Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

CONTRIBUTION TO THE CRITIQUE OF THE FRAGMENT OF »CHRONOLOGIA«, A WORK ASCRIBED TO JOHN ARCHDEACON OF GERCS

Mladen Švab


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 2.766 Kb

str. 119-160

preuzimanja: 0

citiraj


Sažetak

Unlike other authors who studied the Fragment, the author of this paper proceeded another way, ie. attempted to establish credibility of data in the Fragment, and not to answer the question whether John, archdeacon of Geres, wrote it or not. The results show that the Fragment consists of following cathegories of data.
The data undoubtedly taken over from positively established other sources: quotation from Annales Stadenses, of little importance for historical problems, but indicative for familiarizing with the literature used by the author of the Fragment; adapted data about the war between Conrad and Stephen, which, although supplemented, can be deduced from Würzburg Chronicle or Ekkehard’s Universal Chronicle. The same applies to the datum about peace contract in 1031, only the Emeric’s role as a reconciliator has to be excluded from it.

Ključne riječi

Hrčak ID:

324119

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/324119

Datum izdavanja:

1.12.1982.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 0 *

accessibility

closePristupačnostrefresh

Ako želite spremiti trajne postavke, kliknite Spremi, ako ne - vaše će se postavke poništiti kad zatvorite preglednik.