Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.29.3.2

A large-sport event and its influence on tourism destination image in Indonesia

Pahrudin Pahrudin ; Researcher Chaoyang University of Technology, Department of Leisure and Service Management, Taichung, Taiwan Hamzanwadi University Faculty of Social Science and Economic Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Li-Wei Liu ; Chaoyang University of Technology Department of Leisure and Service Management, Taichung, Taiwan
Achlan Fahlevi Royanow ; Lecturer Lombok Tourism Polytechnic Department of Tour and Travel Business
Idham Kholid ; East Lombok Tourism Promotion Board


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 366 Kb

str. 335-348

preuzimanja: 226

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Purpose – This study aims to explore the perception of local society regarding the government’s
hosting of a large-sport event such as the MotoGP in Indonesia, using social exchange theory
such as economic, social, cultural, and environmental aspects to support tourism development
and destination image.
Design/methodology – This study provides the locals’ perception of the large-sport events of
MotoGP Indonesia in 2022 using a quantitative approach through Structural Equation ModelPartial Least Square (SEM-PLS).
Findings – The results indicate that economic, social, and cultural perceptions significantly
support tourism development and destination image in Indonesia. However, environmental
perceptions were not significant and did not support the hypothesis that they support tourism
development. Therefore, it can be concluded that this significant event can contribute to the
development of tourism and destination image in Indonesia.
Originality of the research – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to
examine the mega sporting event and tourism destination using multiple indicators, such as
economic, social, cultural, and environmental. In addition, this is the first study to examine the
host perception of the MotoGP mega sporting event in Indonesia.

Ključne riječi

host-perception; large-sport; MotoGP; destination image; Indonesia

Hrčak ID:

306549

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/306549

Datum izdavanja:

5.7.2023.

Posjeta: 470 *




INTRODUCTION

The tourism sector is one of the sectors that can give benefit to local communities. The tourism industry, including sport tourism, is one of the sectors that may create an impact on social conflict in the destination community due to the difference in sociocultural and economic welfare, and the power gaps between the host community and tourists in purchasing (Tosun, 2002). Several studies on large-sport events such as Olympic Games and FIFA World Cup have focussed on the attitude and perceptions of host communities (Kaplanidou et al., 2013; Knott et al., 2015; Prayag et al., 2013; Zhou & Ap, 2009).

The perception of hosting an event has two insights, both positive and negative impacts. Some literature has discussed several aspects of hosting large-sport events based on the social exchange theory (SET) such as the economic, social, and environmental aspects that affect the sports event (Duan et al., 2021). Some scholars believe that hosting mega-sport events can bring both positive and negative impacts on the community such as challenges in the economic and financial aspects (Knott et al., 2015). The interaction between the event-hosting community and visitors from different backgrounds can give negative attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of the event and tourism.

Although there are different perceptions of tourism development, sports tourism development is one of the fastest-growing and special events in tourism (Daniels & Norman, 2003). More tourists are interested in attending sports activities during their trips, whether sports are the main objective of travel or not. The large-sport event is a catalyst in the tourism sector as a destination branding for visitors. The large-sport events influence several sectors such as developing infrastructure for hosting the event, economic aspects, social benefits, and others.

In Indonesia, sports tourism has begun to be developed and become one of the events included in the calendar of Indonesian tourism events, such as Tour de Singkarak. Since it was first conducted in 2009, this activity has given an impact on the number of visitors to West Sumatra and attracted sports tourism players to participate in this activity (Susanti & Syahar, 2019). Currently, the Indonesian government is focusing on developing sports tourism as one of the tourist attractions in Indonesia such as motorsport (MotoGP and WSBK), International Run Festival, and others.

Furthermore, the Indonesian government developed the Mandalika Circuit to support sports tourism development by hosting the MotoGP event. Mandalika is one of the five super-priority areas developed to become a special economic tourism zone (the government regulation, 25/2014). The development of the Mandalika Circuit is part of increasing tourist attractions in the area of MotoGP. The development of the event will be a permanent icon and improving the image of the destination and increasing tourist visits (Daniels & Norman, 2003).

The development of MotoGP especially large-sports events on tourism will give an impact on several aspects such as the economy, environment, and socio-culture (Turco et al., 2003). In addition, skilled personnel is needed in carrying out MotoGP events because the support of trained, educated, and professional human resources will increase the value of tourist satisfaction and sustainability (Mazanec et al., 2007). A few studies have been undertaken on the local community perspective and community involvement in sport tourism literature based on how the local community’s perception and its effects on destination images (Lee et al., 2013; Turco et al., 2003).

Meanwhile, little research has been undertaken on society’s perceptions of sport tourism development in developing countries, the majority of the studies have been conducted in developed countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and others (Sharpley, 2014). However, no study has been done on how the host’s perception of a large sports event of MotoGP in developing countries such as Indonesia. This study aims to examine the host’s perception of the local community of the event of MotoGP toward t tourism development and destinations in Indonesia in early 2022.

As a result, this study is being conducted to fill out the gap by utilizing SET (Social Exchange Theory) to measure the host’s perception of large-sport events from various perspectives, including economic, social, cultural, and environmental aspects. Besides, support for tourism development and a destination image in the context of the MotoGP event in Indonesia has not yet been discussed in the large sports event in tourism studies. This study also contributes to the literature on sports tourism and provides useful information for those involved in organizing major sporting events in Indonesia. As a result, this study helps stakeholders and marketers in sport tourism (MotoGP) to decide the marketing plan for hosting the event to impact the local community and tourism sector in Indonesia.

This study is presented with several parts. Section one discusses the conceptual background and hypothesis development. Section two presents the research methodology. Section three explains the result and discussion of the study. The last section is the conclusion including limitations and future research agenda.

  1. CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT

    1. Social Exchange Theory

The social exchange theory (SET) was discovered by (Emerson, 1976) and refers to the psychological and sociological perspective from two sides process in two or more groups (Boley et al., 2014). In the tourism literature, social exchange theory was applied to understand both residents and tourists. Several studies in the field of tourism, sports tourism, sports management, and hospitality management have used social exchange theory in examining resident perception, such as a study from (Duan et al., 2021) that examined the perception of the hosting of mega event Marathon in China from their perception of attitude and residents’ quality of life . In addition, the study conducted by (Yao & Schwarz, 2018) used the theory of social exchange theory to explain the residents’ perceptions in the context of the World Golf Championship HSBC, China. Tourists can get benefit from tourism and its cost because the residents are motivated to interact with the tourists (Jurowski et al., 1997). Besides, residents can evaluate these costs, such as the economic, environmental, and social value (Sharpley, 2014).

Hence, it is important to analyze the perception of residents in using Social Exchange Theory (SET) on the mega-sport event in the context of MotoGP toward tourism destinations in Indonesia. the followings are several explanations of social exchange theory from the perspective of hosting the large sports event of MotoGP in Indonesia.

The impact of large sport event

Hosting large-scale of sports tourism events can increase the number of visitors and generate extensive impacts and implications for the host communities (Caiazza & Audretsch, 2015; Chersulich Tomino et al., 2020; Ohmann et al., 2006; Perić, 2018). Hosting sports tourism events has a big chance to enhance the lives of the host’s society by fostering economic growth, expanding social and recreational activities, and building new infrastructure (Fredline, 2005). However, hosting sports tourism events may also give a negative impact on several aspects such as environmental field, noise, and social impact if it is poorly handled (Fredline, 2005).

Many subsequent scholars have attempted to examine hosting large sports events from several perspectives, such as social- economic (Kim et al., 2015; Lee & Taylor, 2005; Perić, 2018; Turco et al., 2003), socio-culture (Caiazza & Audretsch, 2015), destination image (Andersson et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2005), and an evaluation towards host community

perspectives as well (Ma et al., 2013; Maheshwari et al., 2019; Tichaawa et al., 2015; Yao & Schwarz, 2018). However, the contribution of sports tourism in a broader context discloses various debates concerning its uncertain evaluation. It usually grossly overestimates the economic impact, both short-term and longer-term planning (Hall, 2004).

Economic impact

Large-scale sports tourism events have an impact, especially on the economic aspect. Some researchers (Scheu & Preuss, 2018; Wicker et al., 2012). According to previous research, sports events generally have both positive and negative consequences, with some evidence suggesting that mega-events have more negative than positive effects (Scheu & Preuss, 2018). Several examples showed that hosting a large-sports tourism event can reduce unemployment by 1.9% and increase domestic growth by 1.3% from 1997 until 2005 (Kasimati & Dawson, 2009). Furthermore, hosting the Olympics event substantially impacts the economy, such as tax revenue, income sources for employment, and society during and after hosting the large event (Kang & Perdue, 1994; Madden, 2002). In addition, the study conducted by (Walker et al., 2013) revealed that hosting mega- events is the potential for country or city growth and drives economic mobility. The residents supporting mega-events can contribute to the event’s economic aspect (Kim et al., 2015). Furthermore, a study done by (Kim et al., 2015), reported that mega-events can bring positive impacts, such as infrastructure and economic development for residents. According to the aforementioned studies, the social exchange theory (SET) in the context of hosting mega-events directly gives benefits to residents and improves their support for tourist development.

Social impact

Research done by Kim & Petrick (2005) contended that understanding the necessity for stability between economic and social goals is critical to building successful sports tourism events. However, different from the economic aspect, the social impacts of hosting large-scale sports tourism events is a bit challenging to measure (Kim et al., 2015) as residents’ perspectives can alter over time. Quantifying social effects is difficult due to this form of assessment’s perceived lack of credibility (Jönsson & Lewis, 2014). As a result, Kim et al. (2014) created a scale to assess the perceived social impacts of a large-scale sports tourism event that included a six-factor model with 23 items: financial gains, society/community pride, community development, financial costs, traffic issues, and security threats. The study’s findings demonstrated the multi-dimensional character of the perceived social consequences associated with sports tourism events.

Cultural impact

Hosting large events gives a chance for the local communities to meet new people and increase pride in the city, promote the city as a tourism destination, and help people to understand the local communities’ culture, values, and identity (Kim et al., 2006; Kim & Petrick, 2005; Lorde et al., 2011; Waitt, 2003). Some large events, such Sydney Olympics allows the people to show all of the elements of the city, such as the vibrant environment and economy of the locals (Waitt, 2003). Strengthening the community toward the value and culture of the local community is a positive social and cultural benefit of mega events in tourism development studies (Andriotis & Vaughan, 2003).

Some researchers believe that sociocultural aspects have a positive and negative impact on residents to support tourism development and events (Andereck & Vogt, 2000; Dyer et al., 2007; Gursoy & Kendall, 2006). Therefore, residents’ perception of society and culture has a relationship to support tourism development. However, research from (Vargas-Sánchez et al., 2011) revealed that the relation between variable social-cultural attitudes could be perceived from the tourism development and events in communities or the residents.

A study by (Chersulich Tomino et al., 2020) contended that events should have a dedicated cultural program. As an illustration, a comprehensive schedule of mini-events showcasing art and culture was developed for the Sydney Olympics. With the program, visitors may increase and residents would have access to a wider variety of leisure activities because visitors’ stays could be extended. Additionally, the chance to grow the firm was seized to market Sydney to the biggest corporations in the world. In this way, a specific occasion functioned as a catalyst for the expansion of options for access to new technology, the sharing of ideas, the establishment of significant business and professional contacts, as well as other activities (Mules & Dwyer, 2005). The residents must get involved and take part in the event. The creation of jobs for locals, which must be permanent rather than temporary, is maybe the most crucial factor (Chersulich Tomino et al., 2020).

Environmental impact

The environment is one of the significant issues in hosting a large-sport event. Some tourism literature has discussed the positive impact of hosting events from the perspective of the host city and non-host city using environmental issues (Johnston et al., 2023; Mohanty et al., 2020; Perić, 2018; Remoaldo et al., 2015; Yuan, 2013). Therefore, a large event can maintain

environmental objects and local legacy (Lorde et al., 2011). A hosting city and its surroundings are large event areas that catalyse environmental and landscape restoration. For example, hosting the large event FIFA World Cup 2002 in South Korea provided a reward or incentive to the host for conserving the environment and historical buildings (Kim et al., 2006) and the green goal program in FIFA world cup 2010 (Death, 2011). The residents can also enrich environmental consciousness and local sustainable development through large events (Kim et al., 2021).

However, hosting mega-events can negatively impact environmental issues such as pollution, traffic, physical environment, and land use to build infrastructure (Elahi et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2006; Lorde et al., 2011; Ritchie et al,, 2009). Rugby World Cup 1999 is one of the examples showing that hosting a mega event can make local society feel inconvenient (Jones, 2001). Hosting a mega event can also negatively impact the environment of tourism development in the host society (Kim et al., 2015; Yuan, 2013).

Some studies have shown that citizens’ perceptions of the environment affect the development of the tourism industry (Collins et al., 2012). The perception of environmental issues has been gained from studying mega-events and tourism (Cornelissen et al., 2011; Jin et al., 2011). On the other side, the relationship between environmental consequences and general opinions is discussed in a few pieces of evidence. The study conducted by (Perić, 2018) revealed the negative impacts on the environment. Therefore, the social exchange theory (SET) revealed that positive perception could impact a positive attitude. The rationality of SET indicates the effect of the values and beliefs of the residents’ opinions or perceptions. Based on this rule, the residents will disagree with the development of the tourists, which contradicts their beliefs and attitude.

Destination image

Due to it influences on both supply and demand perspectives of marketing, the destination image is typically regarded as a crucial component in thriving tourism development and destination marketing by hosting the large-sport event (Kenyon & Bodet, 2018). According to research by Knott et al. (2017), such large-scale events had distinctive qualities that significantly increased the chances of a host country to build its national destination image. Additionally, research from (Herstein & Berger, 2013; Kaplanidou et al., 2012) indicated that hosting a mega-event might improve the host city’s image as a desirable vacation destination, as well as boost the city’s competitiveness in the business and tourist sectors.

A study (Dongfeng, 2013) revealed that the destination image is predictive of the intention to revisit the destination after hosting a major sports event. Furthermore, South Korea’s hosting of the FIFA World Cup in 2002 had a beneficial effect on visitors’ perceptions of the nation, according to an empirical study by Lee et al., (2005). The study’s findings also showed that foreign tourists who were not in Korea for the World Cup noticed some changes in their perceptions of the country. Travelers who came to Korea for the World Cup had a more favourable perception of the country, were happier with their experiences in Korea, and appeared more probable to recommend it to others (Lee et al., 2005).

Large scale sport event toward support tourism development and destination image

The social exchange theory was applied in tourism research to examine and determine the economic impact on supporting tourism development (Boonsiritomachai & Phonthanukitithaworn, 2019). Social Exchange Theory (SET) was applied to examine this study from the host’s perception of the large sports event in Indonesia with several indicators such as the economic, social, environmental, and social impact on supporting tourism development. Previous studies found that communities have a perceived impact on the economic sector (such as income, tax revenue, and employment). While in the context of social impact (such as social interaction, culture exchange, and others), it failed to contribute to resident communities (Wang & Pfister, 2008). Using social exchange theory (SET) in the context of a significant sports event—the Sydney 2000 Olympics—a study administered by (Waitt, 2003) found that people frequently re-evaluate how they perceive the effects of exchange processes in dynamic social environments. Additionally, according to the research by (Gursoy & Kendall, 2006), several variables including inhabitants’ worries, feelings, and attitudes toward the environment, affected how they responded to big sports events.

Residents’ impressions of the effects of hosting large-scale sporting and tourist events have grown as important criteria for garnering support for the event from the entire community (Kim et al., 2015). Positive opinions from the locals would encourage the event’s continued hosting (Tichaawa et al., 2015; Yao & Schwarz, 2018). In addition, Kaplanidou, (2021) asserted that the characteristics of the host community may influence how the asset or needs-based community theory is applied to achieve community development objectives associated with hosting a certain scale of sports events.

Empirical evidence is provided by a study by Kim et al., (2020) that examined how locals could see the effects of the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympic Games in Korea. According to the study, locals’ perceptions of the advantages related to the economy, infrastructure, and tourism were highly predictive of how they would perceive the local community to receive an impact on sustainable development. Therefore, integrating locals’ impressions of any participants in the activities is a step toward sport tourism events’ success and future (Tichaawa et al., 2015).

According to the research by Pranić et al., (2012), positive local perceptions of the social impact and other effects of a sports tourism event are important factors in staging a successful sports tourism event and guaranteeing sustained development for the host town. However, opinions about the effects of the mega-event among the community’s members vary before, during, and after the event (Ma et al., 2013). Therefore, the current research contends that host perceptions need to be addressed. It may bring more perception related to the large-scale tourism events toward the destination image that earlier studies might suggest.

The study done by (Karadakis, 2012) found that hosting a large-scale event has a social and economic impact on residents’ support for hosting and also a negative impact on sports tourism. This study result contributed to adding the literature on sports events and tourism. In addition, the study on large sports tourism found that the residents perceived the economic impact of sports tourism in Keiyo County, while residents perceived a negative social impact (Imbaya & Irungu, 2013).

A study by (Kavetsos & Szymanski, 2010) examined the impact of hosting large sports events such as the Olympic games, the FIFA World cup, and the UEFA European championship. The result found a positive relationship and significance between hosting large sports events and social well-being. Furthermore, (Imbaya & Irungu, 2013) stated that hosting sports events have an urgent role in the social benefit of the community, economic gains of the local community, and perceived negative impact for supporting tourism development. In addition, social perception has been examined in hosting the event of Run Barbados event from locals’ perception and the result found that there is a positive perception of the local community in social interaction (Jönsson & Lewis, 2014).

Understanding the role of the host’s perception toward support tourism development is needed to explore in the context of large sports events. Several studies have investigated residents’ perceptions of both positive and negative impacts on tourist destinations in the context of tourism development (Látková & Vogt, 2012; Nicholas et al., 2009; Nunkoo & Ramkissoon, 2011). Furthermore, supporting tourism development in tourism destinations influences the local community, such as the destination’s sustainability (Nicholas et al., 2009; Nunkoo & Ramkissoon, 2011). Local communities or residents who believe tourism has a beneficial influence will support it, while those who believe tourism has a negative impact will oppose it (Nunkoo & Ramkissoon, 2011). In addition, this study tried to explore the role of large sports events toward tourism development support and tourist destination based on the host’s community perception using social exchange theory.

This study identifies that several indicators of social exchange theory support tourism development and destination images

in Indonesia when hosting the large sports event of MotoGP Indonesia. The hypotheses proposed in this study are as follows:

H1: The impact of perceived economic aspects in hosting large sports events positively and significantly influences

support of tourism development.

H2: The impact of the perceived environmental in hosting large sports events negatively and significantly influences

support of tourism development.

H3: The impact of perceived social aspects in hosting large sports events negatively and significantly influences

support of tourism development.

H4: The impact of perceived cultural aspects in hosting large sports events positively and significantly influences

support of tourism development.

H5: Support for tourism development has positively and significantly influenced destination images.

The proposed model (framework) in this study can be seen in figure 1.

Figure 1: Research Framework

  • 2. RESEARCH METHOD

    1. Sample and data collection

In this study, an online survey was administered randomly to deliver the questions to respondents. The data were collected from the local Indonesian society or community of hosting the large event of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia. The questionnaire was developed toward the perception of hosting the mega-event of MotoGP that was conducted in early 2022. The study was conducted after the event of MotoGP 2022 Mandalika, Indonesia, to assess the perception of local society toward the mega- event of MotoGP 2022, Indonesia.

Furthermore, the convenience sampling method was chosen in this study. Convenience sampling is one kind of non-probability technique with the limitation of generalizing to the larger population (Malhotra, 1996). Conveniently accessing respondents at a low cost and with no effort is one of the benefits of adopting convenience sampling. Additionally, convenience sampling can be used in theory research and exploratory study when academics require a quick and inexpensive technique to decide whether more research is necessary. Thus, to investigate the host’s perspective of the effect of a large sports event on tourism, convenience sampling was used in this study.

Construct measurement and development

Several indicators have been modified in this questionnaire. The questions about local society’s perception of the social- economic impact of big-scale sports events were modified and adapted from a similar questionnaire as used in previous studies. The items of the question consist of both positive and negative questions. The survey questions regarding local society’s perceptions of the social effects of the large-scale sports events were modified from a similar survey used in other studies (Kim et al., 2015; Liu, 2016; Perić, 2018; Prayag et al., 2013; Yoon et al., 2001) with three indicators (disruption of residents and conflicts). The questions related to economic impact were modified and adapted from (Liu, 2016; Perić, 2018; Prayag et al., 2013; Yoon et al., 2001) with five indicators (local business, employment, investment, economy of community, and acceleration of economic development).

The questions related to the environment were modified and adapted based on previous studies (Abdel Azim Ahmed, 2017; Konstantaki & Wickens, 2010; Yoon et al., 2001) with three indicators (development of area circuit, pollution, and damage impact for community). The questions about the cultural aspect were modified and adapted (Abdel Azim Ahmed, 2017; Prayag et al., 2013; Yoon et al., 2001) with five indicators (cross-cultural understanding, local society, acculturation, and local culture). The questions related to supporting tourism development were modified and adapted (Abdel Azim Ahmed, 2017; Boonsiritomachai & Phonthanukitithaworn, 2019; Prayag et al., 2013; Yoon et al., 2001) with three indicators (support for international destination, support for sports tourism destination, and premium destinations). In addition to the last variable, the variable destination image was modified and adapted from (Andersson et al., 2021; Baloglu & McCleary, 1999; Kanwel et al., 2019) with five indicators (attractiveness, accessibility, facilities, resource, and scenery of the circuit). These items were specifically used in this study in Table 1.

In this study, the questionnaire was arranged in Indonesian languages because the respondents are local Indonesian societies hosting a large sports event of MotoGP in the region of West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia, conducted in early of the year 2022.

Data analysis

The data were analysed using the Structural Equation Model-Partial Least Square (SmartPLS-3) and the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Furthermore, the data in this study were analysed using a structural equation model and partial least squares method. According to (Hair et al., 2014) the latent variable or patterns and the relationships between the variables are examined using PLS-SEM. The following three criteria should be taken into consideration when evaluating the constructs in SEM-PLS: (1) Composite reliability (CR), the threshold value of CR more than or should be at least at 0.7 (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994), 2) average variance extracted (AVE, the threshold value of AVE at least 0.5 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981) and

(3) and the threshold value of factor loading of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is 0.6 (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994). In addition, the descriptive statistics of the respondents—including their gender, education, background, age, etc were investigated using the SPSS program. This study’s sample size was sufficient to analyse the data using multivariate data analysis (Structural Equation Model) based on the final data of this study.

  • 3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    1. Profile respondent

In this part, respondents’ descriptive information is generally explained by profile respondents. Based on the characteristic of respondents, the respondents in this study were 59.8% male and 40.2 % female. The age of respondents was dominated by age between 18-24 years. A bachelor dominated the educational background of the respondents with 47.9%. Students with 51.3% generally explained the occupation of the respondents. The respondents’ income is generally dominated by less than IDR 1.000.0000 (USD 65.20 per month).

Validity and reliability analysis

The result found that the value of factor loadings ranges from .709 to.936; It means all variables in this research supported convergent validity. The constructs value of composite reliability was higher than .70. The AVE value is more significant than 0.70. The researchers suggest that AVE’s standard value should be more than .70 (Venkatesh et al., 2012). To measure the latent variable validity, we looked at each constructs-related to the loading factors of indicators and the average value extracted (AVE) score. The loading factors were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis. The result revealed that the AVE value was in the range of .750 to .906, which is substantially over the threshold value of.50. The result showed that two indicators of culture perception were removed because they could not reach the value of the loading factor. Furthermore, three indicators of environment perception were removed because they could not reach the value of the loading factor. The last, one item of support tourism development was deleted because it could not reach the threshold of loading factor value. The measurement model used in this investigation is generally explained in Table 1 below.

Table 1: The measurements of Validity and Reliability (Factor loading, AVE, CR and Cronbach alpha)

Construct and item mea- surement

Indicators Factor loading

Cronbach’s

Alpha

CR AVE

Cultural Perceptions

1. The event of MotoGP Mandalika Indonesia increased visitors’ cross- cultural understanding and local society.

0.7220.7500.8540.662

2. The event of MotoGP Mandalika Indonesia gave an opportunity to local society to know international visitors’ culture.

0.835

3. The event of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia increased interest in an international sports event

0.877

Economic Perceptions

1. The area of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia increased trade for local businesses.

0.841

0.899

0.925

0.713

2. The area of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia increased employment opportunities.

0.833

3. The area of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia increased investment development.

0.775

4. The area of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia increased the economy sector of society or community.

0.895

5. The area of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia accelerated the community economic development.

0.873

Environmental Perceptions

1. The area development of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia negatively affected the environment in long term.

0.931

0.896

0.935

0.828

2. The constructions or facilities of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia increased the pollution from the environmental aspect.

0.928

3. The area of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia has an impact on environmental damage to the local community.

0.890

Construct and item mea- surement

Indicators Factor loading

Cronbach’s

Alpha

CR AVE

Social Perceptions

1. The event of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia disrupted the lives of residents.

0.8960.8370.8990.749

2. The event of Moto GP Mandalika caused a

conflict between visitors and residents.

0.907

3. The event of MotoGP Mandalika Indonesia

increased the social conflicts in society.

0.789
Support for Tourism Develop- ment.

1. I supported the development of MotoGP Mandalika, Indonesia into an international destination.

0.9140.9060.9410.842

2. I supported the development area of Mo- toGP Mandalika, Indonesia into a sports tourism destination.

0.936

3. I supported the development of MotoGP Mandalika Indonesia as a premium destination in sports tourism.

0.902
Destination Image

1. The Mandalika Indonesia destination is more attractive because of the event of the MotoGP championship.

0.8090.8560.8950.632

2. Accessibility to the MotoGP area is easy for visitors.

0.801

3. Moto GP Mandalika, Indonesia area has ad- equate facilities for visitors.

0.859

4. Moto GP Mandalika, Indonesia has talented human resources.

0.709

5. Moto GP Mandalika circuit is one of the beautiful circuits located in the area of beach, hill, and beautiful scenery for visi- tors.

0.789

As shown in Table 2 for measurement AVE, in this study, each construct is against the inter-construct correlation. All diagonal elements exceed the inter-construct correlation of each variable and satisfy the discriminant value. In addition, the structural testing model has been examined in Table 3.

Table 2: Discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker Criterion)

Culture

DI Economy Environment STD Social
Culture 0.814
Destination Image0.519 0.795
Economy0.4670.552 0.844
Environment-0.014-0.208-0.235 0.910
STD0.5610.7420.607-0.221 0.918

Social

-0.051

-0.256

-0.276

0.768

-0.293

0.866

Note: DI = Destination image, STD = Support tourism development

Table 3: Structure testing model

Item

Original Sample

SE

T Statistics

P-Value

C2 <- Culture

0.722

0.064

11.243

0.000

C4 <- Culture

0.835

0.040

20.679

0.000

C5 <- Culture

0.877

0.018

49.874

0.000

DI1 <- Destination Image

0.809

0.023

34.566

0.000

DI2 <- Destination Image

0.801

0.046

17.529

0.000

DI3 <- Destination Image

0.859

0.026

33.341

0.000

DI4 <- Destination Image

0.709

0.052

13.704

0.000

DI5 <- Destination Image

0.789

0.041

19.227

0.000

Item

Original Sample

SE

T Statistics

P-Value

E1 <- Economy

0.841

0.029

29.292

0.000

E2 <- Economy

0.833

0.042

19.937

0.000

E3 <- Economy

0.775

0.031

24.657

0.000

E4 <- Economy

0.895

0.018

49.741

0.000

E5 <- Economy

0.873

0.021

40.948

0.000

L4 <- Environment

0.913

0.022

41.451

0.000

L5 <- Environment

0.928

0.018

52.646

0.000

L6 <- Environment

0.890

0.025

36.081

0.000

S1 <- Social

0.896

0.021

42.280

0.000

S2 <- Social

0.907

0.020

44.225

0.000

S3 <- Social

0.789

0.062

12.629

0.000

STD1 <- STD

0.914

0.023

39.134

0.000

STD2 <- STD

0.936

0.017

54.348

0.000

STD3 <- STD

0.902

0.025

36.073

0.000

Hypothesis analysis

Structural Equation Model Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) was employed to test the hypothesis in this study. There are two kinds of testing for the inner model in structural equation modelling. The explanatory model using R is standardized and determined by the path coefficient (Fornell & Larcker, 1981; Hair et al., 2014), and statistical significance was described by the path coefficient between variables, and the goodness of the structural model was assessed by the R-value.

The result of hypothesis testing found that the variable of culture positively and significantly impacted support tourism destinations (H1: β=.371, t = 4.646). Furthermore, variable economy positively and significantly impacted the tourism destination (H2: β =.388, t = 5.429). Thus, this hypothesis was accepted. The variable environment through tourism destination had not significantly and positively impacted the tourism destination support (H3: β = 0.008, t = 0.019), or the hypothesis was rejected. The variable social perception negatively and significantly impacted tourism destination support (H4: β = -0172, t = 2.846) or the hypothesis was accepted. The last hypothesis in this study tourism destination support had a positive and significant impact on destination images (H5: β = .742, t = 20.344), or the hypothesis was accepted. Table 4 shows the result of the hypotheses testing of the study.

Table 4: Hypotheses Testing

Original Sample

(Estimated )

SE

T-Stat

P-Stat

Decision

Culture -> STD

0.371

0.080

4.646

0.000

Accepted***

Economy -> STD

0.388

0.071

5.429

0.000

Accepted***

Environment -> STD

0.008

0.063

0.119

0.905

Rejected*

Social -> STD

-0.172

0.061

2.846

0.005

Accepted***

STD -> DI

0.742

0.036

20.344

0.000

Accepted***

Note, STD = Support Tourism Development. DI = Destination image, SE = Standard error. ***p < .0.5, *p < .0.1

Capability index

The R square value was used in this study to examine the capability index. The R-value refers to the percentage of the variance of the outer variables that can explain the inner variable. The causal relationship among the variable of the study, the explanatory power of the R square determination model, and the coefficient of the standardized statistical significance (Fornell & Larcker, 1981; Hair et al., 2014). The fit index summary of the research model is presented in Table 5.

The structural model is to be measured by goodness of fit (GoF). Table 5 shows the measurement model for the fit index. Based on the table, it can be deduced that the model’s explanation for the R square variable of the support tourism destination is 493 or 49.3% of the model explains the model, and variable destination image explains the model by .551 or 55.1% explains the model of this study.

Table 5: Fit Index Summary

Variable

Saturated Model Estimated Model Evaluation

SOME

0.067

0.071Good Fit

d_ULS

1.130

1.281

Good Fit

d_G

0.480

0.493

Good Fit

Chi-Square ( X2)

740.372753.294Good Fit

NFI

0.814

0.811Good Fit

R2 (R Square)

Support Tourism Development0.493 (49.3%)
Destination Image0.551 (55.1%)

Note: Standardised Root Mean Square (SRMS), Norm Fit Index (NFI),

DISCUSSION

Hosting mega-sport tourism events has the effect of hosting communities both in economic and social culture. Therefore, Social Exchange Theory was applied in this study based on the communities’ perception of economic, social, cultural, and environmental indicators, tourism development support, and destination image analysis in Indonesia. This study addresses a gap in the literature on tourism by extending the conceptual framework of a large-scale sports event, such as hosting the MotoGP in Indonesia, based on the perspective of the local community to support tourist development and destination images in Indonesia’s destination. The research findings showed a strong agreement with the Social Exchange Theory’s conceptual framework (SET). They disclosed that hosting a large sports event (MotoGP) can support Indonesia as a travel destination and encourage tourism growth.

The result found that culture had a significant impact on supporting tourism destinations in the context of a mega-sport event host perception, especially the MotoGP event in 2022 Mandalika, Indonesia. Therefore, locals or communities can support the development of tourism if they have favorable perceptions or insights into the culture. To showcase their culture to foreign tourists, locals take pleasure in their culture and consider it a part of their legacy. They feel happy to be a member of the local community and that they have helped their place become renowned to people from across the world by hosting a mega-sports event. The result is similar to a study conducted by (Yoon et al., 2001), which showed that culture is a part of cultural identity and activity exchange between the local community and tourists as well as part of tourism development. The research by (Duan et al., 2021) also showed that social and cultural factors have a big impact on event support in the case of mega-events.

The host’s perception of society had a significant impact on tourism destination support in hosting the large sports event of MotoGP, Indonesia. This finding demonstrates how a local community’s social impression of the potential benefits of hosting a large event for society. The social benefit of holding the MotoGP mega-sports event in Mandalika, Indonesia is a catalyst for interpersonal interaction between the event and the locals/communities. The findings of this study are consistent with the study done by (Knott et al., 2015), which found that a sports event’s social and cultural context had the greatest influence on the local community. Additionally, according to a study (Taks, 2013) the mega-sports event may present a potential for greater beneficial impacts on the host communities. However, the current finding implied that hosting a large-sports event in Mandalika, Indonesia, negatively affects societies or local communities, such as social conflicts. Several social conflicts happened in the region of the arena circuit Mandalika, such as the land conflict between the government and society in the area of the circuit. This result was supported by (Fredline, 2005) who revealed that hosting sport event can bring the negative impact on social if it is poorly handled.

The impact of economic perception can affect tourism destination support. Based on some research, the economic aspect, such as perceived benefit and cost, is the primary way to support sustainable tourism destinations (Gursoy et al., 2009). The result of the study is similar to the study from (Prayag et al., 2013; Yoon et al., 2001), which found that the communities can perceive an opportunity to benefit economically. For example, it increases trade for local businesses, employment opportunities, and investment development. It also increases economic society and can accelerate the community’s economy. The host community’s economic aspects are always valued to benefit tourism development (Jurowski & Gursoy, 2004). The finding in this research showed that the economic aspects had an impact on supporting tourism development, similar to the previous view that hosting the event in tourism support can improve the economy of local society (Getz & Page, 2016; Prayag et al., 2013).

One of Indonesia’s projects in the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) is Mandalika, which aims to become a top tourist attraction and one of the locations for the MotoGP, the world’s biggest motorsports event. From an economic aspect, the event will create plenty of job opportunities, reduce poverty, and enhance the livelihood of the surrounding society by developing infrastructure and leading the construction of the event/circuit, including the tourism sector, to create various small and medium enterprises. Furthermore, the investment in the Mandalika’s project around forth tens of trillions of Indonesian Rupiah (IDR/currency of

Indonesia) will give an impact on the local community or society. In addition, the project also can decrease the poverty in eastern Indonesia, especially in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. This is similar to the study by (Duan et al., 2021), which stated that sport-event employs the host city’s society or residents.

The environmental is one issue in tourism sectors related to tourism sustainability (Pahrudin et al, 2022). Sustainability is concern critical in tourism destinations of hosting large-sports tourism events. The study from (Deccio & Baloglu, 2002) revealed that hosting tourism events brings more concern about environmental issues. The finding of this study found that the environmental variable is insignificant in supporting tourism destinations. The mega-sports MotoGP Mandalika Indonesia was held in 2022 based on the event’s calendar. The local communities are worried about the environmental issue because some infrastructures need to be built. In addition, they assume that hosting an event such as MotoGP will increase the pollution of the environment. Therefore, the local communities believe that the mega-event of MotoGP will cause environmental damage to local communities. In addition, the large sports event, in the case of the Olympics, has impacted long-term environmental issues more than smaller events that are more sensitive to environmental issues (Boonsiritomachai & Phonthanukitithaworn, 2019). Consequently, more researchers have discussed the environmental issue as a critical issue for local event organizers (Konstantaki & Wickens, 2010).

The local community’s perceptions of the environment for MotoGP, Indonesia, is that developing an arena or circuit for the event must consider the environmental aspect. The Mandalika region is being developed using an environmentally friendly development strategy. The worth and quality of the environment in society are protected things. The developer of the arena under the Indonesia tourism development corporation (ITDC) of the MotoGP event in Mandalika Indonesia may require the community’s infrastructure related to environmental issues such as clean water, sanitation, and maintaining the public facility. The study administered by (Liu & Wilson, 2014) found that tourists’ potential to receive a negative impact on hosting the Olympics 2012 related to a destination such as inflation, travel inconvenience, risk of criminals, environmental issue, and perceived risk of disease.

This study found that hosting large-sports events of MotoGP 2022 Mandalika can support tourism development and destination images. Supporting tourism development is one factor that enhances the trust of tourists to come to upcoming events, such as supporting facilities and infrastructure. The MotoGP event, held as an international event and an attractive world-class event can enhance the trust and interest of visitors to visit the destination images in Mandalika, Indonesia. Some studies revealed that the mega-sports tourism event could enhance the less popular destination to be more popular (Arnegger & Herz, 2016).

CONCLUSION

The hosting of the Moto-GP Mandalika event was examined by the perceptions of the local community toward economic perspective, culture, society, and environmental, supporting tourism development and destination images in Indonesia. The result showed that the local community’s perceptions of hosting large-sport events had a significant impact on tourism development support and destination images in Indonesia. However, in this study, the perception of the environment did not significantly support tourism development in Indonesia.

The local society believed that hosting MotoGP Mandalika gives an impact on the economy, society, culture, and environment aspect. However, hosting the event also has negative impacts, such as social conflict, pollution, and environmental damage to the local community. The event’s hosting impacted local society and created an excellent destination image for different visitors worldwide. Hosting the event also gives local society more opportunities to meet with people from different countries because MotoGP is one of the largest events in the world.

Furthermore, the results should gain the attention of the event’s stakeholders to enhance the event’s positive perceptions to support tourism development. In addition, the stakeholders also need to pay attention to the insignificant result of the study. For example, in environmental perceptions, the stakeholders can reduce the negative impact of the environment. Sports marketers of a large sports event of MotoGP can support tourism development and destination images based on economic, social, and cultural perceptions. Hosting the event can give an impact on local society and support tourism destinations in Mandalika, Indonesia. From this result, the government may focus on the event because it can enhance the destination images and impact local society economically. Local society believes that hosting the sports event in the future can give benefit and support tourism development. Therefore, the government should have strategic advice on the managerial and marketing strategies that involve the local society in hosting the event. The research in this area can be applied to event planners.

Additionally, this study has several limitations. First, from the methodology perspective, this study used quantitative methods to investigate how large sports events affected on tourism sector from the perception of the local community. Future researchers may use mixed methods to understand the host’s local society on a large sports event and tourist destinations. There is also the study’s sample size in this study. Due to the limited sample size used in this study, the result cannot be generalized. Third, this study focuses on the large sports event of the MotoGP in Indonesia from the perspective of the host community toward the travel and tourism industry. Future study topics may find other forms of event tourism such as cultural events, music events, religious tourist events, and others to examine the large sports event in the tourism sector.

References

 

Abdel Azim Ahmed, T. S. 2017 A triple bottom line analysis of the impacts of the Hail International Rally in Saudi Arabia. Managing Sport and Leisure. 22(4):276–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2018.1465841

 

Andereck, K. L., & Vogt, C. A. 2000 The relationship between residents’ attitudes toward tourism and tourism development options. Journal of Travel Research. 39(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750003900104

 

Andersson, S., Bengtsson, L., & Svensson, Å. 2021 Mega-sport football events’ influence on destination images: A study of the of 2016 UEFA European Football Championship in France, the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia, and the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management. 19:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100536

 

Andriotis, K., & Vaughan, R. D. 2003 Urban residents’ attitudes toward tourism development: The case of Crete. Journal of Travel Research. 42(2):172–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503257488

 

Arnegger, J., & Herz, M. 2016 Economic and destination image impacts of mega-events in emerging tourist destinations. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 5(2):76–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.11.007

 

Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W. 1999 A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research. 26(4):868–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-73839900030–73839900034

 

Boley, B. B., McGehee, N. G., Perdue, R. R., & Long, P. 2014 Empowerment and resident attitudes toward tourism: Strengthening the theoretical foundation through a Weberian lens. Annals of Tourism Research. 49:33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.08.005

 

Boonsiritomachai, W., & Phonthanukitithaworn, C. 2019 Residents’ support for sports events tourism development in beach city: The role of community’s participation and tourism impacts. SAGE Open. 9(2)https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019843417

 

Caiazza, R., & Audretsch, D. 2015 Can a sport mega-event support hosting city’s economic, socio-cultural and political development? Tourism Management Perspectives. 1412:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.01.001

 

Chersulich Tomino, A., Perić, M., & Wise, N. 2020 Assessing and considering the wider impacts of sport-tourism events: A research agenda review of sustainability and strategic planning elements. Sustainability (Switzerland). 12(11)https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114473

 

Collins, A., Munday, M., & Roberts, A. 2012 Environmental consequences of tourism consumption at major events: An analysis of the UK stages of the 2007 Tour de France. Journal of Travel Research. 51(5):577–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511434113

 

Cornelissen, S., Bob, U., & Swart, K. 2011 Towards redefining the concept of legacy in relation to sport mega-events: Insights from the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Development Southern Africa. 28(3):307–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2011.595990

 

Daniels, M. J., & Norman, W. C. 2003 Estimating the economic impacts of seven regular sport tourism events. Journal of Sport Tourism. 8(4):214–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1477508032000161528

 

Death, C. 2011 ‘Greening’ the 2010 FIFA World Cup: Environmental Sustainability and the Mega-Event in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 13(2):99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.572656

 

Deccio, C., & Baloglu, S. 2002 Nonhost community resident reactions to the 2002 winter olympics: The spillover impacts. Journal of Travel Research. 41(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287502041001006

 

Dongfeng, L. 2013 Major sports events, destination image and intention to revisit from the foreign tourist’s perspective. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. 14(3):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-14-03-2013-B003

 

Duan, Y., Mastromartino, B., Nauright, J., Zhang, J. J., & Liu, B. 2021 How do perceptions of non-mega sport events impact quality of life and support for the event among local residents?,. Sport in Society. 24(10):1742–1762. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2021.1916247

 

Dyer, P., Gursoy, D., Sharma, B., & Carter, J. 2007 Structural modeling of resident perceptions of tourism and associated development on the Sunshine Coast, Australia. Tourism Management. 28(2):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.002

 

Elahi, A., Gholampour, S., & Askarian, F. 2021 The Effects of Sports Mega-Events on Host Communities: A Systematic Review of Studies in Three Recent Decades. Sports Business Journal. 1(1):13–30. http://doi.org/10.22051/SBJ.2021.36862.1007

 

Emerson, R. M. 1976 Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology. 2(1):335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

 

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981 Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

 

Fredline, E. 2005 Host and guest relations and sport tourism. Sport in Society. 8(2):263–27910108017430430500087328

 

Getz, D., & Page, S. J. 2016 Progress and prospects for event tourism research. Tourism Management. 52:593–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2015.03.007

 

Gursoy, D., Chi, C. G., & Dyer, P. 2009 Locals’ attitudes toward mass and alternative tourism: The case of sunshine coast, Australia. Journal of Travel Research. 49(3):381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287509346853

 

Gursoy, D., & Kendall, K. W. 2006 Hosting mega events: Modeling locals’ support. Annals of Tourism Research. 33(3):603–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. annals.2006.01.005

 

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. 2014 A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications Inc.;

 

Hall, C. M. 2004 Sport Tourism and Urban Regeneration. In Ritchie, B. W., & Adair, D. (Eds), , editor. Sport tourism. p. 192–205. Channel View Publications.; https://doi.org/10.21832/9781873150672-012

 

Herstein, R., & Berger, R. 2013 Much more than sports: sports events as stimuli for city re‐branding. Journal of Business Strategy. 34(2):38–44. https://doi. org/10.1108/02756661311310440

 

Imbaya, B. H. O., & Irungu, M. W. 2013 The perceived impacts of sport tourism: A host community’s perspective around Iten town, Kenya. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports–An Open Access International Journal. 1:78–81. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234696753.pdf

 

Jin, L., Zhang, J. J., Ma, X., & Connaughton, D. P. 2011 Residents’ perceptions of environmental impacts of the 2008 Beijing Green Olympic Games.

 

European Sport Management Quarterly. 11(3):p. 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2011.577791

 

Johnston, M., Naylor, M., & Dickson, G. 2023 Local resident support for hosting a major sport event: The role of perceived personal and community impacts.

 

European Sport Management Quarterly. 2383:p. 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1937263

 

Jones, C. 2001 Mega-events and host-region impacts :. International Journal of Tourism Research. 3(3):241–251. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ jtr.326/epdf

 

Jönsson, C., & Lewis, C. C. 2014 Impacts of hosting a sport event in tourism high season. Recreation and Society in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 5(1):1–18. https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/rasaala/article/view/3152

 

Joseph F. Hair Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2014 Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.;

 

Jurowski, C., & Gursoy, D. 2004 Distance effects on residents’ attitudes toward tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 31(2):296–312. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.005

 

Jurowski, C., Uysal, M., & Williams, D. R. 1997 A theoretical analysis of host community resident reactions to tourism. Journal of Travel Research. 36(2):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759703600202

 

Kang, Y.-S., & Perdue, R. 1994 Long-term impact of a mega-event on international tourism to the host country: A conceptual model and the case of the 1988 Seoul Olympics. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 634:205–225. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v06n03_11

 

Kanwel, S., Lingqiang, Z., Asif, M., Hwang, J., Hussain, A., & Jameel, A. 2019 The influence of destination image on tourist loyalty and intention to visit: Testing a multiple mediation approach. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1110339011226401(22)

 

Kaplanidou, K. 2021 Sport events and community development: resident considerations and community goals. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. 22(1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-05-2020-0082

 

Kaplanidou, K., Jordan, J. S., Funk, D., & Ridinger, L. L. 2012 Recurring sport events and destination image perceptions: Impact on active sport tourist behavioral intentions and place attachment. Journal of Sport Management. 26(3):237–248. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.26.3.237

 

Kaplanidou, K., Karadakis, K., Gibson, H., Thapa, B., Walker, M., Geldenhuys, S., & Coetzee, W. 2013 Quality of life, event impacts, and mega-event support among South African residents before and after the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Travel Research. 52(5):631–645. https://doi. org/10.1177/0047287513478501

 

Karadakis, K. 2012 The influence of small-scale sport event impacts on personal and community quality of life and support for sport event tourism. [Doctoral dissertation,. University of Florida]. http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/uf/e0/04/43/76/00001/karadakis_k.pdf Kasimati, E., & Dawson, P. 2009 Assessing the impact of the 2004 olympic games on the Greek economy: A small macroeconometric model. Economic Modelling. 26(1):139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2008.06.006

 

Kavetsos, G., & Szymanski, S. 2010 National well-being and international sports events. Journal of Economic Psychology. 31(2):158–171. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.11.005

 

Kenyon, J. A., & Bodet, G. 2018 Exploring the domestic relationship between mega-events and destination image: The image impact of hosting the 2012 Olympic Games for the city of London. Sport Management Review. 21(3):232–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.001

 

Kim, H. J., Gursoy, D., & Lee, S.-B. 2006 The impact of the 2002 World Cup on South Korea: Comparisons of pre-and post-games. Tourism Management. 27(1):86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.07.010

 

Kim, J., Kang, J. H., & Kim, Y.-K. 2014 Impact of mega sport events on destination image and country image. Sport Marketing Quarterly. 23(3):161 Kim, M. C., Park, S., & Kim, S. 2021 The perceived impact of hosting mega-sports events in a developing region:. the case of the PyeongChang 2018 Winter.

 

Olympic Games. Current Issues in Tourism. 24(20):2843–2848. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1850652

 

Kim, S. S., & Petrick, J. F. 2005 Residents’ perceptions on impacts of the FIFA 2002 World Cup: The case of Seoul as a host city. Tourism Management. 26(1):25–38101016200309013

 

Kim, W., Jun, H. M., Walker, M., & Drane, D. 2015 Evaluating the perceived social impacts of hosting large-scale sport tourism events: Scale development and validation. Tourism Management. 48:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.015

 

Knott, B., Fyall, A., & Jones, I. 2017 Sport mega-events and nation branding: Unique characteristics of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, South Africa. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 29(3):900–923. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2015-0523

 

Knott, B., Swart, K., & Visser, S. 2015 The impact of sport mega-events on the quality of life for host city residents: reflections on the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

 

African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 4https://digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za/handle/11189/4503 Konstantaki, M., & Wickens, E. 2010 Residents’ perceptions of environmental and security issues at the 2012 London olympic games. Journal of Sport & Tourism. 15(4):337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2010.533921

 

Látková, P., & Vogt, C. A. 2012 Residents’ attitudes toward existing and future tourism development in rural communities. Journal of Travel Research. 51(1):50–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510394193

 

Lee, C. K., & Taylor, T. 2005 Critical reflections on the economic impact assessment of a mega-event: The case of 2002 FIFA World Cup. Tourism Management. 26(4):595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.03.002

 

Lee, C.-K., Taylor, T., Lee, Y.-K., & Lee, B. 2005 The impact of a sport mega-event on destination image: The case of the 2002 FIFA world cup Korea/Japan. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration. 6(3):27–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J149v06n03_03

 

Lee, S. P., Cornwell, T. B., & Babiak, K. 2013 Developing an instrument to measure the social impact of sport: Social capital, collective identities, health literacy, well-being and human capital. Journal of Sport Management. 27(1):24–42. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.27.1.24

 

Liu, D. 2016 Social impact of major sports events perceived by host community. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. 17(1):78–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-02-2016-005

 

Lorde, T., Greenidge, D., & Devonish, D. 2011 Local residents’ perceptions of the impacts of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2007 on Barbados: Comparisons of pre- and post-games. Tourism Management. 32(2):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.004

 

Ma, S. C., Ma, S. M., Wu, J. H., & Rotherham, I. D. 2013 Host residents’ perception changes on major sport events. European Sport Management Quarterly. 13(5):511–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2013.838980

 

Madden, J. R. 2002 The economic consequences of the Sydney Olympics: the CREA/Arthur Andersen study. Current Issues in Tourism. 5(1):7–21. https:// https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500208667904

 

Maheshwari, V., Giraldi, J. de M. E., & Montanari, M. G. 2019 Investigating residents’ attitudes of 2016 olympic games: Examining socio-cultural, economic and environmental dimensions. Journal of Place Management and Development. 12(3):291–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-08-2018-0059

 

Malhotra, N. K. 1996 Marketing Research and Applied Orientation 2nd ed, Upper Sidle River. Prentice Hall Internasional.;

 

Mazanec, J. A., Wober, K., & Zins, A. H. 2007 Tourism destination competitiveness: From definition to explanation ? Journal of Travel Research. 46(1):86–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507302389

 

Mohanty, P., Singhania, O., & Hasana, U. 2020 Mega-events tourism and sustainability: a critique.In Event Tourism in Asian Countries. p. 219–234. Apple Academic Press.;

 

Mules, T., & Dwyer, L. 2005 Public sector support for sport tourism events: The role of cost-benefit analysis. Sport in Society. 8(2):338–355. https://doi. org/10.1080/17430430500087864

 

Nicholas, L. N., Thapa, B., & Ko, Y. J. 2009 Residents’ perspectives of a world heritage site: The pitons management area, st. Lucia. Annals of Tourism Research. 36(3):390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.03.005

 

Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. 2011 Residents’ satisfaction with community attributes and support for tourism. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. 35(2):171–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348010384600

 

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994 Psychometric Theory. (3th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.;

 

Ohmann, S., Jones, I., & Wilkes, K. 2006 The perceived social impacts of the 2006 football world cup on munich residents. Journal of Sport and Tourism. 11(2):129–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080601155167

 

Pahrudin, P., Liu, L.-W., & Li, S.-Y. 2022 What Is the Role of Tourism Management and Marketing toward Sustainable Tourism? A Bibliometric Analysis Approach. Sustainability. 14(7)https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074226

 

Perić, M. 2018 Estimating the perceived socio-economic impacts of hosting large-scale sport tourism events. Social Sciences. 7(10)https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci7100176

 

Pranić, L., Petrić, L., & Cetinić, L. 2012 Host population perceptions of the social impacts of sport tourism events in transition countries: Evidence from Croatia. International Journal of Event and Festival Management. 3(3):236–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/17582951211262684

 

Prayag, G., Hosany, S., Nunkoo, R., & Alders, T. 2013 London residents’ support for the 2012 Olympic Games: The mediating effect of overall attitude.

 

Tourism Management. 36:p. 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.08.003

 

Remoaldo, P. C. A., Duque, E. J., & Ribeiro, J. C. 2015 The environmental impacts of hosting the “2012 Guimarães European Capital of Culture”. as perceived by the local community, 19(36).http://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ayd19-36.eihg

 

Ritchie, B. W., Shipway, R., & Cleeve, B. 2009 Resident Perceptions of Mega-Sporting Events: A Non-Host City Perspective of the 2012 London Olympic Games. Journal of Sport & Tourism. 14(3):143–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080902965108

 

Scheu, A., & Preuss, H. 2018 Residents’ perceptions of mega sport event legacies and impacts. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. 48(3):376–386. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-018-0499-y

 

Sharpley, R. 2014 Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tourism Management. 4237–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.10.007 Susanti, R., & Syahar, F. 2019 Tour De Singkarak, West Sumatra Event Sustainable Marketing and Tourism. International Journal of Tourism, Heritage and Recreation Sport. 1(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijthrs.v1i1.15

 

Taks, M. 2013 Social sustainability of non-mega sport events in a global world1. European Journal for Sport and Society. 10(2):121–141. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/16138171.2013.11687915

 

Tichaawa, T. M., Moyo, S., Swart, K., & Mhlanga, O. 2015 The perceived impacts of sport tourism events: residents’ perceptions in East London, South Africa. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance. 21:1218–1232. Retrieve from. https://hdl.handle. net/10520/EJC182192

 

Tosun, C. 2002 Host perceptions of impacts: A comparative tourism study. Annals of Tourism Research. 29(1):231–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-73830100039–73830100031

 

Turco, D. M., Swart, K., Bob, U., & Moodley, V. 2003 Socio-economic impacts of sport tourism in the Durban Unicity, South Africa. Journal of Sport & Tourism. 8(4):223–2391010801477508032000161537

 

Vargas-Sánchez, A., Porras-Bueno, N., & Plaza-Mejía, M. de los Á. 2011 Explaining residents’ attitudes to tourism: Is a universal model possible? Annals of Tourism Research. 38(2):460–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.10.004

 

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. 2012 Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly. 36(1):157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

 

Waitt, G. 2003 Social impacts of the Sydney Olympics. Annals of Tourism Research. 30(1):194–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00050-6 Walker, M., Kaplanidou, K., Gibson, H., Thapa, B., Geldenhuys, S., & Coetzee, W. 2013 “Win in Africa, With Africa”: Social responsibility, event image,.

 

and destination benefits. The case of the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa. Tourism Management. 34:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2012.03.015

 

Wang, Y., & Pfister, R. E. 2008 Residents’ attitudes toward tourism and perceived personal benefits in a rural community. Journal of Travel Research. 47(1):84–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507312402

 

Wicker, P., Hallmann, K., & Zhang, J. J. 2012 What is influencing consumer expenditure and intention to revisit? An investigation of marathon events.

 

Journal of Sport & Tourism. 17(3):p. 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2012.734058

 

Yao, Q., & Schwarz, E. C. 2018 Impacts and implications of an annual major sport event: A host community perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 8:161–169101016201702007

 

Yoon, Y., Gursoy, D., & Chen, J. S. 2001 Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling. Tourism Management. 22(4):363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00062-5

 

Yuan, Y. Y. 2013 Adding environmental sustainability to the management of event tourism. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research. 7(2):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-04-2013-0024

 

Zhou, Y., & Ap, J. 2009 Residents’ perceptions towards the impacts of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. Journal of Travel Research. 48(1):78–91. https:// https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508328792Please cite this article as:.

 

Pahrudin, P., Liu, L.W., Royanow, A.F. & Kholid, I. 2023 A Large-Sport Event and its Influence on Tourism Destination Image in Indonesia. Tourism and Hospitality Management. 29(3):335–348. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.29.3.2


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.