Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.1.1

Inevitability of Aporia in the Attempts to Define Knowledge in the Plato’s Dialogues Theaetetus and Phaido, on the logos, and on the Scientificity of Theology

Josip Balabanić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-4715 ; PhD, Grad. Biol., Grad. Theol., MA Biomed., Sci. Adv., Mus. Adv., Ass. Memb. of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. Retired


Full text: croatian pdf 264 Kb

page 1-24

downloads: 666

cite


Abstract

What this article is to show is how the participants in dialogue Theaetetus agreed that knowledge (ἐπιστήμη) is ‘true opinion (doxa) coupled with explanation’ (logos) (201 d), but that they failed to interpret what a logos is, and the dialogue ended in aporia. The present author by reference to the explanation of the logos in the Sophist dialogue (259e5) finds the reason for this failure. He said that in the reflection (diάnoia) logos »arises through the intertwining of ideas« (συμπλοκὴ tῶn eἰdῶν) and concludes that in things there is an intertwining of many ideas and that this intertwining or logos the mind (soul) cannot fully interpret. Therefore, on the basis of sensory experience, one does not come to true knowledge, to the knowledge of essence of thing. It turns out that the outcome of the search for knowledge about human life and dying, about the immortal soul, in the dialogue Phaedo, ended equally vaguely or in aporia (cf. 107b). The article goes on to say that for some monotheistic theology, Socrates /Plato’s eide are God’s thoughts. A parallel is drawn with thoughts woven into the products of intentional human action, but also with information in genetic programs in living nature. The conclusion is that all sciences come only to some knowledge, not to real knowledge, an understanding of the essence of them. Christian theology as a humanistic science is only in some advantage over other sciences by having the Word of Revelation, the divine Logos, Christ, so it can also speak of the meaning of things and man. Thus, there is a special review of Simia’s remark to Socrates (Faedo85c-d) to make true knowledge perhaps by means of a secure conveyance afforded by some divine doctrine (divine logos). Since for a theistic evolutionist anthropological substance dualism presents a special difficulty, in theology of creation a form of nonreductive physicalism is proposed.

Keywords

aporia; knowledge; Phaedo; substance dualism; Theaetetos; scientificity of theology

Hrčak ID:

274133

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/274133

Publication date:

17.3.2022.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.734 *