Meeting abstract
Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation
M. Krmpotić
Full text: croatian pdf 49 Kb
page 354-354
downloads: 644
cite
APA 6th Edition
Krmpotić, M. (2003). Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37 (3), 354-354. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
MLA 8th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 37, no. 3, 2003, pp. 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. Accessed 18 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica 37, no. 3 (2003): 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
Harvard
Krmpotić, M. (2003). 'Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37(3), pp. 354-354. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417 (Accessed 18 December 2024)
Vancouver
Krmpotić M. Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2024 December 18];37(3):354-354. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
IEEE
M. Krmpotić, "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.37, no. 3, pp. 354-354, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. [Accessed: 18 December 2024]
Full text: english pdf 49 Kb
page 354-354
downloads: 508
cite
APA 6th Edition
Krmpotić, M. (2003). Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37 (3), 354-354. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
MLA 8th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 37, no. 3, 2003, pp. 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. Accessed 18 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica 37, no. 3 (2003): 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
Harvard
Krmpotić, M. (2003). 'Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37(3), pp. 354-354. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417 (Accessed 18 December 2024)
Vancouver
Krmpotić M. Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2024 December 18];37(3):354-354. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
IEEE
M. Krmpotić, "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.37, no. 3, pp. 354-354, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. [Accessed: 18 December 2024]
Abstract
The problem of low alveolar recessus of maxillar sinus is the most frequent limiting factor when implanting dental implants in distal portions of the maxilla. The aim of the sinus lift procedure is to gain enough alveolar bone in vertical dimension.There are several methods of sinus lift operation. In this presentation two of the most often used methods are described and compared on the basis of own clinical experience. First is the so-called, classic opened method via vestibular approach to the frontal wall of the maxilla, followed by the trepanation of bone and preparation of sinus mucosa, augmentation of the sinus floor and immediate implantation of the dental implant. Second is the so-called, closed method of transalveolar condensation of sinus floor via implant preparation in the alveolar ridge, using special bone condensors. The implant is positioned in the same procedure.One patient treated by classic opened method and 5 more treated by closed transalveolar mehod are presented. The surgical procedures are described for both methods. The advantages and disadvantages are debated.The conclusion of this presentation is that both methods are of equal clinical value and complementary in many ways. It is necessary to be well trained in using both methods when dealing with advanced dental implantology.
Keywords
Hrčak ID:
3417
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
Publication date:
15.9.2003.
Article data in other languages:
croatian
Visits: 2.368
*
