Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Prethodno priopćenje

https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35210

Sceptical Doubts – Raising the Standards or Changing the Angle?

Jelena Pavličić ; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Čika-Ljubina 18–20, Molerova 86, RS–11000 Belgrade


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 423 Kb

verzije

str. 453-469

preuzimanja: 196

citiraj

Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 423 Kb

verzije

str. 453-469

preuzimanja: 188

citiraj

Puni tekst: njemački pdf 423 Kb

verzije

str. 468-468

preuzimanja: 104

citiraj

Puni tekst: francuski pdf 423 Kb

verzije

str. 469-469

preuzimanja: 108

citiraj


Sažetak

The goal of this paper is to explore two different accounts of the mechanisms by which epistemic standards change, as a basis for the explanation of how arguments for radical scepticism get their appearance of legitimacy and persuasive power. The discussion begins with a presentation of arguments for the view that our epistemic practice contains a mechanism that raises the epistemic standards, to illustrate how sceptical hypotheses pose challenges to the truth value of our ordinary knowledge claims. Then, the discussion moves to a critique aimed to show that raising the standards approach is not well-suited to the job because it does not truly account for the radical form of philosophical scepticism. We take that these arguments pose serious problems with raising the standards approach and have to be dealt with. We examine an alternative account of changing epistemic standards, changing the angle of scrutiny, in line with which epistemic standards are interpreted as conditioned by disciplinary fields within which we conduct our research. After that, we compare the two highlighted approaches based on their success in providing an adequate description of actual epistemic practice. We conclude by arguing in favour of a latter approach as a superior conception and also as a promissory framework for an explanation of the phenomenology of our involvement with philosophical scepticism. Finally, we will close with some questions for both accounts.

Ključne riječi

epistemic standards; level of scrutiny; knowledge claims; angle of scrutiny

Hrčak ID:

254038

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/254038

Datum izdavanja:

29.12.2020.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski njemački francuski

Posjeta: 1.840 *