Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

DALMATIAN STATUTE LAW AND THE QUESTION OF DENYING JUDICIARY AND RIGHT

Željko Radić


Full text: croatian pdf 100 Kb

page 345-358

downloads: 1.355

cite


Abstract

In this paper, it is shown that Dalmatian statute law in principle did not allow the possibility of denying judiciary (i.e court proceedings) nor right (i.e court decisions) upon observation of lack of legal foundation for making a court decision or because of judge/s’ priori belief in a lack of legal grounding for the lawsuit. Similarly, denying right (i.e court decisions) was not allowed with the excuse of unclear regulations or factual questions. In general, the position of Dalmatian statutes was often shown indirectly in the formula of judges’ oaths that proceedings would always commence when such was requested in the prescribed way, and that they would be meritoriously completed with either a conviction or an acquittal. The judgement had to be founded fi rstly on statutory regulations and, in the absence of such, on subsidiary sources which were often divided according to a strict hierarchy.

Keywords

statutes; statutory law; denying judiciary and right; subsidiary legal sources; hierarchy of legal sources

Hrčak ID:

31301

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/31301

Publication date:

15.9.2008.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.564 *