Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.69.3.02

Philosophical Background of the Condictio Claims in Classical Roman Law

Henrik-Riko Held orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6217-2655 ; Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 351 Kb

str. 347-375

preuzimanja: 898

citiraj


Sažetak

In this article the author analyses the problem of the philosophical background of the condictio claims in classical Roman law from three different aspects. First he deals with the issue of the apparent origins of the philosophical principles and concepts associated with condictio claims in sources such as ius naturale, aequitas, natura, etc. After dismissing the possibility of their postclassical origin, the focus of the analysis shifts to the possible influences of certain Greek philosophical schools on them, namely the Peripatetics and the Stoics. Finally, the actual reach of such influence is discussed.

Ključne riječi

condictio; unjustified enrichment; ius naturale; aequitas; Roman law

Hrčak ID:

222627

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/222627

Datum izdavanja:

10.7.2019.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 2.830 *