hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117

Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture

Josip Berdica   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0326 ; Sveučilište J. J. Strossmayera u Osijeku, Pravni fakultet, Stjepana Radića 13, HR–31000 Osijek
Tomislav Nedić ; Orahovička 47, HR–31000 Osijek

Fulltext: english, pdf (426 KB) pages 225-245 downloads: 42* cite
APA 6th Edition
Berdica, J. & Nedić, T. (2019). Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture. Filozofska istraživanja, 39 (1), 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
MLA 8th Edition
Berdica, Josip and Tomislav Nedić. "Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture." Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 39, no. 1, 2019, pp. 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117. Accessed 30 Nov. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Berdica, Josip and Tomislav Nedić. "Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture." Filozofska istraživanja 39, no. 1 (2019): 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
Harvard
Berdica, J., and Nedić, T. (2019). 'Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture', Filozofska istraživanja, 39(1), pp. 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
Vancouver
Berdica J, Nedić T. Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture. Filozofska istraživanja [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 November 30];39(1):225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
IEEE
J. Berdica and T. Nedić, "Conscientious Objection and Legal Profession. Critical Review about Legal (Lack of) Culture", Filozofska istraživanja, vol.39, no. 1, pp. 225-245, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
Fulltext: croatian, pdf (426 KB) pages 225-245 downloads: 138* cite
APA 6th Edition
Berdica, J. & Nedić, T. (2019). Prigovor savjesti i pravnička profesija. Kritički ogled o pravnoj (ne)kulturi. Filozofska istraživanja, 39 (1), 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
MLA 8th Edition
Berdica, Josip and Tomislav Nedić. "Prigovor savjesti i pravnička profesija. Kritički ogled o pravnoj (ne)kulturi." Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 39, no. 1, 2019, pp. 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117. Accessed 30 Nov. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Berdica, Josip and Tomislav Nedić. "Prigovor savjesti i pravnička profesija. Kritički ogled o pravnoj (ne)kulturi." Filozofska istraživanja 39, no. 1 (2019): 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
Harvard
Berdica, J., and Nedić, T. (2019). 'Prigovor savjesti i pravnička profesija. Kritički ogled o pravnoj (ne)kulturi', Filozofska istraživanja, 39(1), pp. 225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
Vancouver
Berdica J, Nedić T. Prigovor savjesti i pravnička profesija. Kritički ogled o pravnoj (ne)kulturi. Filozofska istraživanja [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 November 30];39(1):225-245. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117
IEEE
J. Berdica and T. Nedić, "Prigovor savjesti i pravnička profesija. Kritički ogled o pravnoj (ne)kulturi", Filozofska istraživanja, vol.39, no. 1, pp. 225-245, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi39117

Abstracts
The paper deals with the critical questioning of the relation between legitimate imposed legal obligations and the rights to refuse these obligations based on the right of the freedom of conscience, i.e. conscientious objection. The critical perspective that is applied to conduct the questioning is a legal profession because, in Croatian legal culture, there is no articulated answer to the question of how to reconcile these two obligations within the legal profession. The paper draws on the comprehension of John Rawls’s theory of conscientious objection since it is a systematic analysis of justice that shall submit subjective understanding of the good (conscience) to the principle of right (legitimate imposed obligation). In practice, the focus is on the grounds for acknowledging conscientious objection among lawyers as well on the obstacles to exercising this right.

Keywords
conscientious objection; John Rawls; legal culture; legal profession; lawyers

Hrčak ID: 224022

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/224022

[croatian]

Visits: 416 *