hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10

ANTICHRESIS DE LEGE FERENDA

Ines Matić   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-8445 ; University of Rijeka, Faculty of Law, Rijeka, Croatia
Anamari Petranović ; University of Rijeka, Faculty of Law, Rijeka, Croatia

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (304 KB) str. 261-284 preuzimanja: 353* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Matić, I. i Petranović, A. (2019). ANTIHREZA DE LEGE FERENDA. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 40 (1), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10
MLA 8th Edition
Matić, Ines i Anamari Petranović. "ANTIHREZA DE LEGE FERENDA." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol. 40, br. 1, 2019, str. 261-284. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10. Citirano 18.09.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Matić, Ines i Anamari Petranović. "ANTIHREZA DE LEGE FERENDA." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 40, br. 1 (2019): 261-284. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10
Harvard
Matić, I., i Petranović, A. (2019). 'ANTIHREZA DE LEGE FERENDA', Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 40(1), str. 261-284. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10
Vancouver
Matić I, Petranović A. ANTIHREZA DE LEGE FERENDA. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 18.09.2021.];40(1):261-284. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10
IEEE
I. Matić i A. Petranović, "ANTIHREZA DE LEGE FERENDA", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol.40, br. 1, str. 261-284, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.1.10

Sažetak
The Croatian Act on Ownership and Other Real Rights, Article 329 (paragraph 1) prohibits a mortgage lender from possessing and using the immovable property that is the subject of a mortgage, including the collection of fruits or other benefits from referring subject, further prescribing (paragraph 2) as null and void provision of opposite contractual order. Consequently, by this provision Croatian legislative
platform does prohibit pactum antichreticum, while antichresis, as an independent contract, is not (co)existant. The aim of this paper is to examine the potential advantages in regulation of the institute of antichresis and / or pactum antichreticum that is considering Croatian law de lege ferenda. For this purpose, the first part of the paper provides the functionally summarized historical legal analysis of these
institutes that propedeutically support the comparative analysis of their position in contemporary law, which has been examined in the second part of the paper, leading to their conclusive evaluation and affirmation of their potential benefits and practical advantages.

Ključne riječi
antichresis; pactum antichreticum; Roman law; Act on Ownership and Other real Rights; security rights; settlement of claims

Hrčak ID: 219392

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/219392

[hrvatski] [njemački] [talijanski]

Posjeta: 738 *