Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.64.01.26.9195

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Glycosyltransferase Gmh5 is a Functional Homologue of the α-1,6-Mannosyltransferase Mnn10 Crucial for N-Glycan Processing

Mark Lommel orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-3714 ; Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 360, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Franziska Hutzler ; Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 360, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Lina Siukstaite orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-1916 ; Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 360, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Klemens Wild ; Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center (BZH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Antonija Grbavac orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-2739 ; Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 360, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Irmgard Sinning orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-4477 ; Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center (BZH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Sabine Strahl orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4024-0741 ; Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 360, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 2.674 Kb

str. 39-52

preuzimanja: 36

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku

Prilozi: FTB-64-39-S1.pdf


Sažetak

Research background. Glycosyltransferases represent a large and diverse family of enzymes that catalyze the transfer of sugar residues to proteins and lipids, thereby regulating essential cellular processes such as protein quality control and cell wall biosynthesis. In yeast, protein O-mannosyltransferases and other glycosyltransferases are crucial for maintaining cell wall integrity. While the functions of many of these enzymes are well characterized, the role of some of them, such as Gmh5p, remains unknown. This study aims to elucidate the function of Gmh5p, a previously uncharacterized member of the GT34 glycosyltransferase family, in the context of protein and cell wall biosynthesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Experimental approach. To identify proteins and pathways compensating for reduced O-mannosylation, we performed a genetic screening for multicopy suppressors in a conditional lethal nmt81-oma2+ mutant background. The enzymatic activity of Gmh5p was biochemically characterized, and its functional homology to known mannosyltransferases was assessed through complementation experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In addition, the N-glycosylation status of model substrates was analyzed in gmh5Δ mutant strains.
Results and conclusions. Gmh5p was identified as a suppressor of O-mannosylation defects. Contrary to its predicted function, Gmh5p did not exhibit α-1,2-galactosyltransferase activity but instead showed mannosyltransferase activity. Expression of gmh5+ in S. cerevisiae mnn10Δ mutants restored hygromycin tolerance to near wild-type levels. Furthermore, N-glycosylation of model substrates was reduced in gmh5Δ mutants. These results demonstrate that Gmh5p is a mannosyltransferase involved in the outer chain elongation of N-linked glycans and functions as a homologue of Mnn10p.
Novelty and scientific contribution. This study provides the first functional characterization of Gmh5p as a mannosyltransferase of the GT34 family and demonstrates its role in N-glycan biosynthesis. Our findings expand the current understanding of the diversity and specificity of glycosyltransferases in eukaryotes and highlight their importance in cell wall biology.

Ključne riječi

glycosyltransferase Gmh5; mannosyltransferase; N-glycosylation; O-mannosylation; Schizosaccharomyces pombe; cell wall integrity

Hrčak ID:

344213

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/344213

Datum izdavanja:

6.2.2026.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 199 *




INTRODUCTION

Glycosylation is among the most diverse and complex post-translational modifications of secretory and membrane proteins. The structural diversity of glycans not only modulates the physicochemical properties of proteins but also plays crucial roles in a wide range of cellular processes, including protein quality control, cell signalling, and host-microbe interactions (1).

In the eukaryotic model organism budding (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), most proteins that enter the secretory pathway are subject to N-glycosylation and O-mannosylation (2,3). Both modifications are essential for cell growth and division, particularly due to their importance in building and maintaining an intact cell wall (4). N-glycosylation begins at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, where the lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO) Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol is assembled in a stepwise manner (5). The completed oligosaccharide is then transferred en bloc from the LLO to asparagine residues within the consensus sequence Asn-X-Ser/Thr of nascent polypeptides, a reaction catalyzed by the oligosaccharyltransferase complex. During ER protein quality control, specific glycosidases remove the three glucose residues and, optionally, one mannose residue from the protein-linked oligosaccharide (5). Correctly folded glycoproteins can then exit the ER and enter the Golgi apparatus, where N-linked glycans are further processed. While the ER-based steps of N-glycan biosynthesis are highly conserved among eukaryotes, subsequent modifications in the Golgi apparatus are diverse and species-specific (5). In all studied yeasts, the core N-glycan is extended by a single α-1,6-mannose residue, added by the α-1,6-mannosyltransferase Och1p (6,7). In S. cerevisiae, this mannose can be further elongated by α-1,6-linked mannose units, catalyzed by the M-Pol I complex, primarily composed of Mnn9p and Van1p (8). Additional mannosyltransferases of the M-Pol II complex (including Anp1p, Mnn10p, Mnn11p and Hoc1p in S. cerevisiae) assemble a polymannose backbone, which can reach up to 50–150 mannose residues in baker’s yeast, though the exact length can vary (9,10). This α-1,6-polymannose backbone is further decorated by α-1,2- and α-1,3-mannosyltransferases, resulting in the addition of short side chains that contribute to the structural diversity of yeast N-glycans (10). In contrast to baker’s yeast, in S. pombe, complex N-linked galactomannans with structures such as Hex10-15GlcNAc2 are formed (11). An M-Pol II-like complex composed of Mnn9p and Anp1p, sequentially elongates the mannose chain initiated by Och1p (7,12). However, in contrast to S. cerevisiae, the outer chain of N-glycans in S. pombe is mainly decorated with single α-1,2-galactose residues, which can be further modified by pyruvylated β-1,3-linked galactose (13). Several α-1,2- and α-1,3-linked galactose units may also be incorporated (14,15). The α-1,2-galactosyltransferases Gma12p, Gmh2p, Gmh3p and Gmh6p are involved in these modifications, with evidence suggesting that they have different substrate preferences (15). Additional glycosyltransferases, such as Otg2p and Otg3p, can form α-1,3-linkages between galactose and mannose residues, contributing further to glycan diversity (16). Furthermore, recent studies confirm that Otg1p exhibits α1,3-galactosyltransferase activity specifically when co-expressed with Gmh6p, demonstrating that its enzymatic function requires the presence of α-1,2-linked galactose provided by this interaction (17).

O-mannosylation is initiated in the ER lumen by members of the protein O-mannosyltransferase (PMT) family, which is conserved from fungi to humans (3,4). These enzymes transfer mannose from dolichol phosphate-mannose to the hydroxyl group of serine or threonine residues on nascent polypeptides. The PMT family is divided into three subfamilies: PMT1, PMT2 and PMT4 (4). In S. pombe, each subfamily is represented by a single member (Oma1p, Oma2p and Oma4p) (18). Functional conservation between fission and budding yeast has been demonstrated, and heteromeric complexes (Oma1p/Oma2p) differ in substrate specificity from Oma4p (18). After the initial addition of mannose, properly folded glycoproteins exit the ER. In the Golgi, O-mannosyl glycans are further extended in a species-specific manner. In S. cerevisiae, the O-linked mannose can be elongated by α-1,2- and α-1,3-mannosyltransferases from the KTR and MNN1 families (19). In S. pombe, O-mannosyl glycans are typically elongated with one or two α-1,2-linked mannose units (14) and may be further decorated with α-1,2- and α-1,3-linked galactose residues, catalyzed by α-1,2-galactosyltransferases (Gma12p, Gmh2p, Gmh6p) and the α-1,3-galactosyltransferase Ogh2p (15,16).

In sum, the complex glycosylation pathways in yeasts result in large, structurally diverse N-linked glycans and short, highly abundant O-mannosyl glycans. These modifications are critical for protein function and for the biogenesis and integrity of the yeast cell wall, which is a vital structure (20). In S. pombe, the cell wall consists of an inner layer of α- and β-glucan covered with galactomannoproteins (21). Mutants with altered galactomannan content display phenotypes similar to those with defects in O-mannosylation. For example, deletion of oma2+ in S. pombe is lethal, while oma1Δ and oma4Δ mutants are viable but exhibit growth defects at elevated temperatures and in the presence of cell wall stressors such as caffeine (18). These mutants also show severe abnormalities in cell wall and septum formation, underlining the essential role of O-mannosylation in cell wall integrity.

To learn more about the molecular causes underlying the phenotypes of omaΔ mutants, we screened for multicopy suppressors of the conditional lethal nmt81-oma2+ mutant in this study. We identified the yet functionally uncharacterized predicted α-1,2 galactosyltransferase Gmh5p. Strikingly, we provide evidence that Gmh5p represents an orthologue of S. cerevisiae mannosyltransferase Mnn10p, an M-Pol II complex component.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unless stated otherwise, all medium components were obtained from Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and standard laboratory chemicals were purchased from either Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) or Carl Roth & Co KG (Karlsruhe, Germany).

Yeast strains and growth conditions

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used are listed inTable S1 (14,18). Rich media YES (yeast extract plus supplements) and YPD (yeast extract, Bacto™ peptone, dextrose) as well as minimal defined media EMM (Edinburgh minimal medium) and SD (synthetic defined) medium were used as described previously (18). Phosphate-free minimal medium based on EMM contained 14.6 mM sodium acetate instead of disodium hydrogen phosphate and potassium hydrogen phthalate. For shutdown experiments using the nmt81 promoter, cells were restreaked twice on EMM plates containing 5 mg/L thiamine. Standard procedures were used for yeast transformation as well as for genetic DNA manipulations. All cloning procedures were carried out in the Escherichia coli host DH5α (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).

S. pombe strains CMY1 and CMY2: a disruption cassette replacing the entire open reading frame of SPAC637.06 by the kanMX gene was amplified from genomic DNA of the heterozygous SPAC637.06 mutant strain BG_1883 (Bioneer Cooperation, Daejeon, South Korea) using primers Oligo 1305 and Oligo1306. A mass of 5 µg of the resulting DNA fragment was used to transform the wild-type (WT) yeast strain FY527 or the oma1Δ mutant strain SBY90. Transformants that integrated the disruption cassette were selected on YES medium containing G418. Genomic DNA was prepared from the resulting transformants and successful targeting of SPAC637.06 was confirmed by PCR using primers Oligo1231 and Oligo1232. All oligonucleotide sequences used in this study are available upon request.

Multicopy suppressor screening and plasmids

The thiamine repressible nmt81-oma2+ strain TWY16 was transformed with S. pombe genomic libraries contained in pURSP1 and pURSP2, respectively (22). Before transformation, cells were grown in medium lacking thiamine. After transformation, cells were plated on selective medium lacking uracil and containing thiamine, then incubated for three days at 32 °C. For plasmid isolation, individual clones were grown overnight in 3 mL of cultures and harvested. Pellets were resuspended in 100 µL of buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH=8.0, 50 mM EDTA, 8 % sucrose and 5 % Triton X-100. Cells were disrupted with glass beads (d=0.5 mm) using a RiboLyser (Hybaid, Altrincham, UK). After separation from the glass beads, samples were incubated for 3 min in a boiling water bath, chilled on ice and cell debris was pelleted for 10 min at 20 000×g. From the supernatant, plasmid DNA was recovered by ethanol precipitation and retransformed in E. coli. Isolated plasmids were retransformed in TWY16 and three independent clones were tested to reconfirm their suppressor ability on restrictive plates containing thiamine. To identify the genes contained in the suppressor plasmid, genomic sequences were determined by Sanger sequencing using M13fwd and M13rev universal primers.

Plasmids pTW51-1 and pTW60 have been described previously (18).

Plasmid pI-1/9: Plasmid pI-1/9 was directly derived from the multicopy suppressor screen with a genomic DNA fragment and only the phx1+ (SPAC32A11.03c) coding sequence.

Plasmid pCM6: The plasmid pII-1/2 containing the entire open reading frame of mpg1+ (SPCC1906.01) and a truncated coding sequence of SPCC1906.02c was isolated from the multicopy suppressor screen. This plasmid was cut with PstI to remove the SPCC1906.02c-containing fragment and religated, resulting in plasmid pCM6.

Plasmid pII-2/17: The plasmid pII-2/17 was directly derived from the multicopy suppressor screen and contains a genomic DNA fragment with only the gmh5+ (SPAC637.06) coding sequence.

Plasmid pCM10 and pCM11: For overexpression of gmh5+ and a gmh5+-hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tag fusion in S. pombe and S. cerevisiae, primer pairs Oligo1246 combined with Oligo1247 or Oligo1248 were used to amplify a 1.0 kb DNA fragment containing the gmh5+ coding sequence. The resulting PCR products were cut with NotI and SalI or NotI and XhoI and subcloned into pREP3adh (18) cut with the same enzymes. The resulting plasmids pCM10 and pCM11 encode for Gmh5p and a Gmh5p-HA-tag fusion protein under the transcriptional control of the alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (adh1) promoter.

Plasmid pCM12: The 1.5 kb coding region of the S. cerevisiae SUC2 gene was amplified by PCR from S. cerevisiae genomic DNA using Oligo1309 and Oligo1310. The primer pair was used to introduce a 5’ NotI restriction site and a 6× His epitope-tag and XhoI restriction site. The resulting PCR product was digested with NotI and XhoI and subcloned into pREP3adh cut with the same enzymes. The resulting plasmid encodes a Suc2-6xHis-3xHA fusion protein under the transcription control of the adh1 promoter.

Plasmid pGma12HA: The primer pair Oligo1297 and Oligo1299 was used to amplify a 1.1 kb PCR fragment containing the coding region of gma12+ excluding the stop-codon. S. pombe genomic DNA was used as a template. The resulting PCR product was subcloned into pREP3adh using NotI and XhoI restriction sites. The resulting plasmid encodes for a Gma12p-3xHA fusion protein driven by the adh1 promoter.

Inhibitor sensitivity assays

Assays were performed in 96-well microtiter plates in a final volume of 200 µL of YES medium or YPD medium for S. pombe or S. cerevisiae, respectively. Serial dilutions of caffeine (0 to 17 mM; Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, St. Louis, MO, USA), hygromycin (0 to 16.25 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, Merck) and the PMT-inhibitor R3A-5a (0 to 32 µM; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (23)) were prepared in EMM or SD medium and inoculated from a logarithmically growing culture to a final absorbance A600 nm=0.02. The 96-well microtiter plates were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C and cell growth was determined by measuring the absorbance in a FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) microplate reader at 600 nm. All conditions were tested in triplicates and experiments were repeated twice.

Preparation of membranes and cell walls

Crude yeast membranes used in Western blot analysis and mannosyltransferase assays were prepared as described previously (24). In brief, a total of cells corresponding to a combined A600 nm of 200 were harvested from a logarithmically growing culture and washed once with ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.4, and 5 mM MgCl2. Cells were resuspended in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), 1 mM benzamidine, 50 µg/mL tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), 0.25 mM tosyl-l-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK), 10 µg/mL antipain, 1 µg/mL leupeptin and 1 µg/mL pepstatin as protease inhibitors (PI). An equal volume of glass beads (d=0.5 mm) was added, and cells lysed in a RiboLyser (Hybaid; 4×25 s at level 4.5 with 1-minute intervals on ice). The tube was punctured at the bottom, and the lysate was allowed to flow into a fresh tube. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (model 5430R; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 5 min at 1500×g and 4 °C). Microsomal membranes were collected by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R; 60 min at 30 000×g and 4 °C). The membrane fraction was resuspended in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH=8.0, 10 mM EDTA, and PI equivalent to A600 nm (cell)=1.0 per 1 µL. For cell wall preparations, cell lysates were pelleted for 20 s at 20 000×g and 4 °C, pellets were washed twice in ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.4, and 5 mM MgCl2 plus PI and resuspended in the same buffer to 1.0 A600 nm cell equivalents.

Galactosyltransferase assay

Cultures of S. cerevisiae BY4741 strain transformed with pREP3adh (empty vector), pGma12 (gma12+) or pCM10 (gmh5+) were grown overnight in SD medium lacking leucine to final A600 nm of 1.0. A total of cells corresponding to a combined A600 nm of 200 was harvested by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R) at 3000×g for 10 min at 4 °C and washed once with TMS buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.5, 5 mM MgCl2 and 250 mM sucrose). Cell pellets were resuspended in 200 µL TMS buffer plus PI, and an equal volume of glass beads (d=0.5 mm) was added. Cells were lysed using a RiboLyser (Hybaid) in four 30-second intervals (level 4.5) interrupted by 1 min cooling on ice. The bottoms of the reaction tubes were punctured and lysates were collected. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 3000×g and 4 °C and microsomal membranes were harvested from the supernatant at 30 000×g for 60 min at 4 °C. The membrane fraction was resuspended in TMS to a final concentration of 20 µg/µL, Triton X-100 was added to a final amount of 2 % (m/V) and microsomes were solubilized for 30 min at 4 °C with mild agitation. Solubilized samples were cleared by centrifugation at 30 000×g for 60 min at 4 °C, and the protein concentration was determined by DC protein assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Then, galactosyltransferase assays of 50 µL of total volume were performed containing 0.1 M Hepes-NaOH, pH=7.0, 1 mM MnCl2, 25 nmol UDP-[3H]galactose (specific activity 1 mCi/mmol (1 Ci=3.7·1010 Bq); BioTrend, Köln, Germany), 5 µmol of a given sugar acceptor and 50 µg of solubilized protein extracts. Acceptors used were: α-methyl-d-mannoside (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck), α-methyl-d-galactoside (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck) and α-1,6-mannobiose (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck). The samples were incubated for 60 min at 30 °C. Each reaction was terminated by the addition of 200 µL of ice-cold water and loaded on an 800 µL Dowex-1 (Cl-form; Sigma-Aldrich, Merck) column packed in a Pasteur pipette. Each column was washed twice with 1 mL of water, eluates were combined, and radioactivity in the eluates was determined in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman, Brea, CA, USA). Each reaction was performed in triplicate and the experiment was repeated twice.

Mannosyltransferase assay

Cultures of S. cerevisiae BY4741 strain transformed with pREP3adh (empty vector) and pCM11 (Gmh5p-HA) were grown overnight in SD medium lacking leucine to final A600 nm=1.0. Microsomal membrane fractions were obtained as described above. Microsomes were resuspended in 300 µL buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.5, 5 mM MnCl2, 250 mM sucrose, 1 % digitonine, and PI, and solubilized for 1 h at 4 °C with mild agitation. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R) at 20 000×g for 30 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was added to 50 µL of anti-HA monoclonal antibody covalently coupled to Sepharose (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Proteins were immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C and washed three times with a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH=7.2, 0.4 % digitonin and 10 mM MnCl2, and resuspended in 50 µL of the same buffer. Mannosyltransferase assays of 50 µL volume contained 50 mM HEPES, pH=7.2, 0.4 % digitonin, 10 mM MnCl2, 25 nmol GDP-[3H]mannose (specific activity 1 mCi/mmol (1 Ci=3.7·1010 Bq); BioTrend), 10 mM α-methyl-d-mannoside, and 5 µL of anti-HA sepharose. Reactions were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C with agitation. Reactions were terminated by adding 200 µL of ice-cold water and loaded on an 800 µL Dowex-1 (Cl-form, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck) column packed in a Pasteur pipette. Each column was washed twice with 1 mL of water, eluates were combined, and radioactivity in the eluates was determined in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman). Each reaction was performed in triplicate and the experiment was repeated twice.

Isolation and analysis of chitinase

For heterologous expression of the S. cerevisiae protein chitinase, S. pombe strains FY527, omh1Δ and CMY1 (gmh5Δ) were transformed with the plasmid pFML1-CTS1 (14), and chitinase was isolated as described elsewhere (14). In brief, 5 mL cultures were grown to saturation in EMM lacking leucine, harvested by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R) at 3000×g for 10 min at room temperature and resuspended in 10 mL EMM containing 0.1 % glucose and 2 % raffinose instead of 2 % glucose. Cultures were allowed to express chitinase for 48 h. The medium was then cleared by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R; 3000×g for 10 min at room temperature), 20 mg of crab shell chitin was added and the samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with agitation. The chitin was pelleted by centrifugation (15 000×g for 15 min at 4 °C), washed three times with ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and chitinase was eluted in 50 µL 2× SDS sample buffer at 95 °C for 5 min. A volume of 10 µL of each sample was separated on 6 % SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot.

Isolation and deglycosylation of invertase

Strains FY127 (WT) and CMY1 (gmh5Δ) were transformed with plasmid pCM12 to heterologously express S. cerevisiae invertase Suc2p. Cell walls from these transformants were isolated as described above. To remove N-glycosidically linked glycans, cell walls of 5.0 A600 nm equivalents were treated with endoglycosidase H (Endo H; New England Biolabs GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions omitting the glycosidase served as a control. From each reaction, proteins were extracted with 1× SDS sample buffer, and 1.0 A600 nm cell equivalents were separated on SDS gels and analyzed by Western blot.

Western blot analysis

Protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Monoclonal mouse anti‐HA (16B12; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), polyclonal rabbit anti-Cts1 (gift from W. Tanner) and anti‐invertase (gift from L. Lehle) antibodies were used at 1:8000 (anti-HA) and 1:5000 (others) dilutions, respectively. A horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck) were used at 1:5000 dilution. Protein–antibody complexes were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using the Amersham ECL system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA).

Native gel electrophoresis of acidic phosphatase

Cells were grown in 5 mL YES medium to an A600 nm=1.5, and N(cell)=1.5·108 were pelleted, resuspended in 5 mL of MM-P medium, and incubated for 3 h at 30 °C to induce production of acid phosphatase. The cells were then collected by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R; 3000×g for 10 min at 4 °C), washed once with 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH=6.8, and suspended in 200 μL ice-cold lysis buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH=6.8, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM PMSF, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol and 10 % glycerol). Cell lysates were prepared by vigorously mixing the cell suspension five times with glass beads (d=0.5 mm) for 30 s at 4 °C using a RiboLyser (Hybaid). The lysates were centrifuged at 15 000×g for 10 min, and the supernatants were recovered and centrifuged again at 15 000×g for 20 min. The supernatants were recovered again and protein was determined using a BCA™ protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). A mass of 30 μg of total protein from each sample were mixed with 1/3 volume of 0.01 % bromophenol blue, 15 % glycerol and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH=6.8, and were immediately subjected to electrophoresis on a 6 % polyacrylamide native gel. The electrophoresis buffer and the method for staining for acid phosphatase activity were used as described elsewhere (25).

Microscopy of S. pombe cells

Cells were grown overnight to an A600 nm of 1.0. A volume of 1 mL of the cell suspension was harvested by centrifugation (Eppendorf 5430R) at 3000×g for 3 min. Cell pellets were washed once with distilled water and resuspended in 100 µL of staining solution containing either 0.5 mg/mL aniline blue (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck; dissolved in distilled water) or 5 µg/mL filipin complex (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck; dissolved in DMSO). Aniline blue served both as a β-1,3-glucan stain and as a vital dye for viability assays. Samples (15 µL) were mounted and analyzed on a Leica DM IBR fluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with Leica DFC 350 FX monochrome CMOS camera.

Phyogenetic and structural analyses

Phylogenetic analysis of galactosyl- and mannosyltransferases was carried out using Clustal Omega (26). Phylogenetic tree data were visualized using Phylodendron (27). Input protein sequences used were: S. cerevisiae: ScHoc1 (UniPro P47124), ScMnn10 (UniProt P50108), ScMnn11 (UniProt P46985), ScMnn9 (UniProt P39107), ScAnp1 (UniProt P32629); S. pombe: SpGmh1 (PomBase SPAC5H10.1), SpGmh2 (PomBase SPAC5H10.13c), SpGmh3 (PomBase SPAC22E12.06c), SpGmh4 (Pombase SPBC8D2.17), SpGmh5 (PomBase SPAC637.06), SpGmh6 (PomBase SPBC1289.13c), SpGma12 (PomBase SPCC736.04c); Candida albicans: CaMnn10 (UniProt Q59UR2); Kluyveromyces lactis: KlMnn10 (UniProt Q70KX5).

Superimpositions were performed with program Coot (28) and structure predictions were done with AlphaFold (29). Structural models and their superimpositions were visualized using PyMOL (30).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v. 8.0 (31). For glycosyltransferase assays data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey´s post-hoc test to create confidence intervals for all pairwise differences between the different conditions. For inhibitor assays, non-linear expression analysis was performed and IC50 values were determined. Differences in IC50 values across different conditions were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey´s post-hoc test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Identification of gmh5+ as multicopy suppressor of decreased O-mannosylation

We previously demonstrated that in the model yeast S. pombe decreased O-mannosylation severely affects cell wall morphology and stability, especially during septum formation (18). To characterize these defects in more detail, logarithmically growing WT, oma1Δ and oma4Δ mutant cells were stained with aniline blue. The dye preferentially binds to linear β-1,3-glucan (32), mainly localized in the primary septum of dividing cells, where it can be detected from initiation to completion of septum formation (33). In contrast to WT cells with defined staining of the septum, around 30 % of oma1Δ (out of 847 cells) and 40 % oma4Δ (out of 261 cells) cells, respectively, showed significant accumulation of β-1,3-glucan at one or both cell poles, or at the septum (Fig. 1a). Staining of sterol-rich areas of the plasma membrane confirmed local thickening of the cell wall in these mutants (Fig. 1a). Furthermore, vital staining with aniline blue revealed that around 7 % (30 out of 455 cells) of oma1Δ and 20 % (31 out of 153 cells) of oma4Δ cells die during vegetative growth (Fig. S1).

Fig. 1 Phenotypic characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe oma mutants: a) aniline blue (cell wall β-1,3-glucan and dead cells) and filipin (ergosterol, sterol-rich regions of the plasma membrane) staining of wild-type (WT) and mutants oma1Δ and oma4Δ, grown to logarithmic phase on EMM medium (for details see Materials and Methods). Mutant cells show abnormal thickening of the cell wall by β-1,3 glucan depositions at the poles (asterisk) or the septum (arrows), and b) aniline blue staining of nmt81-oma2+ cells grown on thiamine-containing medium. Twenty-four hours after shut-off of the promoter most cells are dead (dark cells, left panel) and/or show β-1,3 glucan depositions in the cell wall (right panel). Differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence microscopic images are shown at 630-fold magnification
FTB-64-39-f1

To define the lethal phenotype caused by defective O-mannosylation more precisely, we took advantage of oma2+, the essential member of the PMT family in S. pombe (18). We analyzed a conditional lethal mutant expressing the oma2+ gene under the control of the nmt81 promoter, which is repressed by thiamine (34,35). As shown inFig. 1b, after 24-hour incubation in thiamine-containing medium, more than 80 % of the nmt81-oma2+ cells were dead (210 out of 253 cells) with most cells lysing at the septum during or after cell separation (170 out of 253 cells). In some cells, large β-1,3-glucan depositions could be observed in the cell wall, similar to oma1Δ and oma4Δ cells.

In S. pombe, β-1,3-glucan serves as a primary structural component of the cell wall (21). When the synthesis of other cell wall constituents, such as α-glucan or glycoproteins, is compromised, the cell activates compensatory mechanisms to maintain integrity (21). Central to this response is the upregulation of β-1,3-glucan synthesis, which is regulated by signalling pathways involving Rho1 GTPase and protein kinase C homologues, which respond to cell wall stress (36). This adaptive increase in β-glucan content reinforces the cell wall, ensuring cellular morphology and viability under stress conditions. The accumulation of β-glucan at the septum and cell poles and frequent cell lysis at the septum in O-mannosylation mutants (Fig. 1a andFig. 1b) highlights the crucial role of O-mannosylation in cell wall organization. Consistent with this interpretation, transcriptome analyses of mutant oma421, expressing the oma1+, oma2+ and oma4+ genes under the control of the nmt81 promoter, indicated an induction of genes related to Rho1/PKC signalling pathways when grown in the presence of thiamine. A detailed description of these data will be presented elsewhere.

To find out which proteins and pathways are affected when O-mannosylation is decreased, we screened for multicopy suppressors of the conditionally lethal phenotype of mutant nmt81-oma2+. The S. pombe genomic DNA libraries pURSP1 and pURSP2 (22) were used to transform nmt81-oma2+ cells. Approximately 106 400 individual transformants were further selected on thiamine-containing medium. After a second round of selection, library plasmids were recovered and retransformed into strain nmt81-oma2+. Genes of interest were subcloned into the vector pUR19 (22), and individually validated as suppressors of nmt81-oma2+. Among the identified suppressors were the homeobox protein SPAC32A11.03c/Phx1p, which is essential for long-term survival and meiotic sporulation (37), the GDP-mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase SPCC1906.01/Mpg1p required for proper septum structure and cell cycle progression (38), and SPAC637.06/Gmh5p, a so far uncharacterized predicted α-1,2-galactosyltransferase (15,39) (Fig. 2a). Phx1p (SPAC32A11.03c) is a transcription factor essential for long-term survival and stress adaptation in S. pombe (37). Its multicopy suppression of O-mannosyltransferase mutants may result from enhanced stress tolerance and metabolic flexibility, indirectly supporting cell viability under glycosylation stress. Overexpression of SPCC1906.01/Mpg1p, which encodes a GDP-mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase essential for GDP-mannose biosynthesis also suppressed the lethal phenotype of mutant oma2Δ (Fig. 2b). This effect is most likely due to increased availability of this donor substrate for various glycosylation steps.

Fig. 2 Multicopy suppressors of O-mannosylation deficient mutants: a) complementation of synthetic lethality of mutant nmt81-oma2+. Mutant strain nmt81-oma2+ (TWY16) transformed with the plasmid pI-1/9 (phx1+), pCM6 (mpg1+), pII-2/17 (gmh5+) or pUR19 (vector), was grown on EMM plates without uracil in the absence (-Thia, left panel) or presence (+Thia, right panel) of thiamine. Shown are plates with two individual transformants of each plasmid grown at 32 °C for three days. In contrast to the vector control, phx1+, mpg1+ as well as gmh5+ support the vegetative growth of the cells after nmt81-oma2+ was switched off under the applied conditions (for details see Materials and Methods). The slight growth of the vector control may be due to residual expression of oma2+ resulting from promoter leakiness under thiamine repression, b) complementation of the lethality of mutant oma2Δ. Strain TWY14 (oma2Δ expressing oma2+ on the ura4+ plasmid pTW51-1) was transformed with plasmid pTW60 (LEU2, oma2+), pREP3adh (LEU2, vector), pCM10 (LEU2, gmh5+) and pMLP02 (LEU2, mpg1+). For plasmid loss experiments, transformants were grown on EMM plates without leucine, in the absence (left panel) or presence (right panel) of 5-FOA. Shown are plates with three individual transformants of the genes of interest grown at 32 °C for three days. Cells expressing oma2+ on plasmid pTW60 (lower panel) or the suppressor mpg1+ on pMLP02 (upper panel) are able to lose plasmid pTW51-1 (ura4+, oma2+), thus grow in the presence of 5-FOA. In contrast, expression of the suppressor gmh5+ (pCM10) does not compensate for the complete loss of Oma2p activity. Thus, like the vector control (upper panel), gmh5+ expressing cells are unable to lose plasmid pTW51-1, and therefore do not grow on 5-FOA-containing plates (lower panel), and c) overexpression of gmh5+ decreases caffeine sensitivity of oma1Δ (upper panel) and oma4Δ (lower panel) mutants. Viable oma1Δ and oma4Δ mutants were transformed with the vector control pREP3adh (omaΔ), pCM10 (gmh5+) or the corresponding oma gene (WT; pTW24 (oma1+) or pTW25 (oma4+)); omaΔ + gmh5+-1 and omaΔ + gmh5+-2 represent two independent transformants. Growth in the presence of increasing amounts of caffeine as indicated was tested as detailed in Materials and Methods. Each experiment was performed twice using three technical replicates. Results were used for nonlinear regression analysis and IC50 was determined. Differences in the IC50 values were confirmed to be significant by statistical analysis (p<0.05). WT=wild-type
FTB-64-39-f2

In contrast to mpg1+, gmh5+ overexpression does not suppress the lethality of oma2Δ (Fig. 2b). The different outcomes of the complementation tests (compareFig. 2a andFig. 2b) can be explained by residual expression of oma2+ in the thiamine-repressible strain due to promoter leakiness, while in the oma2Δ mutant, Oma2p activity is completely lost after 5’-FOA treatment. Consequently, suppressor gmh5+ can only complement the thiamine-repressed strain, but not the full deletion of oma2+. Furthermore, hypersensitivity of the viable oma1Δ and oma4Δ mutants to the drug caffeine (18) is significantly reduced when gmh5+ is overexpressed, although not to full extent. Apparent IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) values change from 4.30 to 6.81 mM in oma1Δ, and from 5.00 to 7.17 mM in oma4Δ mutants expressing gmh5+ on pREP3adh, but are still below the IC50 value of 8.55 mM in WT cells (Fig. 2c). Based on these findings, we consider gmh5+ to be a moderate suppressor of O-mannosylation deficiency. In the following study we are focusing on Gmh5p.

Phylogenetic and structural analysis of Gmh5p

SPAC637.06/Gmh5p is a member of the glycosyltransferase family 34 (GT34), including the S. pombe glycosyltransferases Gma12p and Gmh1p to Gmh6p (40). These enzymes show structural features typical for type-II Golgi glycosyltransferases with a single transmembrane domain flanked by a short N-terminal cytoplasmic and a C-terminal catalytic domain and a typical DxD motif for divalent metal ion binding (41). Gmh1p, Gmh2p, Gmh3p, Gmh6p and Gma12p are confirmed α-1,2-galactosyltransferases acting in the extension of N-linked outer chain and O-mannosyl glycans (15,16). Gmh5p was initially predicted to act as α-1,2-galactosyltransferase. However, in vivo galactosylation of N- and O-linked glycans was unaffected in a S. pombe gmh5+ deletion mutant (15); thus, the enzymatic activity of Gmh5p remains elusive.

The GT34 family includes the mannosyltransferases Mnn10p and Mnn11p from S. cerevisiae (42,43). Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequences of various galactosyl- and mannosyltransferases of this family from different yeast species revealed the highest homology of Gmh5p to Mnn10p α-1,6-mannosyltransferases (Fig. 3a), with a sequence identity of 38 % to Mnn10p from S. cerevisiae, compared to only 29 % identity to the α-1,2-galactosyltransferase Gma12p from S. pombe.

Fig. 3 Phylogenetic analysis and structural alignments of Gmh5p with GT34 family glycosyltransferases: a) phylogeny of galactosyl- and mannosyltransferases. Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequences of various galactosyl- and mannosyltransferases from different yeast strains revealed the highest homology of Gmh5p to α-1,6-mannosyltransferases. Protein sequences from S. pombe (Sp), S. cerevisiae (Sc), Candida albicans (Ca), and Kluyveromyces lactis (Kl) were used, b) superimposition of Gmh5p (cyan) and α-1,6-mannosyltransferase Mnn10p from S. cerevisiae (green), c) superimposition of Gmh5p (cyan) and α-1,2-galactosyltransferase Gma12p from S. pombe (deep purple). The Gmh5p, Mnn10p and Gma12p structures are AlphaFold predictions with a very high (pLDDT>90) score, which is highly reliable for a defined fold. N-terminal and C-terminal tails are truncated for clarity, and d) active site superimpositions within the GT34 family for Gmh5p (cyan), Mnn10p (green), and AtXXT1 (orange, PDB ID: 6bsw). Functions are assigned according to AtXXT1 (dashed ovals): Sugar-binding site indicated by a bound glycerol molecule, metal binding site by the DxD/H motif and nucleobase pocket by the uridine moiety. The active site view corresponds to the right panels in b) and c)
FTB-64-39-f3

Like other GT34 family members, Gmh5p is predicted to be a retaining glycosyltransferase with a GT-A fold, including a Rossmann-like domain (40,44). Gmh5p features a DxD-like motif for divalent metal ion binding, although the second aspartate is replaced by threonine (DxT), a variation also observed in other glycosyltransferases (44). Currently the only GT34 enzyme with an experimentally determined 3D structure is the xyloglucan-xylosyltransferase 1 (XXT1; PDB ID: 6bsu) from Arabidopsis thaliana (45), but no experimental structures are available for fungal GT34 enzymes. However, AlphaFold (29) predictions provide highly reliable models of the core domains for Gmh5p, Mnn10p, and the confirmed α-1,2-galactosyltransferase Gma12p (46). Structural superimposition of Gmh5p and Mnn10p yields a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 1.2 Å over 265 Cα atoms, indicating a very close structural similarity (Fig. 3b). In contrast, the RMSD between Gmh5p and Gma12p is 1.5 Å over 219 Cα atoms (Fig. 3c), reflecting greater divergence. A detailed comparison of the active sites within the GT34 family shows that in contrast to XXT1, Gmh5p and Mnn10p are nearly identical in their active site architecture, especially in the nucleotide-binding site (Fig. 3d). All enzymes share the GT-A fold and the metal-binding motif, suggesting similar mechanisms for donor substrate binding. However, there is a key difference in nucleotide specificity of the enzymes: while XXT1 from Arabidopsis uses UDP-xylose (47), Mnn10p uses GDP-mannose (9) as a donor substrate. Overall, the nucleotide-binding site of Gmh5p is highly similar to Mnn10p, suggesting that Gmh5p uses GDP-mannose rather than UDP-galactose as donor substrate and is thus more likely to act as a mannosyl- than a galactosyltransferase.

Gmh5+ acts as mannosyltransferase

Since baker's yeast does not possess intrinsic galactosyltransfease activity, we further explored the enzymatic activity of Gmh5p in S. cerevisiae. For this purpose, Gmh5p and Gma12p, C-terminally tagged with the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope, were recombinantly expressed under the control of the adh1 promoter in S. cerevisiae WT strain BY4741 (Fig. S2a). Microsomal membranes were used as an enzyme source to measure galactosyl transfer from UDP-[3H]galactose to the putative acceptor substrates α-methyl-d-galactoside, α-methyl-d-mannoside and α-1,6-mannobiose. As shown inFig. 4a, galactosyltransfer by Gma12p-HA to α-methyl-d-mannoside and to α-1,6-mannobiose could be detected, confirming previous results. However, Gmh5p-HA showed no activity towards the tested acceptor substrates. Thus, the results further support that Gmh5p does not act as α-1,2-galactosyltransferase.

Fig. 4 Galactosyl- and mannosyltransferase activity of Gmh5p. Gmh5p-HA and the proven galactosyltransferase Gma1p-HA, respectively, were expressed in and enriched from S. cerevisiae wild-type (WT) cells (Fig. S2a andFig. S2b): a) galactosyltransfer from UDP-[3H]galactose to α-methyl-d-mannoside (M), α-methyl-d-galactoside (G), and α-1,6-mannobiose (B) was determined. S. cerevisiae cells transformed with the empty vector served as a control. Enriched membranes served as enzyme source. In strains overexpressing Gma12p, transferase activity to α-methyl-d-mannoside (Gma12 (M)) and α-1,6-mannobiose (Gma12 (B)) was significantly increased compared to the other conditions tested (p<0.0001), and b) mannosyltransferase activity of purified Gmh5p-HA was determined with GDP-[3H]mannose as donor in the presence (+) or absence (-) of α-methyl-d-mannoside as an acceptor. Immunopurified Gmh5p-HA served as enzyme source. Experiments were performed three times using three replicates. Average transferase activities from all experiments are shown. Gmh5p transferase activity (Gmh5 (+)) was significantly increased compared to the other conditions tested (p<0.0001). DPM=disintegrations per minute.
FTB-64-39-f4

To test for mannosyltransferase activity, Gmh5p-HA was solubilized from microsomal membranes using 1 % digitonine and immunopurified using anti-HA monoclonal antibodies attached to sepharose beads. Immunopurified Gmh5p-HA catalyzed the transfer of α-[3H]mannose from GDP-[3H]mannose to α-methyl-d-mannoside, which serves as a standard model substrate in such assays (Fig. 4b andFig. S2b). These data further support mannosyltransferase activity Gmh5p.

These experimental results validate our structural predictions and clarify the previous ambiguity regarding the enzymatic specificity of Gmh5p. The activity of Gmh5p corresponds to its closer sequence and structural similarity to Mnn10p from S. cerevisiae, an α-1,6-mannosyltransferase. This provides conclusive evidence that Gmh5p functions as a mannosyl- and not as a galactosyltransferase.

Gmh5+ represents an orthologue of S. cerevisiae mnn10

Having defined Gmh5p as a mannosyltransferase, we examined whether Gmh5p is a functional homologue of S. cerevisiae Mnn10p. The Mnn10p protein is a major catalytic subunit of the Golgi-localized M-Pol II complex (Anp1p, Hoc1p Mnn9p to Mnn11p), responsible for the elongation of the α-1,6-mannan backbone of N-linked carbohydrates in baker's yeast (42). In S. cerevisiae, mnn10 mutants have a severely negative impact on N-linked glycosylation (48) and show strong sensitivity towards the aminoglycoside hygromycin B (43). This drug sensitivity was exploited to determine the functional conservation between S. cerevisiae Mnn10p and S. pombe Gmh5p. To that end, Gmh5p was expressed in S. cerevisiae mnn10Δ mutant cells. As shown inFig. 5, hygromycin tolerance in mnn10Δ strains expressing gmh5+ nearly reached WT levels (IC50: mnn10Δ, 1.34 µg/mL; mnn10Δ + gmh5+, 2.515 µg/mL (two individual transformants are shown inFig. 5), WT, 3.00 µg/mL), qualifying Gmh5p as an Mnn10p orthologue.

Fig. 5 Complementation of S. cerevisiae mutant mnn10Δ with S. pombe gmh5+. S. cerevisiae mnn10Δ mutant transformed with a gmh5+ expression plasmid or the empty vector backbone, as well as the isogenic wild-type (WT) strain transformed with the empty vector, were treated with the indicated concentrations of hygromycin. Absorption at A600 nm was measured after a growth period of 24 h. Strains mnn10Δ + gmh5+-1 and mnn10Δ + gmh5+-2 represent two independent transformants. The experiment was performed twice using three technical replicates. Results were used for linear regression analysis and the IC50 was determined. Differences in the IC50 values were confirmed to be significant by statistical analysis (p<0.05)
FTB-64-39-f5

This functional conservation between Gmh5p and Mnn10p is particularly interesting given their taxonomic distance. S. pombe and S. cerevisiae diverged approximately 400-600 million years ago and have distinct cell wall compositions (49,50). The ability of Gmh5p to complement the mnn10Δ phenotype supports the conclusion that core aspects of N-glycan biosynthesis pathways remain conserved despite other evolutionary changes in cell wall structure and composition (12,51). Interestingly, in S. cerevisiae pmtΔ mutants, the Mnn10p orthologue Mnn11p (21 % sequence identity) was shown to be destabilized in pmtΔ mutants, most likely due to reduced O-mannosylation (52). A similar mechanism may apply in S. pombe, where impaired O-mannosylation in omaΔ mutants could affect the stability of Gmh5p and thereby explain its role as a multicopy suppressor of omaΔ mutants. Exploring this hypothesis in S. pombe will be an interesting avenue for future research.

Gmh5p participates in N-linked glycan outer chain elongation

In order to investigate changes in protein glycosylation in more detail, we created an S. pombe gmh5+ deletion strain (detailed in Materials and Methods). The known N-glycosylated S. pombe protein, acidic phosphatase (53) was induced in WT and gmh5Δ mutant strains. Cell lysates were analyzed by native polyacrylamide gel-electrophoresis followed by activity staining. Acid phosphatase extracted from gmh5Δ cells has increased electrophoretic mobility compared to WT cells (Fig. 6a), suggesting decreased N-glycosylation, which agrees with Gmh5p acting as an S. cerevisiae Mnn10p orthologue in the elongation of N-linked core glycans. In addition, the highly N-glycosylated and O-mannosylated S. cerevisiae enzymes invertase (54) and chitinase (24), respectively, were recombinantly expressed in S. pombe mutant gmh5Δ. Enriched protein fractions were isolated and proteins analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. Both enzymes were detected with protein-specific polyclonal antibodies. Like in S. cerevisiae, in S. pombe WT cells, invertase migrates as a broad band ranging from 100 to 250 kDa, which shifts to the mass of the unmodified protein (~60 kDa) after N-glycans were removed with Endo H (Fig. 6b). In mutant gmh5Δ, high molecular mass protein species >150 kDa are strongly reduced, which further corroborates the role of Gmh5p in the extension of outer chain of N-glycans. In contrast, the molecular mass of exclusively O-mannosylated chitinase is not changed in mutant gmh5Δ compared to WT (Fig. 6c). The observation that O-mannosylation of chitinase remains unaffected in gmh5Δ mutants while N-glycosylation of acid phosphatase and invertase is significantly impacted highlights the specificity of Gmh5p in the biosynthesis of N-linked glycans.

Fig. 6 Analysis of glycosylated proteins in mutant gmh5Δ: a) acidic phosphatase: the enzyme was induced in wild-type (WT) and gmh5Δ, and analyzed on polyacrylamide native gels as described in Materials and Methods, b) invertase: a recombinant version of S. cerevisiae invertase was expressed in mutant gmh5Δ and the isogenic WT strain. Protein extracts were treated with endoglycosidase H (Endo H) to remove N-linked glycans and analyzed by Western blot using invertase-specific antibodies (see Materials and Methods for details), and c) chitinase: S. cerevisiae chitinase was heterologously expressed in S. pombe omh1Δ and gmh5Δ mutants and the isogenic WT strain. Chitinase was extracted from medium supernatants using crab shell chitin and analyzed by Western blot using chitinase-specific antibodies (detailed in Materials and Methods). Mutant omh1Δ, lacking a α-1,2-mannosyltransferase which plays a major role in extending O-linked mannoses, served as a control
FTB-64-39-f6

In S. pombe, N-linked outer chains can be elongated by the action of an M-Pol II-like complex composed of Mnn9p and Anp1p, which sequentially elongates the mannose chains (12). This complex is mirroring the function of M-Pol I (Anp1p and Van1p) and M-Pol II (including Anp1p, Mnn10p, Mnn11p and Hoc1p) in S. cerevisiae (8,9,42) but may differ in its assembly. Our data now strongly support that Gmh5p is an orthologue of S. cerevisiae Mnn10p and contributes to M-Pol II-like complex activity in S. pombe by further extending the mannose backbone. This is evident inFig. 6a andFig. 6b, where Western blot shows that although N-glycosylation of acid phosphatase and invertase is still present, the glycan chains are substantially shorter, as indicated by the reduced molecular mass of the glycoproteins. Whether these effects observed in mutant gmh5Δ can be complemented by heterologous expression of S. cerevisiae Mnn10p remains to be determined.

In S. cerevisiae, impairment of the M-Pol II complex, as in anp1Δ mutants, leads to synthetic growth defects under conditions of compromised O-mannosylation (55). In line with its function as an orthologue of S. cerevisiae Mnn10p, targeted disruption of gmh5+ in oma1Δ cells resulted in increased phenotypic severity of aberrant cell and cell wall morphologies (Fig. 7a). Furthermore, gmh5Δ mutants were highly susceptible to the protein O-mannosyltransferase inhibitor R3A-5a (23) (IC50: WT, 3.08 µM; gmh5Δ, 1.45 µM (two individual mutant clones are shown inFig. 7b).

Fig. 7 Phenotypic characterization of S. pombe gmh5Δ mutants: a) wild-type (WT) and the indicated mutant strains were grown to logarithmic phase on EMM medium (for details see Materials and Methods). Mutant oma1Δgmh5Δ shows defects in cell separation leading to abnormally shaped elongated or branched cells. Aniline blue staining is used to visualize β-glucans. Differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence microscopic images are shown; magnification 630-fold, and b) treatment of S. pombe strains with the O-mannosylation inhibitor R3A-5a. WT and two independent mutant clones (gmh5Δ-1 and gmh5Δ-2; represented as dotted and dashed lines, respectively), were treated with the indicated concentrations of R3A-5a. A600 nm was determined after a growth period of 24 h. The experiment was performed twice using three technical replicates. Results were used for linear regression analysis and the IC50 was determined. Differences in the IC50 values were confirmed to be significant by statistical analysis (p<0.05)
FTB-64-39-f7

The exacerbated phenotypic severity observed when gmh5+ is disrupted in oma1Δ cells shows an important interplay between O- and N-linked glycosylation pathways in maintaining cell wall integrity. Similarly, the hypersensitivity of gmh5Δ mutants to the inhibitor R3A-5a suggests a compensatory relationship between these pathways. Our previous work in S. cerevisiae already showed a compensatory response between the two types of glycosylation, specifically in the formation of high mannose outer chains. Transcription of several mannosyltransferase genes involved in the biosynthesis of N-linked high mannose carbohydrate chains was induced upon treatment with O-mannosylation inhibitors and in pmtΔ mutants (56). Similarly, inhibition of N-glycosylation by tunicamycin leads to increased transcription of PMTs and KTR1 involved in O-glycosylation (57), further suggesting a regulatory relationship between these pathways in yeast cell wall biogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data strongly indicate that Gmh5p is involved in the outer chain elongation of N-linked glycans, almost certainly representing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mnn10p orthologue. Our identification of Gmh5p as a multicopy suppressor of decreased O-mannosylation highlights the complex interplay between different glycosylation pathways in maintaining cell wall integrity. The characterization of Gmh5p as a mannosyltransferase rather than the previously predicted galactosyltransferase contributes to our understanding of glycan biosynthesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and reveals evolutionarily conserved aspects of protein glycosylation between distantly related yeast species. These findings provide important insights into the critical role of protein glycosylation in cell wall integrity and the function of a previously uncharacterized glycosyltransferase.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

All supplementary materials are available at:www.ftb.com.hr.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This paper is dedicated to Vlado Mrša, a dear friend and long-time colleague who left us far too soon, with whom I shared many years of deep fascination for fungal glycosylation and cell wall biology.

We would like to express our gratitude to U. Klaube, C. Müller und A. Metschies for their invaluable technical support. Our sincere thanks go to J. Stolz, S.L. Forsburg and K. Takegawa for generously providing S. pombe genomic libraries, strains and plasmids, essential to our research. We are grateful to L. Lehe and W. Tanner for generously providing invertase- and chitinase-specific antibodies. We also deeply appreciate Carlos Vázquez de Aldana’s generous help with the microscopic analyses. We gratefully acknowledge Daniel Sturm for discussions on the project and for his contribution to help with the preparation of the graphical abstract which was created using BioRender.com. We acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (OpenAI) to assist with language editing and text refinement during manuscript preparation. All scientific content and conclusions were generated by the authors without AI assistance.

Notes

[1] Financial disclosure FUNDING

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) grant STR 443/3-1 (to S.S.) and Forschungsgruppe FOR 2509 Project-ID STR 443/6-1 (to S. S.), FOR 2509 P07 (to I.S.).

[2] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

REFERENCES

1 

Varki A. Biological roles of glycans. Glycobiology. 2017;27(1):3–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cww086 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558841

2 

Neubert P, Halim A, Zauser M, Essig A, Joshi HJ, Zatorska E, et al. Mapping the O-mannose glycoproteome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15(4):1323–37. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M115.057505 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26764011

3 

Neubert P, Strahl S. Protein O-mannosylation in the early secretory pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;41:100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2016.04.010 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161930

4 

Loibl M, Strahl S. Protein O-mannosylation: What we have learned from baker’s yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2013;1833(11):2438–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.02.008 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23434682

5 

Stanley P, Moremen KW, Lewis NE, Taniguchi N, Aebi M. N-glycans. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Stanley P, Hart GW, Aebi M, et al, editors. Essentials of glycobiology. Woodbury, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2022.

6 

Nakanishi-Shindo Y, Nakayama K, Tanaka A, Toda Y, Jigami Y. Structure of the N-linked oligosaccharides that show the complete loss of α-1,6-polymannose outer chain from och1, och1 mnn1, and och1 mnn1 alg3 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(35):26338–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)74320-8 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8253757

7 

Yoko-o T, Tsukahara K, Watanabe T, Hata-Sugi N, Yoshimatsu K, Nagasu T, et al. Schizosaccharomyces pombe och1+ encodes α-1,6-mannosyltransferase that is involved in outer chain elongation of N-linked oligosaccharides. FEBS Lett. 2001;489(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02082-8 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11231017

8 

Stolz J, Munro S. The components of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannosyltransferase complex M-Pol I have distinct functions in mannan synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(47):44801–8. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M208023200 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12235155

9 

Jungmann J, Rayner JC, Munro S. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Mnn10p/Bed1p is a subunit of a Golgi mannosyltransferase complex. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(10):6579–85. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.10.6579 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10037752

10 

Munro S. What can yeast tell us about N-linked glycosylation in the Golgi apparatus? FEBS Lett. 2001;498(2-3):223–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02488-7 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11412862

11 

Ziegler FD, Cavanagh J, Lubowski C, Trimble RB. Novel Schizosaccharomyces pombe N-linked GalMan9GlcNAc isomers: Role of the Golgi GMA12 galactosyltransferase in core glycan galactosylation. Glycobiology. 1999;9(5):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/9.5.497 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10207182

12 

Ohashi T, Tanaka T, Tanaka N, Takegawa K. SpMnn9p and SpAnp1p form a protein complex involved in mannan synthesis in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biosci Bioeng. 2020;130(4):335–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.06.003 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650974

13 

Gemmill TR, Trimble RB. All pyruvylated galactose in Schizosaccharomyces pombe N-glycans is present in the terminal disaccharide, 4, 6-O-[(R)-(1-carboxyethylidine)]-Galβ1,3Galα1-. Glycobiology. 1998;8(11):1087–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/8.11.1087 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9751795

14 

Ikeda Y, Ohashi T, Tanaka N, Takegawa K. Identification and characterization of a gene required for α1,2-mannose extension in the O-linked glycan synthesis pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9(1):115–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00458.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19054127

15 

Ohashi T, Nakakita S, Sumiyoshi W, Yamada N, Ikeda Y, Tanaka N, et al. Structural analysis of α1,3-linked galactose-containing oligosaccharides in Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutants harboring single and multiple α-galactosyltransferase genes disruptions. Glycobiology. 2011;21(3):340–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwq167 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21098516

16 

Ohashi T, Fujiyama K, Takegawa K. Identification of novel α1,3-galactosyltransferase and elimination of α-galactose-containing glycans by disruption of multiple α-galactosyltransferase genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(46):38866–75. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.347351 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988247

17 

Fukunaga T, Tanaka N, Furumoto T, Nakakita S, Ohashi T, Higuchi Y, et al. Substrate specificities of α1,2- and α1,3-galactosyltransferases and characterization of Gmh1p and Otg1p in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Glycobiology. 2021;31(8):1037–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwab028 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909078

18 

Willer T, Brandl M, Sipiczki M, Strahl S. Protein O-mannosylation is crucial for cell wall integrity, septation and viability in fission yeast. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57(1):156–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04692.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15948957

19 

Lussier M, Sdicu AM, Bussey H. The KTR and MNN1 mannosyltransferase families of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1426(2):323–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(98)00133-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9878809

20 

Gow NAR, Latge JP, Munro CA. The fungal cell wall: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(3):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28513415

21 

Pérez P, Cortés JCG, Cansado J, Ribas JC. Fission yeast cell wall biosynthesis and cell integrity signalling. Cell Surf. 2018;4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2018.10.001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743131

22 

Barbet N, Muriel WJ, Carr AM. Versatile shuttle vectors and genomic libraries for use with Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene. 1992;114(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(92)90707-V PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1587485

23 

Orchard MG, Neuss JC, Galley CMS, Carr A, Porter DW, Smith P, et al. Rhodanine-3-acetic acid derivatives as inhibitors of fungal protein mannosyl transferase 1 (PMT1). Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004;14(15):3975–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.05.050 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15225710

24 

Girrbach V, Zeller T, Priesmeier M, Strahl-Bolsinger S. Structure-function analysis of the dolichyl phosphate-mannose: Protein O-mannosyltransferase ScPmt1p. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(25):19288–96. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001771200 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10764776

25 

Tanaka N, Konomi M, Osumi M, Takegawa K. Characterization of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutant deficient in UDP-galactose transport activity. Yeast. 2001;18(10):903–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.740 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11447596

26 

Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:MSB201175. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.75 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21988835

27 

Gouet P, Robert X, Courcelle E. ESPript/ENDscript: Extracting and rendering sequence and 3D information from atomic structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3320–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg556 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12824317

28 

Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2010;66(Part 4):486–501. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20383002

29 

Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265844

30 

The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, v. 3.0, Schrödinger LLC, New York, NY, USA; 2024. Available from:www.pymol.org.

31 

GraphPad Prism, v. 8.0, GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA; 2018. Available from:www.graphpad.com.

32 

Young SH, Dong WJ, Jacobs RR. Observation of a partially opened triple-helix conformation in 1→3-β-glucan by fluorescence resonance energy transfer spectroscopy. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(16):11874–9. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.16.11874 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10766814

33 

Humbel BM, Konomi M, Takagi T, Kamasawa N, Ishijima SA, Osumi M. In situ localization of β-glucans in the cell wall of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2001;18(5):433–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.694 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255251

34 

Maundrell K. nmt1 of fission yeast. A highly transcribed gene completely repressed by thiamine. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(19):10857–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38525-4 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2358444

35 

Basi G, Schmid E, Maundrell K. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1 promoter affect transcription efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene. 1993;123(1):131–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90552-E PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8422997

36 

Cansado J, Soto T, Franco A, Vicente-Soler J, Madrid M. The fission yeast cell integrity pathway: A functional hub for cell survival upon stress and beyond. J Fungi. 2022;8(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8010032 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049972

37 

Kim JY, Kwon ES, Roe JH. A homeobox protein Phx1 regulates long-term survival and meiotic sporulation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-86 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646093

38 

Donoso I, Muñoz-Centeno MC, Sànchez-Durán MA, Flores A, Daga RR, Guevara CM, et al. Mpg1, a fission yeast protein required for proper septum structure, is involved in cell cycle progression through cell-size checkpoint. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;274(2):155–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-005-0005-8 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16049679

39 

Harris MA, Rutherford KM, Hayles J, Lock A, Bähler J, Oliver SG, et al. Fission stories: Using PomBase to understand Schizosaccharomyces pombe biology. Genetics. 2022;220(4):iyab222. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyab222 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100366

40 

Drula E, Garron ML, Dogan S, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Terrapon N. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: Functions and literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50 D1:D571–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1045 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850161

41 

Harrus D, Kellokumpu S, Glumoff T. Crystal structures of eukaryote glycosyltransferases reveal biologically relevant enzyme homooligomers. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(5):833–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2659-x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932871

42 

Jungmann J, Munro S. Multi-protein complexes in the cis Golgi of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with α-1,6-mannosyltransferase activity. EMBO J. 1998;17(2):423–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.2.423 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9430634

43 

Dean N, Poster JB. Molecular and phenotypic analysis of the S. cerevisiae MNN10 gene identifies a family of related glycosyltransferases. Glycobiology. 1996;6(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/6.1.73 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8991513

44 

Breton C, Šnajdrová L, Jeanneau C, Koča J, Imberty A. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyltransferases. Glycobiology. 2006;16(2):29R–37R. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwj016 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16037492

45 

Culbertson AT, Ehrlich JJ, Choe JY, Honzatko RB, Zabotina OA. Structure of xyloglucan xylosyltransferase 1 reveals simple steric rules that define biological patterns of xyloglucan polymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(23):6064–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801105115 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29784804

46 

Kainuma M, Ishida N, Yoko-o T, Yoshioka S, Takeuchi M, Kawakita M, et al.Kawakita M, Jigami Yet al. Coexpression of α1,2 galactosyltransferase and UDP-galactose transporter efficiently galactosylates N- and O-glycans in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Glycobiology. 1999;9(2):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/9.2.133 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9949191

47 

Cavalier DM, Keegstra K. Two xyloglucan xylosyltransferases catalyze the addition of multiple xylosyl residues to cellohexaose. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(45):34197–207. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M606379200 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16982611

48 

Hernandez LM, Ballou L, Alvarado E, Tsai PK, Ballou CE. Structure of the phosphorylated N-linked oligosaccharides from the mnn9 and mnn10 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(23):13648–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)80046-1 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2668269

49 

Sipiczki M. Where does fission yeast sit on the tree of life? Genome Biol. 2000;1(2):reviews1011. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-reviews1011 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11178233

50 

Free SJ. Fungal cell wall organization and biosynthesis. Adv Genet. 2013;81:33–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407677-8.00002-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23419716

51 

Zielinska DF, Gnad F, Schropp K, Wiśniewski JR, Mann M. Mapping N-glycosylation sites across seven evolutionarily distant species reveals a divergent substrate proteome despite a common core machinery. Mol Cell. 2012;46(4):542–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.031 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22633491

52 

Castells-Ballester J, Zatorska E, Meurer M, Neubert P, Metschies A, Knop M, et al. Monitoring protein dynamics in protein O-mannosyltransferase mutants in vivo by tandem fluorescent protein timers. Molecules. 2018;23(10):2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102622 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30322079

53 

Huang KM, Snider MD. Isolation of protein glycosylation mutants in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 1995;6(5):485–96. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.6.5.485 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7663020

54 

Lehle L, Eiden A, Lehnert K, Haselbeck A, Kopetzki E. Glycoprotein biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: ngd29, an N-glycosylation mutant allelic to och1 having a defect in the initiation of outer chain formation. FEBS Lett. 1995;370(1-2):41–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)00789-C PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7649302

55 

Zatorska E, Gal L, Schmitt J, Bausewein D, Schuldiner M, Strahl S. Cellular consequences of diminished protein O-mannosyltransferase activity in baker’s yeast. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061226 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28598353

56 

Arroyo J, Hutzler J, Bermejo C, Ragni E, García-Cantalejo J, Botías P, et al. Functional and genomic analyses of blocked protein O-mannosylation in baker’s yeast. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79(6):1529–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07537.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21231968

57 

Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L, Lockhart DJ, Weissman JS, Walter P. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell. 2000;101(3):249–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80835-1 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10847680

Appendices

Table S1 Yeast strains used in this study
StrainGenotypeReference
S. pombe
FY527h, ade6-M216, his3-Δ1, leu1-32, ura4-Δ18Forsburg lab
SBY90Isogenic to FY527 except oma1::hisG (18)
SBY88Isogenic to FY527 except oma4::hisG (18)
TWY14ade6-M210, his3-Δ1, leu1-32, ura4-Δ18, oma2::his3+, transformed with pTW51-1 (18)
TWY16Isogenic to FY527 except nmt81-oma2+ (18)
CMY1Isogenic to FY527 except gmh5::kanMXThis study
CMY2Isogenic to SBY90 except gmh5::kanMXThis study
omh1Δh+, ade6-M210, ura4-Δ18, leu1-32, omh1::kanMX4 (14)
S. cerevisiae
BY4741MATa his3Δ1, leu2Δ0, met15Δ0, ura3Δ0Euroscarf, Oberursel, Germany
mnn10ΔIsogenic to BY4741 except mnn10::kanMXEuroscarf, Oberursel, Germany
Fig. S1 Viability of Schizosaccharomyces pombe omaΔ mutants. Wild-type (WT), oma1Δ and oma4Δ mutants grown to logarithmic phase on EMM medium are shown. Dead cells are visualized by aniline blue staining. Differential interference contrast (DIC) images are shown; magnification 630-fold
FTB-64-39-fS1
Fig. S2 Expression of S. pombe Gmh5p and Gma12p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a) S. pombe Gmh5p-HA (pCM11), Gma12p-HA (pGma12HA) and an empty vector control were expressed in S. cerevisiae wild-type (WT) cells. Microsomal membranes equivalent to A600 nm(cell solution)=1 were separated on 10 % SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and b) Gmh5p-HA was solubilized from microsomal membranes using 1 % digitonine and immunopurified using anti-HA monoclonal antibodies coupled to sepharose beads using standard procedures. Aliquots of the input and the immunoprecipitate were separated on 10 % SDS-polyacrylamide gels. HA-tagged proteins were detected by Western blot decorated with monoclonal mouse anti‐HA (16B12; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 1:8000 dilution. IP=immunoprecipitate, HA=hemagglutinin
FTB-64-39-fS2

This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.