APA 6th Edition Posavec, Z. (2003). Formiranje političkoga jedinstva u modernom pluralnom društvu. Politička misao, 40 (1), 33-40. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/23291
MLA 8th Edition Posavec, Zvonko. "Formiranje političkoga jedinstva u modernom pluralnom društvu." Politička misao, vol. 40, br. 1, 2003, str. 33-40. https://hrcak.srce.hr/23291. Citirano 11.12.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition Posavec, Zvonko. "Formiranje političkoga jedinstva u modernom pluralnom društvu." Politička misao 40, br. 1 (2003): 33-40. https://hrcak.srce.hr/23291
Harvard Posavec, Z. (2003). 'Formiranje političkoga jedinstva u modernom pluralnom društvu', Politička misao, 40(1), str. 33-40. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/23291 (Datum pristupa: 11.12.2019.)
Vancouver Posavec Z. Formiranje političkoga jedinstva u modernom pluralnom društvu. Politička misao [Internet]. 2003 [pristupljeno 11.12.2019.];40(1):33-40. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/23291
IEEE Z. Posavec, "Formiranje političkoga jedinstva u modernom pluralnom društvu", Politička misao, vol.40, br. 1, str. 33-40, 2003. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/23291. [Citirano: 11.12.2019.]
Sažetak Modern states display a pluralism of ethical, religious and philosophical convictions that brings into question the possibility of a strong identification of citizens with the political community. Due to these centrifugal tendencies, as well as to the disintegration of the traditional ties, modern political communities need more solidarity in order to be able to efficiently solve the complex problems of modern society. The burden of political decision-making in modern societies is constantly growing, while its space is at the same time getting more confined due to the tendency of differentiation and separation of the administrative and economic sphere of power from the disposition of politics. The question is: how can modern societies surmount these challenges by linking tolerance and solidarity, democracy and social complexity? Which are the cultural prerequisites for this and which institutional rules are necessary to overcome these difficulties? How is it possible in such a situation to achieve political unity and ensure the legitimation of activities necessary for a normal functioning of a political community? Here, the author outlines Rawls’ answer regarding the pluralism of modern societies and the solutions he offered. First, he focuses on the changes in Rawls’ original position that occurred after his book A Theory of Justice (1), then he highlights several motifs contained in the criticisms that prompted Rawls to change his original position (2), he analyses the concept of justice as fairness from the point of view of pluralism (3), and finally, he outlines Rawls’ concepts that are, according to him, conducive to political unity and legitimacy (4).