hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

Limits of Eidetic Dominance

Janko M. Lozar   ORCID icon ; Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta, Slovenija

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (345 KB) str. 539-549 preuzimanja: 372* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Lozar, J.M. (2013). Granice eidetske vladavine. Filozofska istraživanja, 33 (3), 539-549. Preuzeto s
MLA 8th Edition
Lozar, Janko M.. "Granice eidetske vladavine." Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 33, br. 3, 2013, str. 539-549. Citirano 18.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Lozar, Janko M.. "Granice eidetske vladavine." Filozofska istraživanja 33, br. 3 (2013): 539-549.
Lozar, J.M. (2013). 'Granice eidetske vladavine', Filozofska istraživanja, 33(3), str. 539-549. Preuzeto s: (Datum pristupa: 18.06.2021.)
Lozar JM. Granice eidetske vladavine. Filozofska istraživanja [Internet]. 2013 [pristupljeno 18.06.2021.];33(3):539-549. Dostupno na:
J.M. Lozar, "Granice eidetske vladavine", Filozofska istraživanja, vol.33, br. 3, str. 539-549, 2013. [Online]. Dostupno na: [Citirano: 18.06.2021.]

Eidetic dominance of Husserl’s philosophy is first and foremost evinced in transcendental subject’s relation to time and history. The dominance of eidetics further evinces the sovereignty of the subject, who can reach the level of the extratemporal and ahistorical as the highest, purest being of the pure ego. With his sixth Cartesian meditation, Eugen Fink, Husserl’s assistant, convincingly shows how transcendental constitution in its activity cannot be purely pure exactly because it experiences the rub of the constitution of the nothing of beings. And with it there opens up the arena of Heidegger’s philosophy of being, which is actually anchored in the reflection on this very nothing of beings.

Ključne riječi
eidetic dominance; transcendental method; ontological difference; history; Eugen Fink; Martin Heidegger; Edmund Husserl

Hrčak ID: 117095



Posjeta: 599 *