Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.21464/fi42306

Why Are There So Few Women in Philosophy?

Luka Boršić ; Institut za filozofiju, Ulica grada Vukovara 54, HR–10000 Zagreb


Full text: croatian pdf 341 Kb

page 503-520

downloads: 467

cite

Full text: english pdf 341 Kb

page 520-520

downloads: 157

cite


Abstract

There is no clear answer as to why there are more employed male philosophers than female philosophers in most universities. The first part analyses the problem of the historical under-education of women – which may be a simple explanation for the absence of women in the history of philosophy. Today, however, the situation in the humanities, including philosophy, is different, as there are often more female than male students, but this does not lead to a significant balance of men and women in higher academic positions. Therefore, the first part of the paper also discusses fifteen hypotheses about the causes of this state of affairs, some of which have been rejected, some of which are highly probable, while further research is needed to confirm or reject some. The second part addresses the problem of the idea that traditional philosophy needs “the feminine” as “the other”, which it defines negatively. This position can be rejected with similar arguments that can also be used to reject essentialism.

Keywords

women philosophers; underrepresentation; misogyny; education; essentialism; Aristotle; Plato; René Descartes; Simone de Beauvoir; Vigdis Songe-Møller; Michèle Le Dœuff

Hrčak ID:

295489

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/295489

Publication date:

16.11.2022.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.549 *