Sažetak sa skupa
Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation
M. Krmpotić
Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 49 Kb
str. 354-354
preuzimanja: 644
citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Krmpotić, M. (2003). Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37 (3), 354-354. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
MLA 8th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 37, br. 3, 2003, str. 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. Citirano 18.12.2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica 37, br. 3 (2003): 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
Harvard
Krmpotić, M. (2003). 'Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37(3), str. 354-354. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417 (Datum pristupa: 18.12.2024.)
Vancouver
Krmpotić M. Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2003 [pristupljeno 18.12.2024.];37(3):354-354. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
IEEE
M. Krmpotić, "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.37, br. 3, str. 354-354, 2003. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. [Citirano: 18.12.2024.]
Puni tekst: engleski pdf 49 Kb
str. 354-354
preuzimanja: 508
citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Krmpotić, M. (2003). Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37 (3), 354-354. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
MLA 8th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 37, br. 3, 2003, str. 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. Citirano 18.12.2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krmpotić, M.. "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation." Acta stomatologica Croatica 37, br. 3 (2003): 354-354. https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
Harvard
Krmpotić, M. (2003). 'Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 37(3), str. 354-354. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417 (Datum pristupa: 18.12.2024.)
Vancouver
Krmpotić M. Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2003 [pristupljeno 18.12.2024.];37(3):354-354. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
IEEE
M. Krmpotić, "Elevation of the Sinus Floor- Classic Opened Method Via Vestibular Approach vs. Closed Method by Transalveolar Bone Condensation", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.37, br. 3, str. 354-354, 2003. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417. [Citirano: 18.12.2024.]
Sažetak
The problem of low alveolar recessus of maxillar sinus is the most frequent limiting factor when implanting dental implants in distal portions of the maxilla. The aim of the sinus lift procedure is to gain enough alveolar bone in vertical dimension.There are several methods of sinus lift operation. In this presentation two of the most often used methods are described and compared on the basis of own clinical experience. First is the so-called, classic opened method via vestibular approach to the frontal wall of the maxilla, followed by the trepanation of bone and preparation of sinus mucosa, augmentation of the sinus floor and immediate implantation of the dental implant. Second is the so-called, closed method of transalveolar condensation of sinus floor via implant preparation in the alveolar ridge, using special bone condensors. The implant is positioned in the same procedure.One patient treated by classic opened method and 5 more treated by closed transalveolar mehod are presented. The surgical procedures are described for both methods. The advantages and disadvantages are debated.The conclusion of this presentation is that both methods are of equal clinical value and complementary in many ways. It is necessary to be well trained in using both methods when dealing with advanced dental implantology.
Ključne riječi
Hrčak ID:
3417
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/3417
Datum izdavanja:
15.9.2003.
Podaci na drugim jezicima:
hrvatski
Posjeta: 2.368
*