Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 23 No. 2, 2008.
Izvorni znanstveni članak
Heidegger and the Science
Vesna Batovanja
; Zagreb, Hrvatska
Sažetak
Heidegger wasn’t a philosopher of science, nor a philosopher of natural science. In Carl Richard von Weizsäcker’s remark, science in Heidegger’s opinion wasn’t “the source nor the objective of his thinking”. In fact, according to Weizsäcker, the point is in mutual misunderstanding. “Until now the science hasn’t understood what Heidegger meant to say to it, while on the other hand, as it seems to me, Heidegger couldn’t thoroughly think the nature science through.” Maybe it would be more to the point to say that it wasn’t just about misunderstanding, but more about Heidegger’s effort to define thinking and science in a radically new approach. The radicalism of his endeavor is, maybe, best shown in his insulting sentence (the way Heidegger names it): “Science doesn’t think.” That doesn’t mean only that there’s a gap between thinking and science, but also that this gap is unsurmountable. Thus, the point isn’t in any kind of an objective, but in “establishing the inner structure of science: that in its essence it is to be, on one level, in reference to what philosophy thinks, but in itself is not concerned about what it is supposed to think and forgets about it”.
Ključne riječi
Martin Heidegger; philosopher of science; radical determination of thinking
Hrčak ID:
37219
URI
Datum izdavanja:
13.2.2009.
Posjeta: 6.361 *