Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 21 No. 1, 2006.
Original scientific paper
“Man is Only Human When at Play”. Friedrich Schiller’s Ideas Concerning the “Aesthetical Education of Man” and Maria Montessori’s Thoughts on Pedagogics
Gesine Dörnberg
Abstract
In Schiller’s opinion, to play means to act free from the force of need as well as of duty and thus to enjoy liberation from necessity. It is this experience of freedom that links play with the aesthetical phenomenon of beauty and causes its high educational value. The quality that we call beauty represents the same lightness of spirit as the game does. In the beautiful work of art, the material is not dominated by the form or vice versa. The work of art shows a free play between form and matter, between beauty and necessity, and thus represents the highest kind of play. Games are steps on the way to beauty, because they educate the player to enjoy the freedom of creativity.
Contrary to Schiller’s position, Montessori refuses play as a means of education. She holds that children have to work in order to find their way in the difficulties of reality. But in studying her methods one realizes that there are many elements of that freedom which Schiller attributes to play. Children can chose the things with which they “work”. They are not forced to use them in exactly the same way that the nurse has shown them. And most important: the children enjoy their “work” thoroughly.
In my paper I will first explain Schiller’s thoughts on education by play with special emphasis on the phenomenon of fantasy. In the second part of my paper I will discuss the question whether it is true to say that Montessori refuses fantasy as a means of education.
Keywords
Friedrich Schiller; play; aesthetical education; Maria Montessori; freedom of creativity
Hrčak ID:
5916
URI
Publication date:
3.7.2006.
Visits: 28.632 *