Skip to the main content

Review article

Benacerraf on Mathematical Knowledge

Vladimir Drekalović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-9046-1596 ; Univerzitet Crne Gore, Filozofski fakultet, Nikšić, Crna Gora


Full text: croatian pdf 157 Kb

page 97-121

downloads: 1.046

cite


Abstract

Causal theory of knowledge has been used by some theoreticians who, dealing with the philosophy of mathematics, touched the subject of mathematical knowledge. Some of them discuss the necessity of the causal condition for justification, which creates the grounds for renewing the old conflict between empiricists and rationalists. Emphasizing the condition of causality as necessary for justifiability, causal theory has provided stimulus for the contemporary empiricists to venture on the so far unquestioned cognitive foundations of mathematics. However, in what sense can we speak about the justifiability as causality when it comes to mathematical knowledge? Can we justify the mathematical statement 2+2=4 by means of causality-perceptibility? Do we need perceptibility, a visual image of apples and marbles we add up in our first mathematics lesson, in order to know that statement? Does the same go with the statement that any two points can be joined by a straight line, and that the sum of angles in any triangle is the angle the measure of which equals the sum of the measures of the two right angles? Even though the major part of this article offers a review of the attitudes of various authors who endeavor to discuss the application of the causal theory to the problem of understanding of mathematical knowledge, it advocates the idea that knowledge expressed in a mathematical statement is acquired and transmitted by evidence. Evidence is by itself a guarantee of truth. It convinces us of the accuracy of mathematical truths. Proving, we find out. The greatest part of what we know (claim to know) is based on evidence of the previous knowledge (claims). Due to the previous knowledge, we can say that knowledge in mathematics is in itself different from the knowledge in empirical sciences, i.e. it does not require causal relation that is considered necessary condition of knowing in those sciences.

Keywords

Benacerraf; causality; evidence; knowledge; mathematics

Hrčak ID:

54608

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/54608

Publication date:

29.6.2010.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.524 *