APA 6th Edition Kalanj, R. (1996). MOĆ I NEMOĆ LJUDSKIH PRAVA. Socijalna ekologija, 5 (1), 47-63. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/141413
MLA 8th Edition Kalanj, Rade. "MOĆ I NEMOĆ LJUDSKIH PRAVA." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 5, br. 1, 1996, str. 47-63. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141413. Citirano 11.07.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Kalanj, Rade. "MOĆ I NEMOĆ LJUDSKIH PRAVA." Socijalna ekologija 5, br. 1 (1996): 47-63. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141413
Harvard Kalanj, R. (1996). 'MOĆ I NEMOĆ LJUDSKIH PRAVA', Socijalna ekologija, 5(1), str. 47-63. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141413 (Datum pristupa: 11.07.2020.)
Vancouver Kalanj R. MOĆ I NEMOĆ LJUDSKIH PRAVA. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 1996 [pristupljeno 11.07.2020.];5(1):47-63. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141413
IEEE R. Kalanj, "MOĆ I NEMOĆ LJUDSKIH PRAVA", Socijalna ekologija, vol.5, br. 1, str. 47-63, 1996. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141413. [Citirano: 11.07.2020.]
Sažetak Starting from the conclusion that modern time can be characterized as “the age of human rights”, this paper makes enquiries about the genesis of the discourse on human rights and tries to answer the question whether their power grows or declines. AN answer to the question results from the structural analysis of the typical “discourse formations” through which human thought on human rights has gone through. In this respect, it we can converse about four typical discourses: the discourse of founding universalism (the age of French and American declaration), the socially differentiated discourse of industrial development, the discourse of large mobilizations and bloc power structures, and the discourse of globalization and singularity. Apart from this, the paper especially draws attention to the status of human rights in the sociological science and shows that sociology in this field falls behind other social sciences. From the mentioned analyses follows a conclusion that human rights are constantly branching out, that their field is widening, but that they loose substantiality they had at the age of the founding ideas. The instrumental (institutional) power of human rights grows, and there is more and more less ideas about their ontologically set essence. This is the result of the modern societies instrumental power growth.