A philosophical argument for the beginning of time
Jacobus Erasmus
; School of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, North-West University Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
Laureano Luna
orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-4084
; IES “Doctor Francisco Marin”, Siles, Jaén, Spain
APA 6th Edition Erasmus, J. i Luna, L. (2020). A philosophical argument for the beginning of time. Prolegomena, 19 (2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.26362/20200201
MLA 8th Edition Erasmus, Jacobus i Laureano Luna. "A philosophical argument for the beginning of time." Prolegomena, vol. 19, br. 2, 2020, str. 161-176. https://doi.org/10.26362/20200201. Citirano 25.01.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Erasmus, Jacobus i Laureano Luna. "A philosophical argument for the beginning of time." Prolegomena 19, br. 2 (2020): 161-176. https://doi.org/10.26362/20200201
Harvard Erasmus, J., i Luna, L. (2020). 'A philosophical argument for the beginning of time', Prolegomena, 19(2), str. 161-176. https://doi.org/10.26362/20200201
Vancouver Erasmus J, Luna L. A philosophical argument for the beginning of time. Prolegomena [Internet]. 2020 [pristupljeno 25.01.2021.];19(2):161-176. https://doi.org/10.26362/20200201
IEEE J. Erasmus i L. Luna, "A philosophical argument for the beginning of time", Prolegomena, vol.19, br. 2, str. 161-176, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.26362/20200201
Sažetak A common argument in support of a beginning of the universe used by advocates of the kalām cosmological argument (KCA) is the argument against the possibility of an actual infinite, or the “Infinity Argument”. However, it turns out that the Infinity Argument loses some of its force when compared with the achievements of set theory and it brings into question the view that God predetermined an endless future. We therefore defend a new formal argument, based on the nature of time (just as geometrical reasoning is based on the nature of space), which addresses more directly the question of beginningless time.