hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper

Comparison of two versions of the implicit association test for power motive measurement

Maja Parmač Kovačić ; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Zvonimir Galić   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-0975 ; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Marija Kušan ; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Fulltext: croatian, pdf (364 KB) pages 175-189 downloads: 192* cite
APA 6th Edition
Parmač Kovačić, M., Galić, Z. & Kušan, M. (2015). Usporedba dvije verzije testa implicitnih asocijacija za mjerenje motiva za moći. Suvremena psihologija, 18 (2), 175-189. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818
MLA 8th Edition
Parmač Kovačić, Maja, et al. "Usporedba dvije verzije testa implicitnih asocijacija za mjerenje motiva za moći." Suvremena psihologija, vol. 18, no. 2, 2015, pp. 175-189. https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818. Accessed 26 Aug. 2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Parmač Kovačić, Maja, Zvonimir Galić and Marija Kušan. "Usporedba dvije verzije testa implicitnih asocijacija za mjerenje motiva za moći." Suvremena psihologija 18, no. 2 (2015): 175-189. https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818
Harvard
Parmač Kovačić, M., Galić, Z., and Kušan, M. (2015). 'Usporedba dvije verzije testa implicitnih asocijacija za mjerenje motiva za moći', Suvremena psihologija, 18(2), pp. 175-189. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818 (Accessed 26 August 2019)
Vancouver
Parmač Kovačić M, Galić Z, Kušan M. Usporedba dvije verzije testa implicitnih asocijacija za mjerenje motiva za moći. Suvremena psihologija [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 August 26];18(2):175-189. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818
IEEE
M. Parmač Kovačić, Z. Galić and M. Kušan, "Usporedba dvije verzije testa implicitnih asocijacija za mjerenje motiva za moći", Suvremena psihologija, vol.18, no. 2, pp. 175-189, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818. [Accessed: 26 August 2019]

Abstracts
The aim of the study was to compare the validity of two versions of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) for implicit power motive measurement. In the first IAT version we used natural antonyms “power” and “non-Power” and in the second IAT more equally
desirable categories “dominance” and “cooperation”. The study was conducted on a sample of psychology students (N=73). In addition to the data on two IATs, we collected self-ratings on an explicit measure of power motive, two measures of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and peer-ratings of dominance. Though both IAT versions
showed satisfactory reliability, the IAT “dominance-cooperation” seemed as a more valid measure of implicit power motive. Compared to the IAT “power-nonPower” which had no significant correlations with the other measures used, the IAT “dominance-cooperation” had significant and moderately high correlations with both the
self-ratings and the ratings of dominance and the two measures of intrinsic motivation.

Keywords
Implicit Association Test; power motive; implicit motives; explicit motives

Hrčak ID: 169818

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818

[croatian]

Visits: 380 *