Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2023.0406

Prevalence of mastitis in Algerian dromedary camels and antimicrobial resistance of the causative Staphylococci

Imane Barka ; National Higher School of Veterinary (NHSV), 16000, Algiers, Algeria
Madjid Akkou orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1631-9249 ; Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Saad DAHLAB Blida1 PB: 09000, Blida, Algeria *
Djamel Khelef ; National Higher School of Veterinary (NHSV), 16000, Algiers, Algeria
Lamia Bentayeb ; Laboratory of Biotechnology, Environment and Health, University Blida1 PB: 09000, Algeria
Amina Bouchami ; Laboratory of medical analyses, Bioclinic, Douera, Algiers, Algeria
Abdelkarim Boudrissa ; Branch of M’sila, Pasteur Institute of Algeria, 28000, Algeria
Bernard Faye ; CIRAD-ES, UMR SELMET, TA/C112A, International Campus of Baillarguet, 34389, Montpellier, France
Khatima Ait-Oudhia ; National Higher School of Veterinary (NHSV), 16000, Algiers, Algeria

* Dopisni autor.


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 552 Kb

str. 271-280

preuzimanja: 513

citiraj

Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 552 Kb

str. 271-280

preuzimanja: 107

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

To investigate the prevalence, bacterial spectrum of mastitis, and antimicrobial resistance of the causative staphylococci in Algerian dromedary camels, a total of 200 lactating camels were first examined for clinical mastitis and the healthy quarters were examined for subclinical mastitis using the California Mastitis Test (CMT). Milk samples from the affected quarters were collected aseptically and analysed using conventional bacteriological isolation and identification procedures. Staphylococcal isolates were then analysed for antimicrobial resistance. The overall prevalence of mastitis in camels based on CMT and clinical examination was 35 % (70/200), of which 7.5 % (15/200) was clinical mastitis and 27.5 % (55/200) was subclinical mastitis. At the quarterly level, the overall prevalence was 11.87 % (95/800), of which 2.62 % (21/800) was clinical mastitis and 9.25 % (74/800) was subclinical mastitis. A total of 98 bacterial isolates were identified from the 95 cultured milk samples. Staphylococci (70.4%) were the predominant isolates, with 31.63 % identified as coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) including S. aureus at 25.51 % and 38.77 % identified as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). The remaining isolates were Micrococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., Bacillus sp., E. coli, and Enterococcus. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that 24 (34.78 %) of the isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobial drugs tested, while 21.73 % (15/69) were multidrug resistant strains. The highest resistance rates were found for penicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin with 33.33 %, 31.48 % and 21.74 %, respectively. Therefore, the implementation of integrated approaches in the study is of great importance for the prevention and control of mastitis to improve the quality of camel milk, minimize economic losses and avoid significant public health risks.

Ključne riječi

antibiotics resistance; Camelus dromedarius; mastitis; prevalence; staphylococci

Hrčak ID:

308304

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/308304

Datum izdavanja:

28.9.2023.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 1.348 *




Introduction

Similar to cow’s milk, camel's milk contains important nutrients as well as potentially therapeutic compounds with antihypertensive and antioxidant properties (Mahmoudi et al., 2022). Mastitis is one of the most problematic diseases in dairy animals around the world, caused by a wide range of microorganisms. In cattle, these include contagious and environmental bacteria, as well as fungi, algae, and viruses (Mbindyo et al., 2020). From the limited literature available for camels, the major bacterial pathogens isolated from subclinical mastitis were Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus, Bacillus, and Micrococcus species (Rahmeh et al., 2022; Alebie et al., 2021; Seligsohn et al., 2020; Abdelgadir, 2014; Saleh and Faye, 2011).

Two main forms of mastitis could be distinguished. The clinical form is less common and is characterized by systemic symptoms in the animals and conspicuous abnormalities in the udder and/or milk. In contrast, subclinical mastitis is more common and results in decreased milk production without visible clinical signs in the udder or abnormalities in the milk. Because subclinical mastitis is difficult to assess without diagnostic tests such as the California Mastitis Test (CMT) or somatic cell counts, camel farmers pay less attention to its occurrence and consequences than to clinical mastitis (Abera et al., 2010; Volpato et al., 2015). In addition to the serious economic losses caused by the disease, mastitis has serious zoonotic potential and has been linked to the increasing development and rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant strains worldwide (Kaczorek et al., 2017; Martins et al., 2020; Algammal et al., 2020). The overuse and misuse of antibiotics is a common practice in the dairy industry and on livestock farms in general. Recent evaluations show that 56 % of farmers worldwide treat their animals with non-prescribed antibiotics (Antók et al., 2020). Careless use of antimicrobial agents and inadequate hygiene and biosecurity contribute to the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance worldwide (Kaczorek et al., 2017).

To our knowledge, there is limited information on antimicrobial use and resistance in mastitis pathogens of dromedary camels in Algeria (Azzi et al., 2020; Saidi et al., 2021). Surveillance of pathogen susceptibility to antimicrobials is of paramount importance for animal health and public health as it provides important information for awareness, advice and policy recommendations (Acar and Roestel, 2001). Timely identification and understanding of the diversity of pathogens associated with mastitis is essential for effective control and prevention. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence, identify the major bacterial causes and determine the antimicrobial profile of staphylococcal strains causing mastitis in camelids in M’sila and Biskra districts of Algeria.

Materials and methods

Study area

This study was conducted in two districts in Algeria, namely M’sila and Biskra. The study area can be roughly divided into two agroclimatic zones.

The district of M’sila is located on the semi-arid bioclimatic plain of the continental type, which is partially subject to the influence of the Sahara. The summer is dry and very hot (38 to 42 °C), while the winter is very cold (7 to 10 °C). Rainfall is very low and irregular, not exceeding 250 mm/year. Biskra is located in the lower arid or Saharan bioclimatic stage, with very irregular rainfall of less than 200 mm/year. M’sila district belongs to the central highlands region (between 34°13’ and 36°02’ north latitude; 5°20’ and 3°21’east) and covers an area of 18,175 km². It is an agricultural-pastoral district of the steppe. Biskra district is located in the southeast of Algeria (between 33°21’ and 35°17’ north latitude; 4°08’ and 6°45’ east longitude). It covers an area of 22379.95 Km². The arable area is 185473 hectares (Figure 1).

image1.jpeg

Figure 1. Geographical situation of the camel herds

Samples selection

Only herds managed under pastoralist conditions were eligible for selection. Other factors considered during selection of herds were accessibility of herds, willingness to participate and cooperation among animal owners and herders.

Ethics statement and mastitis investigation

After approval by the camel breeders, the camel udders were first visually inspected and palpated for the presence of injury, pain, heat, and swelling. Any abnormality in the color or consistency of the milk collected from each quarter was examined. In one quarter that appeared healthy after clinical examination, the California Mastitis Test (CMT) was performed in the postcolostrum period to diagnose the presence of subclinical mastitis according to the procedures of Quinn et al. (Quinn et al., 1994). A quarter that has no visible signs of clinical mastitis but shows a positive CMT result is considered to be affected by subclinical mastitis. If clinical or subclinical mastitis was detected in the udder quarter, it was sampled individually and the milk was collected according to the procedures of the National Mastitis Council (NMC, 1990). A mastitic camel was required to have at least one quarter affected.

Animal sampling

Animals were selected from thirteen dairy herds located in the departments of M’sila and Biskra in Algeria. Milk samples were collected from udder-quarters of camels with subclinical mastitis SCM, as well as from camels with clinical mastitis, just before morning milking. Teats were washed thoroughly and dried with a single-use paper towel. The first three streams of milk from each teat were discarded. The teat-end and orifice were disinfected with cotton swabs soaked 70 % ethyl alcohol and approximately 10 mL foremilk samples were collected from each quarter of camels in a sterile tube seized horizontally. Samples were immediately placed in crushed ice and submitted to the laboratory within 2-4 hours.

Microbiological analysis

Bacteriological culture was performed and evaluated according to NMC standards (NMC, 1990). Briefly, 0.01 ml of milk from each sample was plated on blood agar, McConkey agar, and mannitol salt agar. After 24- or 48-h incubation, the plates that showed one or two types of colonies on blood agar were separately subcultured onto the appropriate media for pure culture processing. A mammary quarter was considered culture positive if growth of at least one colony was detected on the strips. Samples containing more than two different bacterial species were considered contaminated.

Of the pure cultures, each isolate was identified by colony morphology, type of hemolysis, Gram stain microscopy, and various biochemical tests used to characterize the isolates. Biochemical tests included: catalase and oxidase activities, substrate utilization determined by commercial biochemical test kits, and coagulase tests using rabbit plasma to identify staphylococci. Only coagulase-positive staphylococci were subjected to Api-Staph gallery analysis. Final identification of strains was performed using the commercial API20NE kit (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Several commercial API kits (API20NE, API20E, APINH, API Staph, API Strept) (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) were used for strain identification.

Staphylococci identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

In Gram-positive cocci, catalase tests with hydrogen peroxide 3 % were used to distinguish catalase-positive staphylococci from catalase-negative cocci. Coagulase tests with rabbit plasma were performed to distinguish between coagulase- positive staphylococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci. The coagulase-positive strains were further tested with the API Staph gallery assay. Antibiotic susceptibility testing for penicillin, oxacillin, cefoxitin, streptomycin, gentamicin, neomycin, erythromycin, lincomycin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, kanamycin, and norfloxacin was performed on all staphylococcal isolates using the disk diffusion methods recommended by SFM (2018).

Map conception and data analysis

The map showing the geographic distribution of herds in Figure 1 was created using Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 as available in Microsoft Office software, while the quality of the visuals was improved using Photoshop software.7.0.1 The data were presented in tables with frequencies and percentages. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2016. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for data analysis and calculation of significance differences. Results were considered significant when p<0.05.

Results and discussion

Knowledge on prevalence of camel mastitis, microbial panorama, and antimicrobial susceptibility of the disease-causing agents would significantly improve prevention and guide treatment.

Table 1. Population of the study and mastitis prevalence in dromedary camels

image2.jpeg

Clinical and subclinical mastitis prevalence

In this survey, the overall prevalence at the camel level was 35 %, with subclinical mastitis (27.5 %) and clinical mastitis accounting for the lowest percentage (7.5 %). Of the udder quarters, 11.87 % (95/800) were affected, of which 9.25% (74/800) were subclinical. The remaining 2.62 % (21/800) were in clinical form, showing active cases of mastitis with visible signs of the inflamed udder and abnormalities in the milk (Table 1). Regarding the geographical origin, subclinical mastitis was more prevalent in the udder districts studied in the department of Biskra (p=0.04) than in the province of M’sila. The present result is in agreement with the report of Saidi et al (2021), according to which the prevalence of clinical and subclinical mastitis in Algerian camels was 3.22 % and 35.48 %, respectively, regardless of the cause. The relatively high prevalence of mastitis in camels observed in Algeria might be related to the lack of reliable mastitis prevention. Although clinical mastitis in camels is easily detected and treated, the subclinical form almost always goes unnoticed by the camel owner and spreads the infection throughout the herd (Abera et al., 2010; Alebie et al., 2021); none of the farmers routinely performed CMT or other tests to screen their camels for subclinical mastitis. In addition, the harsh sanitary conditions with limited access to water under which herders' herds operate likely play a role in the hygienic udder health complications noted in this study, as hand hygiene and milking are a cornerstone of mastitis-reducing practices (Zucali et al., 2011; Azevedo et al., 2016). Elementary milking hygiene practices, such as washing hands and udder before milking, were rarely followed in the daily routine of the herds we visited.

Increasing age and lactation stage were associated with both a higher risk of SCM and a higher risk of IMI (Seligsohn et al., 2020). As camels naturally have a lactation period of up to 24 months (Nagy and Juhasz, 2016), the spread of mastitis pathogens in camel herds could be even greater, as all herds have at least one case of mastitis. In addition, unidentified infected animals could be the reservoir for contagious bacteria; transmission can occur from one animal to another during milking through the hands of milkers (Azevedo et al., 2016; Tourette et al., 2002). The finding that subclinical mastitis is the predominant form in both camels (27.5 %) and udder quarters (9.25 %) is clear evidence of the insidious enormous economic loss suffered by the sector. This poses a serious threat to consumers, as hygienic treatment of camel milk along the dairy value chain is generally non-existent (Wanjohi et al., 2013; Jans et al., 2017). Moreover, the increase in conductivity due to intramammary infection in milk was strongly associated with prolongation of rennet addition for milk gelling (Bentayeb et al., 2023). In healthy camel milk, caseins produced by rennet-induced coagulation showed a significant change in surface composition, with a decrease in carbon and oxygen atom concentration and an increase in nitrogen atom concentration at the surface of the proteins (Bensalah and Acem, 2022). Subclinical mastitis in camels can reduce the coagulability of camel milk.

Compared to other studies on subclinical mastitis in camels, our results are higher than the prevalence of 11.67 % in camels and the prevalence of 5.86 % in udder quarters reported by Al-Juboori et al. (2013) in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, but lower than 46 % in camels and 26 % in udder quarters reported by Seligsohn et al. (2020) in Kenya. Based on our findings, subclinical mastitis was found in 25 % of camels and 8.85 % of udder quarters in Ethiopia (Alebie et al., 2021). These observed differences in the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in camels could be related to different management practises.

Table 2. Bacterial isolation from quarter suffering from mastitis in camel

image3.jpeg

Bacteria responsible for intramammary infection in dromedary camels

From the point of view of intramammary infection, 98 mastitis pathogens, including Gramme-positive and Gramme-negative bacterial isolates, were identified from 95 mastitic udder quarter milk samples. Staphylococci (70.4 %) were the most frequently identified isolates, with 31.63 % for CPS and 38.77 % for CNS (Table 2). Staphylococci were frequently found in milk samples from camels with subclinical mastitis as well as in cases of clinical mastitis observed in our study, which is supported by the current knowledge on mastitis-causing pathogens in Algeria (Saidi et al., 2021). Of the total number of isolates, 38.77 % coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were isolated from most mastitis-positive milk samples, which is in agreement with the results of Mengistu et al. (2010) who reported 40.4 %. However, it is higher than Alebie et al. (2021) who reported 19.57 %. The high prevalence of CNS in this study could be explained by the fact that the bacterium, which is a normal skin flora, could originate from the hands of the milkers, the camel skin during milking or the camels' environment (Alamin, et al., 2013; Alqurashi et al., 2013). However, further studies are needed for Algeria to investigate the epidemiology and the specific pathogenic species involved in CNS mastitis.

In the present study, camel mastitis was mainly associated with CNS in M'sila department (p < 0.05), while a higher frequency of CPS and streptococcal strains was found in Biskra department. In contrast to CNS, which are known as facultative pathogens and are mainly isolated from subclinical mastitis cases that have no measurable impact on milk yield or clinical signs, CPS are of great importance as they are responsible for severe mastitis cases with a strong impact on milk yield and quality. The latter was found to be responsible for 31.63 % of the mastitis samples and for S. aureus in 25.51 %. The high rate of S. aureus isolation can be attributed to the fact that the skin of the udder and the milk of the infected gland are the main reservoirs of S. aureus. In addition, S. aureus can invade tissues and form deep-seated foci that are protected by a tissue barrier (Zaatout et al., 2020). The high incidence of staphylococcal mastitis may be due to inadequate hygiene, poor animal health services and lack of attention to mammary gland health in general.

Infection of udders with coliforms may be due to inadequate hygiene conditions and, to a lesser extent, faecal contamination of the udder (Geresu et al., 2021). The isolation rate of E. coli (8.16 %) in the current study relatively confirms the findings of Mengistu et al. (2010) and Alebie et al. (2021). The camels in the present study are grazed on large areas, the environment is dry and visible faecal contamination of udders, bedding and milking equipment is low.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Antibiotic resistance tests showed that 24 (34.78 %) of the isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobial drugs tested, while 65.21 % of the strains were resistant to at least one antibiotic. Several reports have shown that antibiotic resistance has increased among various bacterial pathogens, which has been identified as an emerging problem that raises major public health concerns due to the risk of transfer of resistance to humans and its impact on the efficacy of existing treatments (Algammal et al., 2020; Ye et al., 2017). In the present study, we described a high level of antimicrobial resistance in strains of staphylococci implicated in camel mastitis, particularly for penicillin G (33.33 %), tetracycline (31.48 %) and erythromycin (21.74 %). Resistance to erythromycin was significantly higher (p=0.03) in CPS than in CNS strains (Table 3).

Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococci involved in camel mastitis

image4.jpeg

Table 4. Antibiotics resistance profiles of Staphylococci associated with camel’s mastitis

image5.jpeg

MDR: multidrug resistance if resistance to three or families of antibiotics

Similar levels of resistance to the first-line treatment with penicillin G have already been reported in strains of bovine mastitis-associated staphylococci in Algeria (Akkou et al., 2016; Saidi et al., 2015). The scientific basis for the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials in camels, particularly with regard to therapeutic use against mastitis, is scant (Barlow, 2011). Six isolates showed a phenotype of methicillin resistance (resistant to cefoxitin) (Table 3). Accordingly, the CA-MRSA -ST8 clone was previously reported in healthy sheep and camels in Algeria (Agabou et al., 2017). Lack of knowledge about antimicrobial withdrawal periods can lead to residues in milk, which could contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance among dairy consumers.

Table 5. Antibiotic resistance Patterns of Staphylococci involved in camel mastitis

image6.jpeg

Patterns of antimicrobial resistance

Resistance to at least three classes of antibiotics is considered multidrug resistance according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), which was found in 21.73 % of staphylococcal isolates in camel mastitis (Table 4). This indicates an alarming increase in multidrug-resistant strains of S. aureus in camels (29.03 %), which poses a significant public health risk due to the regular consumption of raw milk in the area. This result is in partial agreement with the findings of Balemi et al. (2021), who described multidrug resistance in S. aureus species. We characterised the resistant strains with 24 resistance patterns belonging to nine herds. CPS and CNS isolates showed no difference in multidrug resistance levels (Table 5).

Conclusion

The present study shows a high prevalence of mastitis, especially in subclinical forms. Staphylococci were the most common mastitis pathogen. Due to the high prevalence of mastitis and staphylococci in camels, systematic monitoring of mastitis pathogens as well as their susceptibility to antibiotics is recommended in order to introduce appropriate control measures in affected herds. The implementation of integrated approaches to mastitis prevention and control is of great importance in the context of the study in order to improve the quality of camel milk, minimise economic losses and avoid significant public health risks.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their gratitude, especially to the pastoralists who participated in the study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Prevalencija mastitisa u alžirskih jednogrbih deva i antimikrobna rezistencija stafilokoka uzročnika mastitisa

Sažetak

Kako bi se istražila prevalencija, bakterijski spektar mastitisa i antimikrobna rezistencija stafilokoka uzročnika mastitisa u alžirskih jednogrbih deva, ukupno 200 ženki u laktaciji, inicijalno je pregledano na klinički mastitis, a zdrave četvrti pretražene su na subklinički mastitis pomoću kalifornijskog mastitis testa (CMT). Uzorci mlijeka iz oštećenih četvrti aseptički su prikupljeni i analizirani konvencionalnim postupcima bakteriološke izolacije i identifikacije. Zatim su izolati stafilokoka ispitani na antimikrobnu rezistenciju. Rezultati CMT-a i kliničkog pregleda deva ukazali su na ukupnu prevalenciju mastitisa od 35 % (70/200), od čega je 7,5 % (15/200) bio klinički mastitis, dok je 27,5 % (55/200) bio subklinički mastitis. Na razini tromjesečja ukupna prevalencija bila je 11,87 % (95/800), od čega je 2,62 % (21/800) bilo klinički, a 9,25 % (74/800) subklinički mastitis. Iz 95 kultiviranih uzoraka mlijeka identificirano je ukupno 98 bakterijskih izolata. Stafilokoki (70,4 %) su pri tom bili dominantni izolati, od čega je 31,63% bilo koagulaza pozitivnih stafilokoka (CPS) uključujući S. aureus s 25,51 %, a 38,77 % su bili koagulaza negativni stafilokoki (CNS). Preostali izolati bili su sojevi Micrococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., Bacillus sp., E. coli i Enterococcus. Testiranje osjetljivosti na antibiotike pokazalo je da je 24 (34,78 %) izolata bilo osjetljivo na sve testirane antimikrobne lijekove, dok su 21,73 % (15/69) bili sojevi otporni na više lijekova. Najviši stupanj rezistencije utvrđen je za penicilin (33,33 %), tetracikline (31,48 %) i eritromicin (21,74 %). Stoga je primjena integriranog pristupa u provedbi znanstvenih istraživanja od velike važnosti za prevenciju i kontrolu mastitisa kako bi se poboljšala kvaliteta devinog mlijeka, minimizirao ekonomski gubitak i spriječili značajniji rizici u pogledu javnog zdravlja.

Ključne riječi: rezistencija na antibiotike; Camelus dromedarius; mastitis; prevalencija; stafilokoki

References

Tourette, I., Messad, S., Faye, B. (2002): Impact des pratiques de traite des éleveurs sur la qualité sanitaire du lait de chamelle en Mauritanie . Revue d’Elevage de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 55, 229-233.

References

 

Abdelgadir, A.E. 2014Mastitis in camels (Camelus dromedarius): Past and recent research in pastoral production system of both East Africa and Middle East. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health. 6(8):208–216

 

Abera, M., Abdi, O., Abunna, F., Megersa, B. 2010Udder health problems and major bacterial causes of camel mastitis in Jijiga, Eastern Ethiopia: implication for impacting food security. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 42:341–347

 

Acar, J., Röstel, B. 2001Antimicrobial resistance: An overview. Revue Science et Technique. 20:797–810. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.3 .1309

 

Agabou, A., Ouchenane, Z., Essebe, C.N., Khemissi, S., Chehboub, M.T.E., Chehboub, I.B., Sotto, A., Dunyach-Remy, C., Lavigne, J.-P. 2027Emergence of Nasal carriage of ST80 and ST152 PVL+ Staphylococcus aureus isolates from livestock in Algeria. Toxins. 9:303https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9100303

 

Akkou, M., Antri, K., Bachtarzi, M.A., Bes, M., Tristan, A., Dauwalder, O., Kaidi, R., Meugnier, H., Tazir, M., Etienne, J., Laurent, F., Ramdani-Bouguessa, N. 2016Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with bovine mastitis and nasal carriage of workers in contact to animals in Algeria. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 36:184–188

 

Alamin, M.A., Alqurashi, A.M., Elsheikh, A.S., Yasin, T.E. 2013Mastitis incidence and bacterial causative agents isolated from lactating she-camel (Camelus dromedarius). IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 2(3):7–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0230710

 

Alebie, A., Molla, A., Adugna, W., Tesfaye, A., Ejo, M. 2021Prevalence, isolation, identification and risk factors of major bacterial cause of camel subclinical mastitis. BioMed Research International. 6:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522331

 

Algammal, A.M., Hetta, H.F., Elkelish, A., Alkhalifah, D.H.H., Hozzein, W.N., Batiha, G.E., El Nahhas, N., Mabrok, M.A. 2020Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): One health perspective approach to the bacterium epidemiology, virulence factors, antibiotic-resistance, and zoonotic impact. Infection and Drug Resistance. 13:3255–3265. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S272733

 

Al-Juboori, A.A., Kamat, N.K., Sindhu, J.I. 2013Prevalence of some mastitis causes in dromedary camels in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 27(1):9–14

 

Alqurashi, A.M., Alamin, M.A., Elsheikh, A.S., Yasin, T.E. 2013Sensitivity of bacterial isolates from mastitic She-camel (Camelus dromedarius) to antibiotics. Journal of American Science. 9(4)

 

Antók, F.I., Mayrhofer, R., Marbach, H., Masengesho, J.C., Keinprech, H., Nyirimbuga, V., Fischer, O., Lepuschitz, S., Ruppitsh, W., Ehling-schulz, M., Feβler, A.T., Shwartz, S., Monecke, S., Ehricht, R., Grunert, T., Spergser, J., Locaric, I. 2020Characterization of antibiotic and biocide resistance genes and virulence factors of Staphylococcus species associated with bovine mastitis in Rwanda. Antibiotics. 9(1):1

 

Azevedo, C., Pacheco, D., Soares, L., Romão, R., Moitoso, M., Maldonado, J., Guix, R., Simões J. 2016Prevalence of contagious and environmental mastitis-causing bacteria in bulk tank milk and its relationships with milking practices of dairy cattle herds in São Miguel Island (Azores). Tropical Animal Health and Production. 48:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0973-6

 

Azzi, O., Lai, F., Tennah, S., Menoueri, M.N., Achek, R., Azara, E., Tola, S. 2020Spa-typing and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical sheep mastitis in Médéa province, Algeria. Small Ruminant Research. 192:106168

 

Balemi, A., Gumi, B., Amenu, K., Girma, S., Gebru, M., Tekle, M., Ríus, A.A., D’Souza, D.H., Agga, G.E., Kerro Dego, O. 2021Prevalence of Mastitis and Antibiotic Resistance of Bacterial Isolates from CMT Positive milk samples obtained from dairy cows, camels, and goats in two pastoral districts in Southern Ethiopia. Animals. 11:1530https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061530

 

Barlow, J. 2011Mastitis therapy and antimicrobial susceptibility: A multispecies review with a focus on antibiotic treatment of mastitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 16:383–407

 

Bensalah, B., Acem, K. 2022Spectroscopy characterization of acid and rennet camel milk caseins using XRD, XPS, and SEM and evaluation of their emulsifying properties. Mljekarstvo. 72(3):161–171. https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2022.0305

 

Bentayeb, L., Akkou, M., Si-Ahmed Zennia, S., Titouche, Y., Doumandji, A., Megateli, S. 2023Impacts of subclinical mastitis on milk quality, clotting ability and microbial resistance of the causative Staphylococci. Large Animal Review. 29:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9993571

 

Geresu, M.A., Abera Leliso, S., Liben, G.W. 2021Camel mastitis: prevalence, risk factors, and isolation of major bacterial pathogens in Gomole district of Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International. 9993571:11

 

Jans, C., Merz, A., Johler, S., Younan, M., Tanner, S.A., Kaindi, D.W.M., Wangoh, J., Bonfoh, B., Meile, L., Tasara, T. 2017East and West African milk products are reservoirs for human and livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Food Microbiology. 65:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.01.017

 

Kaczorek, E., Malaczewska, J., Wójcik, R., Rękawek, W., Swicki, A.K. 2017Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Streptococcus spp. Isolated from cases of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle in Poland. Journal of Dairy Science. 100:6442–6453

 

Mahmoudi, I., Ben Moussa, O., Boulares, M., Chouaibi, M., Hassouna, M. 2022Novel probiotic camel milk yoghurt supplemented with inulin: antibacterial, antioxidant and antidiabetic effects. Mljekarstvo. 72(4):201–212. https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2022.0402

 

Martins, L., Barcelos, M.M., Cue, R.I., Anderson, K.L., Santos, M.V.,: Gonçalves, J.L. 2020Chronic subclinical mastitis reduces milk and components yield at the cow level. Journal of Dairy Research. 87:298–307

 

Mbindyo, C.M., Gitao, G.C., Mulei, C.M. 2020Dairy cattle in Embu and Kajiado counties, Kenya. Veterinary Medicine International. 12:http://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8831172

 

Mengistu, F., Molla, B., Ali, A. 2010Camel mastitis, associated bacterial pathogens and its impact on milk quality in Gewane District, Afar Regional State, Northeastern Ethiopia. Animal Health and Production. 58:249–259

 

Nagy, P., Juhasz, J. 2016Review of present knowledge on machine milking and intensive milk production in dromedary camels and future challenges. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 48:915–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1036-3

 

NMC 1990Microbiological procedures for the diagnosis of udder infection-3^(rd). Edition. National Mastitis Council,; Arlington, VA, USA.:

 

Quinn, P.J., Carter, M.E, Markey, B., Carter, G.R. 1994Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Wolfe Publishing,; London, UK,: p. 95–101

 

Rahmeh, R., Akbar, A., Alomirah, H., Kishk, M., Al-Ateeqi, A., Shajan, A., Thnayan, A., Esposito, A. 2022Assessment of mastitis in camel using high-throughput sequencing. Plos One. 170278456(12)

 

Saidi, R., Cantekin, Z., Khelef, D., Ergün, Y., Solmaz, H., Kaidi, R. 2015Antibiotic susceptibility and molecular identification of antibiotic resistance genes of Staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis in Algeria. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 21:513–520

 

Saidi, R., Mimoune, N., Benaissa, M.H., Baazizi, R., Aissaoui, F.Z., Behalil, M., Khelef, D., Kaidi, R. 2021Camel mastitis southern Algeria. Veterinarska stanica. 52(3):315–322

 

Saleh, S.K., Faye, B. 2011Detection of subclinical mastitis in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) using somatic cell counts, California mastitis test and udder pathogen. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 48–58

 

Seligsohn, D., Nyman, A.K., Younan, M., Sake, W., Persson, Y., Bornstein, S., Maichomo, M., de Verdier, K., Morrell J.M., Chenais, E. 2020Subclinical mastitis in pastoralist dairy camel herds in Isiolo, Kenya: Prevalence, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Journal of Dairy Science. 103:5

 

SFM: Société Française de Microbiologie 2018Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie : recommandations. Soussy CJ: CA-SFM Tourette, I., Messad, S., Faye, B. 2002Impact des pratiques de traite des éleveurs sur la qualité sanitaire du lait de chamelle en Mauritanie. Revue d’Elevage de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux. 55:229–233

 

Volpato, G., Lamin Saleh, S.M., Di Nardo, A. 2015Ethnoveterinary of Sahrawi pastoralists of Western Sahara: Camel diseases and remedies. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 11:54https://doi.org/10 .1186/s13002-015-0040-4

 

Wanjohi, M., Gitao, C.G., Bebora, L. 2013Subclinical mastitis affecting hygienic quality of marketed camel milk from North Eastern Province, Kenya. Microbiology Research International. 1:6–15

 

Ye, Q., Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Yang, G., Wang, H., Huang, J., Chen, M., Xue, L., Wang, J. 2017Antibiotic-resistant extended spectrum β-lactamase- and plasmid-mediated ampc-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated from retail food products and the pearl river in Guangzhou, China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8:96

 

Zaatout, N., Ayachi, A., Kecha, M. 2020Staphylococcus aureus persistence properties associated with bovine mastitis and alternative therapeutic modalities. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 129:1102–1119

 

Zucali, M., Bava, L., Tamburini, A., Brasca, M., Vanoni, L., Sandrucci, A. 2011Effects of season, milking routine and cow cleanliness on bacterial and somatic cell counts of bulk tank milk. Journal of Dairy Research. 78:436–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029911000598


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.