Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20241221135943

Impact of Infill Pattern Design on Stress-Strain behaviour of 3D Printed Parts

Rrahim Sejdiu orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-2057 ; University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj - Kosovo, Str. "University", 70000 Ferizaj, Kosovo
Xhemajl Mehmeti orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8512-3047 ; University of Business and Technology, Lagjja Kalabria, 10000 Prishtine - Kosovo *
Flamur Salihu orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-3530 ; University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj - Kosovo Str. "University", 70000 Ferizaj, Kosovo
Labinot Topilla orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-0834 ; University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj - Kosovo, Str. "University", 70000 Ferizaj, Kosovo
Drin Krasniqi orcid id orcid.org/0009-0005-0381-5859 ; University of Pristina, "George Bush", Nr. 31, 10000 Prishtine - Kosovo
Mohamad El Mehtedi orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1211-6663 ; University of Cagliari, Via Marengo, 2, 09123 Cagliari - Italia
Agron Bajraktari ; University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj - Kosovo, Str. "University", 70000 Ferizaj, Kosovo

* Dopisni autor.


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 1.522 Kb

verzije

str. 73-78

preuzimanja: 120

citiraj


Sažetak

Compared to some conventional manufacturing processes, the properties of additive manufacturing parts can depend on the structural and manufacturing process parameters, rather than just on the type of materials used. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the tensile mechanical properties of the components printed with a 3D printer by changing the design of the infill pattern. The study presents the data of 13 (by 3 tests for each form of filling) different infill pattern designs, prepared and tested according to the ISO 527-2:2012 standard. The samples were analyzed according to the paired sample tests, considering the weight and the results of the tests, as well as the impact of the infill pattern on the test results. Significant differences were observed among the samples in terms of engineering stress and strain. The line infill pattern demonstrated better results in the engineering strain whereas the concentric infill pattern yielded superior values for engineering stress. Regarding ultimate tensile strength, concentric infill pattern shows significantly higher results than all other samples. Taking into consideration the results of the samples, it is concluded that there are significant differences between the design of the infill pattern and the other analyzed studies, which should be considered depending on the intended use of the 3D printed elements.

Ključne riječi

infill pattern; tensile strain; tensile stress; tensile strength; 3D printing

Hrčak ID:

344757

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/344757

Datum izdavanja:

13.3.2026.

Posjeta: 304 *