Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.59549/n.164.3-4.5

Predatory journals: authors in great doubt

Kristina Romić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-7063 *

* Corresponding author.


Full text: croatian pdf 677 Kb

page 287-308

downloads: 431

cite

Supplements: 05 Abstract romic.pdf


Abstract

The emergence of journals and publishers of questionable quality has become
a major problem not only for scientific communication but also for the
development of science and human society. Such journals are published in
open access; they use the business model of charging costs to authors; and
at the same time, they do not conduct peer review but publish everything
without any criteria. Therefore, the basic feature of a journal of questionable
quality is the lack of selectivity in the manuscript selection process due to the
absence of a review process. It is extremely important that users (scientists,
but also the general public) know how to recognise such journals. The aim of
the paper is to investigate the appearance of journals and publishers of questionable
quality as an anomaly within the scientific communication model
moulded by scientific journals in the Croatian scientific community.

Keywords

black lists; open access; open access journals; predatory journals; predatory publishers; questionable quality journals; scientific communication; white lists

Hrčak ID:

311265

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/311265

Publication date:

13.12.2023.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 982 *