Skip to the main content

Review article

https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.61.02.23.7622

Kako različiti sastojci i dodaci utječu na proizvodnju i biološku aktivnost medovine?

Larissa Simão orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-9988
Bruna Rafaela da Silva Monteiro Wanderley orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-1086
Michelly Pontes Tavares Vieira orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-2214
Isabel Cristina da Silva Haas orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-2397
Renata Dias de Mello Castanho Amboni orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6467-3760
Carlise Beddin Fritzen-Freire orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-0914


Full text: english pdf 424 Kb

page 179-190

downloads: 201

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Medovina je fermentirano alkoholno piće dobiveno otapanjem meda u vodi, često uz dodatak različitih sastojaka. Kemijska svojstva medovine ovise o sastojcima i dodacima koji se koriste u njezinoj pripremi, osobito o vrsti meda, soju kvasca i hranjivim sastojcima koji se dodaju prije vrenja, te o dodanim biljkama, začinima i/ili voću. Ti dodaci ne utječu samo na vrenje, prije svega na aktivnost kvasca, proizvodnju metabolita i vrijeme fermentacije, već i na biološku aktivnost medovine, koja ovisi o sadržaju fenolnih spojeva. Znanstvena istraživanja pokazuju da medovina s dodatkom različitih biljaka sadržava velike količine različitih polifenola s bitnim biološkim svojstvima. Stoga je svrha ovoga preglednog rada bila ispitati na koji način različiti sastojci i dodaci mogu utjecati na pojedine faze pripreme medovine te njezinu biološku aktivnost, s ciljem razumijevanja njihovog učinka na kemijski sastav ovog pića, što mu daje veću tržišnu vrijednost.

Keywords

med; proizvodnja medovine; fenolni spojevi; alkoholno vrenje; voćni napitak; antioksidans

Hrčak ID:

305934

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/305934

Publication date:

29.6.2023.

Article data in other languages: english

Visits: 1.127 *




INTRODUCTION

Mead is an alcoholic beverage obtained from the fermentation of honey diluted in water (1,2). Other ingredients such as herbs, spices and/or fruits, are commonly added to modify the chemical and sensory characteristics of this beverage (3). The chemical composition of mead can be altered by different factors, such as the origin of the honey, the yeast strains used, and the additives and other ingredients that are incorporated into the wort, as well as the product preparation steps (4,5).

Although mead has been produced in various regions of the world since ancient times, mainly in Nordic countries and Eastern Europe, in recent years this beverage has shown an important growth in the global alcoholic beverage market (6). However, mead is still mostly produced empirically and as a handcrafted beverage, with relatively few scientific reports in comparison with other alcoholic beverages (7). Moreover, the production of mead shows some problems related to slow fermentation, mainly due to the variability in the composition of honey and its low buffering capacity, as well as to the limited amount of nutrients in the wort, which are essential for yeast development (6,8).

The ingredients used for the preparation of the beverage have a significant impact on the fermentation process and can modify the bioactive potential of the mead (9,10). Studies of the characteristics of meads with added herbs and fruits have been published recently (3,9,11). Besides, nutritional additives and supplements, mainly those that are nitrogen-based, minerals, vitamins and acids have been incorporated into the wort in order to stimulate yeast growth and consequently improve the fermentation process (7,12,13).

Given the above, this review seeks to investigate how different ingredients and additives can affect the stages of the preparation of mead, as well as its bioactive potential, in order to understand the effects on its chemical composition, and thus add greater commercial value to this ancient yet little researched beverage.

TYPES OF MEAD AND MAIN INGREDIENTS

Traditionally, mead is made from three basic ingredients: water, honey and yeast. However, in order to diversify the beverage and improve its bioactive and sensory properties, different types of honey and yeast can be used, besides other additional ingredients. According to Starowicz and Granvogl (14), different meads can be obtained by using different ratios of honey and water, as well as by the addition of fruits, herbs and/or spices or other additives. Thus, there are some denominations regarding the types of mead according to the used ingredients, such as: melomel (addition of fruits or fruit juice) (15), cyser (addition of apple juice or cider) (7), pyment (addition of grape juice or wine) (16), and metheglin (addition of spices and/or herbs) (7).

Among the basic ingredients of mead, water is predominant, and thus it is important to check its quality for the preparation of the beverage. In order for water to be used in the manufacture of alcoholic beverages, it must meet certain requirements, such as not having turbidity or high levels of chlorine, having a controlled pH, and meeting the desired microbiological standards (15,17).

Honey is a natural food which is produced mainly by the honey bee from the nectar of flowers, secretions from living parts of plants, or excretions from sucking insects (18,19). It is a saturated solution of sugars, mainly fructose (38 %) and glucose (31 %), as well as minor constituents, such as minerals, proteins, amino acids, enzymes, organic acids, aromatic substances, vitamins, phenolic acids, and flavonoids, among others (20,21). The chemical composition and the sensory characteristics of honey are affected by its botanical and geographic origin, the climatic conditions, maturation stage, bee species, as well as the processing and storage conditions (20,22). Honey has been acknowledged as a functional food mainly because of its antioxidant and antimicrobial properties (23-25), and its colour is directly related to its phenolic content (26). Thus, honey can be used as a basic raw material for obtaining different foods and beverages, including alcoholic beverages such as mead, and it directly affects the chemical and sensory characteristics of the product (14). Floral honey types are used the most for the preparation of mead (1,9,10). However, honeydew honey has aroused the interest of researchers because of its distinct chemical composition (3).

The choice of fermentative microorganisms is also of great importance in the production of mead as they play a key role in the efficient conversion of sugar into ethanol (5). Yeasts are facultative unicellular and anaerobic microorganisms and are responsible for the fermentation process of mead, especially those of the genus Saccharomyces. The species that are best known for their performance in alcoholic beverage fermentations are S. cerevisiae and S. bayanus (27). However, in recent years, efforts have been made to select different yeast strains and also to use non-Saccharomyces yeasts, whether in mixed or pure cultures (28,29) aiming at a greater control of the fermentation process and of the characteristics of the product (1,30).

Some studies have also investigated the effects of additives, nutritional supplements, and vegetables, especially fruits, herbs and spices, in the preparation of mead in order to examine the fermentation kinetics and chemical characteristics of the product (1,11,27,31).

IMPACT OF DIFFERENT INGREDIENTS AND ADDITIVES ON THE STAGES OF MEAD PREPARATION

In general, the mead preparation comprises some fundamental stages, which include prefermentation step (preparation of the wort), alcoholic fermentation step and post-fermentation step (clarification/bottling) (Fig. S1 (9,32)) (7). It is noteworthy that there may be changes in the initial and final stages of mead preparation depending on the available infrastructure and the characteristics that are desired for the product. Moreover, different ingredients and additives can be incorporated into the wort prior to the fermentation, while after racking maturation occurs optionally and can be carried out either before or after bottling.

Prefermentation step

Honey can be diluted in water at different ratios according to the type of beverage that is intended to be obtained (33). For instance, the meads known as Półtoraki, Dwójniaki, Trójniaki and Czwórniaki are made using the following ratios: V(honey):V(water)=1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 (16,34). It is important to point out that it is more usual to prepare worts with a total soluble solid (TSS) content around 20 to 25 °Brix (32,35) in order to obtain beverages with alcoholic strength from 10 to 13 %.

Although mead is obtained from a raw material that contains a high concentration of sugar, this alcoholic fermentation presents difficulties due to the chemical composition of honey, which lacks some nutrients necessary for yeast development, such as nitrogen and phosphorus (6,9). Honey contains a significantly low amount of nitrogen, which is an important element for adequate yeast growth (36). According to Morales et al. (37), substrates with nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency can prolong fermentation time, and thus yeast autolysis can occur, leaving the mead vulnerable to bacterial contamination. Therefore, after the honey has been diluted in water, additives and nutritional supplements that contain nitrogen, minerals, vitamins and acids can be added in the wort in order to stimulate yeast growth and, consequently, obtain better fermentation (12,13).

In view of these possible problems, it is important that the mead preparation is carried out under controlled conditions and with sufficient nutrients to obtain a quality product. In this sense, several studies have investigated the effect of the addition of prefermentative additives and supplements on the characteristics of mead (Table 1 (1,6,9-11,13,27,28,32,38-44)).

Table 1 Pre-fermentative additives used in making mead wort
Origin  Additive/supplement  Reference
Brazil(NH4)2SO4, Mg and CaCO3 (1)
Brazil(NH4)3PO4 (6)
PolandCaCO3, (NH4)3PO4 and vitamin B1 (9)
BrazilYeast extract, malt extract, peptone, MgCl2, (NH4)2SO4 and (NH4)2HPO4 (10)
BrazilSO2 (11)
USAFermaid-O (autolyzed yeasts of S. cerevisiae) (13)
PolandK2HPO4 and CaCO3 (27)
USAYeast extract and peptone (28)
SpanishC4H6O6, K2S2O5 and pollen (32)
PortugalK2C4H4O6, C4H6O5 and (NH4)2HPO4 (38)
PortugalK2C4H4O6, C4H6O5 and (NH4)2HPO4 (39)
Portugal(NH4)2HPO4 (40)
PortugalCommercial nutrient, SO2 and C4H6O6 (41)
PortugalK2C4H4O6, C4H6O5 and (NH4)2HPO4 (42)
BrazilCommercial nutrient and SO2 (43)
PolandK2HPO4 and CaCO3 (44)

Some compounds, such as (NH4)2HPO4 and K2C4H4O6, are added to the wort in order to increase the fermentative activity of yeasts, thus reducing fermentation time, besides acting on the production of volatile compounds, which are important for the aromatic complexity of the beverage (10,38-40).

Willey et al. (13) added autolyzed yeast-based supplements to mead and obtained fermented products with higher yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) contents, besides lower residual sugar contents and higher pH than of the sample without supplementation.

Preservatives are also often added to the wort, such as K2S2O5, which is used to prevent contamination by bacteria and other yeasts that can either interrupt fermentation or promote oxidative process (32). The same occurs when SO2 is added (41). It is noteworthy that before starting the fermentation, the wort can also undergo pasteurization in order to reduce its microbial load (12,38,42). However, Klikarová et al. (45) report that despite this step being helpful in a more controlled fermentation process, there is the possibility of it causing degradation of some thermolabile bioactive components of the wort (phenolic compounds, enzymes and vitamins), browning, oxidation and increased 5-hydroxymethylfurfural content. In this way, aiming to preserve the chemical compounds of the wort and its sensory characteristics, preservatives are often added before the fermentation of the mead.

Some organic acids are added to the mead wort in order to promote pH adjustment, such as tartaric (41) and malic acid (38,39,42), and thus provide a better balance between sweetness and acidity besides increasing the buffering capacity of the wort, thereby improving yeast activity throughout fermentation (16). In this sense, some plant species, as tamarind, pineapple, feijoa, uvaia and blackberry, have also been incorporated into the wort before mead fermentation (Table 2 (1,3,6,9-11,27,31,43,44,46-48)) to improve the characteristics of the product.

Table 2 Different ingredients used in the prefermentation steps of mead production
OriginType of honeyYeastFruit/spiceReference
BrazilFloralS. cerevisiae (ScST58)/S. bayanus
(SbPB and SbPC)
Cowpea bean (0.5 and 30 g/L) (1)
ItalyHoneydew HoneyS. cerevisiae (isolated from sweet wine and indigenous yeasts)Cannabis sativa L. (0.25 and 0.50 %) (3)
BrazilMultifloral honeyS. cerevisiaeMoscato grape juice (10, 20 and 30 %) (6)
PolandWild floralS. bayanus (Safspirit fruit)Dandelion syrup (10 %), chokeberry fruits (10 %) and grape seed powder (10 g/L) (9)
BrazilFloralS. cerevisiae (AWRI 796)Concentrated acerola pulp (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 %) (10)
BrazilWild floralS. bayanus (SbPB)Ilex paraguariensis (1 %) (11)
PolandRapeseed honeyS. bayanus (Safspirit fruit)/S. cerevisiae
(Safspirit malt)
Cornelia cherry (10 %) (27)
NigeriaNo dataS. cerevisiaeV(honey):V(coconut milk)=1:1, 1:2, 2:1, 3:1 and 1:3 (31)
BrazilWild honeyS. bayanusRubus spp. cv. Tupy (10 %), Acca sellowiana Berg (10 %), Eugenia pyriformes Cambess (10 %) (43)
PolandRapeseed honeyS. bayanus (Safspirit fruit)Cornelian cherry juice (10 %) (44)
Czech RepublicNo dataNo dataCherry, blackcurrant, raspberry, herbs, nuts (46)
BrazilNo dataS. cerevisiaeTamarind pulp (10, 20 and 30 %) (47)
BrazilNo dataS. cerevisiae (Montrachet)Pineapple pulp (0, 10, 20 and 30 %) (48)

Švecová et al. (46) conducted an evaluation of the Czech meads and noted that the samples containing cherry showed higher levels of citric acid (3130 mg/L), which were attributed to the fruit source and to the amount of the used fruit. According to Uzhel et al. (49), citric acid has been frequently added to fermented beverages to improve their antioxidant action and colour retention. On the other hand, Pereira et al. (7) noted low malic acid contents (mean values) in traditional meads, which suggests the need for the addition of this acid to worts, whether in its isolated or natural form, in order to stimulate the fermentation process. However, Romano et al. (3) observed an increase in the concentration of succinic acid during the fermentation of meads containing different parts of Cannabis sativa L. Succinic acid is a metabolite of alcoholic fermentation, which results in a rapid pH decrease in the first hours of the process, and strongly depends on the yeast strain and on the presence of nitrogenous compounds in the medium (50).

Meanwhile, Romano et al. (3) noted the production of acetic acid over five weeks of fermentation in samples containing hemp stalks (104.57 mg/L). Moreover, Kawa-Rygielska et al. (9) noted a significant increase in this acid over 16 days of fermentation in the meads with added aronia syrup (1070 mg/L), dandelion (1400.6 mg/L) and powdered grape seeds (1150 mg/L). However, the values these authors obtained were lower than those reported for the control sample (1700 mg/L). According to Sroka and Tuszyński (50), high osmotic pressure and unfavourable fermentation conditions can increase acetic acid synthesis by yeasts, leading to the accumulation of a higher concentration of this acid in the mead, which in turn can negatively affect the quality of the product.

Anunciação et al. (47) added tamarind pulp (10 %) to the mead wort, which resulted in an increase in the yeast cell viability during fermentation and also in an increase in the ethanol production. However, Amorim et al. (10) evaluated the effect of the addition of 0, 10, 15, 25 and 30 % of acerola pulp on the production of mead by S. cerevisiae AWRI796 and reported that the addition of increasing amounts of acerola pulp promoted a progressive increase in the cell growth of the fermentative yeast. Balogu and Towobola (31) noted that the addition of coconut milk to mead improved some fermentative parameters, especially of the sample prepared with honey wort (1200 mL) and coconut milk (600 mL), which showed higher attenuation (98.63 %), lower residual sugar content (3.01 g/L), and higher fermentation velocity (0.99) after 60 days of fermentation. According to Mascarenhas et al. (48), the addition of pineapple pulp to mead made it possible to obtain a beverage with 30 % more ethanol than the control sample. Araújo et al. (1) noted that a higher concentration of cowpea extract (30 g/L) had a stimulatory effect on the metabolic activities of yeasts, especially in relation to Saccharomyces bayanus (SbPB), thus resulting in a higher substrate consumption (90 %) and a greater ethanol production (15.5 %).

In a study conducted by Cavanholi et al. (11) on the mead with added yerba mate powder extract, obtained by cold infusion and by hot infusion, higher acidity values were noted in the samples containing yerba mate powder extract (60.0 to 60.5 mmol/L), and a higher content of total soluble solids (24.73 °Brix) in the wort with yerba mate powder extract obtained by hot infusion, which resulted in a higher alcohol content in the beverage (11.05 %).

Alcoholic fermentation step

In the alcoholic fermentation step, the wort may be boiled to ensure aseptic conditions for fermentation (34). Furthermore, Starowicz and Granvogl (51) reported that controlled boiling of the wort can result in the mead with high aroma quality. However, temperature and boiling time are not well defined. Moreover, it is possible to note a discrepancy between the temperatures and boiling times in different studies (34,52).

The alcoholic fermentation step of mead is the biochemical process that occurs by the action of yeasts through the conversion of sugars from honey or other wort ingredients into ethanol and carbon dioxide (36). The yeasts that are mostly used in meads are those of the genus Saccharomyces (14,53), which must show high fermentative activity, high tolerance to osmotic pressure, and high concentrations of ethanol (42). However, recently the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts, such as those of the Torulaspora genus, has been proposed for the preparation of either mixed or pure cultures aiming mainly to increase the aromatic complexity of the mead. Barry et al. (28) noted that the mixed culture of different Torulaspora strains (YH178 and YH179) together with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (WLP715) showed a good fermentative performance in less than 10 days. Moreover, mead fermented by Torulaspora strains showed better sensory characteristics, especially regarding its flavour.

It is important to highlight that the fermentation time for mead is quite variable and depends on the ingredients used in the wort, as well as on the dilution ratio and type of yeast (50). The temperature dictates the speed of the process (36), which is normally carried out between 22 and 25 °C and must be monitored periodically to minimize the risk of premature interruption of the fermentation (7,32,33). Some studies have been carried out aiming to optimize the fermentation time and increase the quality of mead. Roldán et al. (32) added pollen to the wort as a fermentation activator and noted an increase in the yield and fermentation efficiency of approx. 7 and 10 %, respectively, besides an increase in the volatile content and an improvement in the beverage sensory profile. Similar results were obtained by Kempka and Mantovani (54), who also added pollen to the mead (1 %) and noted a decrease in fermentation time, from 168 to 72 h, compared with the control sample (without pollen).

The end of fermentation is reached when the density of the mead remains constant, indicating the need for filtration to remove suspended particles that are deposited at the bottom of the fermentor (dregs). However, fermentation may also be interrupted in order to obtain mead with a sweet characteristic and lower alcohol content.

Post-fermentation step

After fermentation, the racking of the mead (transfer of the wort from one container to another) is carried out (12) in order to remove the dregs that have settled on the bottom of the fermentor. The clarification of the mead can be carried out by centrifugation of the wort or by the addition of clarifying agents, such as bentonite, egg white, gelatin, casein, and others (7), in which case the insoluble solids of the beverage are removed by sedimentation. Silva et al. (55) investigated the effect of different clarifying agents (bentonite, banana peel flour and passion fruit peel flour) on the presence of biogenic amines in mead. These authors concluded that bentonite is a good binder for mead, since the mean values for the number of biogenic amines remained low and constant ​​during storage of the beverage. Moreover, the other clarifying agents used (banana peel flour and passion fruit peel meal) proved to be a viable alternative for the producer, as they showed a profile similar to that of the control (bentonite).

After clarification, the mead is bottled. The bottles must be stored in a cool environment, protected from light and without variation in temperature in order to maintain the chemical and sensory characteristics of the product (56). After that, the mead can be subjected to maturation, where the aromatic compounds in the beverage are developed. The maturation stage can take from several months to years. In some cases, in order to make the beverage more complex, the maturation of mead may take place in wooden barrels before bottling (57). The maturation of beverages in oak barrels promotes the integration of aromatic compounds, softening the structure of the beverage and balancing its flavour (58). However, other types of maturation techniques and wood can also be used in the maturation of mead. Fey et al. (56) conducted maturation of meads for 100 days using woodchips of European oak, jatobá (stinkingtoe) and jequitibá and noted a decrease in luminosity and an increase in the intensity of the yellow and red colours in the samples with the woodchips in comparison with the control (without woodchips) besides an increase in the content of some esters, especially ethyl acetate.

BIOACTIVE POTENTIAL OF MEAD: EFFECT OF THE ADDITION OF DIFFERENT INGREDIENTS AND ADDITIVES ON THE PHENOLIC COMPOSITION OF THE BEVERAGES

Mead has been reported as a potentially bioactive beverage, mainly because of its profile of phenolic compounds and its antioxidant activity. The phenolic content of mead is strongly related to the ingredients that are used to produce it (14). It is worth noting that honey is an important source of bioactive compounds for mead since some phenolic compounds are transferred from the plants to the honey by the bees (59). However, the concentration of these compounds in mead depends on the origin and on the type of honey, besides the amount used in the preparation of the beverage (60). Although there are many studies on the phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of different types of honey, little information can be found regarding mead.

Phenolic compounds comprise a distinct class of secondary plant metabolites from different plant sources, such as fruits, cereals and herbs (61), which are rich in flavonoids, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, anthocyanins, catechins, phenolic acids, phytoestrogens, tannins, stilbenes and curcuminoids (62). Phenolic compounds are potent antioxidants that reduce or even inhibit the propagation of oxidation reactions by scavenging the reactive form of oxygen (60).

As reported by Dhalaria et al. (63), the health benefits associated with the consumption of fruits and vegetables have drawn increasing interest from consumers. Thus, the inclusion of ingredients of vegetable origin in the mead can enhance the beverage’s bioactive properties, since Bednarek and Szwengiel (52) report that the antioxidant potential of mead can be improved by adding fruit juices and herbs.Table 3 (9,27,46,52,60) shows the phenolic composition of the mead containing different ingredients of vegetable origin.

Table 3 Phenolic profile of the mead containing different ingredients of plant origin
Meadγ(phenolic compound)/(mg/L)Reference
Chokeberry meadProtocatechuic acid: 4.46
Flavonols: 1.78
(9)
Dandelion meadFlavonols: 1.06 (9)
Grape seed meadGallic acid: 3.66
Procyanidins: 14.04
(9)
Yellow Cornelian cherry meadGallic acid: 2.30
p-Coumaric acid: 0.18
Loganic acid: 54.80
Ellagic acid: 0.205-O-caffeoylquinic acid: 1.20
Hydroxybenzoic acids: 4.10
Hydroxycinnamic acids: 1.60
(27)
Coral Cornelian cherry meadGallic acid: 1.20
p-Coumaric acid: 0.18
Loganic acid: 76.40
Ellagic acid: 0.20
5-O-caffeoylquinic acid: 1.80
Hydroxybenzoic acids: 3.40
Hydroxycinnamic acids: 2.30
(27)
Red Cornelian cherry meadGallic acid: 1.00
p-Coumaric acid: 0.18
Loganic acid: 48.80
Ellagic acid: 0.20
5-O-caffeoylquinic acid: 1.40
Hydroxybenzoic acids: 3.40
Hydroxycinnamic acids: 1.80
(27)
Sherry meadGallic acid: 0.805
Protocatechuic acid: 0.344
Gentisic acid: 0.039
Protocatechuic aldehyde: 0.029
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 0.057
Vanillic acid: 0.152
Caffeic acid: 0.087
Syringic acid: 0.038
Vanillin: 4.126
Ferulic acid: 0.224
Ethylvanillin: 0.075
p-coumaric acid: 2.335
(46)
Nut meadGallic acid: 0.100
Protocatechuic acid: 0.020
Protocatechuic aldehyde: 0.048
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 0.060
Caffeic acid: 0.081
Syringic acid: 0.088
Vanillin: 0.312
Ferulic acid: 0.059
Ethylvanillin: 0.063
p-coumaric acid: 0.097
(46)
Almond meadGallic acid: 0.084
Protocatechuic acid: 0.054
Gentisic acid: 0.022
Protocatechuicaldehyde: 0.027
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 0.054
Vanillic acid: 0.114
Vanillin: 40.403
Ferulic acid: 0.085
Ethylvanillin: 0.028
p-coumaric acid: 0.057
(46)
Blackcurrant meadGallic acid: 3.367
Protocatechuic acid: 1.525
Gentisic acid: 0.191
Protocatechuicaldehyde: 0.272
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 1.867
Vanillic acid: 0.724
Caffeic acid: 2.998
Syringic acid: 2.443
Vanillin: 1.297
Ferulic acid: 1.701
Ethylvanillin: 0.332
p-coumaric acid: 0.273
(46)
Raspberry meadGallic acid: 0.395
Protocatechuic acid: 1.089
Gentisic acid: 0.022
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 0.168
Vanillic acid: 0.742
Caffeic acid: 1.139
Syringic acid: 0.197
Vanillin: 0.280
Ferulic acid: 0.771
Ethylvanillin: 0.092
p-coumaric acid: 0.081
(46)
Herbal meadProtocatechuic acid: 0.242
Gentisic acid: 0.015
Protocatechuic aldehyde: 0.027
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 0.248
Vanillic acid: 0.222
Caffeic acid: 0.797
Syringic acid: 0.066
Vanillin: 1.548
Ferulic acid: 1.919
Ethylvanillin: 0.091
p-coumaric acid: 0.110
(46)
Cherry meadGallic acid: 0.472
Protocatechuic acid: 0,600
Protocatechuic aldehyde: 0.238
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid: 0.494
Vanillic acid: 0.369
Caffeic acid: 1.317
Syringic acid: 0.271
Vanillin: 0.868
Ferulic acid: 2.418
Ethylvanillin: 1.496
p-coumaric acid: 0.109
(46)
Fruit juice, root extract and herbsVanillic acid: 0.12
Caffeic acid: 1.01
Syringic acid: 0.43
Ferulic acid: 0.21
p-coumaric acid: 3.92
Chlorogenic acid: 4.99
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid: 2.35
Apigenin: 0.04
Catechin: 0.01
Isoorientin: 0.05
Kaempferol: 0.10
Naringenin: 4.54
Orientin: 0.16
Quercetin: 0.32
Rutin: 1.75
Sinapic acid: 0.01
Tyrosol: 19.07
(52)
Multi-fruit juiceGallic acid: 3.46
Protocatechuic acid: 0.74
Vanillic acid: 0.09
Caffeic acid: 0.33
Ferulic acid: 0.15
p-coumaric acid: 1.20
Chlorogenic acid: 0.24
(60)
Extracts from roots and herbsGallic acid: 7.56
Protocatechuic acid: 1.89
Vanillic acid: 0.24
Caffeic acid: 0.37
Ferulic acid: 0.30
p-coumaric acid: 0.41
Chlorogenic acid: 0.22
(60)
HerbsGallic acid: 0.73
Protocatechuic acid: 2.01
Vanillic acid: 0.29
Caffeic acid: 0.29
Ferulic acid: 0.20
p-coumaric acid: 0.93
Chlorogenic acid: 0.57
(60)
Blackcurrant juice and root spicesGallic acid: 0.86
Protocatechuic acid: 1.38
Vanillic acid: 0.84
Caffeic acid: 0.87
Ferulic acid: 0.48
p-coumaric acid: 0.73
Chlorogenic acid: 0.22
(60)
Raspberry juiceGallic acid: 1.36
Protocatechuic acid: 1.47
Vanillic acid: 0.15
Caffeic acid: 0.69
Ferulic acid: 0.50
p-coumaric acid: 0.19
Chlorogenic acid: 0.24
(60)
Rowanberry juiceGallic acid: 1.15
Protocatechuic acid: 0.71
Vanillic acid: 0.33
Caffeic acid: 0.87
Ferulic acid: 0.49
p-coumaric acid: 0.04
Chlorogenic acid: 0.53
(60)
Chokeberry juice and root spicesGallic acid: 0.78
Protocatechuic acid: 1.02
Vanillic acid: 0.33
Caffeic acid: 0.18
Ferulic acid: 0.11
p-coumaric acid: 0.17
Chlorogenic acid: 1.38
(60)
Root spices and herbsGallic acid: 0.80
Protocatechuic acid: 0.30
Vanillic acid: 0.12
Caffeic acid: 0.24
Ferulic acid: 0.21
p-coumaric acid: 0.03
Chlorogenic acid: 1.07
(60)
Sour cherry juice and root spicesGallic acid: 0.55
Protocatechuic acid: 0.71
Vanillic acid: 0.40
Caffeic acid: 0.03
Ferulic acid: 0.15
p-coumaric acid: 0.20
Chlorogenic acid: 0.08
(60)
Plum must and root spicesGallic acid: 1.14
Protocatechuic acid: 1.14
Vanillic acid: 0.40
Caffeic acid: 0.22
Ferulic acid: 0.10
p-coumaric acid: 0.18
Chlorogenic acid: 0.71
(60)

According to a study by Socha et al. (60), two groups of phenolic acids were identified in ten samples of commercial mead from Poland. These authors found that the plant species used in the preparation of the mead had a significant effect on the profile of phenolic acids, especially in the sample made with honey (in a 1:2 ratio of honey and water) and rowan juice (4.46 mg/L), and also in the sample of ’Kasztelanski’ mead (in a 1:1 ratio of honey and water) with added extract of roots and herbs (10.97 mg/L). Among the hydroxycinnamic acids, the highest measured amounts were of chlorogenic, caffeic, p-coumaric and ferulic acids, and among the hydroxybenzoic acids, the identified acids were gallic and protocatechuic (predominant among the analysed samples), besides vanillic acid. Zahrani et al. (64) reported that gallic acid is commonly found in several plant species, has different biological activities, and is considered a substance that contains antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic properties. However, in relation to protocatechuic acid, its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects on animal tissues (mice) were proven in a study conducted by Habib et al. (65).

Švecová et al. (46) analysed 22 samples of commercial Czech meads and noted a great variability in the profile of phenolic compounds, which showed higher values for the samples containing additional ingredients (fruit juice, nuts, and herbal extracts) than the traditional meads, made only with honey and water. This result was especially evident in the mead with added black currant, which showed the highest content of phenolic compounds, with the emphasis on the concentrations of gallic (3.37 mg/L) and caffeic (2.99 mg/L) acids. It is noteworthy that caffeic acid can play an important role in the protection of different tissues and organs, protecting cell membranes from oxidative damage because of its ability to scavenge free radicals (66).

Adamenko et al. (27) investigated the effect of the addition of different varieties of Cornelian cherry on the polyphenol profile of meads and identified some compounds that belong to the groups of monoterpenes, phenolic acids and flavonoids. Among the monoterpenes, the iridoids, which until then had not been identified in the mead, were quantified. The iridoids from these monoterpenes have been reported to exert positive effects on the biological properties of the Cornelian cherry (67). The predominant phenolic acids were gallic (3.8 mg/mL) and chlorogenic (2.4 mg/mL) acids, showing higher concentrations in the mead fermented with the coral Cornelian cherry variety. Chlorogenic acid is a hydroxycinnamic acid that is widely present in plant species and has functional properties that are related to hypoglycaemic, hepatoprotective, antiviral, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory capacity (68). Besides these compounds, Adamenko et al. (27) also detected a different group of phenolic compounds that affect the biological properties and quality of foods, namely, the Q-3-glucuronide (Q-3-glcr), which was the only representative of the flavonols in the samples. On the other hand, anthocyanins were detected only in the mead with the addition of coral Cornelian cherry juice and red Cornelian cherry juice, with a predominance of those derived from pelargonidin. Anthocyanins have drawn increasing attention because of their preventive effect against some diseases, their ability to react with reactive oxygen species resulting from natural metabolic processes in plants or animals (69). Furthermore, according to Martín-Gómez et al. (70), the main health benefit properties of anthocyanins are their neuroprotective, cardioprotective, nephroprotective and ocular protection potential, as well as their anticarcinogenic and anti-inflammatory activity, among others.

In the study conducted by Kawa-Rygielska et al. (9), aronia syrup, dandelion and powdered grape seeds were separately added to the mead wort, and the phenolic compounds identified in the mead were hydroxycinnamic acids (derived from caffeic acid) and hydroxybenzoic acids (protocatechuic and gallic acid) as well as flavonols, procyanidins and flavanones. These authors noted that the highest concentration of phenolic acids was determined in the samples fermented with aronia syrup (52.9 mg/L of hydroxycinnamic acids and 4.39 mg/L of protocatechuic acid). Meanwhile, the mead with added powdered grape seeds stood out for its concentration of gallic acid (3.98 mg/L) and procyanidins (20.97 mg/L), which derived from the vegetable ingredient added to the wort. It is known that procyanidins have antibacterial, antioxidant and anti-obesity activities (71,72).

Bednarek and Szwengiel (52) investigated samples of commercial mead from Poland. The samples were saturated (heat treated) and unsaturated (non-heat treated), and also supplemented with fruit juice (raspberry, rowan and rosehip), root extract and herbs. These authors noted that the most abundant phenolic acid in the samples was chlorogenic acid, with average concentration of 4.99 mg/L. Naringenin was the flavonoid that had the highest concentration (4.54 mg/L), and is reported in other studies as the predominant flavonoid in Polish honeys (73). Naringenin is a flavanone usually present in citrus fruits. It has different pharmacological and biological properties regarding its antioxidant activity, which is related to anti-inflammatory and antitumour action, antimicrobial activity, and also fights the development of atherosclerosis (74,75). According to Smruthi et al. (74), naringenin is also present in glycosidic form, as naringin, which is responsible for the bitterness of the fruits.

Furthermore, the presence of tyrosol in mead was first reported in a study conducted by Bednarek and Szwengiel (52), who found that it was produced at concentration of 19.07 mg/L from tyrosine during fermentation. Tyrosol is a compound that is stable and less subject to autoxidation than other polyphenols, and in vitro and in vivo studies point to its biological potential related to antiatherogenic, cardioprotective and neuroprotective effects (76). This information may be interesting, since the polyphenols present in alcoholic beverages can have high bioaccessibility and are more easily absorbed by the intestine (60). However, so far there are no reports of studies that have evaluated the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds in the mead.

It is important to emphasize that bioactive compounds from different sources added to mead tend to positively influence its sensory acceptability (9,32). However, it is important to evaluate the desirable concentrations of these compounds in the beverage.

CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MEAD

Among the main challenges of the production of mead, the conditions of production stand out. This beverage is often produced either empirically or homemade, and producers many times come across problems related to the lack of standardization of the produced mead (3,7). Many of these problems are related to the harsh and adverse growth conditions to which yeasts need to respond and adapt. Another challenge for the productive sector is the standardization of mead in relation to its alcohol content, since mead is a beverage that shows a wide range of alcoholic content worldwide, generally between 8 and 18 % (8). Thus, depending on the ratio of honey and water used to make the wort, the incorporation of additional ingredients and the fermentation time, the obtained products will have completely different chemical and sensory characteristics. These differences reflect mainly on the sweetness parameters and on the perception of alcohol content, which are important characteristics for the consumer acceptance of beverages (9,41). Furthermore, Simão et al. (77) reported that although the technology patents related to mead are significant in number, there still is a demand for the diversification of this beverage.

Due to the slow scientific progress in this field, and taking into account the small amount of research studies on mead compared to other fermented alcoholic beverages (e.g. wine and beer), there is a possibility for research related to production issues, as well as the chemical quality, sensorial and bioactive aspects of the mead, which can and should be investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being relatively simple, the mead preparation process demands caution in relation to different process parameters in order to obtain a high-quality beverage. The addition of different additives and ingredients greatly affects both the preparation process and the composition of the mead. Thus, there is a need for greater dissemination of technical and scientific knowledge for the production of this beverage on a large scale and under controlled conditions for its preparation. It is also noted that there is little data related to the bioactive potential of mead. This way, this review study serves as a motivation for further investigations aiming at the development of innovative products with potential benefits to human health. Therefore, research studies mainly related to the bioaccessibility of the bioactive compounds in mead have great scientific relevance, raising many questions that still need to be answered.

Notes

[1] Financial disclosure FUNDING

This work was supported in part by the CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Brazil - code 001), CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil) and FAPESC (Research and Innovation Support Foundation of Santa Catarina State, Brazil – code 2021TR000353).

[2] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials are available at:www.ftb.com.hr.

REFERENCES

1 

Araújo GS, Gutiérrez MP, Sampaio KF, de Souza SMA, Rodrigues RCLB, Martínez EA. Mead production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Safbrew T-58 and Saccharomyces bayanus (Premier Blanc and Premier Cuvée): Effect of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) extract concentration. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2020;191:212–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03267-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32112188

2 

Sottil C, Salor-Torregrosa JM, Moreno-Garcia J, Peinado J, Mauricio JC, Moreno J, et al. Using Torulaspora delbrueckii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus wine yeasts as starter cultures for fermentation and quality improvement of mead. Eur Food Res Technol. 2019;245:2705–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03384-z

3 

Romano R, Aiello A, de Luca L, Sica R, Caprio E, Pizzolongo F, et al. Characterization of a new type of mead fermented with Cannabis sativa L. (hemp). J Food Sci. 2021;86(3):874–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15614 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559225

4 

Akalin H, Bayram M, Anli RE. Determination of some individual phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of mead produced from different types of honey. J Inst Brew. 2017;123(1):167–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.396

5 

Gaglio R, Alfonzo A, Francesca N, Corona O, Gerlando RD, Columba P, et al. Production of the Sicilian distillate “Spiritu re fascitrari” from honey by- products: An interesting source of yeast diversity. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;261:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.09.004 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28992516

6 

Schwarz LV, Marcon AR, Delamare APL, Agostini F. Selection of low nitrogen demand yeast strains and their impact on the physicochemical and volatile composition of mead. J Food Sci Technol. 2020;57:2840–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04316-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624591

7 

Pereira AP, Oliveira JM, Mendes-Fereira A, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A. Mead and other fermented beverages. In: Pandey A, Sanromán MÁ, Du G, Soccol CR, Dussap C, editors. Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc; 2017. pp. 407-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63666-9.00014-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63666-9.00014-5

8 

Pereira AP, Mendes-Fereira A, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A. Improvement of mead fermentation by honey-must supplementation. J Inst Brew. 2015;121(3):405–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.239

9 

Kawa-Rygielska J, Adamenko K, Kucharsca AZ, Szatkowska K. Fruit and herbal meads – Chemical composition and antioxidant properties. Food Chem. 2019;283:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.040 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30722860

10 

Amorim TS, Lopes S de B, Bispo JAC, Bonafe CFS, de Carvalho GBM, Martínez EA. Influence of acerola pulp concentration on mead production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae AWRI 796. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2018;97:561–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.07.009

11 

Cavanholi MG, Wanderley BRSM, Santetti GS, Amboni RDMC, Fritzen-Freire CB. Influence of the addition of yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis A. St. Hil.) in powder on the physicochemical characteristics and bioactive potential of meads. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(9);e25010917821 (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17821 https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17821

12 

Iglesias A, Pascoal A, Choupina AB, Carvalho CA, Feás X, Estevinho LM. Developments in the fermentation process and quality improvement strategies for mead production. Molecules. 2014;19(8):12577–90. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190812577 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25153872

13 

Willey J, Jutzi C, Tomasino E. Influence of fermentation temperature and nutrient addition on chemical and sensory characteristics of traditional honey wine. Food Process Preserv. 2018;3(1):1022.

14 

Starowicz M, Granvogl M. An overview of mead production and the physicochemical, toxicological, and sensory characteristics of mead with a special emphasis on flavor. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020;106:402–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.09.006

15 

Piatz S. The complete guide to making mead: The ingredients, equipment, processes, and recipes for crafting honey wine. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Voyageur Press; 2014.

16 

Ramalhosa E, Gomes T, Pereira AP, Dias TG, Estevinho LM. Mead production: Tradition versus modernity. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2011;63:101–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384927-4.00004-X PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21867893

17 

Morais de LF. The Craft Mead Guide. São Paulo, Brazil: Livraria da Física; 2018 (in Portuguese).

18 

Codex Stan 12-1981 (Rev. 2-2001). Revised codex standard for honey. Codex Alimentarius. Geneva, Switzerland: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO); 2001. Available from:https://ihc-platform.net/codex2001.pdf.

19 

Seraglio SKT, Schulz M, Brugnerotto P, Silva B, Gonzaga LV, Fett R, et al. Quality, composition and health-protective properties of citrus honey: A review. Food Res Int. 2021;143:110268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110268 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33992369

20 

da Silva PM, Gauche C, Gonzaga LV, Costa ACO, Fett R. Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem. 2016;196:309–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.051 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26593496

21 

Santos-Buelga C. González-Paramás AM. Chemical composition of honey. In: Alvarez-Suarez J, editor. Bee Products - Chemical and biological properties. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. pp. 43-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59689-1_3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59689-1_3

22 

Al-Farsi M, Al-Belushi S, Al-Amri A, Al-Hadhrami A, Al-Rusheidi M, Al-Alawi A. Quality evaluation of Omani honey. Food Chem. 2018;262:162–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.104 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29751904

23 

De Melo AAM, de Almeida-Muradian LB, Sancho TM, Pascual-Maté A. Composition and properties of Apis mellifera honey: A review. J Apic Res. 2017;57(1):5–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1338444

24 

Luchese RH, Prudencio ER, Guerra AF. Honey as a functional food. In: Alencar ATV, editor. Honey analysis. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2017. pp. 287-308. https://doi.org/10.5772/67020 https://doi.org/10.5772/67020

25 

Villacrés-Granda I, Coello D, Proaño A, Ballesteros I, Roubik DW, Jijón G, et al. Honey quality parameters, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity in twelve Ecuadorian stingless bees (Apidae: Apinae: Meliponini) tested against multi resistant human pathogens. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2021;140:110737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110737

26 

Terzo S, Mulè F, Amato A. Honey and obesity-related dysfunctions: A summary on health benefits. J Nutr Biochem. 2020;82:108401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108401 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454412

27 

Adamenko K, Kawa-Rygielska J, Kucharscka AZ, Piórecki N. Characteristics of biologically active compounds in Cornelian cherry meads. Molecules. 2018;23(8):2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23082024 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110900

28 

Barry JP, Metz MS, Hughey J, Quirk A, Bochman ML. Two novel strains of Torulaspora delbrueckii isolated from the honey bee microbiome and their use in honey fermentation. Fermentation (Basel). 2018;4(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation4020022

29 

Silva IP, Dias LG, da Silva MO, Machado C. Detection of biogenic amines in mead of social bee. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2020;121:108969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108969

30 

Lopes R, Costa M, Ferreira M, Gameiro P, Fernandes S, Catarino C, et al. Caffeic acid phenolipids in the protection of cell membranes from oxidative injuries. Interaction with the membrane phospholipid bilayer. BBA Biomembranes. 2021;1863(12):183727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183727 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400139

31 

Balogu TV, Towobola O. Production and quality analysis of wine from honey and coconut milk blend using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fermentation (Basel). 2017;3(2):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation3020016

32 

Roldán A, van Muiswinkel GCJ, Lasanta C. Palacios, Caro I. Influence of pollen addition on mead elaboration: Physicochemical and sensory characteristics. Food Chem. 2011;126(2):574–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.045

33 

Gupta JK, Sharma R. Production technology and quality characteristics of mead and fruit-honey wines: A review. Nat Prod Radiance. 2009;8(4):345–55.

34 

Czabaj S, Kawa-Rygielska J, Kucharska AZ, Kliks J. Effects of mead wort heat treatment on the mead fermentation process and antioxidant activity. Molecules. 2017;22(5):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050803 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28505111

35 

Chen XX, Lam KH, Chen QX, Leung GPH, Tang SCW, Sze SCW, et al. Ficus virens proanthocyanidins induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells concomitantly ameliorated 5-fluorouracil induced intestinal mucositis in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;110:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.10.017 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29030256

36 

Mărgăoan R, Strant M, Varadi A, Topal E, Yucel B, Comea-Cipcigan M, et al. Bee collected pollen and bee bread: Bioactive constituents and health benefits. Antioxidants. 2019;8(12):568. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120568 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756937

37 

Morales VE, Alcarde EM, de Angelis D de F. Mead features fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae (lalvin k1-1116). Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12(2):199–204. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.2147

38 

Mendes-Ferreira A, Cosme F, Basbosa C, Falco V, Inês A, Mendes-Faia A. Optimization of honey-must preparation and alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for mead production. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;144(1):193–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.016 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20937538

39 

Pereira AP, Mendes-Fereira A, Oliveira JM, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A. High-cell-density fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the optimisation of mead production. Food Microbiol. 2013;33(1):114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.09.006 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23122509

40 

Pereira AP, Mendes-Fereira A, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A. Mead production: Fermentative performance of yeasts entrapped in different concentrations of alginate. J Inst Brew. 2014;120(4):575–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.175

41 

Gomes TD, Dias TG, Cadavez VAP, Verdial J. Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 2105;65(2):137-42. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjfns-2015-0006 https://doi.org/10.1515/pjfns-2015-0006

42 

Pereira AP, Mendes-Fereira A, Oliveira JM, Estevinho LM. Mendes-Faia. Mead production: Effect of nitrogen supplementation on growth, fermentation profile and aroma formation by yeasts in mead fermentation. J Inst Brew. 2015;121(1):122–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.184

43 

Wanderley BRSM, Haas ICS, Biluca FC, Brugnerotto P, Aquino ACMS, Costa ACO, et al. How native and exotic Brazilian fruits affect the profile of organic acids and the yeast performance during the mead fermentation process? JSFA Rep. 2022;2(4):161–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsf2.40

44 

Adamenko K, Kawa-Rygielska J, Kucharska AZ, Głowacki A, Piórecki N. Changes in the antioxidative activity and the content of phenolics and iridoids during fermentation and aging of natural fruit meads. Biomolecules. 2021;11(8):2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081113 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439780

45 

Klikarová J, Ceslová L, Fischer J. Rapid analysis of phenyl isothiocyanate derivatives of amino acids present in Czech meads. J Chromatogr A. 2021;1644:462134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462134 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33848765

46 

Švecová B, Bordovská M, Kalvachová D, Hájek T. Analysis of Czech meads: Sugar content, organic acids content and selected phenolic compounds content. J Food Compos Anal. 2015;38:80–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2014.11.002

47 

Anunciação AS, Martins JAB, Amorim TS, de Carvalho GBM, Martinez EA. Tamarind pulp in the mead production. Rev Bras Agrotec. 2017;7(2):441–5. [in Portuguese]

48 

Mascarenhas AM de O, Amorim TS, Anunciação AS, Albinati FL, Martinez EC. Mead production: Pineapple (Ananas mill) pulp concentration effect. Rev Bras Agrotec. 2017;7(2):436–40. [in Portuguese]

49 

Uzhel AS, Borodina AN, Gorbovskaya AV, Shpigun OA, Zatirakha AV. Determination of full organic acid profiles in fruit juices and alcoholic beverages using novel chemically derivatized hyperbranched anion exchanger. J Food Compos Anal. 2021;95:103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103674

50 

Sroka P, Tuszyński T. Changes in organic acid contents during mead wort fermentation. Food Chem. 2007;104(3):1250–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.046

51 

Starowicz M, Granvogl M. Effect of wort boiling on volatiles formation and sensory properties of mead. Molecules. 2022;27(3):710. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030710 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35163970

52 

Bednarek M, Szwengiel A. Distinguishing between saturated and unsaturated meads based on their chemical characteristics. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2020;133:109962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109962

53 

Pereira AP. Characterization of honey for mead production [MSc Thesis]. Bragança, SP, BR: Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança, Instituto Politécnico Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança; 2008 (in Portuguese).

54 

Kempka AP, Mantovani GZ. Production of mead using honey of different qualities. Rev Brasil Prod Agroind. 2013;15(3):273-81 (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.15871/151-8595/rbpa.v15n3p273-281

55 

Silva PI, Dias LG, da Silva MO, Machado CS, Paula VMB, Evangelista-Barreto NS, et al. Detection of biogenic amines in mead of social bee. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2020;121:108969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108969

56 

Fey GG, Junior MRC, Mileski JPF, Lucchetta L. Characterization and volatile compounds of fresh and aged mead in different types of wood. Braz J Develop. 2020;6(5):25812–26. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n5-146

57 

Peepall C, Nickens DG, Vinciguerra J, Bochman M. An organoleptic survey of meads made with lactic acid-producing yeasts. Food Microbiol. 2019;82:398–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027799

58 

Morata A, Vaquero C, Palomero IF, Loira MA, Bañuelos J, Suárez-Lepe A. Technology of Vermouth Wines. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM, editors. Alcoholic beverages. Cambridge: UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. pp. 35-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815269-0.00002-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815269-0.00002-7

59 

Kahoun D, Rezková S, Veskrnová K, Královský J, Holčapek M. Determination of phenolic compounds and hydroxymethylfurfural in meads using high performance liquid chromatography with coulometric-array and UV detection. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1202(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.06.016 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18620360

60 

Socha R, Pajak P, Fortuna T, Buksa K. Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of Polish meads. Int J Food Prop. 2015;18(12):2713–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015.1004588

61 

Mikolajczak N, Tanska M, Ogrodowska D. Phenolic compounds in plant oils: A review of composition, analytical methods, and effect on oxidative stability. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;113:110–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.046

62 

Huang Y, Xiao D, Burton-Freeman BM, Edirisinghe I. Chemical changes of bioactive phytochemicals during thermal processing. In: Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier Inc.; 2016. pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03055-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03055-9

63 

Dhalaria R, Verma R, Kumar D, Puri S, Tapwal A, Kumar V, et al. Bioactive compounds of edible fruits with their anti-aging properties: A comprehensive review to prolong human life. Antioxidants. 2020;9(11):1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9111123 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202871

64 

Al Zahrani NA, El-Shishtawy RM, Asiri AM. Recent developments of gallic acid derivatives and their hybrids in medicinal chemistry: A review. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;204:112609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112609 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32731188

65 

Habib SA, Suddek GM, Rahim MA, Abdelrahman RS. The protective effect of protocatechuic acid on hepatotoxicity induced by cisplatin in mice. Life Sci. 2021;277:119485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119485 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864821

66 

Lopes ACA, Costa R, Andrade RP, Lima LMZ. Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae single inoculum and mixed inoculum with Meyerozyma caribbica on the quality of mead. Eur Food Res Technol. 2020;246:2175–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03563-3

67 

Dinda B, Kyriakopoulos AM, Dinda S, Zoumpourlis V, Thomaidis NS, Velegraki A, et al. Cornus mas L. (cornelian cherry), an important European and Asian traditional food and medicine: Ethnomedicine, phytochemistry and pharmacology for its commercial utilization in drug industry. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;193:670–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.09.042 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27705748

68 

Ballesteros LF, Ramirez MJ, Orrego CE, Teixeira JA, Mussatto SI. Optimization of autohydrolysis conditions to extract antioxidant phenolic compounds from spent coffee grounds. J Food Eng. 2017;199:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.11.014

69 

Oliveira Filho JG de O, Braga CRA, de Oliveira BR, Gomes FP, Moreira VL, Pereira VAC, et al. The potential of anthocyanins in smart, active, and bioactive eco-friendly polymer-based films: A review. Food Res Int. 2021;142:110202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110202 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773677

70 

Martín-Gómez J, García-Martínez MT, Varo A, Merida J. Phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and color in the fermentation of mixed blueberry and grape juice with different yeasts. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2021;146:111661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111661

71 

Cao J, Yu X, Deng Z, Pan Y, Zhang B, Tsao R, et al. Chemical compositions, antiobesity, and antioxidant effects of proanthocyanidins from lotus seed epicarp and lotus seed pot. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(51):13492–502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05137 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30449095

72 

Chen CH, Wu YL, Lo D, Wu MC. Physicochemical property changes during the fermentation of longan (Dimocarpus longan) mead and its aroma composition using multiple yeast inoculations. J Inst Brew. 2013;119(4):303–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.95

73 

Socha R, Juszczak L, Pietrzyk S, Galkowska D, Fortuna T, Witczak T. Phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of Polish honeys. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2011;46(4):528–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02517.x

74 

Smruthi MR, Nallamuthu I, Anand T. A comparative study of optimized naringenin nanoformulations using nano-carriers (PLA/PVA and zein/pectin) for improvement of bioavailability. Food Chem. 2022;369:130950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130950 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34474288

75 

Tripoli E, Guardia ML, Giammanco S, Majo DD, Giammanco M. Citrus flavonoids: Molecular structure, biological activity and nutritional properties: A review. Food Chem. 2007;104(2):466–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.054

76 

Karković Marković A, Torić J, Barbarić M, Jakobušić Brala C. Hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol and derivatives and their potential effects on human health. Molecules. 2019;24(10):2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137753

77 

Simão L, Wanderley BRSM, Nunes IL, Fritzen-Freire CB. Technological prospecting of patents on mead: Current overview and future perspectives. Cad Prospec. 2022;15(3):912-28 (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v15i3.47032 https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v15i3.47032

Appendices

Fig. S1 Flowchart showing the main steps in the preparation of mead. *Dotted rectangles represent optional steps in mead production. Adapted from (9) and (32)
FTB-61-179-fS.jpg

This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.