hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1

INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION

Jurij Toplak ; Faculty of Law, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
Boštjan Brezovnik ; Faculty of Law, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (457 KB) str. 1-8 preuzimanja: 196* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Toplak, J. i Brezovnik, B. (2019). INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION. Informatologia, 52 (1-2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1
MLA 8th Edition
Toplak, Jurij i Boštjan Brezovnik. "INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION." Informatologia, vol. 52, br. 1-2, 2019, str. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1. Citirano 25.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Toplak, Jurij i Boštjan Brezovnik. "INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION." Informatologia 52, br. 1-2 (2019): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1
Harvard
Toplak, J., i Brezovnik, B. (2019). 'INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION', Informatologia, 52(1-2), str. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1
Vancouver
Toplak J, Brezovnik B. INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION. Informatologia [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 25.09.2020.];52(1-2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1
IEEE
J. Toplak i B. Brezovnik, "INFORMATION DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED: LENGTHY PROCEDURES DENY THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION", Informatologia, vol.52, br. 1-2, str. 1-8, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.52.1-2.1

Sažetak
European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2016 that the European Convention on Human Rights includes a right to access information held by public authorities. While according to international documents the procedures for accessing information should be ‘rapid’, the courts have yet to rule on what ‘rapid’ means and when the procedures are so long that they violate rights of those asking for information. This article analyses the length of proceedings in access to information cases in Slovenia and Croatia. It shows that these two countries do not have a system of effective protection of rights because the authorities can easily delay disclosure of information for several years. It argues that lengthy procedures violate the right to access the information and the freedom of expression. It then presents solutions for improving access to information procedures in order for them to become ‘rapid’.

Ključne riječi
freedom of information; access to information; transparency; right to know; reasonable time; European Convention on Human Rights; Slovenia; Croatia

Hrčak ID: 222945

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/222945

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 414 *