetic material in oral vaccines, allowing the introduction of therapeutic genes into specific cells, increasing efficacy, and improving systemic mucosal immunity [6,11,77]. Hu et al. [12] used TNF-α RNAi mediated by oral yeast microcapsules in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis, the results of which indicated a reduction in pro-inflammatory factors and a greater systematic regulation of the inflammatory response [12].

Another recently developed application using capsules demonstrates the combination with micro/nanorobot technology, administered as therapeutic molecules or medications in a targeted manner. Furthermore, they have considerable promising in vivo applications related to inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract due to the adoption of biocompatible endogenous fuels [78]. In the study by Zhang et al. [78] capsules derived from the yeast S. cerevisiae were used as a biocompatible and intelligent material to design self-adaptive micro/nanorobots with dual biomotor (TBY robot) to reach multiple biological barriers, allowing active administration of drugs for therapy of the TGI. In a murine animal model, TBY robots attenuated inflamemation and improved disease pathology. TBY robots exhibited enzymatic actuation and the capacity to reprogram macrophages, enabling autonomous adaptation to changes in the surrounding environment to penetrate multiple biological barriers to reach inflamed sites. These effects ensure a precise therapy for gastrointestinal inflammation [78].

Therefore, as new research and advancements occur in the area of yeast derivatives, the potential of these capsules as facilitators of innovative therapies continues to grow, paving the way for promising future developments and applications. However, different types of yeast-derived particles offer varied approaches to meet the specific needs of each application, and distinct delivery routes can influence their action as a carrier and enhancer of the immune response [14,79].

Possibility of molecules carried by YS

Both yeast and yeast shells can transport a broad spectrum of molecules such as DNA, mRNA, iRNA, and proteins (Table 2). On the other hand, the structure and composition of YS allow for the additional advantage of incorporating and carrying nanoprobes (performing contrast-enhanced imaging exams) and nanoparticles loaded with vaccines or medicines [13].

Table 2: Diversity of yeast-derived molecules and structure types that can be used for carriage.
Target-diseaseMoleculeCapsule typeRef.
HFD-obesityshRNAMicrocapsule[3,17,18]
CancerProteinβ-Glucan whole particle[3,16,18]
-DNA associated to tRNA and PEI polymersYeast cell wall particle (YCWP)[8]
Cryptococcus neoformansProtein extractβ-glucan particles[61]
Coccidioides posadasiiProteinCapsules formed with different glucan-chitin concentrations[70]
Cryptococcus neoformansProteinβ-glucan particles with a silica structure using tetraethylorthosilicate[80]
Cepa KN99 do C. neoformansAggregated nickel particlesβ-glucan particles[81]
-PseudovirusYeast cell wall particle modified with positively charged polyethyleneimine[82]
-Quantum dotsβ-glucan particles[3,13,18]
-Iron oxide nanoparticlesβ-glucan particles[13]
-Fluorescent organic nanoparticlesβ-glucan particles[13]
Inflammatory diseasesNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicationβ-glucan particles[13]
CancerChemotherapy agentβ-glucan particles[13]

YS has been used to deliver nucleic acids or protein subunits as an oral vaccine strategy [11]. Aouadi et al. [83] employed this system to silence the expression of Map4k4 and inhibit the production of TNF-α using 40 pmol of siRNA in 108 GeRP40 (β-1,3-D-Glucans). They proposed an oral vaccine model against inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, and psoriasis [83]. An in vitro study carried out by Plavcová et al. [52] observed that the treatment of THP-1 cells (555,555 cells/mL) with 10 μL of YS/curcumin promoted a decrease in NF-κB/AP-1 activity. This model acts as an antioxidant, which could eventually be used for inflammatory diseases [52].

Regarding the concentration of the target compound to be carried by YS, the specific amounts are not well described for each application. However, some studies have demonstrated different quantities that enable distinct applications of these structures, as reviewed inTable 3.

Table 3: Antigens loaded in different models of yeast capsules, concentrations, and their applications.
ModelContent of GP particlesLoaded antigenAdministrationRef.
C57BL/6 mice500 μgExtract of Toxoplasma gondiiOral[38]
C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice(0,375 mg/kg) of NP YCW in 50 μl-Intratumoral[58]
C57BL/6 mice30 mg of microcapsule per kgIL-1β shRNAOral[14]
THP1 XBlue™ MD2 CD14 cell line670 μg/mlCurcumin-[52]
C57BL/6 mice1 mgOVASubcutaneous[84]
ApoE -/- mice100 mg of YC in 10 mlRapamycin (RAP)Oral[85]
BALB/c mice2×108 YCIndomethacin (IND) and paclitaxel (PTX)Oral[13]
B6.V -Lep ob /J mice1 mg/mlARNipIntraperitoneal[86]
C57BL/6 mice50 mg of YSOVASubcutaneous[40]
C57BL6/J mice108 YCiRNAOral[83]
NIH3T3-D1 cell line8 μg of DNA/ 106 YCgWizGFP plasmidTransfection[8]

Administration routes for yeast shells

An important point to consider for the efficiency of using capsules for the purposes presented above is the route of administration. Different approaches employ oral, intranasal, intradermal, subcutaneous, and intraperitoneal routes, with advantages and disadvantages further discussed in this section.

The size of the carrier structure can influence the choice of the most appropriate route of administration. Some studies suggest that the diameter of yeast cells, ranging from 1 to 10 μm, can lead to local adverse events when administered intramuscularly or intraperitoneally [59]. Adverse reactions would be related to the local inflammatory response due to the accumulation of yeast due to low absorption. This effect could be minimized or eliminated by employing yeast-derived capsules (diameter of 2 to 4 μm) not associated with exacerbated local inflammatory processes. Furthermore, microcapsules stand out for their low toxicity to the body, enabling the administration for long periods without causing damage to the biological system [87].

Subcutaneous injection was adopted in a murine model to evaluate antitumor efficacy and induced Th1/Th17 immune responses, characterized by the production of IL-17, and inhibited tumor growth by up to 91.8 % [88]. The intraperitoneal route was used in a β-glucan-based delivery system for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, showing a robust cellular and humoral immune response [89]. In a randomized clinical trial using a dendritic cell vaccine with YS for stage III/IV melanoma with intradermal application, there was an improvement in overall survival with no difference in progression-free survival [90].

For oral administration, it is necessary to consider the challenges related to low pH, bile salts, and digestive enzymes [91], besides ensuring adequate tissue absorption and targeting [11]. The use of YS overcomes most of these adversities. When used as a shRNA delivery vehicle in post-traumatic osteoarthritis gene therapy, YS passed through the gastrointestinal tract without degradation after oral administration [92]. Similar findings were reported to reduce parasite load in the murine model of visceral leishmaniasis [93].

Concurrently, using orally administered WGP β-glucans in conjunction with monoclonal antibody therapy against tumors, a significant tumor regression of ≥80 % was achieved compared to treatment with monoclonal antibodies alone. In this case, WGP is processed by macrophages that prime the leukocyte complement receptor 3 (CR3), allowing these cells to eliminate opsonized tumors with the complement fragment iC3b [94]. Therefore, despite the mentioned difficulties, the oral route is one of the most promising due to its good adhesion, broad spectrum of therapeutic regions, and easy operation [95].

Furthermore, oral administration of vaccines has immunological advantages because of the stimulation of mucosal and systemic responses [11]. Additionally, some studies have applied the use of YS as adjuvants to assist in the local response to vaccine application [96-98]. In the study by Bi et al. [97] the product AngelPW220 derived from S. cerevisiae containing β-glucan (≥30 %) and mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) (≥20 %) (Angel Yeast, Yichang, China) was tested. YS was added to the oral basal diet of Sanhuang chickens, which then received intraocular and intranasal immunization with a live NVD (Newcastle disease virus) vaccine [97]. In this specific study, it was observed that birds subjected to YS supplementation had significantly elevated serum levels of IL-4, IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-β compared to those that received the vaccine alone. These results indicated that YS can safely stimulate both Th1 and Th2 immune responses in animals [97,98]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further investigations into YS as a potential immunopotentiator and its combination with mucosal administration strategies.

An innovative approach for biotechnological applications: yeast derivatives

Nanomedicine has emerged in recent decades as an auxiliary tool for improving the immune response against different antigens [99]. A study demonstrated that the use of nanoparticles in conjunction with β1,3-glucan decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in supernatants of bone marrow dendritic cells cultured in vitro, and the immunomodulatory effect of this system was dependent on the size of the nanoparticles [100]. When comparing different diameters of NPY, it was observed that 355 nm glucan particles induced the secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α. This effect was not observed in smaller particles, suggesting that the immunomodulatory effect of NPY is associated with particle size, configuring an important parameter to ensure therapeutic efficacy in nanomedicine [101].

NPY has been studied for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Its use for carrying methotrexate (MTX) showed good biocompatibility and targeting macrophages, leading to the polarization of macrophages from the M1 to M2 type, in addition to reducing pro-inflammatory factors. Thus, the use of NPY may be a safe alternative strategy for clinical treatment to reduce inflammation and protect joints, enhancing the therapeutic effect [102].

One of the factors that impairs the induction of anti-cancer immune responses is the tumor microenvironment (TME) composition. However, the TME immunological profile can be manipulated by β-glucans particles that can modulate the TME by altering the phenotype of immunosuppressive cells [76,103]. In this sense, He et al. [16] observed that this system promotes the activation of bone marrow-derived macrophages, significantly contributing to the delay in tumor progression [16].

Silica associated with GP structure blocks protein charges and their thermal denaturation through “imprisonment in silica”. Thus, an ensilicated GP vaccine delivery system (GP + a layer of silica inside the hollow GP cavity) showed high immunogenicity, protecting vaccinated mice from lethal pulmonary infection by Cryptococcus neoformans [80]. These biomimetic and magnetic nanoparticles did not cause the production of pro-inflammatory mediators (IL-6 and TNF-α), formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), or alteration in monocytes and dendritic cell viability [104].

The immunotherapeutic effect of a delivery system for carboxymethylated β- d -glucan (CMPTR) and iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) (CMPTR/IONPs) was evaluated in cultured bone marrow-derived macrophage cells and B16F10 melanoma from skin cancer patients, and led to reduced cancer cell migration [105]. The encapsulation of nanoparticles complexed with humic acid and iron (HA-Fe NPs) within glucomannan lipid particles (GMLPs) extracted from the yeast cell wall was efficient in tests carried out in vivo against the toxicity of aflatoxin B (AFB 1), presenting protective effect also against oxidative stress and histological changes in the liver and kidneys [106]. The use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and platinum (PtNPs) complexed in yeast microcapsules seems to be efficient in activating immune responses and remodeling the tumor microenvironment, acting in synergy with chemodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy [107]. Attachment of β-glucan particles loaded with inflammasome inhibitor protein 3 (NLRP3) onto nanoparticle surface enabled precise and efficient targeting of cardiac ischemic/reperfusion injury and showed higher efficacy when compared to nanomicelle formulation, being approved by the Food Drugs Association (FDA) [108].

Conclusions

Using yeast shells as carriers for therapeutic agents, proteins, and biomolecules, including nucleic acids, offers a unique combination of safety, low toxicity upon administration, and intrinsic potential as an adjuvant and modulator of the immune system. The exploration of various yeast-derived particles, such as GPs, WGPs, YCWPs, and others as YSs, reflects a versatility of use that can be tailored to optimize absorption and immunological response in target organisms.

In particular, applying YSs in oral formulations may allow for the induction of a systemic response through mucosal surfaces, which, for example, can be an effective strategy in the treatment and prevention of inflammatory diseases affecting the respiratory tract. As discussed in this article, there is a variety of methods available for the formulation of YSs alongside the elements of interest to be transported. The relative simplicity of these procedures may make them accessible and cost-effective alternatives in various applications.

However, it is important to emphasize that continuous advancements in research are necessary for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of interaction and processing of YSs in target organisms, as well as the development of stabilisation techniques that ensure proper delivery and absorption of the transported compounds. Nevertheless, yeast shells present remarkable potential and versatility that may prove useful in optimizing biotechnological processes in search of solutions for medical conditions.

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully thanks everyone at the Laboratory of Molecular Studies and Experimental Therapy (LEMTE) who participated in the conception of this manuscript.

Notes

[1] Funding: This research was funded by CNPq/MCTI/CT-BIOTEC N° 31/2022, grant number 440315/2022-0.

[2] Conflicts of interest Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the sign of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

[3] Author contributions: All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Conceptualization and Writing—review and editing, were performed by Larissa Silva de Macêdo. Larissa Silva de Macêdo and Samara Souza de Pinho - These authors contributed equally to this work. Larissa Silva de Macêdo and Samara Souza de Pinho performed the Data curation. Larissa Silva de Macêdo, Samara Sousa de Pinho, Anna Jéssica Duarte Silva, Ingrid Andressa de Moura, Benigno Cristofer Flores Espinoza, Maria da Conceição Viana Invenção, Pedro Vinícius Silva Novis, Marco Antonio Turiah Machado da Gama, Matheus do Nascimento Carvalho, Lígia Rosa Sales Leal, Bruna Isabel Santos Cruz, Beatriz Mendonça Alves Bandeira, and Vanessa Emanuelle Pereira Santos performed the Writing—original draft preparation. Antonio Carlos de Freitas performed Supervision, Project administration, and Funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

[1] 

Tan Y.; Chen L.; Li K.; Lou B.; Liu Y.; Liu Z.. Yeast as carrier for drug delivery and vaccine construction. Journal of Controlled Release 346 (2022) 358-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.032.

[2] 

Kumar R.; Kumar P.. Yeast-based vaccines: New perspective in vaccine development and application. FEMS yeast Research 19 (2019) foz007. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz007 https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz007.

[3] 

Jamas Spiros, Ostroff Gary R.; Davidson Easson D. Jr.. Glucan drug delivery system and adjuvant, US5032401A, 1989. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5032401 (accessed December 10, 2023).

[4] 

Sabu C.; Mufeedha P.; Pramod K.. Yeast-inspired drug delivery: biotechnology meets bioengineering and synthetic biology. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 16 (2019) 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2019.1551874 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2019.1551874.

[5] 

Nelson G.; Duckham S.C.; Crothers M.E.D.. Microencapsulation in Yeast Cells and Applications in Drug Delivery. In: Polymeric drug delivery - ACS Symposium Series (2006) pp. 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2006-0923.ch019 https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2006-0923.ch019.

[6] 

Silva A.J.D.; de Macêdo L.S.; Leal L.R.S.; de Jesus A.L.S.; Freitas A.C.. Yeasts as a promising delivery platform for DNA and RNA vaccines. FEMS yeast Research 21 (2021) foab018. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foab018 https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foab018.

[7] 

Silva A.J.D.; Rocha C.K. da S.; de Freitas A.C.. Standardization and Key Aspects of the Development of Whole Yeast Cell Vaccines. Pharmaceutics 14 (2022) 2792. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122792 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122792.

[8] 

Soto E.R.; Ostroff G.R.. Characterization of Multilayered Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Yeast Cell Wall Particles for DNA Delivery. Bioconjugate Chemistry 19 (2008) 840-848. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc700329p https://doi.org/10.1021/bc700329p.

[9] 

Tesz G.J.; Aouadi M.; Prot M.; Nicoloro S.M.; Boutet E.; Amano S.U.; Goller A.; Wang M.; Guo C.-A.; Salomon W.E.; Virbasius J.V.; Baum R.A.; O’Connor M.J.; Soto E.; Ostroff G.R.; Czech M.P.. Glucan particles for selective delivery of siRNA to phagocytic cells in mice. Biochemical Journal 436 (2011) 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20110352 https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20110352.

[10] 

Zhou X.; Ling K.; Liu M.; Zhang X.; Ding J.; Dong Y.; Liang Z.; Li J.; Zhang J.. Targeted Delivery of Cisplatin-Derived Nanoprecursors via a Biomimetic Yeast Microcapsule for Tumor Therapy by the Oral Route. Theranostics 9 (2019) 6568-6586. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.35353 https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.35353.

[11] 

Alexander E.. Yeasts in nanotechnology-enabled oral vaccine and gene delivery. Bioengineered 12 (2021) 8325-8335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1985816 https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1985816.

[12] 

Hu N.; Zhu L.; Zhang L.; Wang J.; Wang Y.; Luo J.; He L.; Hao Z.; Zhang L.. Immunomodulatory effect and safety of TNF-α RNAi mediated by oral yeast microcapsules in rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Materials Today Bio 16 (2022) 100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100384.

[13] 

Zhou X.; Zhang X.; Han S.; Dou Y.; Liu M.; Zhang L.; Guo J.; Shi Q.; Gong G.; Wang R.; Hu J.; Li X.; Zhang J.. Yeast Microcapsule-Mediated Targeted Delivery of Diverse Nanoparticles for Imaging and Therapy via the Oral Route. Nano Letters 17 (2017) 1056-1064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04523 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04523.

[14] 

Zhang L.; Peng H.; Feng M.; Zhang W.; Li Y.. Yeast microcapsule-mediated oral delivery of IL-1β shRNA for post-traumatic osteoarthritis therapy. Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids 23 (2021) 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2020.11.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2020.11.006.

[15] 

Zakria H.M.; Han B.; Yue F.; Mu L.; Fang Y.; Li X.; Xu K.; Zhang Z.. Significant body mass increase by oral administration of a cascade of shIL21-MSTN yeast-based DNA vaccine in mice. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 118 (2019) 109147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109147.

[16] 

He L.; Bai Y.; Xia L.; Pan J.; Sun X.; Zhu Z.; Ding J.; Qi C.; Tang C.. Oral administration of a whole glucan particle (WGP)-based therapeutic cancer vaccine targeting macrophages inhibits tumor growth. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 71 (2022) 2007-2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-03136-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-03136-7.

[17] 

Zhang L.; Zhang W.; Peng H.; Li Y.; Leng T.; Xie C.; Zhang L.. Oral Gene Therapy of HFD-Obesity via Nonpathogenic Yeast Microcapsules Mediated shRNA Delivery. Pharmaceutics 13 (2021) 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101536 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101536.

[18] 

Ostroff Gary. Drug delivery product and methods, US20050281781A1, 2004. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050281781A1/en (accessed December 10, 2023).

[19] 

Wang J.; Li M.; Zheng F.; Niu C.; Liu C.; Li Q.; Sun J.. Cell wall polysaccharides: before and after autolysis of brewer’s yeast. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 34 (2018) 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2508-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2508-6.

[20] 

Klis F.M.; Mol P.; Hellingwerf K.; Brul S.. Dynamics of cell wall structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26 (2002) 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00613.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00613.x.

[21] 

Gow N.A.R.; Latge J.-P.; Munro C.A.. The Fungal Cell Wall: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function. Microbiology Spectrum 5(5) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016 https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016.

[22] 

De Smet R.; Allais L.; Cuvelier C.A.. Recent advances in oral vaccine development. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 10 (2014) 1309-1318. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.28166 https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.28166.

[23] 

De Marco Castro E.; Calder P.C.; Roche H.M.. β‐1,3/1,6‐Glucans and Immunity: State of the Art and Future Directions. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 65 (2021) 1901071. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201901071 https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201901071.

[24] 

Liu Y.; Wu Q.; Wu X.; Algharib S.A.; Gong F.; Hu J.; Luo W.; Zhou M.; Pan Y.; Yan Y.; Wang Y.. Structure, preparation, modification, and bioactivities of β-glucan and mannan from yeast cell wall: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 173 (2021) 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.125.

[25] 

Gani A.; Shah A.; Ahmad M.; Ashwar B.A.; Masoodi F.A.. β-d-glucan as an enteric delivery vehicle for probiotics. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 106 (2018) 864-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.093 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.093.

[26] 

Vetvicka V.; Vannucci L.; Sima P.. β‐glucan as a new tool in vaccine development. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 91 (2020) e12833. https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.12833 https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.12833.

[27] 

Lipke P.N.; Ovalle R.. Cell Wall Architecture in Yeast: New Structure and New Challenges. Journal of Bacteriology 180 (1998) 3735-3740. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.180.15.3735-3740.1998 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.180.15.3735-3740.1998.

[28] 

Lesage G.; Bussey H.. Cell Wall Assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 70 (2006) 317-343. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00038-05 https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00038-05.

[29] 

Orlean P.. Architecture and Biosynthesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Wall. Genetics 192 (2012) 775-818. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.144485 https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.144485.

[30] 

Cabib E.; Durán A.. Synthase III-dependent Chitin Is Bound to Different Acceptors Depending on Location on the Cell Wall of Budding Yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280 (2005) 9170-9179. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414005200 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414005200.

[31] 

Liu Y.; Wu Q.; Wu X.; Algharib S.A.; Gong F.; Hu J.; Luo W.; Zhou M.; Pan Y.; Yan Y.; Wang Y.. Structure, preparation, modification, and bioactivities of β-glucan and mannan from yeast cell wall: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 173 (2021) 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.125.

[32] 

Sung S.; Nelson R.; Silverstein S.. Yeast Mannans inhibit binding and phagocytosis of zymosan by mouse peritoneal macrophages. The Journal of Cell Biology 96 (1983) 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.96.1.160 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.96.1.160.

[33] 

Brattgjerd S.; Evensen O.; Lauve A.. Effect of injected yeast glucan on the activity of macrophages in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., as evaluated by in vitro hydrogen peroxide production and phagocytic capacity. Immunology 83 (1994) 288-94.

[34] 

Graus M.S.; Wester M.J.; Lowman D.W.; Williams D.L.; Kruppa M.D.; Martinez C.M.; Young J.M.; Pappas H.C.; Lidke K.A.; Neumann A.K.. Mannan Molecular Substructures Control Nanoscale Glucan Exposure in Candida. Cell Reports 24 (2018) 2432-2442.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.088 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.088.

[35] 

Bain J.M.; Louw J.; Lewis L.E.; Okai B.; Walls C.A.; Ballou E.R.; Walker L.A.; Reid D.; Munro C.A.; Brown A.J.P.; Brown G.D.; Gow N.A.R.; Erwig L.P.. Candida albicans Hypha Formation and Mannan Masking of β-Glucan Inhibit Macrophage Phagosome Maturation. MBio 5(5) (2014) e01874-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01874-14 https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01874-14.

[36] 

Davis S.E.; Hopke A.; Minkin S.C.; Montedonico A.E.; Wheeler R.T.; Reynolds T.B.. Masking of β(1-3)-Glucan in the Cell Wall of Candida albicans from Detection by Innate Immune Cells Depends on Phosphatidylserine. Infection and Immunity 82 (2014) 4405-4413. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01612-14 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01612-14.

[37] 

Soto E.R.; Caras A.C.; Kut L.C.; Castle M.K.; Ostroff G.R.. Glucan Particles for Macrophage Targeted Delivery of Nanoparticles. Journal of Drug Delivery 2012 (2012) 143524 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/143524 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/143524.

[38] 

Zhu L.; Lei Z.; Xia X.; Zhang Y.; Chen Y.; Wang B.; Li J.; Li G.; Yang G.; Cao G.; Yin Z.. Yeast Shells Encapsulating Adjuvant AS04 as an Antigen Delivery System for a Novel Vaccine against Toxoplasma Gondii. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (2021) 40415-40428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12366 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12366.

[39] 

Soto E.R.; Rus F.; Mirza Z.; Ostroff G.R.. Yeast Particles for Encapsulation of Terpenes and Essential Oils. Molecules 28 (2023) 2273. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052273 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052273.

[40] 

Pan Y.; Li X.; Kang T.; Meng H.; Chen Z.; Yang L.; Wu Y.; Wei Y.; Gou M.. Efficient delivery of antigen to DCs using yeast-derived microparticles. Scientific Reports 5 (2015) 10687. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10687 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10687.

[41] 

Soto E.R.; O’Connell O.; Dikengil F.; Peters P.J.; Clapham P.R.; Ostroff G.R.. Targeted Delivery of Glucan Particle Encapsulated Gallium Nanoparticles Inhibits HIV Growth in Human Macrophages. Journal of Drug Delivery 2016 (2016) 8520629. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8520629 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8520629.

[42] 

Hong Z.; Yu M.; Chen Z.; Guo W.; Wang J.; Feng Y.; Kong X.. Specifically targeted delivery of protein to&amp;nbsp;phagocytic macrophages. International Journal of Nanomedicine 10(10) (2015) 1743. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S75950 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S75950.

[43] 

Yang Z.; Xu M.; Jia Z.; Zhang Y.; Wang L.; Zhang H.; Wang J.; Song M.; Zhao Y.; Wu Z.; Zhao L.; Yin Z.; Hong Z.. A novel antigen delivery system induces strong humoral and CTL immune responses. Biomaterials 134 (2017) 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.035 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.035.

[44] 

Qiao W.; Ji S.; Zhao Y.; Hu T.. Conjugation of β-glucan markedly increase the immunogencity of meningococcal group Y polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. Vaccine 33 (2015) 2066-2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.045 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.045.

[45] 

Lee K.; Kwon Y.; Hwang J.; Choi Y.; Kim K.; Koo H.-J.; Seo Y.; Jeon H.; Choi J.. Synthesis and Functionalization of β-Glucan Particles for the Effective Delivery of Doxorubicin Molecules. ACS Omega 4 (2019) 668-674. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02712 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02712.

[46] 

Tan C.; Wang J.; Sun B.. Polysaccharide dual coating of yeast capsules for stabilization of anthocyanins. Food Chemistry 357 (2021) 129652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129652 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129652.

[47] 

Xie Y.; Hu X.; He H.; Xia F.; Ma Y.; Qi J.; Dong X.; Zhao W.; Lu Y.; Wu W.. Tracking translocation of glucan microparticles targeting M cells: implications for oral drug delivery. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 4 (2016) 2864-2873. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB02706C https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB02706C.

[48] 

Ostroff Gary, Tipper Donald. Yeast Cell Particles As Oral Delivery Vehicles For Antigens, US20080044438A1, 2007. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20080044438A1/en (accessed December 11, 2023).

[49] 

Chowdhury A.S.; Geetha Bai R.; Islam T.; Abir M.; Narayan M.; Khatun Z.; Nurunnabi M.. Bile acid linked β-glucan nanoparticles for liver specific oral delivery of biologics. Biomaterials Science 10 (2022) 2929-2939. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM00316C https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM00316C.

[50] 

Yang F.; Cheung P.C.K.. Fungal β-Glucan-Based Nanotherapeutics: From Fabrication to Application. Journal of Fungi 9 (2023) 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040475 https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040475.

[51] 

Hwang J.; Son J.; Seo Y.; Jo Y.; Lee K.; Lee D.; Khan M.S.; Chavan S.; Park C.; Sharma A.; Gilad A.A.; Choi J.. Functional silica nanoparticles conjugated with beta-glucan to deliver anti-tuberculosis drug molecules. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 58 (2018) 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.051 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.051.

[52] 

Plavcová Z.; Šalamúnová P.; Saloň I.; Štěpánek F.; Hanuš J.; Hošek J.. Curcumin encapsulation in yeast glucan particles promotes its anti-inflammatory potential in vitro. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 568 (2019) 118532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118532 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118532.

[53] 

Liu H.; Meng Z.; Wang H.; Zhang S.; Huang Z.; Geng X.; Guo R.; Wu Z.; Hong Z.. Robust Immune Responses Elicited by a Hybrid Adjuvant Based on β-Glucan Particles from Yeast for the Hepatitis B Vaccine. ACS Applied Bio Materials 4 (2021) 3614-3622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00111 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00111.

[54] 

Jing Z.; Wang S.; Xu K.; Tang Q.; Li W.; Zheng W.; Shi H.; Su K.; Liu Y.; Hong Z.. A Potent Micron Neoantigen Tumor Vaccine GP‐Neoantigen Induces Robust Antitumor Activity in Multiple Tumor Models. Advanced Science 9 (2022) 2201496. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201496 https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201496.

[55] 

Young S.-H.; Ostroff G.R.; Zeidler-Erdely P.C.; Roberts J.R.; Antonini J.M.; Castranova V.. A Comparison of the Pulmonary Inflammatory Potential of Different Components of Yeast Cell Wall*. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 70 (2007) 1116-1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390701212224 https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390701212224.

[56] 

Young S.; Rai R.; Nitin N.. Bioaccessibility of curcumin encapsulated in yeast cells and yeast cell wall particles. Food Chemistry 309 (2020) 125700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125700 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125700.

[57] 

De Smet R.; Demoor T.; Verschuere S.; Dullaers M.; Ostroff G.R.; Leclercq G.; Allais L.; Pilette C.; Dierendonck M.; De Geest B.G.; Cuvelier C.A.. β-Glucan microparticles are good candidates for mucosal antigen delivery in oral vaccination. Journal of Controlled Release 172 (2013) 671-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.007.

[58] 

Xu J.; Ma Q.; Zhang Y.; Fei Z.; Sun Y.; Fan Q.; Liu B.; Bai J.; Yu Y.; Chu J.; Chen J.; Wang C.. Yeast-derived nanoparticles remodel the immunosuppressive microenvironment in tumor and tumor-draining lymph nodes to suppress tumor growth. Nature Communications 13 (2022) 110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27750-2 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27750-2.

[59] 

Lei H.; Xie B.; Gao T.; Cen Q.; Ren Y.. Yeast display platform technology to prepare oral vaccine against lethal H7N9 virus challenge in mice. Microbial Cell Factories 19 (2020) 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01316-1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01316-1.

[60] 

Sabu C.; Raghav D.; Jijith U.S.; Mufeedha P.; Naseef P.P.; Rathinasamy K.; Pramod K.. Bioinspired oral insulin delivery system using yeast microcapsules. Materials Science and Engineering: C 103 (2019) 109753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109753 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109753.

[61] 

Mirza Z.; Soto E.R.; Dikengil F.; Levitz S.M.; Ostroff G.R.. Beta-Glucan Particles as Vaccine Adjuvant Carriers. In Vaccines for Invasive Fungal Infections, Springer (2017), pp. 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7104-6_11 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7104-6_11.

[62] 

Gow N.A.R.; Latge J.-P.; Munro C.A.. The Fungal Cell Wall: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function. Microbiology Spectrum 5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016 https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016.

[63] 

Angrand G.; Quillévéré A.; Loaëc N.; Daskalogianni C.; Granzhan A.; Teulade-Fichou M.-P.; Fahraeus R.; Prado Martins R.; Blondel M.. Sneaking Out for Happy Hour: Yeast-Based Approaches to Explore and Modulate Immune Response and Immune Evasion. Genes 10 (2019) 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090667 https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090667.

[64] 

Halder L.D.; Jo E.A.H.; Hasan M.Z.; Ferreira-Gomes M.; Krüger T.; Westermann M.; Palme D.I.; Rambach G.; Beyersdorf N.; Speth C.; Jacobsen I.D.; Kniemeyer O.; Jungnickel B.; Zipfel P.F.; Skerka C.. Immune modulation by complement receptor 3-dependent human monocyte TGF-β1-transporting vesicles. Nature Communications 11 (2020) 2331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16241-5 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16241-5.

[65] 

Levitz S.M.; Huang H.; Ostroff G.R.; Specht C.A.. Exploiting fungal cell wall components in vaccines. Seminars in Immunopathology 37 (2015) 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-014-0460-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-014-0460-6.

[66] 

Korolenko T.A.; Bgatova N.P.; Vetvicka V.. Glucan and Mannan—Two Peas in a Pod. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (2019) 3189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133189 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133189.

[67] 

Vendele I.; Willment J.A.; Silva L.M.; Palma A.S.; Chai W.; Liu Y.; Feizi T.; Spyrou M.; Stappers M.H.T.; Brown G.D.; Gow N.A.R.. Mannan detecting C-type lectin receptor probes recognise immune epitopes with diverse chemical, spatial and phylogenetic heterogeneity in fungal cell walls. PLOS Pathogens 16 (2020) e1007927. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007927 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007927.

[68] 

Hu X.; Zhang J.. Yeast capsules for targeted delivery: the future of nanotherapy? Nanomedicine 12 (2017) 955-957. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2017-0059 https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2017-0059.

[69] 

Soares E.; Cordeiro R.; Faneca H.; Borges O.. Polymeric nanoengineered HBsAg DNA vaccine designed in combination with β-glucan. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 122 (2019) 930-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.024.

[70] 

Hung C.-Y.; Zhang H.; Castro-Lopez N.; Ostroff G.R.; Khoshlenar P.; Abraham A.; Cole G.T.; Negron A.; Forsthuber T.; Peng T.; Galgiani J.N.; Ampel N.M.; Yu J.-J.. Glucan-Chitin Particles Enhance Th17 Response and Improve Protective Efficacy of a Multivalent Antigen (rCpa1) against Pulmonary Coccidioides posadasii Infection. Infection and Immunity 86 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00070-18 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00070-18.

[71] 

Cole G.T.; Hung C.-Y.; Sanderson S.D.; Hurtgen B.J.; Wüthrich M.; Klein B.S.; Deepe G.S.; Ostroff G.R.; Levitz S.M.. Novel Strategies to Enhance Vaccine Immunity against Coccidioidomycosis. PLoS Pathogens 9 (2013) e1003768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003768 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003768.

[72] 

Chaichian S.; Moazzami B.; Sadoughi F.; Haddad Kashani H.; Zaroudi M.; Asemi Z.. Functional activities of beta-glucans in the prevention or treatment of cervical cancer. Journal of Ovarian Research 13 (2020) 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00626-7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00626-7.

[73] 

Chan G.C.-F.; Chan W.K.; Sze D.M.-Y.. The effects of β-glucan on human immune and cancer cells. Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2 (2009) 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-2-25 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-2-25.

[74] 

Zhu Z.; He L.; Bai Y.; Xia L.; Sun X.; Qi C.. Yeast β-glucan modulates macrophages and improves antitumor NK-cell responses in cancer. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 214 (2023) 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/cei/uxad080 https://doi.org/10.1093/cei/uxad080.

[75] 

Cheng H.; Sun L.; Shen D.; Ren A.; Ma F.; Tai G.; Fan L.; Zhou Y.. Beta-1,6 glucan converts tumor-associated macrophages into an M1-like phenotype. Carbohydrate Polymers 247 (2020) 116715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116715 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116715.

[76] 

Geller A.; Shrestha R.; Yan J.. Yeast-Derived β-Glucan in Cancer: Novel Uses of a Traditional Therapeutic. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (2019) 3618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153618 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153618.

[77] 

Ahadian S.; Finbloom J.A.; Mofidfar M.; Diltemiz S.E.; Nasrollahi F.; Davoodi E.; Hosseini V.; Mylonaki I.; Sangabathuni S.; Montazerian H.; Fetah K.; Nasiri R.; Dokmeci M.R.; Stevens M.M.; Desai T.A.; Khademhosseini A.. Micro and nanoscale technologies in oral drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 157 (2020) 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.012.

[78] 

Zhang B.; Pan H.; Chen Z.; Yin T.; Zheng M.; Cai L.. Twin-bioengine self-adaptive micro/nanorobots using enzyme actuation and macrophage relay for gastrointestinal inflammation therapy. Science Advances 9(9) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adc8978 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adc8978.

[79] 

Wu Y.; Li P.; Jiang Z.; Sun X.; He H.; Yan P.; Xu Y.; Liu Y.. Bioinspired yeast-based β-glucan system for oral drug delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers 319 (2023) 121163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121163.

[80] 

Soto E.R.; Specht C.A.; Rus F.; Lee C.K.; Abraham A.; Levitz S.M.; Ostroff G.R.. An efficient (nano) silica - In glucan particles protein encapsulation approach for improved thermal stability. Journal of Controlled Release 357 (2023) 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.027.

[81] 

Soto E.R.; Specht C.A.; Lee C.K.; Levitz S.M.; Ostroff G.R.. One Step Purification—Vaccine Delivery System. Pharmaceutics 15 (2023) 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051390 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051390.

[82] 

Yang F.; Meng L.; Lin S.; Wu F.; Liu J.. Polyethyleneimine-complexed charge-reversed yeast cell walls for the enhanced oral delivery of pseudovirus-based antigens. Chemical Communications 57 (2021) 12768-12771. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC04901A https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC04901A.

[83] 

Aouadi M.; Tesz G.J.; Nicoloro S.M.; Wang M.; Chouinard M.; Soto E.; Ostroff G.R.; Czech M.P.. Orally delivered siRNA targeting macrophage Map4k4 suppresses systemic inflammation. Nature 458 (2009) 1180-1184. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07774 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07774.

[84] 

Liu H.; Jia Z.; Yang C.; Song M.; Jing Z.; Zhao Y.; Wu Z.; Zhao L.; Wei D.; Yin Z.; Hong Z.. Aluminum hydroxide colloid vaccine encapsulated in yeast shells with enhanced humoral and cellular immune responses. Biomaterials 167 (2018) 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.014.

[85] 

Zhang X.; Xu X.; Chen Y.; Dou Y.; Zhou X.; Li L.; Li C.; An H.; Tao H.; Hu H.; Li X.; Zhang J.. Bioinspired yeast microcapsules loaded with self-assembled nanotherapies for targeted treatment of cardiovascular disease. Materials Today 20 (2017) 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.05.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.05.006.

[86] 

Cohen J.L.; Shen Y.; Aouadi M.; Vangala P.; Tencerova M.; Amano S.U.; Nicoloro S.M.; Yawe J.C.; Czech M.P.. Peptide- and Amine-Modified Glucan Particles for the Delivery of Therapeutic siRNA. Molecular Pharmaceutics 13 (2016) 964-978. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00831 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00831.

[87] 

Sabu C.; Raghav D.; Jijith U.S.; Mufeedha P.; Naseef P.P.; Rathinasamy K.; Pramod K.. Bioinspired oral insulin delivery system using yeast microcapsules. Materials Science and Engineering C 103 (2019) 109753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109753 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109753.

[88] 

Liu D.; Lu S.; Zhang L.; Zhang L.; Ji M.; Liu X.-G.; Yu Z.; Liu R.. A biomimetic yeast shell vaccine coated with layered double hydroxides induces a robust humoral and cellular immune response against tumors. Nanoscale Advances 2 (2020) 3494-3506. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00249F https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00249F.

[89] 

Lei Z.; Zhu L.; Pan P.; Ruan Z.; Gu Y.; Xia X.; Wang S.; Ge W.; Yao Y.; Luo F.; Xiao H.; Guo J.; Ding Q.; Yin Z.; Li Y.; Luo Z.; Zhang Q.; Chen X.; Wu J.. A vaccine delivery system promotes strong immune responses against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. Journal of Medical Virology 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28475 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28475.

[90] 

Vreeland T.J.; Clifton G.T.; Hale D.F.; Chick R.C.; Hickerson A.T.; Cindass J.L.; Adams A.M.; Bohan P.M.K.; Andtbacka R.H.I.; Berger A.C.; Jakub J.W.; Sussman J.J.; Terando A.M.; Wagner T.; Peoples G.E.; Faries M.B.. A Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial of the TLPLDC Vaccine as Adjuvant Therapy After Surgical Resection of Stage III/IV Melanoma: A Primary Analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology 28 (2021) 6126-6137. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09709-1 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09709-1.

[91] 

Austriaco N.. Yeast oral vaccines against infectious diseases. Frontiers in Microbiology 14 (2023) e28475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1150412 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1150412.

[92] 

Zhang L.; Peng H.; Zhang W.; Li Y.; Liu L.; Leng T.. Yeast Cell wall Particle mediated Nanotube-RNA delivery system loaded with miR365 Antagomir for Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Therapy via Oral Route. Theranostics 10 (2020) 8479-8493. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.46761 https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.46761.

[93] 

Scariot D.B.; Volpato H.; Fernandes N.S.; Lazarin-Bidóia D.; Borges O.; Sousa M. do C.; Rosa F.A.; Jacomini A.P.; Silva S.O.; Ueda-Nakamura T.; Rubira A.F.; Nakamura C. V.. Oral treatment with T6-loaded yeast cell wall particles reduces the parasitemia in murine visceral leishmaniasis model. Scientific Reports 9 (2019) 20080. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56647-w https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56647-w.

[94] 

Yan J.; Allendorf D.J.; Brandley B.. Yeast whole glucan particle (WGP) β-glucan in conjunction with antitumour monoclonal antibodies to treat cancer. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 5 (2005) 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.5.5.691 https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.5.5.691.

[95] 

Pu Y.; Fan X.; Zhang Z.; Guo Z.; Pan Q.; Gao W.; Luo K.; He B.. Harnessing polymer-derived drug delivery systems for combating inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Controlled Release 354 (2023) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.044 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.044.

[96] 

Muthusamy N.; Haldar S.; Ghosh T.K.; Bedford M.R.. Effects of hydrolysed Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and yeast cell wall components on live performance, intestinal histo-morphology and humoral immune response of broilers. British Poultry Science 52 (2011) 694-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.633072 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.633072.

[97] 

Bi S.; Zhang J.; Qu Y.; Zhou B.; He X.; Ni J.. Yeast cell wall product enhanced intestinal IgA response and changed cecum microflora species after oral vaccination in chickens. Poultry Science 99 (2020) 6576-6585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.075 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.075.

[98] 

Bi S.; Zhang J.; Zhang L.; Huang K.; Li J.; Cao L.. Yeast cell wall upregulated cell-mediated immune responses to Newcastle disease virus vaccine. Poultry Science 101 (2022) 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101712 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101712.

[99] 

Cordeiro A.S.; Farsakoglu Y.; Crecente-Campo J.; de la Fuente M.; González S.F.; Alonso M.J.. Carboxymethyl-β-glucan/chitosan nanoparticles: new thermostable and efficient carriers for antigen delivery. Drug Delivery and Translational Research 11 (2021) 1689-1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-00968-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-00968-9.

[100] 

Lima T.; Gunnarsson S.B.; Coelho E.; Evtuguin D. V.; Correia A.; Coimbra M.A.; Cedervall T.; Vilanova M.. β-Glucan-Functionalized Nanoparticles Down-Modulate the Proinflammatory Response of Mononuclear Phagocytes Challenged with Candida albicans. Nanomaterials 12 (2022) 2475. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142475 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142475.

[101] 

Colaço M.; Marques A.P.; Jesus S.; Duarte A.; Borges O.. Safe-by-Design of Glucan Nanoparticles: Size Matters When Assessing the Immunotoxicity. Chemical Research in Toxicology 33 (2020) 915-932. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00467 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00467.

[102] 

Chen H.; Sun Y.; Xu X.; Ye Q.. Targeted delivery of methotrexate by modified yeast β-glucan nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Carbohydrate Polymers 284 (2022) 119183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119183.

[103] 

Zhang M.; Kim J.A.; Huang A.Y.-C.. Optimizing Tumor Microenvironment for Cancer Immunotherapy: β-Glucan-Based Nanoparticles. Frontiers in Immunology 9 (2018) 341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00341 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00341.

[104] 

Donini M.; Pettinella F.; Zanella G.; Gaglio S.C.; Laudanna C.; Jimenez-Carretero M.; Jimenez-Lopez C.; Perduca M.; Dusi S.. Effects of Magnetic Nanoparticles on the Functional Activity of Human Monocytes and Dendritic Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 (2023) 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021358 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021358.

[105] 

Su Y.; Yang F.; Wang M.; Cheung P.C.K.. Cancer immunotherapeutic effect of carboxymethylated β-d-glucan coupled with iron oxide nanoparticles via reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 228 (2023) 692-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.154.

[106] 

Hamza Z.K.; Hathout A.S.; Ostroff G.; Soto E.; Sabry B.A.; El‐Hashash M.A.; Hassan N.S.; Aly S.E.. Assessment of the protective effect of yeast cell wall β‐glucan encapsulating humic acid nanoparticles as an aflatoxin B 1 adsorbent in vivo. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 36 (2022) e22941. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22941 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22941.

[107] 

Zhang R.; Qin X.; Lu J.; Xu H.; Zhao S.; Li X.; Yang C.; Kong L.; Guo Y.; Zhang Z.. Chemodynamic/Photothermal Synergistic Cancer Immunotherapy Based on Yeast Microcapsule-Derived Au/Pt Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (2023) 24134-24148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c02646 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c02646.

[108] 

Liu Z.; Lian W.; Long Q.; Cheng R.; Torrieri G.; Zhang B.; Koivuniemi A.; Mahmoudzadeh M.; Bunker A.; Gao H.; He H.; Chen Y.; Hirvonen J.; Zhou R.; Zhao Q.; Ye X.; Deng X.; Santos H.A.. Promoting Cardiac Repair through Simple Engineering of Nanoparticles with Exclusive Targeting Capability toward Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Thermal Resistant Microfluidic Platform. Advanced Functional Materials 32 (2022) 2204666. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202204666 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202204666.


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.