Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.65241/wh.8.2.3

Work environment of critical care nurses in Croatia: national cross-sectional survey

Jelena Slijepcevic ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia, Department for Education and Professional Development of Nursing, Kispaticeva 12, 10000 Zagreb *
Sladjana Rezic ; University of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Mlinarska cesta, Zagreb, Croatia
Adriano Friganovic ; University of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Mlinarska cesta, Zagreb, Croatia
Evanthia Georgiu ; Εducation Sector, Nursing Services, Ministry of Health, 1 Prodromou & Chilonos Street 17, 1448 Nicosia, Cyprus

* Corresponding author.


Full text: english pdf 318 Kb

page 14-27

downloads: 158

cite

Full text: croatian pdf 362 Kb

page 100-113

downloads: 126

cite


Abstract

Background: Working in a supportive, healthy environment
has a direct and positive impact on patient satisfaction and
is also closely linked to nurse retention, job satisfaction,
turnover, and burnout. The aim of the study was to focus
on the perceptions and experiences of critical care nurses
in Croatia.
Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted
using a self-administered questionnaire, the Healthy Work
Environment Assessment Tool, distributed to intensive
care nurses in Croatia. Data analysis was conducted using
R (version 4.1.0; R Core Team, 2021) and SPSS (version 26
for Windows). Descriptive statistics were used to assess the
state of critical care nurses’ work environments across the
six American Association of Critical-Care Nurses subscales.
Results: The mean scores for the implementation of the
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Healthy Work
Environment. Standards at the unit level indicate moderate
levels across all six domains. Among 277 nurses, the highest
mean score was observed for Meaningful Recognition (M =
2.7, SD = 0.7), followed by True Collaboration and Authentic
Leadership (M = 2.5, SD = 0.6–0.7). Lower scores were reported
for Skilled Communication, Effective Decision-Making,
and Appropriate Staffing (M = 2.4, SD = 0.6–0.7). All mean
differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Targeted investments in staffing infrastructure,
leadership training, formal recognition systems, and
psychological safety protocols are crucial for fostering
healthier work environments, enhancing nurse retention,
and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Keywords

Nurses; critical care; healthy work environment; Croatia

Hrčak ID:

343006

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/343006

Publication date:

24.12.2025.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 549 *