APA 6th Edition Šokčević, Š. (2016). Teologija i ideja sveučilišnog obrazovanja. Obnovljeni Život, 71. (2.), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.71.2.6
MLA 8th Edition Šokčević, Šimo. "Teologija i ideja sveučilišnog obrazovanja." Obnovljeni Život, vol. 71., br. 2., 2016, str. 217-229. https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.71.2.6. Citirano 28.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Šokčević, Šimo. "Teologija i ideja sveučilišnog obrazovanja." Obnovljeni Život 71., br. 2. (2016): 217-229. https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.71.2.6
Harvard Šokčević, Š. (2016). 'Teologija i ideja sveučilišnog obrazovanja', Obnovljeni Život, 71.(2.), str. 217-229. https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.71.2.6
Vancouver Šokčević Š. Teologija i ideja sveučilišnog obrazovanja. Obnovljeni Život [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 28.11.2020.];71.(2.):217-229. https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.71.2.6
IEEE Š. Šokčević, "Teologija i ideja sveučilišnog obrazovanja", Obnovljeni Život, vol.71., br. 2., str. 217-229, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.71.2.6
Sažetak This article is a reflection on the crisis in modern education and attempts to offer guidelines for overcoming it. The first section analyzes the essence of education and makes evident that, in the context of modern trends, it is no longer viable today to speak of education, but rather of half–education. Half–education is particular in
its approach for it does not encompass the integral vision of theoretical and practical knowledge which is the essence of education. By contrast, John Henry Newman spoke of the importance of the integral approach, and it is his vision of education
that is the central theme of this paper. His idea involves the key role that theology plays in education as »a form of liberal knowledge«, and this is the theme of the second section of the article. Here we explore the causes for the marginalization of theology at universities and conclude that it is in the discreditation of theology that
the source of the contemporary crisis in education should be sought.