Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.25.75.8

Separatory Confusion Does Not Corrupt

Alexandru Radulescu orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-4397 ; University of Missouri, Columbia, USA


Full text: english pdf 150 Kb

page 425-437

downloads: 86

cite


Abstract

If I am confused, and I think two people are one and the same, that may impair my ability to refer to either of them. This is combinatory confusion. What if I am confused, and think that one person is actually two people? This is separatory confusion, and it seems quite different. After all, even in my confusion, my thoughts and my referential devices seem to track back to a single individual. Unnsteinsson has recently argued that both types of confusion corrupt, i.e. they may prevent us from referring the right way. In this paper, I examine the four arguments he offers for this conclusion, and I argue that the intuitive view that separatory confusion does not corrupt can withstand his challenge.

Keywords

Demonstratives; reference; intentionalism; objectivism.

Hrčak ID:

343194

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/343194

Publication date:

13.1.2026.

Visits: 208 *