 |
|
 |
Recenzija, Prikaz slučaja
The conclusion of the contract of berth and custody of the vessel by implied consent : [court's decision review]
Vesna Skorupan Wolff
; Jadranski zavod HAZU, Zagreb, Hrvatska
| Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (306 KB) | str. 222-223 | citiraj | |
|
APA 6th Edition Skorupan Wolff, V. (2017). Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]. Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, 56 (171), 222-223. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 MLA 8th Edition Skorupan Wolff, Vesna. "Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]." Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, vol. 56, br. 171, 2017, str. 222-223. https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236. Citirano 06.03.2021. Chicago 17th Edition Skorupan Wolff, Vesna. "Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]." Poredbeno pomorsko pravo 56, br. 171 (2017): 222-223. https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 Harvard Skorupan Wolff, V. (2017). 'Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]', Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, 56(171), str. 222-223. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 (Datum pristupa: 06.03.2021.) Vancouver Skorupan Wolff V. Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]. Poredbeno pomorsko pravo [Internet]. 2017 [pristupljeno 06.03.2021.];56(171):222-223. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 IEEE V. Skorupan Wolff, "Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]", Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, vol.56, br. 171, str. 222-223, 2017. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236. [Citirano: 06.03.2021.] |
|||
Sažetak
It may not be supposed that the contract of deposit was concluded – as claimed by the plaintiff
– by implied consent of the plaintiff, who did not take over the vessel after a set time limit,
and the defendant, who moved the vessel to another berth. The defendant’s behaviour and
request to the plaintiff to take over the vessel, as well as moving the vessel to another, less safe
berth after the plaintiff had failed to take over the vessel within the set time limit, showed no
elements of readiness for concluding the contract of the custody of the vessel. Lack of readiness
on the part of the defendant to conclude the contract of deposit implies that the parties have
not concluded the contract of the custody of the plaintiff’s vessel.
Ključne riječi
vessel on bert; contract of berth; contract of deposit of the vessel; decision of the court
Hrčak ID: 190236
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236
Moj profil
Srce