hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Pregledni rad
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204

Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism

Michal Sládeček ; Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Kraljice Natalije 45, RS–11000 Beograd

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (250 KB) str. 282-282 preuzimanja: 32* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Sládeček, M. (2020). Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism. Filozofska istraživanja, 40 (2), 282-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
MLA 8th Edition
Sládeček, Michal. "Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism." Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 40, br. 2, 2020, str. 282-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204. Citirano 25.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Sládeček, Michal. "Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism." Filozofska istraživanja 40, br. 2 (2020): 282-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
Harvard
Sládeček, M. (2020). 'Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism', Filozofska istraživanja, 40(2), str. 282-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
Vancouver
Sládeček M. Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism. Filozofska istraživanja [Internet]. 2020 [pristupljeno 25.11.2020.];40(2):282-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
IEEE
M. Sládeček, "Comprehensiveness and Reasonableness of the Conceptions of the Good in the Dispute of Political Liberalism and Perfectionism", Filozofska istraživanja, vol.40, br. 2, str. 282-282, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (250 KB) str. 269-282 preuzimanja: 32* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Sládeček, M. (2020). Sveobuhvatnost i razložnost koncepcija dobra u raspravi političkog liberalizma i perfekcionizma. Filozofska istraživanja, 40 (2), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
MLA 8th Edition
Sládeček, Michal. "Sveobuhvatnost i razložnost koncepcija dobra u raspravi političkog liberalizma i perfekcionizma." Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 40, br. 2, 2020, str. 269-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204. Citirano 25.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Sládeček, Michal. "Sveobuhvatnost i razložnost koncepcija dobra u raspravi političkog liberalizma i perfekcionizma." Filozofska istraživanja 40, br. 2 (2020): 269-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
Harvard
Sládeček, M. (2020). 'Sveobuhvatnost i razložnost koncepcija dobra u raspravi političkog liberalizma i perfekcionizma', Filozofska istraživanja, 40(2), str. 269-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
Vancouver
Sládeček M. Sveobuhvatnost i razložnost koncepcija dobra u raspravi političkog liberalizma i perfekcionizma. Filozofska istraživanja [Internet]. 2020 [pristupljeno 25.11.2020.];40(2):269-282. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204
IEEE
M. Sládeček, "Sveobuhvatnost i razložnost koncepcija dobra u raspravi političkog liberalizma i perfekcionizma", Filozofska istraživanja, vol.40, br. 2, str. 269-282, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40204

Sažetak
The paper argues that Rawls’ critique of perfectionism from the standpoint of neutral liberalism scrutinizes the conceptions of the good without demarcation between them, that is, without distinguishing whether they are comprehensive religious or philosophical conceptions, or whether they are piecemeal comprehensions of local values, concepts and goods. In addition to the high contestability in the use of the concept of comprehensiveness, it is necessary to retain the concept of reasonableness, as comprehensions of the good have to be to some extent well-founded, consistent and coherent to be considered relevant in a political dispute. Considering these distinctions, it can be claimed that, in particular cases, the application of considerations of the good in disputes concerning constitutional essentials can be supported and, considering reasonable pluralism, morally justified. Nevertheless, moderate perfectionism has to specify whether political decisions create and support options, promote valuable goods or they discourage worthless goods. It is necessary to delineate the limits of perfectionistic measures accordingly.

Ključne riječi
neutrality; liberalism; perfectionism; reasonable conceptions of the good; doctrines; John Rawls

Hrčak ID: 245087

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/245087

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 101 *