APA 6th Edition Jožanc, N. (2015). Studija slučaja u komparativnoj politici. Politička misao, 52 (3), 35-58. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/154647
MLA 8th Edition Jožanc, Nikolina. "Studija slučaja u komparativnoj politici." Politička misao, vol. 52, br. 3, 2015, str. 35-58. https://hrcak.srce.hr/154647. Citirano 30.05.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Jožanc, Nikolina. "Studija slučaja u komparativnoj politici." Politička misao 52, br. 3 (2015): 35-58. https://hrcak.srce.hr/154647
Harvard Jožanc, N. (2015). 'Studija slučaja u komparativnoj politici', Politička misao, 52(3), str. 35-58. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/154647 (Datum pristupa: 30.05.2020.)
Vancouver Jožanc N. Studija slučaja u komparativnoj politici. Politička misao [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 30.05.2020.];52(3):35-58. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/154647
IEEE N. Jožanc, "Studija slučaja u komparativnoj politici", Politička misao, vol.52, br. 3, str. 35-58, 2015. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/154647. [Citirano: 30.05.2020.]
Sažetak Paradoxical status of case studies in social sciences is particularly evident in comparative politics, where theoretical relevance of a case study method is repeatedly undermined despite the overwhelming amount of empirical research that employs it. For this reason, the paper explores under which conditions a single case study can be defined as a method of comparative politics, as well as its specific strengths and weaknesses for theory development in comparative politics. The first part of the paper tries to clarify definitional disputes
which contribute to unjustifiable dismissals of case study as a comparative method. The second part examines in more detail the potential contribution of case studies in accomplishing the goals of comparative research. Arguments put forward in both parts of the paper point to positive evaluation of case study as a legitimate method of comparative politics.