Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.62.04.24.8606

Enterococcus durans SL70, a Novel Exopolysaccharide Producer from Traditional Sourdough Fermentation of Einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum)

Berna Genc orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2790-9578 ; Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Gumushane University, Baglarbasi Road, 29100 Gumushane, Turkey
Seyda Merve Karatas orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-5221-1681 ; Department of Food Engineering, Gumushane University, Baglarbasi Road, 29100 Gumushane, Turkey
Merve Tuğçe Tunç orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-9022-5427 ; Department of Food Engineering, Gumushane University, Baglarbasi Road, 29100 Gumushane, Turkey


Full text: english pdf 442 Kb

page 480-487

downloads: 156

cite

Download JATS file

Supplements: FTB-62-480-S1.pdf


Abstract

Research background. Given the potential of microbial exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria in various industrial processes, alternative sources for the isolation of lactic acid bacteria are highly topical. In this study, we used a traditional sourdough from einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum) as a source of lactic acid bacteria for the isolation, identification and determination of exopolysaccharide producers.
Experimental approach. The sourdough was prepared from einkorn according to the traditional method. Lactic acid bacteria were isolated and purified using the single colony technique on MRS and M17 media. The isolates were characterised using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass (MALDI-TOF) spectrometry. All isolates were analysed for extracellular polysaccharide production and one isolate was selected for purification and characterisation of its polysaccharide.
Results and conclusions. The isolates were identified as Lactobacillus plantarum, L. paraplantarum, L. brevis, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Enterococcus faecium and E. durans. The production of exopolysaccharides by all lactic acid bacteria was evaluated and it was found that all strains (except one) were capable of producing exopolysaccharides. One polysaccharide (EPS-SL70) was purified from the isolates of E. durans SL70. This anionic heteropolysaccharide had, in addition to the carbohydrate backbone, a protein structure that did not contain nucleic acid. The carbohydrate backbone consisted of mannose, glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and galactose.
Novelty and scientific contribution. The microbial flora of traditional einkorn sourdough has been identified in this study and represents the first report on the exopolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria in traditional einkorn sourdough. Additionally, Enterococcus durans from einkorn sourdough was identified as a new exopolysaccharide producer.

Keywords

einkorn; Enterococcus durans; exopolysaccharide; lactic acid bacteria; MALDI-TOF MS; Siyez

Hrčak ID:

326742

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/326742

Publication date:

14.1.2025.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 727 *




INTRODUCTION

Einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum) also known in Turkey as Siyez, is a widely recognised cereal variety. This diploid species is particularly rich in fibre and essential nutrients such as vitamins and minerals, like iron, phytosterol, lutein, B1, B2 and B6, which have higher bioavailability (1,2). The sugar composition of einkorn consists of sucrose, glucose, fructose and maltose, with a total sugar mass fraction of 26.7 g/kg. The folic acid mass fraction in einkorn is between 429 and 678 mg/kg, while other important values include 11.6 g/100 g moisture, 65 g/100 g carbohydrates and 11.83–25.2 g/100 g protein (3,4). Zrcková et al. (5) found that einkorn has on dry mass basis a higher total polyphenol content (744.97 mg/kg) than wheat (702.15 mg/kg). Additionally, einkorn is characterised by a high content of flavonoids, which is 3.8 times higher than that of emmer wheat (6). The tocol mass fraction in einkorn is between 19.6 and 109.89 µg/g, exceeding that of bread wheat (23.3–79.7 µg/g) (7).

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) represent an important group of bacteria with crucial industrial applications. These bacteria, characterised as Gram-positive, catalase-negative, facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, rod- or coccus-shaped bacteria, have a long history of safe use in food production due to their beneficial effects on human health and fermentation. LAB play a vital role in various sectors, including food production, treatment of diseases and production of macromolecules, enzymes and metabolic substances (8). Their antimicrobial properties and production of metabolites make them valuable for food biocontrol. In regions like the European Union (EU) countries, where the use of stabilisers is restricted, thickening cultures containing LAB are commonly used. LAB can produce various polysaccharides and products containing these bacteria are commercially available for thickening purposes in the EU and the USA (9). Furthermore, LAB are known for their texturising properties and are naturally present in numerous fermented products.

Microbial polysaccharides are biopolymers produced by microorganisms as a byproduct of their metabolic processes. These polysaccharides can be either water-soluble or insoluble and can be categorised as ionic or non-ionic carbohydrate-based compounds (10). They are typically classified into three main groups: endopolysaccharides (found within the cell), capsular polysaccharides (attached to the cell surface) and exopolysaccharides (released into the extracellular environment) (11,12). These polysaccharides have different structural properties based on factors such as the composition of monosaccharides, electrical charge, bonding patterns, side chains, chain length and branching frequency. In contrast to plant gums such as locust bean and gum arabic, microbial polysaccharides show higher water solubility and stability in a wide range of environmental conditions including temperature, pH and ionic strength. These polysaccharides, which are not used as energy sources, play crucial roles in reducing water activity, defending against phage attacks and phagocytosis, protecting against toxic compounds and antibiotics, managing osmotic pressure and facilitating the formation of biofilms that aid in cell recognition, adhesion to surfaces and colonisation of different ecosystems (13).

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other PCR-based methods are molecular techniques that provide precise and accurate results for the identification of organisms at the species and sub-species level. However, these methods are costly, time-consuming and labour-intensive, making them unsuitable for routine identification (14). Mass spectrometry (MS) has been used to identify bacteria for many years. Anhalt and Fenselau (15) were the first to propose its use. Over time, the MS technique has been improved by incorporating different structural components of bacterial cells. Recently, Holland et al. (16) have shown that MALDI-TOF can be used to identify bacteria without the need for pretreatment of the cells. This innovative approach has proven effective in identifying bacteria at both the genus and species level (17-19).

In recent years, research has focused largely on novel microbial polysaccharides as they are widely used in industries such as food, textiles, detergent, cosmetics, microbial enhanced petroleum remediation, agriculture and wastewater treatment. These polysaccharides have various functions including gelling, thickening, adhesive, biofilm-forming, anti-tumour, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties due to their distinct physicochemical and rheological properties. Einkorn wheat, a highly nutritious food with a low glycaemic index, is gaining increasing attention due to its unique properties compared to other flours like white flour, leading to its increasing use in the food industry. Despite the growing interest in einkorn, there is only a few studies on the production of sourdough from this particular wheat variety (20).

The aim of this study is to produce einkorn sourdough in traditional einkorn yeast fermentation, isolate and identify lactic acid bacteria that are able to produce exopolysaccharides from einkorn sourdough for the first time, and determine the production of new polysaccharides from sourdough by Enterococcus durans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sourdough fermentation process

Einkorn flour (1.75 % fat, 64.9 % carbohydrate, 9.7 % fibre and 9.6 % protein; Dogalsan, Ankara, Turkey) was used as material and all the chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck (St. Louis, MO, USA), unless otherwise stated. A mixture of 100 g of flour and 100 mL of tap water was prepared and allowed to ferment at 36 °C for 120 h to obtain traditional einkorn sourdough. After fermentation, a fresh mixture of water and flour was inoculated with the matured sourdough from the previous day in a 1:1 ratio, with five daily replenishments (21).

Isolation and identification of microbiota

Serial dilutions were prepared in 0.85 % NaCl solutions up to a dilution of 10-8 to isolate pure colonies. Subsequently, 0.1 mL of each dilution was spread on de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) (Merck Milipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and M17 (Merck Milipore) agar plates for lactic acid bacteria and potato dextrose agar (PDA) for yeasts. The plates were then placed in anaerobic jars (Merck Millipore) containing Anaerocoult® A (Merck Millipore) and incubated at 36 °C for 72 h. Isolates were purified based on colony characteristics and selected colonies were stored at -86 °C in a medium containing 15 % glycerol. The isolates were identified using conventional methods such as Gram staining and catalase tests. Additionally, the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) technique was used to determine the genus and species of the isolates at Mustafa Kemal University (Centre for Implementation and Research of Plant Health Clinic, Hatay, Turkey). Protein was extracted from bacterial isolates on MRS and M17 agar plates by formic acid method (22). Protein spectra were obtained by MALDI-TOF Biotyper and then compared with the protein spectra of reference bacterial isolates in the microbial library of the device using MALDI Biotyper Real-Time Classification (RTC) software (Biotyper 3.0; Microflex LT; Bruker Daltonics GmbH).

Cultivation and polysaccharide extraction

MRS and M17 broth were used for cultivation and production of polysaccharides by lactic acid bacteria. The bacterial isolates were cultured in 10 mL of MRS and M17 broth with a 1 % inoculum and then incubated at 36 °C for 72 h. After fermentation, the biomass was separated and then trichloroacetic acid (Isolab Laborgeräte GmbH, Weinheim, Germany) was added to a final concentration of 4 % (m/V) to remove contaminants. Chilled ethanol was added at three times the supernatant volume to precipitate the polysaccharide at 4 °C overnight (23). Centrifugation (Allegra X30; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) at 3900×g for 15 min was performed after each step to separate biomass, impurities and polysaccharide. The partially purified polysaccharide sample was then lyophilised for further analysis.

Determination of total sugar and protein content

Different solvents were used to determine the solubility of the polysaccharide and it was soluble only in water. The total sugar content was quantified using the phenol-sulfur method (24) with glucose as standard. The total protein content was determined using the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin as standard (25), and the spectrum was scanned in the range of 200−1000 nm.

Elemental analysis

The elemental composition was analysed with an elemental analyser (Truespec Micro; Leco, St. Joseph, MI, USA) to determine the content of nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen in the sample.

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

A mass of 2 mg of polysaccharide sample was mixed with 100 mg of potassium bromide, crushed and placed in a 1-mm pellet for a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum analysis equipped with Spectrum software v. 10.5.2 (PerkinElmer Spectrum 3, Shelton, CT, USA). The spectra were recorded in a frequency range of 400–4000 cm−1.

Monosaccharide composition

The composition of monosaccharides was analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS model 7890A; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) by the breakdown of polysaccharide structures and the subsequent volatilisation of the monosaccharides (26). Glucose, fructose, mannose, xylose, rhamnose and arabinose were used as standards and a similar methodology was applied, except for acid hydrolysis.

Quantification of zeta potential

Zeta potential of the polysaccharide was measured at 25 °C using dynamic light scattering analysis. Malvern Zetasizer Nano Zsp (Malvern, UK) was used for this measurement.

X-ray diffraction analysis

A polysaccharide sample of 100 mg was analysed using the SmartLab XRD instrument (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with a scanning speed of 2°/min in an angular span from 30° to 100°.

Cytotoxicity of polysaccharides

Cytotoxicity was evaluated at the Drug Administration and Research Center at Istanbul Bezmialem University, Turkey. To assess cell viability, the MTT assay was carried out on the CCD-1079Sk fibroblast cell line at a cell count of 104 cell/well. The cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5 % CO2 for 24 h. A control group was maintained in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 % penicillin/streptomycin (27).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Microbial composition of einkorn sourdough

The data inTable 1 show the values obtained in the production of einkorn sourdough. The cell counts of yeast and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were determined both before and after the fermentation and showed that sourdough production was successful after a 10-day fermentation. After this period, the intrinsic microbial content of the einkorn was found to increase approx. 8-fold for the LAB and 2-fold for the yeasts, resulting in a total lactic acid bacteria and yeast cell counts of 8.32 and 4.08 log (CFU/g), respectively. Previous studies by Lim et al. (28) found LAB cell counts of 8.0–9.3 log (CFU/g) post-sourdough production, while Moroni et al. (29) reported yeast cell counts of 3.0–7.3 log (CFU/g) and lactic acid bacteria cell counts of 9.0–9.9 log (CFU/g).

Table 1 Changes in microbial load during sourdough production from einkorn flour
     Before fermentation     After fermentation
Total     N(colony)DFN/(log CFU/g)N(colony)DFN/(log CFU/g)
Yeast     210-22.301210-34.08
LAB     210-11.302110-78.32

DF=dilution factor, LAB=lactic acid bacteria

The composition of the microbial community in einkorn sourdough is shown inTable S1,Table S2 andTable S3. As a result of the MALDI-TOF analysis, log score or match values were obtained for each isolate. These values ranged from 0 to 3 and each value indicated that the isolate was similar to specific bacteria in the library based on data from the NCBI database (30). The successful production of sourdough from einkorn was confirmed by analysing 22 isolates, of which 16 were Saccharomyces cerevisiae (70 %) and 6 were Candida lusitaniae (30 %) (Table S1). In addition, among the 56 isolates obtained after LAB isolation (Table S2 andTable S3), 43 were Lactobacillus plantarum (75 %), 5 were L. paraplantarum (8.7 %), 4 were L. brevis (7 %), 2 were Pediococcus pentosaceus (3.4 %), 1 was Enterococcus faecium (1.8 %) and 1 was E. durans (1.8 %). Saeed et al. (31) emphasised the dominance of L. brevis and L. plantarum as important lactic acid bacteria for sourdough production, while S. cerevisiae was the only species required for sourdough production. Ferraz et al. (32) reported that the quality of sourdough was improved by the co-fermentation of L. plantarum and S. cerevisiae, but the lactic acid bacteria had a direct effect on acidification and the final product. Cakır et al. (20) isolated lactic acid bacteria from einkorn sourdough and reported that the dominant lactic acid bacteria belonged to the species P. pentosaceus, L. brevis, L. paraplantarum and L. plantarum. Wieser et al. (33) reported that L. plantarum and E. faecalis played a joint role in sourdough production and were effective in gluten proteolysis, in contrast to the non-proteolytic L. plantarum and E. faecalis.

Extracellular polysaccharide synthesis by lactic acid bacteria

The study investigated the polysaccharide production of lactic acid bacteria obtained from einkorn sourdough. The results, expressed as dry mass inTable S4, showed that exopolysaccharide concentrations varied between 0.4 and 2.4 g/L. Only one strain (SL-1) did not produce any polysaccharides. In contrast, all other strains, including L. plantarum, L. paraplantarum, L. brevis, P. pentosaceus, E. faecium and E. durans showed the ability to produce exopolysaccharides. Liu et al. (34) identified Lactobacillus spp. and L. plantarum as exopolysaccharide producers isolated from traditional sourdough.

Numerous studies have also shown that different strains of Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria found in different types of sourdough have the ability to produce polysaccharides (35,36). Abedfar et al. (37) isolated lactic acid bacteria from wheat bran sourdough and identified L. plantarum and P. pentosaceus as the predominant species. The production of polysaccharides by P. pentosaceus was 0.26 g/L and by L. plantarum 0.4 g/L. Ogunsakin et al. (38) identified P. pentosaceus SA8 and P. pentosaceus LD7 as producers of polysaccharides. Manini et al. (39) reported that L. plantarum, L. brevis and P. pentosaceus were able to produce exopolysaccharides in sourdough when cultivated on different carbon sources such as glucose, sucrose, raffinose, maltose, lactose and starch. Ispirli et al. (40) isolated and characterised E. durans as a polysaccharide producer from koumiss and kurut. Additionally, Jung et al. (41) identified E. faecium as a polysaccharide producer in sourdough.

Polysaccharide characterisation

The primary organism identified among the isolates was E. durans SL70, which produced extracellular polysaccharides when isolated from einkorn sourdough. The exopolysaccharide from E. durans SL70 in M17 medium, designated EPS-SL70, had a total carbohydrate concentration of (3.7±0.3) g/L and a protein concentration of 0.12 g/L. The absence of a peak at 260 nm indicates the absence of nucleic acid (Fig. S1). In a study by Vosough et al. (42), Enterococcus spp. were identified in Iranian kishk, and the carbohydrate and protein concentrations of EPS from E. durans K48 ranged from 0.76 to 2.39 g/L and 0.2 to 0.52 mg/L, respectively.

Elemental analysis showed that EPS-SL70 contained carbon (30.2 %), hydrogen (5.2 %) and nitrogen (3.6 %). Zanzan et al. (43) identified a polysaccharide from E. faecium F58 with a carbon content of 44.27 %. Gu et al. (44) reported that the polysaccharide derived from E. durans consisted of carbon (41.08 %) and hydrogen (7.23 %), without nitrogen, suggesting the presence of protein.

FTIR analysis revealed ten distinct bands at specific frequencies.Fig. 1a shows a band profile reminiscent of common polysaccharide structures (42,45,46). The frequency at 3280 cm-1 (79.3 %) was attributed to intracellular hydrogen bonds or hydroxyl groups, while the frequency at 1657 cm-1 (52.6 %) indicated C=O stretches of amide bonds, confirming the presence of a protein structure within the carbohydrate backbone of the extracellular polysaccharide. The vibration at 1535 cm-1 (78.3 %) was associated with the carboxyl or carboxylate group. Additionally, the frequencies at 1329 cm-1 (67.2 %) and 1223 cm-1 (75.7 %) were associated with C-H stretching deformation. The presence of C–C vibration in the pyranose form of sugars was identified at 1123 cm-1 (80.8 %) and 1045 cm-1 (73.8 %). Furthermore, frequencies at 830 cm-1 (59.2 %), 736 cm-1 (76.4 %) and 675 cm-1 (58.1 %) indicated configurations (α and β) in the pyranose form, α-glucans and the carbohydrate skeletal vibrations, respectively.

Fig. 1 The results of: a) FTIR spectrum of E. durans SL70 polysaccharide and b) GC-MS spectra of monosaccharides: 1=rhamnose (10.3 min), 2=arabinose (10.6 min), 3=xylose (11 min), 4=mannose (17.9 min), 5=glucose (18.1 min) and 6=galactose (18.4 min)
FTB-62-480-f1

The analysis of monosaccharide composition of the polysaccharide revealed that EPS-SL70 was a heteropolysaccharide composed mainly of mannose (60 %), glucose (15 %), rhamnose (13 %), arabinose (5 %), xylose (3 %) and galactose (3 %), as shown inFig. 1b. E. durans K48 also produced a polysaccharide with a similar structure, but with a higher amount of galactose (42). Lactobacillus spp. showed the ability to produce polysaccharides containing rhamnose, glucose, galactose and mannose units (47). Similarly, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides RJ-5 produced extracellular polysaccharides containing mannose, glucose, arabinose, xylose and galactose (48).

The zeta potential, mobility and conductivity of EPS-SL70 were (-15.2±0.6) mV, (-1.2±0.05) cm2/(V∙s) and (1.42±0.08) mS/cm, respectively. The low value of zeta potential was indicative of the negative charge of the polysaccharide backbone. It was concluded that EPS-SL70 is an anionic heteropolysaccharide. S. thermophilus CRL1190 had a cytoprotective polysaccharide with a zeta potential of (-5.4±0.9) mV (49). The polysaccharide kefiran, produced from kefir grains using UHT skimmed milk, was negatively charged in different aqueous solutions and at different pH values (50).

X-ray diffraction, the most widely used technique for the determination of the crystalline or non-crystalline (amorphous) nature of a polymer, was performed to estimate the phase identification of EPS-SL70 and the narrow peaks showed crystalline form (51). EPS-SL70 was found to have a uniform structure with a large extended peak that represents strong crystallinity without amorphous regions (Fig. 2a). The polysaccharides obtained from E. faecium MC-5 (51) and Lactobacillus sp. had the same structure (52)[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD].

Fig. 2 XRD pattern (a) and cytotoxicity effect (b) of EPS-SL70 on human fibroblast cell line (CCD-1079Sk) (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01). C=control
FTB-62-480-f2

Fibroblasts are the central cells of connective tissue and fibroblast dysfunction causes many defects in this tissue. They are affected by various substances and their activity can decrease, leading to connective tissue defects. In this study, a normal human fibroblast cell line (CCD-1079Sk) was used to evaluate the toxicity of EPS-SL70 (Fig. 2b), and no significant effect was observed at all concentrations. According to Hala et al. (53), lactic acid bacteria were determined to be safe when the survival rate was more than 80 %. Therefore, the cytotoxicity of the polysaccharide from E. durans SL70 can be neglected (p<0.05 and p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of lactic acid bacteria to produce exopolysaccharides in einkorn sourdough was determined for the first time in this study. The results showed that einkorn and sourdough contain many different types of microorganisms. Lactic acid bacteria capable of producing polysaccharides can cooperate with yeasts in the formation of sourdough by releasing their polysaccharide. Therefore, a possible synergistic interaction between bacteria and yeasts in einkorn sourdough could be investigated in the future. The fact that the polysaccharide is not cytotoxic to human fibroblast cell lines makes it a candidate for use in different industrial applications, especially for products for human consumption. The characterisation of the polysaccharide provides important and preliminary information about its structure, but advanced techniques can be selected depending on the industrial application.

Notes

[1] Financial disclosure FUNDING

This work was supported by the Gumushane University Research Fund Grants, Gumushane, Turkey [grant number: BAP-20.F5119.01.03].

[2] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest to be declared.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials are available at:www.ftb.com.hr.

REFERENCES

1 

Pirgozliev V, Rose SP, Pellny T, Amerah AM, Wickramasinghe M, Ulker M, et al. Energy utilization and growth performance of chickens fed novel wheat inbred lines selected for different pentosan levels with and without xylanase supplementation. Poult Sci. 2015;94(2):232–9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu059 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25595480

2 

Nakov G, Brandolini A, Ivanova N, Dimov I, Stamatovska V. The effect of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) whole meal flour addition on physico-chemical characteristics, biological active compounds and in vitro starch digestion of cookies. J Cereal Sci. 2018;83:116–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.08.004

3 

Loje H, Moller B, Laustsen AM, Hansen Å. Chemical composition, functional properties and sensory profiling of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.). J Cereal Sci. 2003;37(2):231–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2002.0498

4 

Hidalgo A, Brandolini A, Ratti S. Influence of genetic and environmental factors on selected nutritional traits of Triticum monococcum. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(14):6342–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901180q PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19601667

5 

Zrcková M, Capouchová I, Paznocht L, Eliasova M, Dvorák P, Konvalina P, et al. Variation of the total content of polyphenols and phenolic acids in einkorn, emmer, spelt and common wheat grain as a function of genotype, wheat species and crop year. Plant Soil Environ. 2019;65(5):260–6. https://doi.org/10.17221/134/2019-PSE

6 

Șerban LR, Păucean A, Man SM, Chiş MS, Mureşan V. Ancient wheat species: Biochemical profile and impact on sourdough bread characteristics—A Review. Processes (Basel). 2021;9(11):2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9112008

7 

Shewry PR, Do Hey S. “ancient” wheat species differ from modern bread wheat in their contents of bioactive components? J Cereal Sci. 2015;65:236–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2015.07.014

8 

Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR. The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15(12):546–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.010 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18024129

9 

Duboc P, Mollet B. Applications of exopolysaccharides in the dairy industry. Int Dairy J. 2001;11(9):759–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00119-4

10 

SureshKumar A, Mody K, Jha B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides–A perception. J Basic Microbiol. 2007;47(2):103–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200610203 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17440912

11 

Lee WY, Park Y, Ahn JK, Ka KH, Park SY. Factors influencing the production of endopolysaccharide and exopolysaccharide from Ganoderma applanatum. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007;40(2):249–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.04.009

12 

Gruyer S, Legin E, Bliard C, Ball S, Duchiron F. The endopolysaccharide metabolism of the hyperthermophilic archeon Thermococcus hydrothermalis: Polymer structure and biosynthesis. Curr Microbiol. 2002;44(3):206–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-001-0029-1 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11821929

13 

Liu J, Wang X, Pu H, Liu S, Kan J, Jin C. Recent advances in endophytic exopolysaccharides: Production, structural characterization, physiological role and biological activity. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:1113–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.084 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27987813

14 

Dušková M, Šedo O, Kšicová K, Zdráhal Z, Karpíšková R. Identification of lactobacilli isolated from food by genotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;159(2):107–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.029 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23072695

15 

Anhalt JP, Fenselau C. Identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1975;47(2):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60352a007

16 

Holland RD, Wilkes JG, Rafii F, Sutherland JB, Persons CC, Voorhees KJ, et al. Rapid identification of intact whole bacteria based on spectral patterns using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1996;10(10):1227–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19960731)10:10<1227::AID-RCM659>3.0.CO;2-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8759332

17 

Pribil P, Fenselau C. Characterization of Enterobacteria using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2005;77(18):6092–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050737c PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16159146

18 

Conway GC, Smole SC, Sarracino DA, Arbeit RD, Leopold PE. Phyloproteomics: species identification of Enterobacteriaceae using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3(1):103–12. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11200222

19 

Sun L, Teramoto K, Sato H, Torimura M, Tao H, Shintani T. Characterization of ribosomal proteins as biomarkers for matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectral identification of Lactobacillus plantarum. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20(24):3789–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2801 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17120274

20 

Cakır E, Arıcı M, Durak MZ, Karasu S. The molecular and technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria in einkorn sourdough: Effect on bread quality. J Food Meas Charact. 2020;14(3):1646–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00412-5

21 

Sáez GD, Saavedra L, Hebert EM, Zárate G. Identification and biotechnological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from chickpea sourdough in northwestern Argentina. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2018;93:249–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.03.040

22 

Soylu S, Kara M, Uysal A, Gümüs Y, Soylu EM, Kurt S, et al. Determination of fungal and bacterial disease agents on significant brassicaceous vegetable species grown in Hatay Province. Ksu J Agric Nat. 2024;27(4):839–55. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1383042

23 

Genc B, Taskin M, Adiguzel A. Exopolysaccharide of Anoxybacillus pushchinoensis G11 has antitumor and antibiofilm activities. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(5):2101–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02185-x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604750

24 

Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28(3):350–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017

25 

Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1-2):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/942051

26 

Silveira MLL, Smiderle FR, Agostini F, Pereira EM, Bonatti-Chaves M, Wisbeck E, et al. Exopolysaccharide produced by Pleurotus sajor-caju: Its chemical structure and anti-inflammatory activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;75:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.023 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600989

27 

Siraj YA, Biadgelign MG, Yassin MO, Chekol YZ. Mucosa-associated cultivable aerobic gut bacterial microbiota among colorectal cancer patients attending at the referral hospitals of Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Gut Pathog. 2021;13(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00415-7 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752753

28 

Lim SB, Tingirikari JMR, Seo JS, Li L, Shim S, Seo JH, et al. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria starters from Jeung-pyun for sourdough fermentation. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018;27(1):73–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0274-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263726

29 

Moroni AV, Arendt EK, Dal Bello F. Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in spontaneously-fermented buckwheat and teff sourdoughs. Food Microbiol. 2011;28(3):497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.016 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356457

30 

National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [Internet]. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information; 1988 [cited 2024 February 01]. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

31 

Saeed M, Anjum FM, Zahoor T, Nawaz H. Sajjad-Ur-Rehman. Isolation and Characterization of Starter Culture from Spontaneous Fermentation of Sourdough. Int J Agric Biol. 2009;11(3):29–332.

32 

Ferraz R, Flores SH, Frazzon J, Thys RCS. The effect of co-fermentation on sourdough breadmaking using different viable cell concentrations of Lactobacillus plantarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as starter cultures. J Culin Sci Technol. 2021;19(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428052.2019.1680472

33 

Wieser H, Vermeulen N, Gaertner F, Vogel RF. Effects of different Lactobacillus and Enterococcus strains and chemical acidification regarding degradation of gluten proteins during sourdough fermentation. Eur Food Res Technol. 2008;226(6):1495–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0681-1

34 

Liu AP, Jia YH, Zhao LZ, Gao Y, Liu GR, Chen YR, et al. Diversity of isolated lactic acid bacteria in Ya’an sourdoughs and evaluation of their exopolysaccharide production characteristics. LWT – Food Sci Technol. 2018;95:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.061

35 

Feng X, Zhang H, Lai PFH, Xiong Z, Ai L. Structure characterization of a pyruvated exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum AR307. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;178:113–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.119 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33621574

36 

Prete R, Alam MK, Perpetuini G, Perla C, Pittia P, Corsetti A. Lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides producers: A sustainable tool for functional foods. Foods. 2021;10(7):1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071653 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359523

37 

Abedfar A, Hosseininezhad M, Sadeghi A, Raeisi M, Feizy J. Investigation on “spontaneous fermentation” and the productivity of microbial exopolysaccharides by Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from wheat bran sourdough. LWT – Food Sci Technol. 2018;96:686–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.05.071

38 

Ogunsakin AO, Vanajakshi V, Anu-Appaiah KA, Vijayendra SVN, Walde SG, Banwo K, et al. Evaluation of functionally important lactic acid bacteria and yeasts from Nigerian sorghum as starter cultures for gluten-free sourdough preparation. LWT – Food Sci Technol. 2017;82:326–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.04.048

39 

Manini F, Casiraghi MC, Poutanen K, Brasca M, Erba D, Plumed-Ferrer C. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wheat bran sourdough. LWT – Food Sci Technol. 2016;66:275–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.045

40 

Ispirli H, Dertli E. Isolation and characterisation of lactic acid bacteria from traditional koumiss and kurut. Int J Food Prop. 2017;20(sup3):S2441–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1372473

41 

Jung SW, Kim WJ, Lee KG, Kim CW, Noh WS. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from sourdough with high exopolysaccharide production ability. J Food Sci Biotechnol. 2009;18(2):384–9.

42 

Vosough PR, Dovom MRE, Najafi MBH, Javadmanesh A, Mayo B. Biodiversity of exopolysaccharide-producing lactic acid bacteria from Iranian traditional Kishk and optimization of EPS yield by Enterococcus spp. Food Biosci. 2022;49:101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101869

43 

Zanzan M, Ezzaky Y, Achemchem F, Hamadi F, Valero A, Mamouni R. Fermentative optimization and characterization of exopolysaccharides from Enterococcus faecium F58 isolated from traditional fresh goat cheese. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2024;33(5):1195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-023-01424-9 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38440680

44 

Gu XM, Wu HM, Ma GR. Isolation, purification and structural elucidation of EPS-I, an extracellular polysaccharide from Enterococcus durans. Chem J Chin Univ. 2004;25(7):1288–90.

45 

Tadayoni M, Sheikh-Zeinoddin M, Soleimanian-Zad S. Isolation of bioactive polysaccharide from acorn and evaluation of its functional properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;72:179–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.015 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159883

46 

Radzki W, Ziaja-Sołtys M, Nowak J, Rzymowska J, Topolska J, Sławińska A, et al. Effect of processing on the content and biological activity of polysaccharides from Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2016;66:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.016

47 

Salazar N, Prieto A, Leal JA, Mayo B, Bada-Gancedo JC, De Los Reyes-Gavilán CG, et al. Production of exopolysaccharides by Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains of human origin, and metabolic activity of the producing bacteria in milk. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(9):4158–68. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2126 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19700676

48 

Chen ZN, Shi JL, Yang XJ, Liu Y, Nan B, Wang ZF. Isolation of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria and yeasts from Tibetan kefir and characterisation of the exopolysaccharides. Dairy Technol. 2016;69(3):410–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12276

49 

Marcial G, Messing J, Menchicchi B, Goycoolea FM, Faller G, Graciela FDV, et al. Effects of polysaccharide isolated from Streptococcus thermophilus CRL1190 on human gastric epithelial cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;62:217–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.08.011 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23999014

50 

Exarhopoulos S, Raphaelides SN, Kontominas MG. Conformational studies and molecular characterization of the polysaccharide kefiran. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;77:347–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.10.011

51 

Tilwani YM, Lakra AK, Domdi L, Yadav S, Jha N, Arul V. Optimization and physicochemical characterization of low molecular levan from Enterococcus faecium MC-5 having potential biological activities. Process Biochem. 2021;110:282–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2021.08.021

52 

Sirin S, Aslim B. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria derived exopolysaccharides for use as a defined neuroprotective agent against amyloid beta(1-42)-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65147-1 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32415207

53 

Hala IEA, Maha AK, Mostafa MES, Nehal MED, Mohamed ZH. Cytotoxicity assay and antioxidant activities of the lactic acid bacterial strains. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012;6(8):1700–12. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.924

Appendices

Fig. S1 Spectrum of the exopolysaccharide EPS-SL70
FTB-62-480-fS1
Table S1 MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of the isolates of yeast obtained from sourdough of einkorn flour
     Isolate     Similarity     Biotyper log(score)     NCBI identifier
     SM-1     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.025     4932
     SM-2     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.230     4932
     SM-3     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.034     4932
     SM-4     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.010     4932
     SM-5     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.928     4932
     SM-6     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.786     4932
     SM-7     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.994     4932
     SM-8     Candida lusitaniae     2.209     3691
     SM-9     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.957     4932
     SM-10     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.895     4932
     SM-11     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.111     4932
     SM-12     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.933     4932
     SM-13     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     1.839     4932
     SM-14     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.103     4932
     SM-15     Candida lusitaniae     2.244     3691
     SM-16     Candida lusitaniae     2.211     3691
     SM-17     Candida lusitaniae     2.213     3691
     SM-18     Candida lusitaniae     2.043     3691
     SM-19     Candida lusitaniae     2.343     3691
     SM-20     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.139     4932
     SM-22     Saccharomyces cerevisiae     2.163     4932
     SM-23     Candida lusitaniae     2.187     3691

Biotyper log(score) value: 3.0–2.3=highly probable species identification, 2.299 –2.000=definite genus identification, probable species identification, 1.999–1.700=probable genus identification, 1.699–0.0=not reliable identification. NCBI=The National Center for Biotechnology Information (30)

Table S2 MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of isolates of lactic acid bacteria grown on MRS medium obtained from sourdough of einkorn flour
     Isolate     Similarity     Biotyper log(score)     NCBI identifier
     SL-1     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.341     1590
     SL-2     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.301     1590
     SL-3     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.340     1590
     SL-4     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.350     1590
     SL-5     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.455     1590
     SL-6     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.442     1590
     SL-7     Pediococcus pentosaceus     2.085     1255
     SL-8     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.335     1590
     SL-9     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.355     1590
     SL-10     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.456     1590
     SL-11     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.422     1590
     SL-12     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.450     1590
     SL-13     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.393     1590
     SL-14     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.280     1590
     SL-15     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.352     1590
     SL-16     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.435     1590
     SL-17     Lactobacillus brevis     2.449     1580
     SL-18     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.396     1590
     SL-20     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.327     1590
     SL-21     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.381     1590
     SL-22     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.566     1590
     SL-23     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.371     1590
     SL-24     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.440     1590
     SL-25     Lactobacillus brevis     2.468     1580
     SL-26     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.316     1590
     SL-27     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.400     1590
     SL-28     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.226     1590

Biotyper log(score) value: 3.0–2.3=highly probable species identification; 2.299 –2.000=definite genus identification, probable species identification; 1.999–1.700=probable genus identification; 1.699–0.0=not reliable identification. NCBI=The National Center for Biotechnology Information (30)

Table S3 MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of isolates of lactic acid bacteria grown on M17 medium obtained from sourdough of einkorn flour
     Isolate     Similarity     Biotyper log(score)     NCBI identifier
     SL-29     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.057     1590
     SL-30     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.737     1590
     SL-31     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.875     1590
     SL-32     Lactobacillus brevis     2.369     1580
     SL-33     Lactobacillus brevis     2.389     1580
     SL-34     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.242     1590
     SL-35     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.900     1590
     SL-36     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.082     1590
     SL-37     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.363     1590
     SL-38     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.090     1590
     SL-39     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.860     1590
     SL-40     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.845     1590
     SL-42     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.897     1590
     SL-43     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.934     1590
     SL-44     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.061     1590
     SL-45     Pediococcus pentosaceus     2.114     1255
     SL-46     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.942     1590
     SL-47     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.871     1590
     SL-49     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.033     1590
     SL-50     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.092     1590
     SL-51     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     1.702     60520
     SL-54     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     1.988     60520
     SL-56     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.988     1590
     SL-58     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     2.027     60520
     SL-60     Enterococcus faecium     1.914     1352
     SL-62     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.922     1590
     SL-65     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     2.018     60520
     SL-69     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     1.758     60520
     SL-70     Enterococcus durans     2.105     53345

Biotyper log(score) value: 3.0–2.3=highly probable species identification; 2.299 –2.000=definite genus identification, probable species identification; 1.999–1.700=probable genus identification; 1.699–0.0=not reliable identification. NCBI=The National Center for Biotechnology Information (30)

Table S4 Production of the exopolysaccharide (EPS) by isolates of lactic acid bacteria obtained from sourdough of einkorn flour
     Isolate     Similarity     γ(EPS)/(g/L)
     SL-1     Lactobacillus plantarum     -
     SL-2     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-3     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-4     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-5     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.8
     SL-6     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-7     Pediococcus pentosaceus     0.7
     SL-8     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.8
     SL-9     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.8
     SL-10     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.9
     SL-11     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-12     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.8
     SL-13     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-14     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-15     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-16     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.9
     SL-17     Lactobacillus brevis     0.9
     SL-18     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-20     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-21     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-22     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.2
     SL-23     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-24     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-25     Lactobacillus brevis     0.9
     SL-26     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-27     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.2
     SL-28     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.2
     SL-29     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.2
     SL-30     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.9
     SL-31     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.7
     SL-32     Lactobacillus brevis     0.9
     SL-33     Lactobacillus brevis     0.8
     SL-34     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.9
     SL-35     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.2
     SL-36     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.3
     SL-37     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.1
     SL-38     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.4
     SL-39     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-40     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.9
     SL-42     Lactobacillus plantarum     2.3
     SL-43     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.6
     SL-44     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.4
     SL-45     Pediococcus pentosaceus     0.7
     SL-46     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.7
     SL-47     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.7
     SL-49     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.7
     SL-50     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.6
     SL-51     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     0.6
     SL-54     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     1.2
     SL-56     Lactobacillus plantarum     1.0
     SL-58     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     1.2
     SL-60     Enterococcus faecium     0.8
     SL-62     Lactobacillus plantarum     0.8
     SL-65     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     1.2
     SL-69     Lactobacillus paraplantarum     0.9
     SL-70     Enterococcus durans     1.0

This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.