Skip to the main content

Meeting abstract

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2025.112

Predictors of residual shunt following patent foramen ovale closure: insights from University Hospital Centre Zagreb

Antun Zvonimir Kovač orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6276-4450 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Kristina Marić Bešić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4004-7271 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Denis Došen orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-5505 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Vlatka Rešković Lukšić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-3236 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Sandra Jakšić Jurinjak orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-6137 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Irena Ivanac Vranešić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-9720 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Joško Bulum orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-6503 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: english pdf 636 Kb

page 112-113

downloads: 203

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

patent formen ovale closure; residual shunt; transthoracic echocardiography bubble test

Hrčak ID:

330621

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/330621

Publication date:

5.5.2025.

Visits: 530 *



Introduction: Recent studies report that the incidence of residual shunting after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure ranges from 10% to 30% (1). Several factors have been proposed as potential predictors, including anatomical characteristics of the PFO tunnel, the presence of atrial septal aneurysms, and occluder device size (2,3). This study aims to evaluate the incidence of residual shunting and identify its predictors in patients who underwent PFO closure at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb.

Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PFO closure at UHC Zagreb. Pre-implantation transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) measurements included PFO tunnel size and septal aneurysm presence (Figure 1). Implanted device size was recorded from hospital charts. Residual shunting was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) bubble test during Valsalva maneuver at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups (Figure 2). Statistical analysis included chi-square test, Cramer’s V test, and linear multivariate regression.

FIGURE 1 Transesophageal echocardiography showing the patent foramen ovale opening during the Valsalva maneuver.
CC202520_5-6_112-3-f1
FIGURE 2 Transthoracic echocardiography bubble test showing residual shunting during the Valsalva maneuver.
CC202520_5-6_112-3-f2

Results: Of 104 attempted PFO closures, device implantation was successful in 100 patients (96.2%). Device size data were available for 98 patients who received the Amplatzer occluder: 50 (51.0%) received an 18/25 mm device, 15 (15.3%) a 25/25 mm device, 9 (9.2%) a 25/30 mm device, 14 (14.3%) a 25/35 mm device, and 10 (10.2%) a 30/30 mm device. Residual shunting was detected in 18 patients (18.0%) exclusively via TTE bubble test. Pre-implantation TEE measurements were available for 54 patients (54.0%) for PFO tunnel width (mean 3.9 ± 2.4 mm) and 51 (51.0%) for tunnel length (mean 10.9 ± 3.6 mm). Atrial septal aneurysm was reported in 33 patients (33.0%). Larger device size (p<0.001) and left atrial disk (p<0.001) were independent risk factors for residual shunting.

Conclusion: The incidence of residual shunting observed in our study (18.0%) aligns with reports from other centers. Notably, all residual shunts were detected exclusively by the TTE bubble test. In our patient population, the only significant predictors of residual shunting were larger device size, particularly the left atrial disk, whereas other studies have identified anatomical PFO features that increase risk.

LITERATURE

1 

Mi Z, Li C, He G, Huang D, Zhou X, Gao H, et al. Relation between anatomical features of patent foramen ovale and residual shunt based on transesophageal echocardiography. Sci Rep. 2025 January 9;15(1):1497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82122-2 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39789058

2 

Marchese N, Pacilli MA, Inchingolo V, Fanelli R, Loperfido F, Vigna C. Residual shunt after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with AMPLATZER occluder devices - influence of anatomic features: a transcranial Doppler and intracardiac echocardiography study. EuroIntervention. 2013 July;9(3):382–8. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I3A61 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23872652

3 

von Bardeleben RS, Richter C, Otto J, Himmrich L, Schnabel R, Kampmann C, et al. Long term follow up after percutaneous closure of PFO in 357 patients with paradoxical embolism: Difference in occlusion systems and influence of atrial septum aneurysm. Int J Cardiol. 2009 May 1;134(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.02.031 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715659


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.