 |
|
 |
Case report
The conclusion of the contract of berth and custody of the vessel by implied consent : [court's decision review]
Vesna Skorupan Wolff
orcid.org/0000-0002-1591-7247
; Jadranski zavod HAZU, Zagreb, Hrvatska
| Fulltext: croatian, pdf (306 KB) | pages 222-223 | cite | |
|
APA 6th Edition Skorupan Wolff, V. (2017). Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]. Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, 56 (171), 222-223. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 MLA 8th Edition Skorupan Wolff, Vesna. "Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]." Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, vol. 56, no. 171, 2017, pp. 222-223. https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236. Accessed 14 Apr. 2021. Chicago 17th Edition Skorupan Wolff, Vesna. "Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]." Poredbeno pomorsko pravo 56, no. 171 (2017): 222-223. https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 Harvard Skorupan Wolff, V. (2017). 'Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]', Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, 56(171), pp. 222-223. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 (Accessed 14 April 2021) Vancouver Skorupan Wolff V. Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]. Poredbeno pomorsko pravo [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 April 14];56(171):222-223. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236 IEEE V. Skorupan Wolff, "Sklapanje ugovora o vezu i ugovora o ostavi plovila konkludentnim činima : [prikaz presude]", Poredbeno pomorsko pravo, vol.56, no. 171, pp. 222-223, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236. [Accessed: 14 April 2021] |
|||
Abstracts
It may not be supposed that the contract of deposit was concluded – as claimed by the plaintiff
– by implied consent of the plaintiff, who did not take over the vessel after a set time limit,
and the defendant, who moved the vessel to another berth. The defendant’s behaviour and
request to the plaintiff to take over the vessel, as well as moving the vessel to another, less safe
berth after the plaintiff had failed to take over the vessel within the set time limit, showed no
elements of readiness for concluding the contract of the custody of the vessel. Lack of readiness
on the part of the defendant to conclude the contract of deposit implies that the parties have
not concluded the contract of the custody of the plaintiff’s vessel.
Keywords
vessel on bert; contract of berth; contract of deposit of the vessel; decision of the court
Hrčak ID: 190236
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/190236
My profile
Srce