Preliminary communication

https://doi.org/10.21464/fi44405

Neoscholastic Thinking of Father Rudolf Brajičić, Jesuit, on Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy

Natali Hrbud orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-9520 ; Ilica 60, HR–10000 Zagreb

Abstract

This paper presents the most basic thoughts, observations, and conceptual guidelines of Father Rudolf Brajičić on the issue of Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. The fundamental starting points for these reflections can be found, first of all, in the works of Father Brajičić: Opravdanje čistoga uma and Filozofski eksperiment. The starting point and focus of the issue is the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments, the difference between analytic and synthetic a priori judgments, and the perception and (non)acceptance of synthetic a priori judgments in neo-scholasticism (e.g. Vilim Keilbach, Stjepan Zimmermann, Miljenko Belić from domestic neo-scholasticism or e.g. Joseph Maréchal and Johannes Baptist Lotz from foreign neo-scholasticism). It seems that Father Brajičić sees in the possibility of accepting synthetic a priori judgments a possibility of criticizing Kant’s philosophy.

Keywords

Immanuel Kant; neo-scholasticism; analytic judgements a priori; synthetic judgements a priori; transcendental relative judgements a priori, physical analytical judgements, existential judgements, Fr. Rudolf Brajičić

Hrčak ID:

330313

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/330313

Publication date:

30.12.2024.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 849 *