Skip to the main content

Meeting abstract

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2026.39

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis and regurgitation: a case report

Kristina Vorkapić orcid id orcid.org/0009-0002-8636-7331 ; General Hospital “Dr. Josip Benčević”, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
Mario Špoljarić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5770-3012 ; General Hospital “Dr. Josip Benčević”, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
Krešimir Gabaldo orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0116-5929 ; General Hospital “Dr. Josip Benčević”, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
Katica Cvitkušić Lukenda orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-0708 ; General Hospital “Dr. Josip Benčević”, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
Domagoj Mišković orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-4600-0498 ; General Hospital “Dr. Josip Benčević”, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
Daniel Unić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-4067 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marijana Knežević Praveček orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-7357 ; General Hospital “Dr. Josip Benčević”, Slavonski Brod, Croatia


Full text: english pdf 148 Kb

page 39-39

downloads: 65

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

Valve-in-valve; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; bioprosthetic valve degeneration; aortic stenosis; aortic regurgitation; high surgical risk

Hrčak ID:

343345

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/343345

Publication date:

15.1.2026.

Visits: 182 *



Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in degenerated bioprosthetic valves, also known as valve-in-valve TAVI, is increasingly used in high-risk surgical patients. While commonly performed for structural valve deterioration causing stenosis, combined severe stenosis and regurgitation presents additional clinical and procedural challenges. (1-4)

Case report: We report the case of a 69-year-old female with a history of arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and previous surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve and aortic root repair according to the Manougian technique 10 years prior. The patient presented with progressive dyspnea (NYHA Class III) and signs of congestive heart failure. Echocardiography revealed severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient 50 mmHg), severe central aortic regurgitation, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 50%), and significant left atrial enlargement. Given her prior cardiac surgery and high operative risk a multidisciplinary Heart Team recommended transfemoral valve-in-valve TAVI. Valve was implanted via transfemoral access under conscious sedation. Preprocedural CT imaging was used to confirm annular dimensions and coronary height. Deployment was guided by fluoroscopy and echocardiography. The valve was successfully positioned within the degenerated surgical bioprosthesis without complications. Post-procedure echocardiography confirmed appropriate valve positioning, no paravalvular leak, and complete resolution of aortic regurgitation. Peak velocity decreased to 3.5 m/s (mean gradient 26 mmHg). Left ventricular ejection fraction is mildly reduced at 40%. Before discharge, medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was optimized.

Conclusion: Valve-in-valve TAVI is a safe and effective alternative for patients with failed surgical bioprosthetic valves and prohibitive surgical risk. This case highlights the feasibility of the procedure even in the presence of both severe stenosis and regurgitation, underlining the importance of detailed preprocedural imaging, careful valve sizing, and interdisciplinary planning. With appropriate patient selection, valve-in-valve TAVI offers excellent early outcomes and symptomatic relief in high-risk populations.

LITERATURE

1 

Dimitriadis K, Pyrpyris N, Aznaouridis K, Soulaidopoulos S, Koutsopoulos G, Beneki E, et al. Valve in valve transcatheter versus redo surgical replacement of a failing surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiol. 2025 Jul 4;86:474–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.022 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40618842

2 

Hassan A, Abdelshafy M, Diab RA, Wienemann H, Adam M, García S, et al. TAVI para la insuficiencia aórtica mediante dispositivos dedicados. Revisión sistemática [[TAVI for aortic regurgitation using dedicated devices. A systematic review]]. REC Interv Cardiol. 2025 February 24;7(1):29–43. https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M24000480 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40417148

3 

Mahmoud AN, Gad MM, Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AA, Taha Y, Elgendy AY, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valves. EuroIntervention. 2020 September 18;16(7):539–48. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00928 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420881

4 

Delgado V, Peláez ED. Severe aortic regurgitation: the limits of TAVI. EuroIntervention. 2024 September 2;20(17):e1051–2. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00045 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39229834


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.